Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T11:41:37.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Media discourse, movement publicity, and the generation of collective action frames: Theoretical and empirical exercises in meaning construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bert Klandermans
Affiliation:
Free University Amsterdam
Sjoerd Goslinga
Affiliation:
Free University Amsterdam
Doug McAdam
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
John D. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Catholic University of America, Washington DC
Mayer N. Zald
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

The Netherlands has the reputation of having one of the best social security systems in the world. Part of this system is the Disability Insurance Act (WAO). It rules that everybody who is physically incapable of continuing to work on his or her own level of education and work experience is entitled to a benefit of 70 percent of his or her last-earned income.

Since 1968, the year the Disability Insurance Act was implemented, work disability in the Netherlands has grown at an epidemic rate. At the time of the Act's conception it was projected that the number of people receiving a disability allowance (DA) would never exceed 200,000. But the number of people on a disability allowance (DA) rose from 160,000 in 1968 to 900,000 in the early 1990s. The “disease of worker disability” is potent only in the Netherlands. In comparable countries such as West Germany, the United States, and Sweden the number of recipients of disability benefits per 1,000 members of the labor force remained fairly stable over a 20-year period from 1970 through 1989 (oscillating around 55 in West Germany, 40 in the United States, and 70 in Sweden). In that same period figures rose in the Netherlands from 55 in 1970 to 152 in 1989 – an increase of almost 300 percent (Burkhauser 1991).

With 900,000 persons on DA, an estimated 21 billion guilders per year, or 6 percent of the country's gross national product, is spent on disability allowances (as compared to 2.3 percent in France and 3.5 percent in West Germany).

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements
Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings
, pp. 312 - 337
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×