![](https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/37682/cover/9780521837682.jpg)
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SKILLS IN COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
- 2 THE EVOLUTION OF SKILL FORMATION IN GERMANY
- 3 THE EVOLUTION OF SKILL FORMATION IN BRITAIN
- 4 THE EVOLUTION OF SKILL FORMATION IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES
- 5 EVOLUTION AND CHANGE IN THE GERMAN SYSTEM OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING
- 6 CONCLUSIONS, EMPIRICAL AND THEORETICAL
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
1 - THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SKILLS IN COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SKILLS IN COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
- 2 THE EVOLUTION OF SKILL FORMATION IN GERMANY
- 3 THE EVOLUTION OF SKILL FORMATION IN BRITAIN
- 4 THE EVOLUTION OF SKILL FORMATION IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES
- 5 EVOLUTION AND CHANGE IN THE GERMAN SYSTEM OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING
- 6 CONCLUSIONS, EMPIRICAL AND THEORETICAL
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
Summary
The past two decades have witnessed an enormous outpouring of literature on the putative effects of “globalization” on the political economies of the advanced industrial countries. A good deal of this literature was inspired by early, sometimes rather breathless predictions of a trend toward convergence in the institutional arrangements governing these political economies. Such convergence, it was argued by some, would result from the pressures imposed by footloose firms engaged in “regime shopping” which would in turn drive competitive deregulation among the advanced countries (see, for example, Kapstein 1996; Kurzer 1993). These prospects were especially worrisome to students of Europe's “corporatist” political economies, which had long been admired as models of economic efficiency and social equality.
In the meantime, however, a good deal of evidence has accumulated that calls into question arguments about a convergence among the institutional arrangements that characterize different political economies (Berger and Dore 1996; Brown, Green, and Lauder 2001; Ferner and Hyman 1998; Garrett 1998; Iversen, Pontusson, and Soskice 2000; Kitschelt et al. 1999; Streeck and Yamamura 2002; Vogel 2001; Wallerstein and Golden 1997). Although there are certainly changes afoot in all countries, a number of scholars have pointed to systematic and apparently enduring differences in the organization of capitalism across the advanced industrial countries. Different authors characterize these differences each in his or her own way, but the consensus that has emerged is truly striking.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- How Institutions EvolveThe Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, pp. 1 - 38Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
- 3
- Cited by