Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T01:22:33.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEVEN - Determinants of United States Farm Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

David Orden
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in Washington, DC
David Blandford
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Timothy Josling
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Kym Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access

Summary

This chapter focuses on the political economy of U.S. farm policy since the Uruguay Round trade negotiations concluded in 1994 and established the World Trade Organization (WTO). The significance of this point of reference is that it introduced a new element into the consideration of farm programs by setting out, in the Agreement on Agriculture (URAA), a multilateral framework for government policies in the areas of domestic support, market access, and export competition. Though few would have expected the United States to make substantial commitments with an immediate impact on its domestic programs, changes might have been anticipated over time in the formulation of U.S. farm policy as a result of its incorporation into an international treaty. Yet the broad thrust of agricultural policies in the United States since the URAA has exhibited a remarkable consistency with earlier decades. Old instruments have been adapted and new ones developed, but the policy mix serves essentially the same purposes, and benefits the same groups, as in the mid-1980s. This resilience of U.S. policy in the context of a potentially increasingly assertive set of multilateral trade rules is a core theme of the chapter.

As an exporter of its primary agricultural products, the United States has maintained a relatively open market. Tariffs on agricultural imports are generally low and have been stable, with limited cuts to bound rates to meet Uruguay Round commitments (Blandford, Laborde and Martin 2008).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. (ed.) (2009), Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: A Global Perspective, 1955–2007, London: Palgrave Macmillan and Washington DC: World Bank.CrossRef
Arha, K., Josling, T., Sumner, D.A. and Thompson, B.H. (eds.) (2007), U.S. Agricultural Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill, California: Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford CA.
Babcock, B. (2008), “Statement Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs,” Presented at the Hearing on Fuel Subsidies and Impact on Food Prices, Washington DC, May 7.
Blandford, D., Laborde, D. and Martin, W. (2008), “Implications for the United States of the May 2008 Draft Agricultural Modalities,” Paper published jointly by the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, the International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council and the International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC. Available online at http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/cp/ictsd_WTOpapers.asp
Blandford, D. and Josling, T. (2008), “The WTO July 10th Agricultural Modalities Proposals and their Impact on Domestic Support in the EU and the US,” Paper prepared for the World Bank, Washington DC, July 15.
Blandford, D. and Orden, D. (2008), “United States: Shadow WTO Agricultural Domestic Support Notifications,” Discussion Paper 821, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
Brasher, P. (2008), “Farm Bill's Potential Cost ‘Off the Charts’,” Des Moines Register, May 16.
Brown, A.B., Rucker, R. and Thurman, W. (2007), “The End of the Federal Tobacco Program: Economic Impacts of the Deregulation of U.S. Tobacco Production,”Review of Agricultural Economics 29(4): 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Chicago Council on Global Affairs (Bertini, C., Schumacher, A. Jr. and Thompson, R.L., ,Agriculture Task Force co-chairs) (2006), Modernizing America's Food and Farm Policy: Vision for a New Direction, Chicago IL: Chicago Council on Global Affairs.Google Scholar
Chite, R. (2007), “Farm Bill Budget and Costs: 2002 vs. 2007,” RS22694, Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, November 7.
,Committee on Agriculture (2008), Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference, Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (H.R. 2419), U.S. House of Representatives, Washington DC. Available online at http://agriculture.house.gov/inside/2007FarmBill.html.Google Scholar
,Congressional Budget Office (2008a), “Estimated Effects on Spending and Revenue of the Conference Agreement for H.R. 2419, the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008,” Washington DC.
,Congressional Budget Office (2008b), “CBO March 2008 Baseline for CCC and FCIC,” prepared by Dave Hull, Jim Langley and Greg Hitz, Washington DC, 20 February.
Gorter, H. and Just, D.R. (2007), “The Law of Unintended Consequences: How the U.S. Biofuel Tax Credit with a Mandate Subsidizes Oil Consumption and Has No Impact on Ethanol Consumption,” Working Paper # 2007–20, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca NY. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1024525
,FAPRI (2008), “Biofuels: Impact of Selected Farm Bill Provisions and other Biofuel Policy Options,” FAPRI-MU Report #06–08, University of Missouri, Columbia MU, June.
Gardner, B. (2009), “United States and Canada”, Ch. 4 in Anderson, K. (ed.), Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: A Global Perspective, 1955–2007, London: Palgrave Macmillan and Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Harris, W., Lubben, B., Novak, J. and Sanders, L. (2008), “The Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008: Summary and Possible Consequences,” DAERS-WP-1–72008, Prepared for the Extension National Farm Bill Train the Trainer Conference, Kansas City, Missouri, July 8–9.
James, S. and Griswold, D. (2007), “Freeing the Farm: A Farm Bill for All Americans,” Washington DC: Cato Institute.
Johnson, R. (2008), “Farm Bill Legislative Action in the 110th Congress,” RL33934, Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, June 19.
Josling, T. (2007), “The Impact of the WTO and Bilateral Trade Agreements on U.S. Farm Policy,” in Gardner, B. and Sumner, D.A. (eds.), Agricultural Policy for the 2007 Farm Bill and Beyond, Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Josling, T., Tangermann, S. and Warley, T.K. (1996), Agriculture in the GATT, London and New York: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, H.W. and Josling, T. (2003), Agricultural Policy Reform: Politics and Process in the EU and US in the 1990s, Burlington VT: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Orden, D. (2002), “Reform's Stunted Crop,”Regulation 25(1): 26–32, Spring.Google Scholar
Orden, D. (2007), “Feasibility of U.S. Farm Program Buyouts: Is It a Possibility for U.S. Sugar,” pp. 147–162 in Huff, K.M., Meilke, K.D., Knutson, R.D., Ochoa, R.F. and Rude, J. (eds.), Achieving NAFTA Plus, College Station TX: Texas A&M University/University of Guelph/Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture-Mexico.Google Scholar
Orden, D., Paarlberg, R. and Roe, T. (1999), Policy Reform in American Agriculture: Analysis and Prognosis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, B. (2007), “Ending Farm Subsidies,”National Journal, February 24.Google Scholar
Tyner, W. (2007), “U.S. Ethanol Policy: Possibilities for the Future,” Bioenergy, Purdue Extension ID-342-W, West Lafayette ID, January.
,USDA (2007), America's Farm Bill: 2007 Farm Bill Proposals, Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
,USDA (2008a), USDA Agricultural Projections to 2017, Office of the Chief Economist, World Agricultural Outlook Board, Long-term Projections Report OCE-2008–1, Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
,USDA (2008b), Charts Showing Budget Exposure from the ACRE Revenue Support, Office of the Chief Economist, Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Womach, J. (2003), “Comparing Quota Buyout Payments for Peanuts and Tobacco,” Congressional Research Service Report RS 1642, Washington DC, October.
,WTO (2005), United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, and WT/DS267/AB/R, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
,WTO (2007a), United States – Domestic Support and Export Credit Guarantees for Agricultural Products, Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Brazil, WT/DS365/13, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
,WTO (2007b), United States – Subsidies and Other Domestic Support for Corn and Other Agricultural Products, Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Canada, WT/DS357/12, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
,WTO (2008), Revised Draft Modalities for Agriculture, TN/AG/W/4/Rev. 3, July 10, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Zulaf, C. (2007), “Analysis of Alternative Farm Bill Support Programs for Corn, Soybeans and Wheat,” AEDE-RP0095–07, Ohio State University, Columbus.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×