Post-Imperial Democracies Ideology and Party Formation in Third Republic France, Weimar Germany, and Post-Soviet Russia
Book contents
3 - Ideology and Party Formation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Summary
The link between political parties and ideology is well established, in both social science theory and empirical research. Indeed, if representative democracy without a system of well-organized political parties is “unthinkable,” as Schattschneider famously argued, genuine electoral competition without competing ideologies seems equally hard to imagine. If parties have no stable ideological positions whatsoever, then party labels cannot convey any meaningful information to party activists and voters about the kinds of policies particular party elites are likely to pursue in office. Electoral campaigns in such a situation become a charade, with politicians merely pretending to stake out positions they had no intention of defending once in power – with the result that voters must quickly learn that their participation in the entire game of electoral politics is irrational. Thus, in any stable democracy there will always be some limits in practice on just how much freedom party elites have in “choosing” positions on the ideological spectrum.
Despite this logic, it is fair to say that the primary focus of most of the literature on comparative political parties has been to emphasize not the ideological limits that the need for credibility places upon party behavior but the tendency of partisan “entrepreneurs” to abandon quickly their professed principles for reasons of electoral and political expediency. Thus, the first serious social scientific analyses of comparative party politics at the turn of the twentieth century focused on the rise of unprincipled mass party “machines” in the United States and Western Europe.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Post-Imperial DemocraciesIdeology and Party Formation in Third Republic France, Weimar Germany, and Post-Soviet Russia, pp. 57 - 84Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (New York: Free Press, 1966 [1915])Google Scholar
, “Politics as a Vocation,” in and , eds., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970), pp. 77–128Google Scholar
, Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State (London: Methuen; New York: Wiley, 1954)Google Scholar
, Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966)Google Scholar
, Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
, Political Parties: Organization and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
, Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
, , and , Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition (London: Wiley, 1976)Google Scholar
, , and , eds., Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)CrossRef
and , Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (New York: International Publishers, 1963)Google Scholar
, “The Possibility of Non-Violent Revolution,” in , ed., The Marx-Engels Reader (New York: Norton, 1978), pp. 522–524Google Scholar
, What Is to Be Done? Burning Questions of Our Movement (New York: International Publishers, 1969)Google Scholar
, Revising State Theory: Essays in Politics and Postindustrialism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Lipset and , “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments,” in and , eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (New York: Free Press, 1967), pp. 1–64Google Scholar
, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
, Altering Political Parties: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001), p. 16Google Scholar
, Why Not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism, and the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google ScholarPubMed
, Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Transformation of European Social Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Social Choice and Individual Values (New York: Wiley; London: Chapman and Hall, 1951)Google Scholar
, “Intransitivity in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control,” Journal of Economic Theory 12 (June 1976): 472–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1955)Google Scholar
, Martin Van Buren and the Making of the Democratic Party (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959), p. 124Google Scholar
and , Martin Van Buren: Law, Politics, and the Shaping of Republican Ideology (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
, Martin Van Buren and the Emergence of American Popular Politics (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002), p. 150Google Scholar
, The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
, Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and East Germany (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
and , Beyond the European Left: Ideology and Political Action in the Belgian Ecology Parties (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
, Party Systems in East-Central Europe: Consolidation or Fluidity? Studies in Public Policy No. 241 (Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, 1995)Google Scholar
and , “Programmatic Party Cohesion in Emerging Postcommunist Democracies: Russia in Comparative Context,” Comparative Political Studies 35(10, 2002): 1228–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “What Counts as a Good Cause?” in and , eds., Capitalism and Democracy in Eastern and Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
, Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Successor Parties in East-Central Europe after 1989 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Defining Democratic Consolidation,” in et al., eds., Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
and , “Time, Space, and Institutional Change in Eastern and Central Europe,” in and , Capitalism and Democracy in Eastern and Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
, Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
, Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987)Google Scholar
, “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science,” in and , eds., Handbook of Political Science (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975), 17: 79–123Google Scholar
, Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005)Google Scholar
, Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “On the Method of Structured, Focused Comparisons,” in , ed., Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy (New York: Free Press, 1979)Google Scholar
, “History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias,” American Political Science Review 90(3, 1996): 605–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ideology, Uncertainty, and the Rise of Anti-System Parties in Post-Communist Russia, Studies in Public Policy No. 289 (Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, 1997)Google Scholar
, “The End of Ideology and the Decline of Russian Political Parties,” in and , eds., The Elections of 1999–2000 in Russia: Their Impact and Legacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 163–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Weber and the Problem of Social Science Prediction,” in , ed., Max Weber's “Objectivity” Reconsidered (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007), pp. 290–308Google Scholar
, States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979), p. 288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Regime Type and Diffusion in Comparative Politics Methodology,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38(1, March 2005): 69–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar