Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T15:19:57.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix II - Cases overruled by the Vinson, Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Saul Brenner
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
Harold J. Spaeth
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

THE VINSON COURT

The Vinson Court was by far the least active in altering precedents. During its life span of seven terms, it formally altered precedent on only six occasions, the first of which did not occur until its third term. But in this term, 1948, it handed down three of its overrulings: Commissioner v. Estate of Church, 335 U.S. 632 (1949), an internal revenue tax case, overruled May v. Reiner, 281 U.S. 238 (1930), which had itself overruled a number of earlier decisions. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co., 336 U.S. 342 (1949), is the first in a lengthy string of state tax cases we consider. This one, based on intergovernmental tax immunity, upheld the state's taxes against lessees of mineral rights on allotted and restricted Indian lands. Overruled was a set of five decisions, dating from 1914 to 1936. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783 (1949), concerned the Jones Act liability of a wartime general agent appointed by the United States for injuries suffered by a seaman. The Court denied liabilty and overruled Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 328 U.S. 707 (1946).

The next term, 1949, produced two overruling decisions, both of which were of considerable importance: United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56 (1950), a CQ-listed case, and Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200 (1950). Rabinowitz initiates our ongoing concern with the Fourth Amendment. Armed with an arrest warrant, officers searched the desk, safe, and file cabinets of an office open to the public. The Vinson Court majority held the seized evidence admissible as a search incident to a lawful arrest, overruling Trupiano v. United States, 334 U.S. 699 (1948), a precedent of its own making.

Type
Chapter
Information
Stare Indecisis
The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court, 1946–1992
, pp. 122 - 142
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×