Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- About the contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introducing Genetic Suspects
- Section 1 Key areas in DNA profiling and databasing
- Section 2 National contexts of forensic DNA technologies and key issues
- 7 DNA databases and the forensic imaginary
- 8 Partners in crime: the use of forensic DNA technologies in Austria
- 9 Inquisitorial forensic DNA profiling in the Netherlands and the expansion of the forensic genetic body
- 10 DNA the Nor-way: black-boxing the evidence and monopolising the key
- 11 Portuguese forensic DNA database: political enthusiasm, public trust and probable issues in future practice
- 12 On trial! Governing forensic DNA technologies in the USA
- 13 Biosurveillance and biocivic concerns, from ‘truth’ to ‘trust’: the Australian forensic DNA terrain
- 14 Finding the balance: forensic DNA profiling in New Zealand
- 15 Forensic DNA profiling and databasing: the Philippine experience
- Section 3 Conclusions
- Index
- References
9 - Inquisitorial forensic DNA profiling in the Netherlands and the expansion of the forensic genetic body
from Section 2 - National contexts of forensic DNA technologies and key issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- About the contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introducing Genetic Suspects
- Section 1 Key areas in DNA profiling and databasing
- Section 2 National contexts of forensic DNA technologies and key issues
- 7 DNA databases and the forensic imaginary
- 8 Partners in crime: the use of forensic DNA technologies in Austria
- 9 Inquisitorial forensic DNA profiling in the Netherlands and the expansion of the forensic genetic body
- 10 DNA the Nor-way: black-boxing the evidence and monopolising the key
- 11 Portuguese forensic DNA database: political enthusiasm, public trust and probable issues in future practice
- 12 On trial! Governing forensic DNA technologies in the USA
- 13 Biosurveillance and biocivic concerns, from ‘truth’ to ‘trust’: the Australian forensic DNA terrain
- 14 Finding the balance: forensic DNA profiling in New Zealand
- 15 Forensic DNA profiling and databasing: the Philippine experience
- Section 3 Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
During the 1990s in the Netherlands, DNA profiling became established as a mechanism to provide legal evidence for severe, violent crimes, including sexual assault, manslaughter and murder. That development was in accord with what Williams and Johnson (2008: 1) have observed in many jurisdictions regarding the transformation of DNA profiling into an important tool in processes of crime investigation and usage in so-called ‘volume crimes’. Drawing upon the Dutch situation, this chapter first describes how Dutch DNA profiling became governed through legal measures and the inquisitorial orientation of the Dutch legal system. Second, the trajectory – the lines of development – of Dutch DNA profiling practices, is described, outlining who and what has been involved in DNA profiling. This account will provide insight into, first, the strategies employed by various stakeholders to achieve the current situation, where DNA profiling is deployed extensively and routinely in volume crimes, and, second, DNA profiling applied in the process of crime investigations. Hence, the analysis contributes to the understanding of how current DNA profiling practices were realised in a country – the Netherlands – that has what can be referred to as an ‘inquisitorial legal orientation’, where judges function as impartial fact finders. Finally, some implications for current directions in the governance of Dutch forensic DNA profiling practices are outlined.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Genetic SuspectsGlobal Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing, pp. 175 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(2005). How to kill with a ballpoint: credibility in Dutch forensic science. Science, Technology and Human Values, 30, 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). The social and legal construction of suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Strasbourg: Council of Europehttp://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=005&CL=ENG (accessed February 2010).Google Scholar
(1990). Wangslijmarrest, nr. 751. [Saliva decision, no. 751.] The Hague: Hoge Raad der Nederlanden [Dutch Constitutional Court].Google Scholar
(2000). Tandenborstelarrest, nr. 10. [Tootbrush decision, no. 10.] The Hague: Hoge Raad der Nederlanden [Dutch Constitutional Court].Google Scholar
(1993). Wet van 8 november 1993 van de regeling van het DNA-onderzoek in strafzaken (Besluit DNA-onderzoeken). [Law of 8 November 1993 regarding DNA research for criminal proceedings (Forensic DNA Profiling Act).]Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, 522, 1–17.Google Scholar
(1994). Reglement DNA-profielregistratie Gerechtelijk Laboratorium. [Regulation regarding the NFI DNA database.]Staatscourtant, nr. 96. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
(2000). Wet van 6 juli 2000, houdende regels inzake de bescherming van persoonsgegevens (Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens). [Law of 6 July 2000 regarding rules for protecting personal data (Personal Data Protection Act).]Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, 302, 1–25.Google Scholar
(2001). Wet van 5 juli 2001 tot wijziging van de regeling van het DNA-onderzoek in strafzaken (Besluit DNA-onderzoek in strafzaken). [Law of 5 July 2001 regarding rules for DNA research in criminal proceedings (Forensic DNA Profiling in Criminal Proceedings Law).]Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, 335, 1–5.Google Scholar
(2003). Wet van 8 mei 2003 tot wijziging van de regeling van het DNA-onderzoek in strafzaken in verband met het vaststellen van uiterlijk waarneembare persoonskenmerken uit celmateriaal. [Law of 8 May 2003 regarding changes of the law on DNA research in criminal proceedings regarding the determination of external visible personal characteristics from cell material.]Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, 201, 1–2.Google Scholar
(2004). Wet van 16 september 2004, houdende regeling van DNA-onderzoek bij veroordeelden (Wet DNA-onderzoek bij veroordeelden). [Law of 16 September 2004 regarding DNA research from convicted criminals (DNA Convicted Persons Act).]Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, 465, 1–7.Google Scholar
(1999a). Vergaderjaar 1998–1999, 26 271, nrs. 4 & 5. [Minutes of Dutch Parliament, 1998–1999, 26 271, no. 4 & 5.] The Hague: Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal [House of Representatives of the Dutch Parliament].Google Scholar
(1999b). Vergaderjaar 1999–2000, 26 271, nrs. 6 & 7. [Minutes of Dutch Parliament, 1998–1999, 26 271, nrs. 6 &.] The Hague: Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal [House of Representatives of the Dutch Parliament].Google Scholar
, and (1985b). Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA. Nature, 316, 76–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and et al. (2008). Three genome-wide association studies and a linkage analysis identify HERC2 as a human iris color gene. American Journal of Human Genetics, 82, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2009). Eye color and the prediction of complex phenotypes from genotypes. Current Biology, 19, R192–R193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2005). The Human Genome Diversity Project. An Ethnography of Scientific Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Silent witness, articulate collectives: DNA evidence and the inference of visible traits. Bioethics, 22, 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Concept-wetsvoorstel tot wijziging van de regeling van het DNA-onderzoek in strafzaken. [Draft Law Proposal to Change the Law Regarding DNA Research for Criminal Proceedings.] The Hague: Minister van Justitie [Ministry of Justice].Google Scholar
(1999). Minister Korthals overweegt bredere toepassing DNA-onderzoek. [Minister Korthals is Considering Expanding the Scope for DNA Profiling.] [Press release 21 June.] The Hague: Minister van Justitie [Ministry of Justice].Google Scholar
(2008a). DNA-verwantschapsonderzoek bij aanpak criminaliteit. [DNA Familial Searching to Fight Crime.] [Press release 16 October.] The Hague: Minister van Justitie [Ministry of Justice].Google Scholar
(2008b). DNA-onderzoek uiterlijk waarneembare kenmerken. [DNA Research on External Visible Characteristics.] [Letter of approval to the director of the NFI to conduct scientific research, ref. 5528833/08, 9 February 2008.] The Hague: Minister van Justitie [Ministry of Justice].Google Scholar
(2002). The Body Multiple. Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Jaarverslag 1999. [Annual Report 1999.] Rijswijk: Nederlands Forensisch Instituut.Google Scholar
(2008). Jaarverslag 2007: Nederlandse DNA-databank voor strafzaken. [Annual report 2007: Dutch DNA Database for Criminal Proceedings.] The Hague: Nederlands Forensisch Instituut.Google Scholar
(2009). Oogkleur voorspellen op basis van DNA [Predicting colour of the eyes based on DNA]. Press release, 10 March. The Hague: Nederlands Forensisch Instituut.Google Scholar
(2008). Opnieuw grootschalig DNA-onderzoek in oude moordzaak. [Once More a DNA Dragnet in Old Murder]. Amsterdam: Openbaar Ministeriehttp://www.om.nl/ (accessed 31 March 2009).Google Scholar
(1998). Nr. FA-123Ke. Inverzekeringstelling en voorlopige hechtenis/raadkamer in het strafrechtelijk onderzoek naar ‘Albin’ [No. FA-123Ke. Arrest and Custody/Council Chamber on the Criminal Investigation regarding ‘Albin’.] The Hague: Openbaar Ministerie [Ministry of Justice].Google Scholar
(1999). Eindrapportage DNA bij inbraken. [Final Report of the Project DNA & Burglary.] Rijswijk: Gerechtelijk Laboratorium (NFI), politieregio Utrecht, politie Midden en West Brabant, arrondissementparketten Breda, Utrecht, Nederlands Politie Instituut.Google Scholar
, and et al. (1996). The validation of a 7-locus multiplex STR test for use in forensic casework. (II) Artefacts, casework studies and success rates. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 109, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2006). DNA fingerprinting and the right to inviolability of the body and bodily integrity in the Netherlands: convincing evidence and proliferating body parts. Journal of Genomics, Society and Policy, 2, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Genetics, biometrics and the informatization of the body. Annali dell' Istituto Superiore di Sanită, 43, 44–50.Google Scholar
(1998). Expert Evidence Compared. Rules and Practices in the Dutch and American Criminal Justice System. Antwerp;Intersentia Rechtswetenschappen.Google Scholar
and (2008). Genetic Policing. The Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations. Cullompton, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by