Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T14:27:09.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Counting the horse's teeth: professional standards in science's barter economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2010

Nicholas Russell
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

Karl Sabbagh tells the unhappy story of Professor J.W. Heslop Harrison FRS and his lapses from the professional standards of behaviour expected of a scientist. He came from humble beginnings, the son of an iron worker, and grew up in harsh conditions in the early part of the twentieth century. By dint of hard work he went to university and eventually became an academic botanist, specializing in the study of plant classification and distribution. In the 1930s when Heslop Harrison began his professional career, the Hebridean islands off the Scottish coast were largely unexplored. When he and others made scientific surveys on the islands, they discovered they had unique species and subspecies of plant and insect, some of which were new to science. These discoveries made Heslop Harrison's reputation. His richest site was the island of Rum, previously in private hands and not botanically examined at all.

At first, his discoveries attracted no suspicion. But by the end of the 1930s some of his claims were becoming bizarre. He was using them to support a hypothesis that the islands had escaped the last Ice Age which had buried the Scottish mainland under a massive sheet of ice. The final straw for a Cambridge colleague, John Raven (a classicist and amateur naturalist), came in 1941 when Heslop Harrison published two papers announcing the discovery on Rum of species previously unknown in Great Britain. After the war, Raven managed to join one of Heslop Harrison's expeditions to the island and see these wonders for himself. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Communicating Science
Professional, Popular, Literary
, pp. 40 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. (2002). Rising star crashes back to Earth. Nature, 3 October, 419, 420–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, A. (2003). Ethics panel attacks environmental book. Nature, 16 January, 421, 201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Anon (2008). More than one bad apple. Nature, 16 October, 455, 835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayes, C. (2002). World's tiniest computer vanishes without trace. The Times, 28 September, 3.Google Scholar
Ball, P. (2003). Physicists fail to find saving grace for falsified research. Nature, 27 February, 421, 878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briefing, (1999). Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud. Nature, 4 March, 398, 13–17.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, G. (2002). Time to wise up?Nature, 11 July, 418, 120–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brumfiel, G. (2002). Misconduct finding at Bell Labs shakes physics community. Nature, 419, 419–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Butler, D. (2008). Entire paper plagiarism caught by software. Nature, 9 October, 455, 715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Check Hayden, E. (2008). Designer debacle. A high-profile scientist, a graduate student and two major retractions. Nature, 15 May, 453, 275–8.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. (1992). Changing Order. Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. (1999). NIH office plans research on misconduct. Nature, 8 July, 400, 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalton, R. (2002). 2002 in context. Nature, 19/26 December, 420, 728–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrar, S. (2002). For whom the Bell tolls?Times Higher Education Supplement, 8 July, 12.Google Scholar
Feder, N. and Stewart, W. W. (2008). Integrity: juniors see leaders gain from calculated dishonesty. Nature, 31 July, 452, 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, J. (2004). Plagiarism in Cambridge physics lab prompts calls for guidelines. Nature, 1 January, 427, 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, J. (2005). Taking on the cheats. Nature, 19 May, 435, 258–9.Google Scholar
Giles, J. (2006). The trouble with replication. Nature, 27 July, 442, 344–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagstrom, W. O. (1982). Gift giving as an organizing principle in science. In Barnes, B. and Edge, D. (eds.). Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. H. (1995). Fraud and hoaxes in science. Nature, 12 October, 377, 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kealey, T. (1997). No sleaze please, we're scientists. The Guardian, 27 March, Online section, 14.Google Scholar
Martinson, B.Anderson, M. and Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 9 June, 435, 737–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medawar, P. (1991). The Threat and the Glory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1973). Institutionalized patterns of evaluation in science. In Merton, R. K.The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Minkel, J. R. (2002). Reality check. Alleged fraud gets physicists thinking about misconduct. Scientific American, November, 10–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Morris, E. (2006). Should journals police scientific fraud?Nature, 2 February, 439, 520–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, K. (1999). A Rum Affair. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Titus, S. L.Wells, J. A. and Rhoades, L. J. (2008). Repairing research integrity. Nature, 19 June, 453, 980–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziman, J. (1999). Rules of the game of doing science. Nature, 19 August, 400, 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinsberg, D. (1994). A big stink in the labs. Times Higher Education Supplement, 14 January, 7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×