Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T05:20:51.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Prospects for research in social behaviour: systems biology meets behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Allen J. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, UK
Tamás Székely
Affiliation:
University of Bath, UK
Jan Komdeur
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Netherlands
Tamás Székely
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Allen J. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Jan Komdeur
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Overview

The study of social behaviour, often called sociobiology, is entering a new phase. A growing focus on mechanisms has enriched the older, evolutionary, perspective of sociobiology. The chapters in this book provide an overview of some of the most influential examples of research adopting the multifaceted approaches used to understand social evolution. There are top-down examinations of the way selection influences behaviour and, therefore, its neural and genetic structure, and bottom-up examinations of the genetic, hormonal or neurobiological substrates of behaviour. We therefore have a detailed understanding of the social, ecological, physiological, neurological, hormonal and genetic factors leading to complex social behaviour, but little integration. Picking apart the components and influences on behaviour is a reductionist approach, and although this has provided considerable insights we argue that it is now time for a synthetic perspective. We argue that a complementary perspective that unifies the particulate knowledge we have gained is now possible, and in keeping with current fashion we label this a systems biology approach to studying behavioural complexity. In reality, this is not new but a re-emphasis of the original synthetic view of sociobiology. Systems biology is simply a focus on interactions among components, and it works towards developing a predictive framework for resulting emergent properties of a system. Systems biology depends on a detailed understanding of the component parts to a system, and we believe this will be increasingly available for social behaviour, given the availability of new and less expensive approaches to gaining mechanistic information.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Behaviour
Genes, Ecology and Evolution
, pp. 538 - 550
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. (2005) Sexual Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badyaev, A. V., Acevedo Seaman, D., Navara, K. J., Hill, G. E. & Mendonça, M. T. (2006) Evolution of sex-biased maternal effects in birds: III. Adjustment of ovulation order can enable sex-specific allocation of hormones, carotenoids, and vitamins. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1044–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blount, J. D., Metcalfe, N. B., Birkhead, T. R. & Surai, P. F. (2003) Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. Science, 300, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1981) In defence of selfish genes. Philosophy, 56, 556–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, J. C. (1999) Molecular basis for circadian clocks. Cell, 96, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggert, A.-K. & Müller, J. K. (1997) Biparental care and social evolution: lessons from the larder. In: The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids, ed. J. E. Choe & B. J. Crespi. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp. 216–236.Google Scholar
Eggert, A.-K. & Müller, J. K. (2000) Timing of oviposition and reproductive skew in cobreeding female burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides). Behavioral Ecology, 11, 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwood, R. W. (1994) A switch in time saves mine. Behavioural Processes, 33, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emlen, D. J. (2008) The evolution of animal weapons. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 39, 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fewell, J. H. (2003) Social insect networks. Science, 301, 1867–1870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, M. J., Ben-Shahar, Y., Smid, H. M.et al. (2005) Candidate genes for behavioural ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grafen, A. (1984) Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. In: Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edn, ed. Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 62–89.Google Scholar
Gray, S. M., Dill, L. M. & McKinnon, J. S. (2007) Cuckoldry incites cannibalism: male fish turn to cannibalism when perceived certainty of paternity decreases. American Naturalist, 169, 258–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houston, A. I., Székely, T. & McNamara, J. M. (2005) Conflict over parental care. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J., Breuker, C. J., Sadowski, J. A. & Moore, A. J. (2009) Male–male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. (1978) Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. (1984) Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edn. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. (1991) Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, 3rd edn. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. (1997) Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, 4th edn. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, P. A. (1902) Mutual Aid: a Factor of Evolution. New York, NY: McClure Philips.Google Scholar
Looby, P & Loudon, A. S. I. (2005) Gene duplication and complex circadian clocks in mammals. Trends in Genetics, 21, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merrow, M., Spoelstra, K. & Roenneberg, T. (2005) The circadian cycle: daily rhythms from behaviour to genes. EMBO Reports, 6, 930–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. K. & Eggert, A.-K. (1990) Time-dependent shifts between infanticidal and parental behavior in female burying beetles: a mechanism of indirect mother-offspring recognition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, B. D. & Sherman, P. W. (2002) Decision making and recognition mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269, 1435–1441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldekop, J. A., Smiseth, P. T., Piggins, H. D. & Moore, A. J. (2007) Adaptive switch from infanticide to parental care: how do beetles time their behaviour?Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 1998–2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panaitof, S. C., Scott, M. P. & Borst, D. W. (2004) Plasticity in juvenile hormone in male burying beetles during breeding: physiological consequences of the loss of a mate. Journal of Insect Physiology, 50, 715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panda, S., Hogenesch, J. B. & Kay, S. A. (2002) Circadian rhythms from flies to humans. Nature, 417, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A. (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, ed. Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A.. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 123–166.Google Scholar
Parker, G. A., Royle, N. J. & Hartley, I. R. (2002) Intrafamilial conflict and parental investment: a synthesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal SocietyB, 357, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrigo, G., Belvin, L. & Vom Saal, F. S. (1992) Time and sex in the male mouse: temporal regulation of infanticide and parental behavior. ChronobiologyInternational, 9, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rendall, D. & DiFiore, A. (2007) Homoplasy, homology, and the perceived special status of behavior in evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 504–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. E. & Ben-Shahar, Y. (2002) Social behavior and comparative genomics: new genes or new gene regulation?Genes, Brain and Behavior, 1, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, G. E., Grozinger, C. M. & Whitfield, C. (2005) Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Fernald, R. D. & Clayton, D. F. (2008) Genes and social behavior. Science, 322, 896–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, M. P. (1998) The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 595–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, M. P. & Panaitof, S. C. (2004) Social stimuli affect juvenile hormone during breeding in biparental burying beetles (Silphidae: Nicrophorus). Hormones and Behavior, 45, 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. P., Trumbo, S. T., Neese, P. A., Bailey, W. D. & Roe, R. M. (2001) Changes in biosynthesis and degradation of juvenile hormone during breeding by burying beetles: a reproductive or social role?Journal of Insect Physiology, 47, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, M. P., Panaitof, S. C. & Carleton, K. L. (2005) Quantification of vitellogenin-mRNA during maturation and breeding of a burying beetle. Journal of Insect Physiology, 51, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smiseth, P. T., Ward, R. J. S. & Moore, A. J. (2006) Asynchronous hatching in Nicrophorus vespilloides, an insect in which parents provide food for their offspring. Functional Ecology, 20, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamps, J. A. (1991) Why evolutionary issues are reviving interest in proximate behavioral mechanisms. American Zoologist, 31, 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanewsky, R. (2003) Genetic analysis of the circadian system inDrosophila melanogaster and mammals. Journal of Neurobiology, 54, 111–147.Google ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, J. S., Shimomura, K. & Kumar, V. (2008) Searching for genes underlying behavior: lessons from circadian rhythms. Science, 322, 909–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinbergen, N. (1953) Social Behaviour in Animals with Special Reference to Vertebrates. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Toth, A. L. & Robinson, G. E. (2007) Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior. Trends in Genetics, 23, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toth, A. L., Varala, K., Newman, T. C.et al. (2007) Wasp gene expression supports and evolutionary link between maternal behavior and eusociality. Science, 318, 441–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. L. (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, ed. Campbell, B.. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1974) Parent–offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumbo, S. T. (1997) Juvenile hormone-mediated reproduction in burying beetles: from behavior to physiology. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 35, 479–490.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumbo, S. T., Borst, D. W & Robinson, G. E. (1995) Rapid elevation of juvenile hormone titer during behavioral assessment of the breeding resource by the burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis. Journal of Insect Physiology, 41, 535–543.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Ross, K. G. & Keller, L. (2008) Genome-wide expression patterns and the genetic architecture of a fundamental social trait. PLoS Genetics, 4 (7), e1000127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S. & Gardner, A. (2007) Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 415–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C. (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1971) The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975) Sociobiology: the New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D. & Moore, A. J. (1999) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process II. Selection resulting from social interactions. American Naturalist, 153, 254–266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Q. & Brown, M. R. (2006) Signaling and function of insulin-like peptides in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 51, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×