Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:21:10.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Scientific advice for policy in the United States: lessons from the National Academies and the Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

Peter D. Blair
Affiliation:
US National Academy of Science
Justus Lentsch
Affiliation:
Heinrich Böll Foundation
Peter Weingart
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The pace of science and technology advancement over the past half-century has delivered enormous benefits to societies throughout the world as well as sobering challenges associated with the role of technology in virtually every aspect of our lives. While reaping the benefits, all of society must also cope with the challenges.

Over two centuries ago as the American democracy took shape, the founding fathers of the fledgling republic worried that democracy could flourish only when the electorate and, in particular, the institutions of government serving it are well informed about the issues upon which they must decide. Today, and increasingly, as science and technology issues become more and more prevalent, prominent, complex and of far reaching impact on society, a democratic government poorly informed about such issues carries greater and greater risk in making bad policy choices with potentially significant consequences from such choices. Yet, it is also becoming increasingly more difficult for anyone, or even any one institution, to keep pace with the frontier of scientific knowledge and its impact on society. In addition, over the last quarter century, the information revolution has expanded the quantity of information accessible to government policymakers, but more information has not proved to be necessarily better information. Indeed, a fundamental problem today is not the lack of information; rather, it is how to gauge validity and usefulness within the torrent of available information and advice.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Scientific Advice
Institutional Design for Quality Assurance
, pp. 297 - 333
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahearne, John F. and Blair, Peter D. 2003. ‘Expanded use of the national academies’, in Morgan, and Peha, (eds.), Science and Technology Advice for Congress, Washington DC: RFF Press, Ch. 8, pp. 118–33 and Appendix 2, pp. 191–207.Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce 1996. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Blair, Peter D. 1994. ‘Technology assessment: Current trends and the myth of a formula’, First Meeting of the International Association of Technology Assessment and Forecasting Institutions, Bergen, Norway, 2 May 1994, available at: www.princeton.edu/∼ota/ns20/blair_f.html.Google Scholar
Blair, Peter D. 1997a. ‘The evolving role of government in science and technology’, The Bridge, 27/3 (Fall 1997): 4–12, Washington, DC: The National Academy of Engineering, available at: www.nae.edu/nae/bridgecom.nsf/weblinks/NAEW-4NHM9J?.Google Scholar
Blair, Peter D. 1997b. ‘Examining our science and technology enterprise’, American Scientist 8/1: 74 (January/February).Google Scholar
Dawson, Jim 2001. ‘Legislation to revive OTA focuses on science advice to congress’, Physics Today 54/10: 24 (October), available at: link.aip.org/link/abstract/PHTOAD/v54/i10/p24/s1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Executive Office of the President 1993. Presidential Executive Order 12832 (Bush, George H.), Amendments Relation to the National Research Council, 19 January 1993, which amended Executive Order 10668 (Dwight D. Eisenhower), National Research Council, May 10, 1956 and Executive Order 2859 (Woodrow Wilson), National Research Council, 10 May 1956, available at: www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/PolicyDocuments.asp.Google Scholar
Fri, Robert W., Granger Morgan (chair), M., Stiles, William A. (Skip) 2002. ‘An external evaluation of the GAO's assessment of technologies for border control', 18 October 2002.
,Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2002. Technology Assessment: Using Biometrics for Border Security, GAO-03–174, November 2002, available at: www.gao.gov/new.items/d03174.pdf.
Guston, David 2003. ‘Insights from the office of technology assessment and other assessment experiences’, in Morgan, and Peha, (eds.), Science and Technology Advice for Congress, Washington, DC: RFF Press, Ch. 4, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard M. 2004. ‘House rejects Rep. Holt amendment to establish OTA-capability’, FYI: The AIP Bulletin of Science Policy News 116, 31 August 2004, available at: www.aip.org/fyi/2004/116.html.Google Scholar
Knezo, Genevieve J. 2005. ‘Technology assessment in congress: History and legislative options’, Congressional Research Service, Order Code RS21586, 20 May 2005, available at: www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS21586.pdf.
Morgan, M. Granger and Peha, John M. (eds.) 2003. Science and Technology Advice for Congress, Washington, DC: RFF Press.
,National Research Council (NRC) 1998. The National Academies: A Unique National Resource, Office of News and Public Information.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (NRC) 2000. Roles of the Committee Chair, available at: www7.nationalacademies.org/committees_chair_roles/index.html.
,National Research Council (NRC) 2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, available at: www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10172.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (NRC) 2003. Policy and Procedures on Committee Composition and Balance and Conflicts of Interest for Committees Used in the Development of Reports, May 2003, available at: www.nationalacademies.org/coi/index.html.
,National Research Council (NRC) 2005. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, available at: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html.Google Scholar
,Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1991. Improving Automobile Fuel Economy: New Standards, New Approaches, OTA-E-504, NTIS order #PB92–115989, 1991, available at: www.princeton.edu/∼ota/disk1/1991/9125_n.html.
,Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1996. OTA Legacy, CD-ROM Collection (Vols. 1–5), GPO Stock No. 052–003–01457–2, Washington, DC: US Govt. Printing Office, available also at: www.wws.princeton.edu/ota/.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce L.R. and Stine, Jeffrey K. 2003. ‘Technical advice for Congress: Past trends and present obstacles’, in Morgan, and Peha, (eds.), Ch. 2, pp. 23–52.
,The National Academies 2004. 2004 Report to Congress, available at: www.nationalacademies.org/annualreport/.
,The National Academies 2005a. The National Academies Study Process: Ensuring Independent, Objective Advice, available at: www.nationalacademies.org/studyprocess/index.html.
,The National Academies 2005b. Getting to Know the Committee Process, Office of News and Public Information.
,The National Academies 2005c. Making a Difference: Selected Studies from The National Academies, available at: www.nationalacademies.org/publications/Making_A_Difference.pdf.
,The National Academies Press 2002. Complete Catalog of Books and Periodicals, 2002 (NRC reports are now indexed and available at: www.nationalacademies.org or www.nap.edu).
,The National Academy of Sciences 2005. The National Academies In Focus, published three times annually, available at: www.infocusmagazine.org.
,US Office of Management and Budget 2005. Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review, 16 December 2006, available at: www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_infopoltech/.
Walker, Robert S. 2001. ‘OTA reconsidered’, Issues in Science and Technology, 17/3 (Spring), available at: www.issues.org/17.3/forum.htm.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×