Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Crisis-induced accountability
- Part II Crisis-induced policy change and learning
- 7 The 1975 Stockholm embassy seizure: crisis and the absence of reform
- 8 The Walkerton water tragedy and the Jerusalem banquet hall collapse: regulatory failure and policy change
- 9 Learning from crisis: NASA and the Challenger disaster
- 10 September 11 and postcrisis investigation: exploring the role and impact of the 9/11 Commission
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
8 - The Walkerton water tragedy and the Jerusalem banquet hall collapse: regulatory failure and policy change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 June 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Crisis-induced accountability
- Part II Crisis-induced policy change and learning
- 7 The 1975 Stockholm embassy seizure: crisis and the absence of reform
- 8 The Walkerton water tragedy and the Jerusalem banquet hall collapse: regulatory failure and policy change
- 9 Learning from crisis: NASA and the Challenger disaster
- 10 September 11 and postcrisis investigation: exploring the role and impact of the 9/11 Commission
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction: a puzzle emerging from tragedy
Risk regulation is a key feature of modern, complex, industrial and postindustrial societies. Reasons for the growth of such regimes are contested (see, e.g. Douglas and Wildavsky 1983; Beck 1999; Jordana and Levi-Faur 2004), but their ‘formal’ roles in systems of governance are clear. As Hood et al. (2001: 3) suggest, risk regulation is ‘governmental interference with market or social processes to control potential adverse consequences to health’. Arguably therefore, the greatest blow to a regulatory policy regime is being implicated as a causal factor in crisis or disaster. With policy legitimacy damaged and operational regulatory matters proving insufficient for the task, it would be logical to assume that liberal democratic processes of inquiry and accountability in the aftermath of crisis/disaster would lead to mature lesson-drawing processes and culminate in regulatory reforms. Indeed, with such high salience and prominence given to the protection of public health, it may be difficult to imagine a regulatory regime which does not engage in policy reforms aimed at restoring operational efficacy and reputational legitimacy of regulators and policy overseers alike.
Herein lies the ‘puzzle’ addressed by this chapter. We tackle two cases of regulatory failure identified as significant causal factors in tragedies, yet vastly different policy outcomes were produced as a result of investigation and lesson drawing.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Governing after CrisisThe Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning, pp. 208 - 231Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
1995. Security threatened: surveying Israeli public opinion on peace and war. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. 1997. After disaster: agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar
2006. Lessons of disaster: policy change after catastrophic events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar
, and 2000. Business and political dimensions in disaster management. Journal of Public Policy 20(3):275–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and ' 2003. Public leadership in times of crisis: mission impossible?Public Administration Review 63(5):544–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ', and 2005. The politics of crisis management: public leadership under pressure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of Inquiry into Safety of Buildings and Public Places 2004. Justice V. Zeiler, Jerusalem chair
Commission on New Building Methods 2001. Recommendations for institutionalizing procedures for checking and approving new building methods. Jerusalem: Ministry of Interior
Concerned Walkerton Citizens. 2001. Walkerton inquiry, part 1A and 1B: Final argument on behalf of the Concerned Walkerton Citizens. http://www.cela.ca/publications/cardfile.shtml?x=1067
, and 2002. The 2001 prime ministerial election in Israel. Electoral Studies 21(4):659–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1983. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Dror, Y. 1988. Public administration in Israel. In (ed.) Public administration in developed democracies: a comparative study. New York: Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
, and 2004. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
, and 2002. The government of Canada's approach to ethics: the evolution of ethical government. Public Integrity 5(1):39–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. The politics of public management. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of CanadaGoogle Scholar
, and 2001. The government of risk: understanding risk regulation regimes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) 2004. The politics of regulation: institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. ‘Common-sense’ neo-liberalism: progressive conservative urbanism in Toronto, Canada. Antipode 34(3):578–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knesset (Israeli Parliament). 2001a. Protocol of the meeting of the committee for the interior and environment, 5 June
Knesset (Israeli Parliament). 2001b. Protocol of the meeting of the committee for the interior and environment, 7 July
2006. The creation of the Israeli ‘political bereavement model’ – security crises and their influence on the political behaviour of loss: a psycho-political approach to the study of politics. Israeli Affairs 12(2): 439–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1997. Mad cows and mother's milk: the perils of poor risk communication. 2nd edn. Montreal: McGill-Queens University PressGoogle Scholar
, and 2002. Pavlovian policy responses to media feeding frenzies? Dangerous dogs regulation in comparative perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 10(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Regulation and compliance motivations: examining different approaches. Public Administration Review 65(1):31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Walkerton: Requiem for the new public management in Ontario?International Journal of Environment and Pollution 21(4):309–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(chair) 2002a. Part One – Report of the Walkerton inquiry: the events of May 2000 and related issues. 2002. Ontario: Ontario Ministry for the Attorney General, http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/walkerton/part1/Google Scholar
(chair) 2002b. Part Two – Report of the Walkerton inquiry: a strategy for safe drinking water. 2002. Ontario: Ontario Ministry for the Attorney General, http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/walkerton/part2/Google Scholar
1998. Comparative politics: theory and methods. New York: New York University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2004. Snakes and ladders of accountability: contradictions between contracting and collaborating for Canada's voluntary sector. Canadian Public Administration 47(4):451–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1994. Inheritance in public policy: change without choice in Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
, and 1993. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
2002. Water wars: privatization, pollution, and profit. Cambridge, MA: South End PressGoogle Scholar
2004. Resisting neo-liberalism: the poisoned water disaster in Walkerton, Ontario. Social & Legal Studies 13(2):265–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Biggest scandal in Canadian history: HRDC audit starts probity war. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 14:187–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2002. Risk, democratic citizenship and public policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
2002. Bereavement, commemoration, and collective identity in contemporary Israeli society. Anthropological Quarterly 70(2):91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by