Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T02:18:52.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

References

Adam Sutton
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Adrian Cherney
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology
Rob White
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Crime Prevention
Principles, Perspectives and Practices
, pp. 164 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International (2004), Singapore: The Death Penalty – A Hidden Toll of Executions, Amnesty International website <www.amnesty.org> (accessed 17 June 2007).
Armitage, R. (2000), An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing within West Yorkshire, Home Office Briefing Note 7/00, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. (2006), ‘Mob mentality: The threat to community sustainability from the search for safety’, in Malpass, P. & Cairncross, L. (eds), Building on the Past: Visions of Housing Futures, Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 163–84.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. & Blandy, S. (2005), Housing Studies, vol. 20, no. 2 (March) (special edn on Gated Communities).
Atkinson, R. & Blandy, S. (2006), Gated Communities, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Attorney-General's Department (2007), ‘Round Four – Security Related Infrastructure’ (Media Release, May), Attorney-General's Department, Canberra <www.crimeprevention.gov.au> (accessed 7 June 2007).
Australian Institute of Criminology (2003), ‘Measuring crime prevention program costs and benefits’, AIC Crime Reduction Matters, no. 15, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
Australian Institute of Criminology <www.aic.gov.au/research/cvp/topics/cpted.html#research> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Barr, R. & Pease, K. (1990), ‘Crime placement, displacement and deflection’, in Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (eds), Crime and Justice: Re Review of the Research, vol. 12, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bell, W. (1991), ‘The role of urban design in crime prevention: Adelaide city – a case study’, Australian Planner, December. pp. 206–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. M. (2006), ‘Public opinion and juvenile justice policy: Myths and misconceptions’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 5, issue 4, pp. 653–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagg, H. & Valuri, G. (2003), An Overview of Night Patrol Services in Australia, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Blagg, H. & Valuri, G. (2004a), ‘Self-policing and community safety: The work of Aboriginal community patrols in Australia’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 205–19.Google Scholar
Blagg, H. & Valuri, G. (2004b), ‘Aboriginal community patrols in Australia: Self-policing, self-determination and security’, Policing & Society, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 313–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakely, E. & Snyder, M. (1999), Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States, Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington & Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bonnemaison, G. (1983), Confronting Crime: Prevention, Repression and Solidarity, Documentation Francaise, Paris.Google Scholar
Bottoms, A. (1974), ‘Book review of defensible space’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 203–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgois, P. (1995), In Search of Respect: Selling Crack at El Barrio, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Boyce, J. (2001), Crime Prevention in a Plains Town – Moree, Paper presented at ‘The Character, Impact and Prevention of Crime in Regional Australia’ Conference, Townsville, August 2001.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2001), ‘The effects of hot spots policing on crime’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science vol. 578, pp. 104–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., McDevitt, J. & Pierce, G. L. (2006), ‘Understanding and preventing gang violence: Problem analysis and response development in Lowell, Massachusetts’, Police Quarterly, vol. 9 no. 1, pp. 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (1989), Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. & Brantingham, P. L. (1993), ‘Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment’, Environmental Psychology, vol. 13, pp. 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. & Brantingham, P. L. (1995), ‘Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. & Faust, F. (1976), ‘A conceptual model of crime prevention’, Crime and Delinquency, vol. 22, pp. 130–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. L., Brantingham, P. J. & Taylor, W. (2005), ‘Situational crime prevention as a key component in embedded crime prevention’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, K., Erol, R. & Tilley, N. (2006), Problem-oriented Policing and Partnerships Implementing on Evidence-based Approach to Crime Reduction, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L. & Smith, E. (2007), ‘Leisure as a context for youth development and delinquency prevention’, in France, A. & Homel, R. (eds), Pathways and Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Practice, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Campbell Collaboration <www.aic.gov.au/campbellcj/> (accessed 26 February 2008).
Canada, National Crime Prevention Centre (1996), Mobilizing Political Will and Community Responsibility to Prevent Youth Crime, National Crime Prevention Council, Ottawa, Canada.
Canada, National Crime Prevention Centre (1998) Building a Safer Canada: A Community Based Crime Prevention Manual. Canadian Department of Justice.
Carson, W. G. (2004a), ‘Is communalism dead? Reflections on the present and future practice of crime prevention: Part 1’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, W. G. (2004b), ‘Is communalism dead? Reflections on the present and future practice of crime prevention: Part 2’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashmore, J., Gilmore, L., Goodnow, J., Hayes, A., Homel, R., Lawrence, J., Leech, M., Najman, J., O'Connor, J., Vinson, T. & Western, J. (2001a), Ending Family Violence? Programs for Perpetrators, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Cashmore, J., Gilmore, L., Goodnow, J., Hayes, A., Homel, R., Lawrence, J., Leech, M., Najman, J., O'Connor, J., Vinson, T. & Western, J. (2001b), Pathways to Prevention: Developmental and Early Intervention Approaches to Crime in Australia (Appendices), Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Castellano, P. & Soderstrom, P. (1992), ‘Therapeutic wilderness programmes and juvenile recidivism: A programme evaluation’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, vol. 17, 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, J. (1994), ‘Crime prevention and the lure of relevance: A response to Adam Sutton’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 25–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, A. (2002), ‘Beyond technicism: Broadening the “what works” paradigm in crime prevention’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, A. (2003), ‘The dust never settles’ crime prevention policy and practice: The Victorian experience, PhD thesis, Unpublished, Department of Criminology, University of Melbourne.
Cherney, A. (2004a), ‘Contingency and politics: The local government community safety officer role’, Criminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 115–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, A. (2004b), ‘A case study of crime prevention/community safety partnerships in Victoria’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 237–52.Google Scholar
Cherney, A. (2005), ‘A letter from Australia: Doing crime prevention research – A personal reflection’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, A. (2006a), ‘Problem solving for crime prevention’, Trends and Issues, no. 314, Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Cherney, A. (2006b), ‘The role of local government in crime prevention: An overview’, Local Government Reporter, vol. 5, nos 3 & 4, pp. 25–8.Google Scholar
Cherney, A. & Sutton, A. (2006), ‘Crime prevention and reduction’, in Goldsmith, A., Israel, M. & Daly, K. (eds), Crime and Justice in the 21st Century: An Australian Textbook in Criminology, 3rd edn, Thomson/LBC, Sydney, pp. 373–93.Google Scholar
Cherney, A. and Sutton, A. (2007), ‘Crime prevention in Australia: Beyond what works’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W. (2006), Nipped in the bud: A situational crime prevention approach to the prevention of bushfire arson, Masters thesis, Unpublished, School of Social Science, University of Queensland.
Clammer, J. (1997), ‘Framing the other: Criminality, social exclusion and social engineering in developing Singapore’, Social Policy and Administration, vol. 31, pp. 136–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1980), ‘Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 136–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (ed.) (1997), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, 2nd edn, Harrow & Heston, New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1998a), ‘Defining police strategies: Problem solving, problem oriented policing and community-oriented policing’, in Grant, A. & Shelley, O. (eds), Problem-Oriented Policing, Police Executive Research Forum, Washington DC, pp. 315–26.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1998b), ‘Theoretical background to crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED), and situational prevention’, Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference, Designing out Crime: Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), 16 June, Sydney, available at <www.aic.gov.au/conferences/cpted/clarke.html> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1999), Hot Products. Understanding, Anticipating and Reducing the Demand for Stolen Goods, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (2005), ‘Seven Misconceptions of Situational Crime Prevention’, in Tilley, N. (ed), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Cornish, D. B. (eds) (1986), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Eck, J. (2003), Become a Problem-Solving Crime Analyst, Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Felson, M. (eds) (1993), Routine Activity and Rational Choice: Advances in Criminological Theory, Transaction, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Homel, R. (1997), ‘A revised classification of situational crime prevention techniques’, in Lab, S. (ed.), Crime Prevention at a Crossroads, Anderson, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Weisburd, D. (1994), ‘Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement’, in Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 2, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 165–84.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. E. & Felson, M. (1979), ‘Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach’, American Sociological Review, vol. 44, pp. 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Roland, T. R. & Steen, S. (2006), ‘Prevention, crime control or cash? Public preferences towards criminal justice spending priorities’, Justice Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R. (2004), Reclaim the Streets: Surveillance, Social Control and the City, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Collins, A. (1998), ‘Hip hop graffiti culture’, Alternative Law Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
Collins, J., Noble, G., Poynting, S. & Tabar, P. (2000), Kebabs, Kids, Cops & Crime: Youth, Ethnicity & Crime, Pluto Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, I. (2004), Design Out Crime: Creating Safe and Sustainable Communities, Elsevier Architectural Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Connell, J. P., Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L. B. & Weiss, C. H. (1995), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Concepts, Methods and Contexts, Aspen Institute, New York.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D. & Camp, bell, D. T. (1979), Quasi-experimentation, Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
Coote, A., Allen, J. & Woodhead, D. (2004), Finding Out What Works: Understanding Complex Community-based Initiatives, Kings Fund, London.Google Scholar
Cozens, P. M., Hillier, D. & Prescott, G. (2001a), ‘Crime and the design of residential property: Exploring the theoretical background’, Property Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 136–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozens, P. M., Hillier, D. & Prescott, G. (2001b), ‘Crime and the design of residential property: Exploring the perceptions of planning professionals, burglars and other users Part 2’, Property Management, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 222–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozens, P. M., Pascoe, T. & Hillier, D. (2004), ‘The policy and practice of secured by design (SBD)’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozens, P. M., Saville, G. & Hillier, D. (2005), ‘Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): A review and modern bibliography’, Journal of Property Management, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 328–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, P. (2000), ‘Young people and public space: Developing inclusive policy and practice’, Scottish Youth Issues Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 105–24.Google Scholar
Crane, P. & Marston, G. (1999), The Myer Centre Youth Protocol: A Summary, Brisbane City Council, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (1994), ‘The partnership approach to community crime prevention: Corporatism at the local level’, Social and Legal Studies, vol. 3, pp. 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (1997), The Local Governance of Crime: Appeals to Community and Partnerships, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (1998), Crime Prevention and Community Safety: Politics, Policies and Practices, Longman, London and New York.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (1999), ‘Questioning appeals to community within crime prevention and control’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 7, pp. 509–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (2002), ‘The growth of crime prevention in France as contrasted with the English experience: Some thoughts on the politics of insecurity’, in Hughes, G., McLaughlin, E. & Muncie, J. (eds), Crime Prevention and Community Safety: New Directions, Sage Publications in association with Open University Press, London, pp. 214–39.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. & Jones, M. (1995), ‘Interagency crime prevention and community based crime prevention’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 35, pp. 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. & Matassa, M. (2000), Community Safety Structures: An International Literature Review, Northern Ireland Officer, Statistics and Research Branch, Criminal Justice Policy Division, Massey House, Belfast.Google Scholar
Crime Prevention Victoria (2003), Safer Design Guidelines for Victoria, Crime Prevention Victoria & Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
Cromwell, P. & Olson, J. N. (2004), Breaking and Entering: Burglars on Burglary, Wadsworth, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
Crowe, T. D. (2000), Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management Concepts, 2nd edn, National Crime Prevention Institute.Google Scholar
Cunneen, C. (1992), ‘Aboriginal imprisonment during and since the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody’, Current Issues In Criminal Justice, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 351–5.Google Scholar
Cunneen, C., Findlay, M., Lynch, R. & Tupper, V. (1989), Dynamics of Collective Conflict: Riots at the Bathurst Bike Races, Law Book Company, Sydney.Google Scholar
Cunneen, C. & White, R. (2007), Juvenile Justice: Youth and Crime in Australia, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Currie, E. (1988), ‘Two visions of community crime prevention’, in Hope, T. & Shaw, M. (eds), Communities and Crime Reduction, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Davids, C. (1995), ‘Understanding the significance and persistence of Neighbourhood Watch in Victoria’, Law in Context, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 57–80.Google Scholar
Davies, J. (1995), ‘Less Mickey Mouse, more Dirty Harry: Property, policing and the postmodern metropolis’, Polemic, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 63–9.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1990), City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Davis, P. (2004), Is Evidence-based Government Possible?, Jerry Lee Lecture Presented at the 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington DC, 18 February, available at <www.policyhub.gov.uk/downloads/JerryLeeLecture1202041.pdf> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
De Liege, M.-P. (1988), ‘The fight against crime and fear: A new initiative in France’, in Hope, T. & Shaw, M. (eds), Communities and Crime Reduction, HMSO, London, pp. 254–9.Google Scholar
De Liege, M.-P. (1991), ‘Social developments and prevention of crime in France’, in Heidenson, F. & Farrell, M. (eds), Crime in Europe, Routledge, London, pp. 121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhiri, S. & Brand, S. (1999), Analysis of Costs and Benefits: Guidance for Evaluators, Crime Reduction Program Guidance Note 1, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Diacon, D. (ed.) (1999), Building Safer Urban Environments: The Way Forward, Building and Social Housing Foundation, Leicestershire.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J. & Poulin, F. (1999), ‘When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behaviour’, American Psychologist, vol. 54, pp. 755–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, D. (2005), ‘Why don't the police stop crime?’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1912), The Elementary Forms of Religious Life.
Durkheim, E. (1969) [1893], ‘Types of law in relation to social solidarity’, from The Division of Labour in Society (trans. G. Simpson, Free Press of Glencoe 1964, New York), incl. in Aubert, V. (ed.), Sociology of Law: Selected Readings, Harmondsworth, Penguin, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1984), The Division of Labour in Society, (trans. W. D. Halls), Free Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2002a), ‘Preventing crime at places’, in Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (eds), Evidence-based Crime Prevention, Routledge, New York, pp. 241–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2002b), ‘Learning from experience in problem orientated policing and situational prevention: The positive functions of weak evaluations and the negative functions of strong ones’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Evaluation for Crime Prevention: Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 14, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 93–117.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2003), ‘Police problems: The complexity of problem theory, research and evaluation’, in Knuttsson, J. (ed.), Problem Oriented Policing: From Innovation to Mainstream, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 15, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 79–113.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2005), ‘Evaluation for lesson learning’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 699–733.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2006), ‘When is a bologna sandwich better than sex? A defence of small-n case study evaluations’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E., Clarke, R. V. & Guerette, R. (2007), ‘Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogeneous sets of facilities’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 21, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. & Spelman, W. (1988), Problem Solving: Problem-orientated Policing in Newport News, Police Executive Research Forum and National Institute of Justice, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. & Weisburd, D. (eds) (1995), Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 4, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (1987), ‘Crime prevention in England: Themes and issues’, in Challinger, D. (ed.), Preventing Property Crime, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (1994), ‘Proximal circumstances: A mechanism-based classification of crime prevention’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 2, pp. 185–232.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2000), ‘The conjunction of criminal opportunity: A tool for clear, joined up thinking about community safety and crime reduction’, in Ballintyne, S., Pease, K. & McLaren, V. (eds), Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety, Institute of Public Policy Research, London, pp. 30–66.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2001), ‘The conjunction of criminal opportunity: A framework for crime reduction toolkits’, available at the UK Crime Reduction website <www.crimereduction.gov.uk> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Ekblom, P. (2002a), ‘From the source to the mainstream is uphill: The challenge of transferring knowledge of crime prevention through replication, innovation and anticipation’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 13, pp. 131–203.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2002b), ‘Towards a European knowledge base’, European Crime Prevention Network Conference 7–8 October 2002, Denmark, vol. 1, Danish Crime Prevention Council, Glostrup, pp. 62–97.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2003), 5Is Introduction and Illustrative Guide, Home Office UK <www.crimereduction.gov.uk/learningzone/5isintro.htm> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Farrell, G. & Roman, J. (2006), ‘Crime as pollution: Proposal for market-based incentives to reduce crime externalities’, in Moss, K. & Stephens, M. (eds), Crime Reduction and the Law, Routledge, London, pp. 135–55.Google Scholar
Farrell, G., Bowers, K. J. & Johnson, S. D. (2005), ‘Cost-benefit analysis for crime science: Making cost-benefit analysis useful through a portfolio of outcomes’, in Smith, M. J. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 56–81.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1995), ‘The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 36, pp. 929–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrington, D. P. (2000), ‘Explaining and preventing crime: The globalization of knowledge’, Criminology, vol. 38, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P. & Welsh, B. C. (2003), ‘Family-based prevention of offending: A meta-analysis’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 36, pp. 127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feins, J. D., Epstein, J. C. & Widom, R. (1997), Solving Crime Problems in Residential Neighbourhoods. Comprehensive Changes in Design, Management and Use, National Institute of Justice Issues and Practices, US Department of Justice, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Felson, M. (1995), ‘Those who discourage crime’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 4, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
Felson, M. (2002), Crime and Everyday Life, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Felson, M. (2006), Crime and Nature, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. (1997), ‘Youth, crime and cultural space’, Social Justice, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. (2005), ‘“Working together”: Neighbourhood Watch, reassurance policing and the potential of partnerships’, Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 303, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Forrester, L. (1993), ‘Youth-generated cultures in western Sydney’, in White, R. (ed.), Youth Subcultures: Theory, History and the Australian Experience, National Clearinghouse for Youth Studies, Hobart.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991), ‘Governmentality’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. & Miller, P. (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in governmentality with two lectures by, and an interview with, Michel Foucault, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, A. & Homel, R. (2006), ‘Societal access routes and developmental pathways: Putting social structure and young people's voice into the analysis of pathways into and out of crime’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, A. & Homel, R. (2007), Pathways and Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Practice, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Freiberg, A. (2001), ‘Affective versus effective justice: Instrumentalism and emotionalism in criminal justice’, Punishment and Society, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 256–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiberg, K., Homel, R. & Lamb, C. (2007), ‘The pervasive impact of poverty on children: Tackling family adversity and promoting child development through the Pathways to Prevention Project’, in France, A. & Homel, R. (eds), Pathways and Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Practice, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 226–46.Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2004), Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gabor, T. (1990), ‘Crime displacement and situational crime prevention: Toward the development of some principles’, Canadian Journal of Criminology, vol. 32, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (1996), ‘The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (1999), ‘The common place and the catastrophic: Interpretations of crime in late modernity’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 353–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (2000) ‘Ideas, institutions and situational crime prevention’, in Hirsch, A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2001), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gastman, R., Rowland, D. & Sattler, T. (2006), Freight Train Graffiti, Thames & Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Geason, S. & Wilson, P. (1990), Preventing Graffiti and Vandalism, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
George, A. L. & Bennett, A. (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Gilling, D. (1996), ‘Problems with the problem orientated approach’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 5, pp. 7–23.Google Scholar
Gilling, D. (1997), Crime Prevention: Theory, Policies and Politics, UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
Gilling, D. & Hughes, G. (2002), ‘The community safety profession: Towards a new expertise in the governance of crime, disorder and safety in the UK?’, Community Safety Journal, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 4–12.Google Scholar
Glenorchy City Council (2003), Face the Challenge, Take the Risk, Enjoy the Ride: A Local Government Guide to Youth Participation, Tasmania Department of Education, Tasmania Office of Youth Affairs, Glenorchy City, Hobart.
Goldblatt, P. & Lewis, C. (1998), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study No. 187, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Goodnow, J. J. (2006), ‘Adding social contexts to developmental analysis of crime prevention’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 327–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. (2000), ‘Criminal business organizations, street gangs and “wanna-be” groups: A Vancouver perspective’, Canadian Journal of Criminology, January, pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. & Hirschi, T. (1990), A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Grabosky, P. & James, M. (eds) (1995), The Promise of Crime Prevention: Leading Crime Prevention Programs, Canberra, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Graham, J. & Bennett, T. (1995), Crime Prevention Strategies in Europe and North America, European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Grant, F. & Grabosky, P. (eds) (2000), The Promise of Crime Prevention: Leading Crime Prevention Programs, 2nd edn, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Gray, D., Shaw, G., d'Abbs, P., Brooks, D., Stearne, A., Mosey, A. & Spooner, C. (2006), Policing, Volatile Substance Misuse, and Indigenous Australians, National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund, Monograph Series No. 16, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1996), Policing Places with Drug Problems, Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Guerette, R. T. (2005), Migrant death and the border safety initiative: An application of situational crime prevention to inform policy and practice, Dissertation, Rutgers State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
Haggerty, K. D. (2007), ‘Book review: The novelty of crime science’, Policing and Society, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 83–8.Google Scholar
Halsey, M. (2001), ‘An aesthetic of prevention’, Criminal Justice, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, M. & Young, A. (2002), ‘The meanings of graffiti and municipal administration’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, M. & Young, A. (2006), “‘Our desires are ungovernable”: Writing graffiti in urban space’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton-Smith, N. (2002), ‘Anticipating consequences: Developing a strategy for the targeted measurement of displacement and diffusion of benefits’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Evaluation for Crime Prevention: Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 14, Criminal Justice Press, New York/ Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 11–52.Google Scholar
Hanmer, J., Griffiths, S. & Jerwood, D. (1999), Arresting Evidence: Domestic Violence and Repeat Victimisation, Police Research Series Paper 104, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968), ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science, vol. 162, no. 3859, pp. 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Hauber, A., Hofstra, B., Toornvliet, L. & Zandbergen, A. (1996), ‘Some new forms of functional social control in the Netherlands and their effects’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. (1999), ‘Preventing crime and violence through communities that care’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 7, pp. 443–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W. & Catalano, R. F. (1995), ‘Preventing substance abuse’, in Tonry, M. & Farrington, D. F. (eds), Building A Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 343–427.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. & Catalano, R. F. (1992), Communities that Care: Action for Drug Abuse Prevention, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. & Catalano, R. F. et al. (1999), ‘Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviours by strengthening protection during childhood’, Archives of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 226–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F. & Arthur, M. (2002), ‘Promoting science-based prevention in communities’, Addictive Behaviors, vol. 90, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. (2002), ‘The vilification and pleasures of youthful transgression’, in Muncie, J., Hughes, G. & McLaughlin, E. (eds), Youth Justice: Critical Readings, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
Healey, K. (ed.) (1996), Youth Gangs, Spinney Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hedderman, C. & Williams, C. (2001), Making Partnerships Work: Emerging Findings from the Reducing Burglary Initiative, Home Office Briefing Note 1/01, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.Google Scholar
Henderson, M., Henderson, P. & Associates Pty Ltd (2001), Preventing Repeat Residential Burglary, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hesseling, R. B. P. (1994), ‘Displacement: A review of the empirical literature’, in Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, vol. 3, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 197–230.Google Scholar
Heywood, P. & Crane, P. with Egginton, A. & Gleeson, J. (1997), Young People in Major Centres: A Policy Investigation and Development Project for Brisbane City Council – Draft 1: Planning & Management Guidelines, Brisbane City Council.Google Scholar
Heywood, P. & Crane, P. with Egginton, A. & Gleeson, J. (1998), Out and About: In or Out? Better Outcomes from Young People's Use of Public and Community Space in the City of Brisbane – Vol. 2: Policies, Implementation Strategies and Tools, Community Development Team West, Brisbane City Council.Google Scholar
Hil, R. (1999), ‘Beating the developmental path: Critical notes on the pathways to prevention report’, Youth Studies Australia, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 49–50.Google Scholar
Hill, I. & Pease, K. (2002) ‘The wicked issues: Displacement and sustainability’, in Ballintyne, S., Pease, K., & McLaren, V. (eds), Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety, Institute of Public Policy Research, London, pp. 131–41.Google Scholar
Hirsch, V. A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds) (2000), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoefnagels, P. (1997), The Prevention Pioneers: History of the Hein Roethof Prize 1987–1996, Ministry of Justice, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hofstra, B. & Shapland, J. (1997), ‘Who is in control?’, Policing and Society, vol. 6, pp. 265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homel, P. (2004), ‘The whole of government approach to crime prevention’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 287, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Homel, P. (2005), ‘A short history of crime prevention in Australia’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 355–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homel, P. (2006), ‘Joining up the pieces: What central agencies need to do to support effective local crime prevention’, in Knutsson, J. & Clarke, R. V. (eds), ‘Putting theory to work: Implementing situational crime prevention and problem-oriented policing’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 20, Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp. 111–38.Google Scholar
Homel, P., Nutley, S., Webb, B. & Tilley, N. (2004), Investing to Deliver: Reviewing the Implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Programme, Home Office Research Study 281, London.Google Scholar
Homel, P., Nutley, S., Tilley, N. & Webb, B. (2005), Making it Happen from the Centre: Managing for the Regional Delivery of Local Crime Reductions Outcomes, Home Office Online Report 54/04, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Homel, R. (2005a), ‘Developmental crime prevention’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 71–106.Google Scholar
Homel, R. (2005b), ‘Moving developmental prevention from “Success in miniature” to mainstream practice that improves outcomes: Can it be done?’, Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology conference, Delivering Crime Prevention: Making the Evidence Work, Sydney, 21–22 November 2005.Google Scholar
Homel, R. et al. (1999), Pathways to Prevention: Developmental and Early Intervention Approaches to Crime, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Homel, R., Freiberg, K., Lamb, C., Leech, M., Batchelor, S., Carr, A., Hay, I., Teague, R. & Elias, G. (2006a), ‘The Pathways to Prevention Project: Doing developmental prevention in a disadvantaged community’, Australian Institute of Criminology Trends and Issues paper 323, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, at <www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi2/tandi323t.html> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Homel, R., Freiberg, K., Lamb, C., Leech, M., Hampshire, A., Hay, I., Elias, G., Carr, A., Manning, M., Teague, R. & Batchelor, S. (2006b), The Pathways to Prevention Project: The First Five Years, 1999–2004, Griffith University and Mission Australia, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (2001), ‘Community crime prevention in Britain: A strategic overview’, Criminal Justice, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. (2003), ‘The reducing burglary initiative and how scientific crime prevention got it wrong’, Paper presented at the 17th Annual Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology Conference, Controlling Crime Risks and Responsibilities, 1–3 October, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (2004), ‘Pretend it works: Evidence and governance in the evaluation of the reducing burglary initiative’, Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. (2005), Sustainability in Crime Prevention: A Nautical Tale, Address to the 10th Anniversary Colloquium of the International Centre for the Prevention of Crime, Paris, 1–2 December 2004, copy obtained from the author.Google Scholar
Hope, T. & Karstedt, S. (2003), ‘Towards a new social prevention’, in Kury, H. & Obergfell-Fuchs, J. (eds), Crime Prevention: New Approaches, Mainzer Schriften zur Situation von Kriminalitaetsopfern, Weisser Ring, Mainz, pp. 461–89.Google Scholar
Hope, T. & Murphy, D. J. I. (1983), ‘Problems of implementing crime prevention: The experience of a demonstration project’, Howard Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. & Shaw, M. (eds) (1988), Communities and Crime Reduction, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Hope, T. & Sparks, R. (2000), ‘For a sociological theory of situations (or how useful is pragmatic criminology?)’, in Hirsch, A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 175–91.Google Scholar
Hough, M. (2004), ‘Modernization, scientific rationalism and the crime reduction programme’, Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, M. (2006), ‘Not seeing the wood for the trees: Mistaking tactics for strategy in crime reduction initiatives’, in Knutsson, J. & Clarke, R. V. (eds), ‘Putting theory to work: Implementing situational crime prevention and problem-oriented policing’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 20, Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp. 139–62.Google Scholar
Hough, M. & Tilley, N. (1998), Auditing Crime and Disorder: Guidance for Local Partnerships, Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 91, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Howell, J. (2000), Youth Gang Programs and Strategies: Summary, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. (1998), Understanding Crime Prevention: Social Control, Risk and Late Modernity, Open University Press, Buckingham.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2002a), ‘Crime and disorder reduction partnerships: The future of community safety’, in Hughes, G., McLaughlin, E. & Muncie, J. (eds), Crime Prevention and Community Safety: New Directions, Sage Publications in association with Open University Press, London, pp. 123–42.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2002b), ‘Plotting the rise of community safety: Critical reflections on research, theory and politics’, in Hughes, G. & Edwards, A. (eds), Crime Control and Community: The New Politics of Public Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 20–45.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2004), ‘Straddling adaptation and denial: Crime and disorder reduction partnerships in England and Wales’, Cambrian Law Review, vol. 35, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2007), The Politics of Crime and Community, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. & Edwards, A. (2001), ‘Defining community safety expertise’, Crime Justice Matters, no. 45, Autumn, pp. 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. & Gilling, D. (2004), ‘Mission impossible? The habitus of the community safety manager and the new expertise in local partnership governance of crime and safety’, Criminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International CPTED Association <www.cpted.net/default.html> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Irving, C. (1993), Wide-body: The Triumph of the 747, W. Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
Iveson, K. (2000), ‘Beyond designer diversity: Planners, public space and a critical politics of difference’, Urban Policy and Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1961), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Sage Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. & Lindblad, T. B. (eds) (2003), Overground: 9 Scandinavian Graffiti Writers, Dokument Forlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science <www.jdi.ucl.ac.uk/> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Jordan, B. (1996), A Theory of Poverty and Social Exclusion, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1988), The Seductions of Crime, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
King, M. (1988), How to Make Crime Prevention Work: The French Experience, NACRO, London.Google Scholar
Klein, M. W. (1995), The American Street Gang, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Klein, M. W. (2002), ‘Street gangs: A cross-national perspective’, in Huff, R. (ed.), Gangs in America, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Klein, M., Kerner, H.-J., Maxon, C. & Weitekamp, E. (eds) (2001), The Eurogang Paradox: Street Gangs and Youth Groups in the U.S. and Europe, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsson, J. (ed.) (2003), ‘Problem oriented policing: From innovation to mainstream’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 15, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York.Google Scholar
Koch, B. C. M. (1998), The Politics of Crime Prevention, Ashgate, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Laub, J. H. (2004), ‘The life course of criminology in the United States’, Criminology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S. & Sampson, R. J. (1998), ‘Trajectories of change in criminal offending: good marriage and the desistance process’, American Sociological Review, vol. 63, pp. 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, G. (2001), Scientist or Politicians: Who has the Answer to Crime?, Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, School of Public Policy, University College London, <www.jdi.ucl.ac.uk> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Laycock, G. (2002), ‘Methodological issues in working with policy advisors and practitioners’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Analysis for Crime Prevention, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 13, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 205–37.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. (2005a), ‘Defining Crime Science’, in Smith, M. J. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. (2005b), ‘Deciding what to do’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 674–98.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. (2006), ‘Implementing crime reduction measures: Conflicts and tensions’, in Knutsson, J. & Clarke, R. V. (eds), Putting Theory to Work: Implementing Situational Crime Prevention and Problem-oriented Policing, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 20, Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. & Webb, B. (2003), ‘Conclusions: The role of the centre’, in Bullock, K. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Reduction and Problem-oriented Policing, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 285–301.Google Scholar
Lee, M. (2006), ‘Public dissent and governmental neglect: Isolating and excluding Macquarie Fields’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32–50.Google Scholar
Lee, M. & Herborn, P. (2003), ‘The role of place management in crime prevention: Some reflections on governmentality and government strategies’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–39.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Farrington, D., Stouthamer-Loeber, M. et al. (2003), ‘The development of male offending: Key findings from fourteen years of the Pittsburgh Youth Study’, in Thornberry, T. P. & Krohn, M. (eds), Taking Stock of Delinquency: An Overview of Findings from Contemporary Longitudinal Studies, Kluwer, New York, pp. 93–130.Google Scholar
Low, S. (2003), Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Lum, C. & Yang, S. N. (2005), ‘Why do researchers in crime and justice choose non-experimental methods’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 1, pp. 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madjulla Incorporated (2004), A Report of the Derby/West Kimberely Project: Working with Adolescents to Prevention Domestic Violence, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.
Maguire, M. (2004), ‘The crime reduction programme in England and Wales: Reflections on the vision and the reality’, Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 213–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, K. (1999), ‘Growing up in cities as a model of participatory planning and “place-making” with young people’, Youth Studies Australia, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
Malone, K. & Hasluck, L. (2002), ‘Australian youth: Aliens in a suburban environment’, in Chawla, L. (ed.), Growing Up in an Urbanising World, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
Matassa, M. & Newburn, T. (2003), ‘Problem-oriented evaluation: Evaluating problem oriented policing initiatives’, in Bulluck, K. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Reduction and Problem Oriented Policing, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 183–216.Google Scholar
Mawby, R. (1977), ‘Defensible space: A theoretical and empirical appraisal’, Urban Studies, vol. 14, pp. 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, P. (1979), ‘Defensible space: The current status of crime prevention theory’, Howard Journal, vol. 18, pp. 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Price, J. & Roehl, J. (2000), ‘Civil remedies and drug control’, Evaluation Review, vol. 24, pp. 212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Soole, D. & Rombouts, S. (2006), ‘Street-level drug law enforcement: A meta-analytical review’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 409–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCamley, P. (2002), ‘Minimising subjectivity: A new risk assessment model for CPTED’, CPTED Journal: The Journal of International Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Association, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
McCord, J. (2003), ‘Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 587, no. 1, pp. 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCord, N. & McCord, J. (1959), Origins of Crime: A New Evaluation of the Cambridge-Somerville Study, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
McDonald, K. (1999), Struggles for Subjectivity: Identity, Action and Youth Experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, E. (2002) ‘Same beds, different dreams: Postmodern reflections on crime prevention and community safety’, in Hughes, G. & Edwards, A. (eds), Crime Control and Community: The New Politics of Public Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, E., Muncie, J. & Hughes, G. (2001), ‘The permanent revolution: New labour, new public management and the modernization of criminal justice’, Criminal Justice: International Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memmott, P., Stacy, R., Chambers, C. & Keys, C. (2001), Violence in Indigenous Communities, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. (1981), ‘Defensible space undefended: Social factors in crime prevention through environmental design’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1938), ‘Social structure and anomie’, American Sociological Review, vol. 3, pp. 672–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. (2001), The Politics of Community Crime Prevention: Implementing Operation Weed and Seed in Seattle, Ashgate, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
Minnery, J. & Lim, B. (2005), ‘Measuring crime prevention through environmental design’, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 330–41.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. (1993), ‘Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy’, Psychological Review, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. (1991), Safer Communities: The Local Delivery of Crime Prevention Through the Partnership Approach, Standing Conference on Crime Prevention, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Moss, K. & Pease, K. (2004), ‘Data sharing in crime prevention: How and why’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, D. S. (2001), ‘Measuring the economic benefits of developmental prevention programs’, in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 28, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 347–84.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., Piquero, A. P., Scott, E. S. & Steinberg, L. (2006), ‘Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 627–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council (2005), ‘Target thefts impacted by immobilizers’, Theft Matters Bulletin, October 2005, National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council, Melbourne, at <www.carsafe.com.au> (accessed 27 February 2008).
National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council (2006), Annual Report: The Benefits of Theft-Reform, National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council, Melbourne, at <www.carsafe.com.au> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Netherlands Ministry of Justice (1985), Society and Crime: A Policy Plan for The Netherlands, Ministry of Justice, The Hague.
New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs & Planning (1999), Urban Design Guidelines with Young People in Mind, Department of Urban Affairs & Planning, Sydney.
New South Wales Police Service (2001), Safer by Design: Evaluation Document One, NSW Police Service <www.police.nsw.gov.au/community_issues>(accessed 27 February 2008).
New South Wales Shopping Centre Protocol Project (2005), Creating the Dialogue: A Guide to Developing a Local Youth Shopping Centre Protocol, New South Wales Attorney General's Crime Prevention Division, Sydney.
New Zealand Crime Prevention Unit (1994), The New Zealand Crime Prevention Strategy. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Parliament Buildings, Wellington NZ Crime Prevention Unit.
New Zealand Ministry of Justice (2003), Review of the Safer Community Council Network: Future Directions, Wellington, New Zealand.
New Zealand Ministry of Justice (2005), National Guidelines for Crime Prevention through Environmental Design in New Zealand, Part 2 Implementation Guide, at <www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/2005/cpted-part-2/index.html> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Newman, O. (1972), Defensible Space: People and Design in the Violent City, Architectural Press, London.Google Scholar
Newman, O. (1975), ‘Reactions to the “Defensible Space” Study and some further readings’, International Journal of Mental Health, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, O. (1996), Creating Defensible Space, US Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Nutley, S. & Homel, P. (2006), ‘Delivering evidence-based policy and practice: Lessons from the implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Program’, Evidence and Evaluation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
O'Malley, P. (1992), ‘Risk power and crime prevention’, Economy and Society, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 252–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, P. (1994), ‘Neo-liberal crime control – political agendas and the future of crime prevention in Australia’, in Chappell, D. & Wilson, P. (eds), The Australian Criminal Justice System: The Mid 1990s, Butterworths, Sydney, pp. 283–98.Google Scholar
O'Malley, P. & Sutton, A. (eds), (1997), Crime Prevention in Australia: Issues in Policy & Research, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Olds, D., Henderson, C., Cole, R., Eckenrode, J., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D., Pettitt, L., Sidora, K., Morris, P. & Powers, J. (1998), ‘Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children's criminal and anti-social behaviour: 15-year follow up of a randomized controlled trial’, Journal of the American Medical Association, October, vol. 14, pp. 1238–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olds, D., Henderson, C., Kitzman, H., Eckenrode, J., Cole, R. & Tatelbaum, R. (1999), ‘Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses: Recent findings’, The Future of Children, Home Visiting: Recent Program Evaluations, vol. 9, no. 1, Summer/Spring.Google ScholarPubMed
Olweus, D. (1993), Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do, Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Painter, K. (1992), ‘Different worlds: The spatial, temporal and social dimensions of female victimization’, in Evans, D., Fyfe, N. & Herbert, D. (eds), Crime, Policing and Place: Essays in Environmental Criminology, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Painter, K. & Farrington, D. P. (1997), ‘The crime reducing effect of improved street lighting: The Dudley Project’, in Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, Harrow & Hestor, New York.Google Scholar
Paneth, N. (2004), ‘Assessing the contributions of John Snow to epidemiology: 150 years after removal of the Broad Street pump handle’, Epidemiology, vol. 15, no. 5, September, pp. 514–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panton, S. (1998), The Local Crime Prevention Committee Program, Evaluation Report, Crime Prevention Unit, Attorney General's Department, South Australia.Google Scholar
Pappas, C. (2001), U.S. Gangs: Their Changing History and Contemporary Solutions. Youth Advocate Program International Resource Paper, Youth Advocate Program International, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Parmar, A. & Sampson, A. (2006), ‘Evaluating domestic violence initiatives’, British Journal of Criminology, Advance Access published on 14 December 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parramatta Local Government Area (2001), Draft Community Safety and Crime Prevention Plan 2001–2004, Parramatta City Council, New South Wales.
Pavlich, G. (1999), ‘Preventing crime: “Social” versus “community” governance in Aotearoa/New Zealand’, in Smandych, R. (ed.), Governable Places: Readings on Governmentality and Crime Control, Ashgate, Dartmouth, pp. 103–31.Google Scholar
Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997), Realistic Evaluation, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Pawson, R. (2002), ‘Evidence-based policy: In search of a method’, Evaluation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, R. (2003), ‘Nothing as practical as a good theory’, Evaluation, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, R. (2006), Evidence-based Policy: A Realistic Perspective, Sage Publications, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, K. (2001), ‘Distributive justice and crime’, European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 413–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrosino, A. & Farrington, D. (2001), ‘The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 578, no. 1, pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
Petrosino, A. & Soydan, H. (2005), ‘The impact of program developers as evaluators on criminal recidivism: Results from meta-analysis of experimental and quasi-experimental research’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 1, pp. 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrosino, A., Petrosino, C. T & Buehler, J. (2003), ‘“Scared Straight” and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency’ (Updated C2 Review), in The Campbell Collaboration Reviews of Intervention and Policy Evaluations (C2-RIPE), November, 2003, Campbell Collaboration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Polk, K. (1997), ‘A community and youth development approach to youth crime prevention’, in O'Malley, P. & Sutton, A. (eds), Crime Prevention in Australia: Issues in Policy & Research, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Posavac, E. J. & Carey, R. C. (1997), Program Evaluation: Methods and Case Studies, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Poyner, B. (1983), Design Against Crime: Beyond Defensible Space, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Poyner, B. (2006), Crime Free Housing in the 21st Century, UCI Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London.Google Scholar
Presdee, M. (2000), Cultural Criminology and the Carnival of Crime, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presdee, M. & Walters, R. (1998), ‘The perils and politics of criminological research and the threat to academic freedom’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 10 no. 2, pp. 156–67.Google Scholar
Putt, A. D. & Springer, J. F. (1998), Policy Research: Concepts, Methods and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Quah, J. (1992), ‘Crime prevention Singapore style’, Asian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 149–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queensland Police Service (2006), Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: An Introduction to CPTEWD Guidelines for Queensland, Queensland Police Service in partnership with the Queensland Department of Communities and Department of Local Government, Planning, Sport and Recreation.
Rigby, K. (2002), A Meta-evaluation of Methods and Approaches to Reduce Bullying in Pre-Schools and Early Primary School in Australia, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1992), ‘Public opinion, crime and criminal justice’, in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 16, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 99–180.Google Scholar
Robinson, C. (2000), ‘Creating space, creating self: Street-frequenting youth in the city and suburbs’, Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 429–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. (1987), ‘The theory and research behind Neighbourhood Watch: Is it a sound fear and crime reduction strategy?’, Crime & Delinquency, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 103–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (1991), National Report (vol. 1, by Commissioner Elliott Johnston), Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Salvadori, I. (1997), ‘A dragon in the neighbourhood: City planning with children in Milan, Italy’, Social Justice, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 192–202.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. (1997), ‘Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy’, Science, vol. 277, no. 5328, pp. 918–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. & Laub, J. (2003), ‘Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70’, Criminology, 41(3), pp. 555–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandercock, L. (1983), ‘Who gets what out of public participation?’, in Sandercock, L. & Berry, M. (eds), Urban Political Economy: The Australian Case, George Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Sandercock, L. (1997), ‘From main street to fortress: The future of malls as public spaces – OR – “shut up and shop”’, Just Policy, no. 9, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Sansfacon, D. & Waller, I. (2001), ‘Recent evolution of governmental crime prevention strategies and implications for evaluation and economic analysis’, in Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. and Sherman, L. W. (eds), Costs and Benefits of Preventing Crime, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 225–47.Google Scholar
Sarre, R. and Prenzler, T. (2005), The Law of Private Security in Australia, Thomson/LBC, Pyrmont, NSW.
Saville, G. & Cleveland, G. (1997), 2nd Generation CPTED: An Antidote to the Social Y2K Virus of Urban Design, Paper presented at the 2nd Annual International CPTED Conference, Orlando, Florida, 3–5 December.
Saville, G. & Cleveland, G. (2003a), ‘An introduction to 2nd generation CPTED: Part 1’, CPTED Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 1, March, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Saville, G. & Cleveland, G. (2003b), ‘An introduction to 2nd generation CPTED: Part 2’, CPTED Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 2, June, pp. 4–8.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. H. & Kitchen, T. (2002), Planning for Crime Prevention: A Transatlantic Perspective, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V. & Weikart, D. P. (1993), Significant Benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through Age 27, Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 10, High/Scope Press, Ypsilanti.
Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R. & Nores, M. (2005), Lifetime Effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through Age 40, Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 14, High/Scope Press, Ypsilanti.
Shaftoe, H. & Read, T. (2005), ‘Planning out crime: The appliance of science or an act of faith’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 245–65.Google Scholar
Shapland, J. (2000), ‘Situational prevention: Social values and social viewpoints’, in Hirsch, A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 113–24.Google Scholar
Shaw, G., Biven, A., Gray, D., Mosey, A., Stearne, A. & Perry, J. (2004), An Evaluation of the Comgas Scheme: They Sniffed it and They Sniffed it – but it Just Wasn't There, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.Google Scholar
Shearing, C. & Stenning, P. (1992), ‘From the Panopticon to Disneyworld: The development of discipline’, in R. Clarke (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, Harrow and Heston, New York.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (2006), ‘To develop and test: the inventive difference between evaluation and experimentation’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W. & Strang, H. (2004), ‘“Verdicts of interventions”? Interpreting results from randomised controlled experiments in criminology’, American Behavioural Scientist, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 575–607.CrossRef
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (2002), Evidence Based Crime Prevention, Routledge, London & New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P. & Bushway, S. (1997), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006), ‘Preventing crime’, in Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (eds), Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, rev. edn, Routledge, London & New York.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (2000), Crime Prevention: The Singapore Approach, Resource Material Series No. 56, Tokyo, UNAFEI.
Skogan, W. G. (1988), ‘Community organisations and crime’, in Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 39–78.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (1990), Disorder and Decline, University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1996), Crime Prevention through Environmental Design in Parking Facilities, National Institute of Justice, Research in Brief, April 1996, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Smith, M. J. & Tilley, N. (eds) (2005), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
South Australia Department of Planning and Urban Transport (2004), Designing Out Crime: Design Solutions for Safer Neighbourhoods, South Australia Department of Planning and Urban Transport, Adelaide.
South Australian Attorney-General's Department (1989), Confronting Crime: The South Australian Crime Prevention Strategy, Attorney-General's Department, Adelaide.
South Australian Crime Prevention Unit (2007), ‘Crime Prevention and Community Safety Grants Program: Guidelines 2007’, Attorney-General's Department, Adelaide <www.cpu.sa.gov.au> (accessed on 6 June 2007).
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. & Dillon, L. (2003), Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence, National Centre for Social Research, Cabinet Office, London.Google Scholar
Stenson, K. (2005), ‘Sovereignty, biopolitics and the local government of crime in Britain’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 265–87.CrossRef
Sutton, A. (1991), ‘The Bonnemaison Model: Theory and application’, in Halstead, B. (ed.), Youth Crime Prevention: Proceedings of a Policy Forum Held 28th & 29th August 1990, Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (1994a), ‘Community crime prevention: A national perspective’, in Chappell, D. & Wilson, P. (eds), The Australian Criminal Justice System: The Mid 1990s, Butterworths, Australia, pp. 213–34.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (1994b), ‘Crime prevention: Promise or threat?’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 27, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, A. (1996), ‘Taking out the interesting bits? Problem solving and crime prevention’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 5, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (1997), ‘Crime prevention: Policy dilemmas – A personal account’, in O'Malley, P. & Sutton, A. (eds), Crime Prevention in Australia: Issues in Policy and Research, Federation Press, Sydney, pp. 12–37.Google Scholar
Sutton A. (2000a), ‘Crime prevention: A viable alternative to the justice system?’, in Chappell, D. & Wilson, P. (eds), Crime and the Criminal Justice System in Australia: 2000 and Beyond, Butterworths, Australia, pp. 316–31.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (2000b), ‘Drugs and dangerousness: Perception and management of risk in the neo-liberal era’, in Brown, M. & Pratt, J. (eds), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order, Routledge, London, pp. 165–80.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. & Cherney, A. (2002), ‘Prevention without politics: The cyclical progress of crime prevention in an Australian state’, Criminal Justice: International Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 325–44.
Sutton, A. & Cherney, A. (2003), ‘Crime prevention and community safety: Some grass roots perspectives’, Paper presented at the Crime Prevention Victoria Conference, Crime Prevention for a Safer Victoria: A Consultative Symposium, 29–30 September 2003, Carlton Crest, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. & Wilson, D. (2004), ‘Open-street CCTV in Australia: The politics of resistance and expansion’, Surveillance and Society, vol. 2, nos 2/3, pp. 310–22, at <www.surveillance-and-society.org/cctv.htm> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Taylor, R. & Gottfredson, S. (1986), ‘Environmental design, crime and prevention: An examination of community dynamics’, in Reiss, A. & Tonry, M. (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 8, pp. 387–416, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tierney, J. P., Grossman, J. B. & Resch, N. L. (1995), Making a Difference: An Impact Evaluation of Big Brothers, Big Sisters, Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2001), ‘Evaluation and evidence led crime reduction policy and practice’, in Matthews, R. & Pitts, J. (eds), Crime Disorder and Community Safety, Routledge, London, pp. 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, N. (2002), ‘The rediscovery of learning: Crime prevention and scientific realism’, in Hughes, G. & Edwards, A. (eds), Crime Control and Community: The New Politics of Public Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 63–85.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2004a), ‘Karl Popper: A philosopher for Ronald Clarke's situational crime prevention’, Israel Studies in Criminology: Tradition and Innovation in Crime and Criminal Justice, vol. 8, de Sitter Publications, Canada.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2004b), ‘Applying theory-driven evaluation to the British Crime Reduction Programme: The theories of the programme and its evaluation’, Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, N. (2005), ‘Driving down crime at motorway service areas’, in Smith, M. J. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 104–25.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2006), ‘Knowing and doing: Guidance and good practice in crime prevention’, in Knutsson, J. & Clarke, R. V. (eds), Putting Theory to Work: Implementing Situational Crime Prevention and Problem-oriented Policing, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 20, Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp. 217–52.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. & Laycock, G. (2000), ‘Joining up research, policy and practice about crime’, Policy Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 214–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, M. & Farrington, D. P. (1995), ‘Strategic approaches to crime prevention’, in Tonry, M. & Farrington, D. P. (eds), Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Toumbourou, J. W. (1999), ‘Implementing communities that care in Australia: A community mobilisation approach to crime prevention’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, Australian Institute of Criminology, July at <www.aic.gov.au> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Tremblay, R. & Craig, W. (1995), ‘Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention’, Crime and Justice, vol. 19, pp. 151–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trench, S., Tanner, O. & Tiesdell, S. (1992), ‘Safer cities for women: Perceived risks and planning measures’, Town Planning Review, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloch, J., Lupton, D., Blood, W., Tulloch, M., Jennett, C. & Enders, M. (1998a), Fear of Crime: Audit of the Literature and Programs, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.
Tulloch, J., Lupton, D., Blood, W., Tulloch, M., Jennett, C. & Enders, M. (1998b), Fear of Crime: The Fieldwork Research, National Campaign Against Violence and Crime, Canberra.Google Scholar
United Kingdom National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal (2000), Report of Policy Action Team 8: Anti-social Behaviour, Home Office, London.
United States Bureau of Justice Assistance (1997), Addressing Community Gang Problems: A Model for Problem Solving, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice, Washington DC.
United States Bureau of Justice Assistance (1998), Addressing Community Gang Problems: A Practical Guide, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice, Washington DC.
Andel, H. (1988), Crime Prevention that Works: The Care of Public Transport in the Netherlands, Ministry of Justice Research and Documentation Centre, The Hague.Google Scholar
van Andel, H. (1992), ‘The care of public transport in the Netherlands’, in Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, Harrow & Heston, New York, pp. 151–63.Google Scholar
Bunt, H. G. & Schoot, C. R. A. (2003), Prevention of Organised Crime: A Situational Approach, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Dijk, J. (1995), ‘In search of synergy: Coalition-building against crime in the Netherlands’, Security Journal, vol. 6, pp. 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, J. & Waard, J. (1991), ‘A two dimensional typology of crime prevention projects: With a bibliography’, Criminal Justice Abstracts, vol. 23, pp. 483–503.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, J. J. M. & Junger-Tas, J. (1988), ‘Trends in crime prevention in The Netherlands’, in Hope, T. & Shaw, M. (eds), Communities and Crime Reduction, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
van Swaaningen, R. (2002), ‘Towards a replacement discourse on community safety: Lessons from The Netherlands’, in Hughes, G., McLaughlin, E. & Muncie, J. (eds), Crime Prevention and Community Safety: New Directions, Sage Publications in association with Open University Press, London, pp. 260–78.Google Scholar
Vinson, T. (2004), Community Adversity and Resilience: The distribution of social disadvantage in Victoria and New South Wales and the mediating role of social cohesion, The Ignatius Centre for Social Policy and Research, Jesuit Social Services, Richmond, Victoria.Google Scholar
Vinson, T. & Baldry, E. (1999), ‘The spatial clustering of child maltreatment: Are micro-social environments involved?’, Paper presented at the Children and Crime: Victims and Offenders Conference, Australian Institute of Criminology, Brisbane, 17–18 June 1999.
Vinson, T. & Homel, R. (1975), Indicators of Community Well-Being, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds) (2000), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
WA Office of Crime Prevention <www.crimeprevention.wa.gov.au> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Walker, J. & McDonald, D. (1995), ‘The over-representation of Indigenous people in custody in Australia’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 47, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Walker, L. (1998), ‘Chivalrous masculinity among juvenile offenders in Western Sydney: A new perspective on working class men and crime’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 279–93.Google Scholar
Walker, L., Butland, D. & Connell, R. (2000), ‘Boys on the road: Masculinities, car culture and road safety education’, Journal of Men's Studies, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, I. (1988), Current Trends in European Crime Prevention including France, England and the Netherlands: Towards National Commitment, Local Inter-agency Involvement and Support of Effective Crime Prevention, Department of Justice, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Walmsley, R. (2003), World Prison Population List, 4th edn, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.Google Scholar
Walters, R. (2003), Deviant Knowledge: Criminology, Politics and Policy, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, D. (2002), ‘Law and order blues’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherburn, D. (2004), Law and Order in Australia: Rhetoric and Reality, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, D. & Lind, B. (1998), ‘Poverty, parenting, peers and crime-prone neighbourhoods’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 85, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, D. & Lind, B. (2001), Delinquent-Prone Communities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1991), ‘Science as a vocation’, in Gerth, H. H. & Mills, C. Wright (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Weekend Australian (2007), ‘Petrol sniffing scourge defeated’, 17–18 March, pp. 1–2.
Weiss, C. H. (1995), ‘Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families’, in Connell, J. P., Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L. B. & Weiss, C. H. (eds), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Concepts, Methods and Contexts, Aspen Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (1999), ‘“Value for money”: A review of the costs and benefits of situational crime prevention’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 39, pp. 345–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2000), ‘Monetary costs and benefits of crime prevention programs’, in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 27, pp. 305–61, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2001), ‘Towards an evidence-based approach to preventing crime’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 578, no. 1, pp. 158–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2002), Crime Prevention Effects of Closed Television: A Systematic Review, Home Office Research Study 252, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2004), ‘Surveillance for crime prevention in public space: Results and policy choices in Britain and America’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 497–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2006), ‘Closed-circuit television surveillance’, in Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (eds), Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims and Places, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. P. & Sherman, L. W. (eds) (2001), Costs and Benefits of Preventing Crime, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
West, D. J. (1973), Who Becomes Delinquent?, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Western Australian Planning Commission (2006), Designing Out Crime: Planning Guidelines, Western Australian Planning Commission.
Whelan, J. (2001), The dynamics of community reputation: A case study, Sociology Honours thesis, School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania, Hobart.Google Scholar
White, R. (1990), No Space of their Own: Young People and Social Control in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
White, R. (1998), Public Spaces for Young People: A Guide to Creative Projects and Positive Strategies, Australian Youth Foundation and National Campaign Against Violence and Crime, Sydney.Google Scholar
White, R. (1999a), ‘Public spaces, social planning and crime prevention’, Urban Policy and Research, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. (1999b), Hanging Out: Negotiating Young People's Use of Public Space, National Crime Prevention, Attorney General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
White, R. (2001), ‘Graffiti, crime prevention and cultural space’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 253–68.Google Scholar
White, R. (2006a), ‘Youth gang research in Australia’, in Short, J. & Hughes, L. (eds), Studying Youth Gangs, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
White, R. (2006b), ‘Swarming and the dynamics of group violence’, Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 326, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
White, R. (2007a), Seniors in Shopping Centres: Preliminary Report of Findings, National Seniors Productive Ageing Centre, Brisbane.Google Scholar
White, R. (2007b), Anti-Gang Strategies and Interventions, ARACY Gangs Briefing Paper No. 2, Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, Perth.Google Scholar
White, R. with Aumair, M., Harris, A. & McDonnel, L. (1997), Any Which Way You Can: Youth Livelihood, Community Resources and Crime, Australian Youth Foundation, Sydney.Google Scholar
White, R. & Coventry, G. (2000), Evaluating Community Safety: A Guide, Department of Justice Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
White, R., Kosky, B. & Kosky, M. (2001), MCS Shopping Centre Project: A Youth-Friendly Approach to Shopping Centre Management, Australian Clearinghouse for Youth Studies, Hobart.Google Scholar
White, R. & Perrone, S. (2005), Crime and Social Control: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
White, R. & Sutton, A. (1995), ‘Crime prevention, urban space and social exclusion’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. & Sutton, A. (2001), ‘Social planning for mall redevelopment: An Australian case study’, Local Environments, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. & Wyn, J. (2008), Youth and Society: Exploring the Social Dynamics of Youth Experience, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wikstrom, Per-Olof. H. (2007), ‘Doing without knowing: Common pitfalls in crime prevention’, in Farrell, G., Bowers, K., Johnson, S. & Townsley, M. (eds), Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 21, pp. 59–80, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York.Google Scholar
Wikstrom, Per-Olof H. & Torstensson, M. (1999), ‘Local crime prevention and its national support: organisation and direction’, European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 7, pp. 459–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, P. (2002), ‘Criminology in the twenty-first century: Public good or private interest’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 35, no. 22, pp. 238–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, P. & Pease, K. (2000), ‘Crime prevention and community safety: Tweedledum and Tweedledee?’, in Ballintyne, S., Pease, K. & McLaren, V. (eds), Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety, Institute of Public Policy Research, London, pp. 21–9.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. (2005), The Impact of Inequality: How to Make Sick Societies Healthier, New Press, New York.Google Scholar
Willemse, H. 1994, ‘Developments in Dutch crime prevention’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 2, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sutton, A. (2003), Open Street CCTV in Australia: A Comparative Study of Establishment and Operation (Report on a Criminology Research Council Funded Project), University of Melbourne Department of Criminology, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. B. (2001), ‘Meta-analytical methods for criminology’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 578, no. 1, pp. 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. & Kelling, G. L. (1982), ‘Broken windows: The police and neighbourhood safety’, Atlantic Monthly, March, pp. 29–38.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (1982), Black Death, White Hands, George Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. & Wileman, B. (2005), ‘Developing a safe city strategy based on CPTED research: An Australian case study’, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 319–29.Google Scholar
Wolverhampton Crime & Disorder Co-ordination Group (2001), Wolverhampton Youth Safety Strategy: Building Safer Communities, Wolverhampton City Council, UK.
World Corporal Punishment Research (corpun), (2007), ‘Singapore: Judicial and prison caning’, <www.corpun.com> (accessed on 17 June 2007).
Worpole, K. & Greenhalgh, L. (1996), The Freedom of the City, Demos, London.Google Scholar
Wortley, R. (2002), Situational Prison Control: Crime Prevention in Correctional Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, B. (1996), ‘May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide’, in Lash, S. (ed.), Risk, Environment and Modernity, Sage Publications, New York, pp. 44–83.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi.Google Scholar
Young, J. (1986), ‘The failure of criminology’, in Mathews, R. and Young, J. (eds), Confronting Crime, Sage Publications, London, pp. 4–30.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (2004), Singapore: The Death Penalty – A Hidden Toll of Executions, Amnesty International website <www.amnesty.org> (accessed 17 June 2007).
Armitage, R. (2000), An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing within West Yorkshire, Home Office Briefing Note 7/00, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. (2006), ‘Mob mentality: The threat to community sustainability from the search for safety’, in Malpass, P. & Cairncross, L. (eds), Building on the Past: Visions of Housing Futures, Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 163–84.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. & Blandy, S. (2005), Housing Studies, vol. 20, no. 2 (March) (special edn on Gated Communities).
Atkinson, R. & Blandy, S. (2006), Gated Communities, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Attorney-General's Department (2007), ‘Round Four – Security Related Infrastructure’ (Media Release, May), Attorney-General's Department, Canberra <www.crimeprevention.gov.au> (accessed 7 June 2007).
Australian Institute of Criminology (2003), ‘Measuring crime prevention program costs and benefits’, AIC Crime Reduction Matters, no. 15, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
Australian Institute of Criminology <www.aic.gov.au/research/cvp/topics/cpted.html#research> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Barr, R. & Pease, K. (1990), ‘Crime placement, displacement and deflection’, in Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (eds), Crime and Justice: Re Review of the Research, vol. 12, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bell, W. (1991), ‘The role of urban design in crime prevention: Adelaide city – a case study’, Australian Planner, December. pp. 206–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. M. (2006), ‘Public opinion and juvenile justice policy: Myths and misconceptions’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 5, issue 4, pp. 653–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagg, H. & Valuri, G. (2003), An Overview of Night Patrol Services in Australia, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Blagg, H. & Valuri, G. (2004a), ‘Self-policing and community safety: The work of Aboriginal community patrols in Australia’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 205–19.Google Scholar
Blagg, H. & Valuri, G. (2004b), ‘Aboriginal community patrols in Australia: Self-policing, self-determination and security’, Policing & Society, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 313–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakely, E. & Snyder, M. (1999), Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States, Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington & Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bonnemaison, G. (1983), Confronting Crime: Prevention, Repression and Solidarity, Documentation Francaise, Paris.Google Scholar
Bottoms, A. (1974), ‘Book review of defensible space’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 203–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgois, P. (1995), In Search of Respect: Selling Crack at El Barrio, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Boyce, J. (2001), Crime Prevention in a Plains Town – Moree, Paper presented at ‘The Character, Impact and Prevention of Crime in Regional Australia’ Conference, Townsville, August 2001.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2001), ‘The effects of hot spots policing on crime’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science vol. 578, pp. 104–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., McDevitt, J. & Pierce, G. L. (2006), ‘Understanding and preventing gang violence: Problem analysis and response development in Lowell, Massachusetts’, Police Quarterly, vol. 9 no. 1, pp. 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (1989), Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. & Brantingham, P. L. (1993), ‘Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment’, Environmental Psychology, vol. 13, pp. 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. & Brantingham, P. L. (1995), ‘Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. & Faust, F. (1976), ‘A conceptual model of crime prevention’, Crime and Delinquency, vol. 22, pp. 130–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. L., Brantingham, P. J. & Taylor, W. (2005), ‘Situational crime prevention as a key component in embedded crime prevention’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, K., Erol, R. & Tilley, N. (2006), Problem-oriented Policing and Partnerships Implementing on Evidence-based Approach to Crime Reduction, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L. & Smith, E. (2007), ‘Leisure as a context for youth development and delinquency prevention’, in France, A. & Homel, R. (eds), Pathways and Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Practice, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Campbell Collaboration <www.aic.gov.au/campbellcj/> (accessed 26 February 2008).
Canada, National Crime Prevention Centre (1996), Mobilizing Political Will and Community Responsibility to Prevent Youth Crime, National Crime Prevention Council, Ottawa, Canada.
Canada, National Crime Prevention Centre (1998) Building a Safer Canada: A Community Based Crime Prevention Manual. Canadian Department of Justice.
Carson, W. G. (2004a), ‘Is communalism dead? Reflections on the present and future practice of crime prevention: Part 1’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, W. G. (2004b), ‘Is communalism dead? Reflections on the present and future practice of crime prevention: Part 2’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashmore, J., Gilmore, L., Goodnow, J., Hayes, A., Homel, R., Lawrence, J., Leech, M., Najman, J., O'Connor, J., Vinson, T. & Western, J. (2001a), Ending Family Violence? Programs for Perpetrators, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Cashmore, J., Gilmore, L., Goodnow, J., Hayes, A., Homel, R., Lawrence, J., Leech, M., Najman, J., O'Connor, J., Vinson, T. & Western, J. (2001b), Pathways to Prevention: Developmental and Early Intervention Approaches to Crime in Australia (Appendices), Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Castellano, P. & Soderstrom, P. (1992), ‘Therapeutic wilderness programmes and juvenile recidivism: A programme evaluation’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, vol. 17, 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, J. (1994), ‘Crime prevention and the lure of relevance: A response to Adam Sutton’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 25–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, A. (2002), ‘Beyond technicism: Broadening the “what works” paradigm in crime prevention’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, A. (2003), ‘The dust never settles’ crime prevention policy and practice: The Victorian experience, PhD thesis, Unpublished, Department of Criminology, University of Melbourne.
Cherney, A. (2004a), ‘Contingency and politics: The local government community safety officer role’, Criminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 115–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, A. (2004b), ‘A case study of crime prevention/community safety partnerships in Victoria’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 237–52.Google Scholar
Cherney, A. (2005), ‘A letter from Australia: Doing crime prevention research – A personal reflection’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, A. (2006a), ‘Problem solving for crime prevention’, Trends and Issues, no. 314, Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Cherney, A. (2006b), ‘The role of local government in crime prevention: An overview’, Local Government Reporter, vol. 5, nos 3 & 4, pp. 25–8.Google Scholar
Cherney, A. & Sutton, A. (2006), ‘Crime prevention and reduction’, in Goldsmith, A., Israel, M. & Daly, K. (eds), Crime and Justice in the 21st Century: An Australian Textbook in Criminology, 3rd edn, Thomson/LBC, Sydney, pp. 373–93.Google Scholar
Cherney, A. and Sutton, A. (2007), ‘Crime prevention in Australia: Beyond what works’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W. (2006), Nipped in the bud: A situational crime prevention approach to the prevention of bushfire arson, Masters thesis, Unpublished, School of Social Science, University of Queensland.
Clammer, J. (1997), ‘Framing the other: Criminality, social exclusion and social engineering in developing Singapore’, Social Policy and Administration, vol. 31, pp. 136–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1980), ‘Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 136–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (ed.) (1997), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, 2nd edn, Harrow & Heston, New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1998a), ‘Defining police strategies: Problem solving, problem oriented policing and community-oriented policing’, in Grant, A. & Shelley, O. (eds), Problem-Oriented Policing, Police Executive Research Forum, Washington DC, pp. 315–26.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1998b), ‘Theoretical background to crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED), and situational prevention’, Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference, Designing out Crime: Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), 16 June, Sydney, available at <www.aic.gov.au/conferences/cpted/clarke.html> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1999), Hot Products. Understanding, Anticipating and Reducing the Demand for Stolen Goods, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (2005), ‘Seven Misconceptions of Situational Crime Prevention’, in Tilley, N. (ed), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Cornish, D. B. (eds) (1986), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Eck, J. (2003), Become a Problem-Solving Crime Analyst, Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Felson, M. (eds) (1993), Routine Activity and Rational Choice: Advances in Criminological Theory, Transaction, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Homel, R. (1997), ‘A revised classification of situational crime prevention techniques’, in Lab, S. (ed.), Crime Prevention at a Crossroads, Anderson, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. & Weisburd, D. (1994), ‘Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement’, in Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 2, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 165–84.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. E. & Felson, M. (1979), ‘Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach’, American Sociological Review, vol. 44, pp. 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Roland, T. R. & Steen, S. (2006), ‘Prevention, crime control or cash? Public preferences towards criminal justice spending priorities’, Justice Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R. (2004), Reclaim the Streets: Surveillance, Social Control and the City, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Collins, A. (1998), ‘Hip hop graffiti culture’, Alternative Law Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
Collins, J., Noble, G., Poynting, S. & Tabar, P. (2000), Kebabs, Kids, Cops & Crime: Youth, Ethnicity & Crime, Pluto Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, I. (2004), Design Out Crime: Creating Safe and Sustainable Communities, Elsevier Architectural Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Connell, J. P., Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L. B. & Weiss, C. H. (1995), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Concepts, Methods and Contexts, Aspen Institute, New York.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D. & Camp, bell, D. T. (1979), Quasi-experimentation, Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
Coote, A., Allen, J. & Woodhead, D. (2004), Finding Out What Works: Understanding Complex Community-based Initiatives, Kings Fund, London.Google Scholar
Cozens, P. M., Hillier, D. & Prescott, G. (2001a), ‘Crime and the design of residential property: Exploring the theoretical background’, Property Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 136–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozens, P. M., Hillier, D. & Prescott, G. (2001b), ‘Crime and the design of residential property: Exploring the perceptions of planning professionals, burglars and other users Part 2’, Property Management, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 222–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozens, P. M., Pascoe, T. & Hillier, D. (2004), ‘The policy and practice of secured by design (SBD)’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozens, P. M., Saville, G. & Hillier, D. (2005), ‘Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): A review and modern bibliography’, Journal of Property Management, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 328–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, P. (2000), ‘Young people and public space: Developing inclusive policy and practice’, Scottish Youth Issues Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 105–24.Google Scholar
Crane, P. & Marston, G. (1999), The Myer Centre Youth Protocol: A Summary, Brisbane City Council, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (1994), ‘The partnership approach to community crime prevention: Corporatism at the local level’, Social and Legal Studies, vol. 3, pp. 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (1997), The Local Governance of Crime: Appeals to Community and Partnerships, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (1998), Crime Prevention and Community Safety: Politics, Policies and Practices, Longman, London and New York.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (1999), ‘Questioning appeals to community within crime prevention and control’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 7, pp. 509–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (2002), ‘The growth of crime prevention in France as contrasted with the English experience: Some thoughts on the politics of insecurity’, in Hughes, G., McLaughlin, E. & Muncie, J. (eds), Crime Prevention and Community Safety: New Directions, Sage Publications in association with Open University Press, London, pp. 214–39.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. & Jones, M. (1995), ‘Interagency crime prevention and community based crime prevention’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 35, pp. 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. & Matassa, M. (2000), Community Safety Structures: An International Literature Review, Northern Ireland Officer, Statistics and Research Branch, Criminal Justice Policy Division, Massey House, Belfast.Google Scholar
Crime Prevention Victoria (2003), Safer Design Guidelines for Victoria, Crime Prevention Victoria & Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
Cromwell, P. & Olson, J. N. (2004), Breaking and Entering: Burglars on Burglary, Wadsworth, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
Crowe, T. D. (2000), Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management Concepts, 2nd edn, National Crime Prevention Institute.Google Scholar
Cunneen, C. (1992), ‘Aboriginal imprisonment during and since the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody’, Current Issues In Criminal Justice, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 351–5.Google Scholar
Cunneen, C., Findlay, M., Lynch, R. & Tupper, V. (1989), Dynamics of Collective Conflict: Riots at the Bathurst Bike Races, Law Book Company, Sydney.Google Scholar
Cunneen, C. & White, R. (2007), Juvenile Justice: Youth and Crime in Australia, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Currie, E. (1988), ‘Two visions of community crime prevention’, in Hope, T. & Shaw, M. (eds), Communities and Crime Reduction, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Davids, C. (1995), ‘Understanding the significance and persistence of Neighbourhood Watch in Victoria’, Law in Context, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 57–80.Google Scholar
Davies, J. (1995), ‘Less Mickey Mouse, more Dirty Harry: Property, policing and the postmodern metropolis’, Polemic, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 63–9.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1990), City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Davis, P. (2004), Is Evidence-based Government Possible?, Jerry Lee Lecture Presented at the 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington DC, 18 February, available at <www.policyhub.gov.uk/downloads/JerryLeeLecture1202041.pdf> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
De Liege, M.-P. (1988), ‘The fight against crime and fear: A new initiative in France’, in Hope, T. & Shaw, M. (eds), Communities and Crime Reduction, HMSO, London, pp. 254–9.Google Scholar
De Liege, M.-P. (1991), ‘Social developments and prevention of crime in France’, in Heidenson, F. & Farrell, M. (eds), Crime in Europe, Routledge, London, pp. 121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhiri, S. & Brand, S. (1999), Analysis of Costs and Benefits: Guidance for Evaluators, Crime Reduction Program Guidance Note 1, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Diacon, D. (ed.) (1999), Building Safer Urban Environments: The Way Forward, Building and Social Housing Foundation, Leicestershire.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J. & Poulin, F. (1999), ‘When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behaviour’, American Psychologist, vol. 54, pp. 755–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, D. (2005), ‘Why don't the police stop crime?’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1912), The Elementary Forms of Religious Life.
Durkheim, E. (1969) [1893], ‘Types of law in relation to social solidarity’, from The Division of Labour in Society (trans. G. Simpson, Free Press of Glencoe 1964, New York), incl. in Aubert, V. (ed.), Sociology of Law: Selected Readings, Harmondsworth, Penguin, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1984), The Division of Labour in Society, (trans. W. D. Halls), Free Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2002a), ‘Preventing crime at places’, in Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (eds), Evidence-based Crime Prevention, Routledge, New York, pp. 241–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2002b), ‘Learning from experience in problem orientated policing and situational prevention: The positive functions of weak evaluations and the negative functions of strong ones’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Evaluation for Crime Prevention: Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 14, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 93–117.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2003), ‘Police problems: The complexity of problem theory, research and evaluation’, in Knuttsson, J. (ed.), Problem Oriented Policing: From Innovation to Mainstream, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 15, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 79–113.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2005), ‘Evaluation for lesson learning’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 699–733.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2006), ‘When is a bologna sandwich better than sex? A defence of small-n case study evaluations’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E., Clarke, R. V. & Guerette, R. (2007), ‘Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogeneous sets of facilities’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 21, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. & Spelman, W. (1988), Problem Solving: Problem-orientated Policing in Newport News, Police Executive Research Forum and National Institute of Justice, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. & Weisburd, D. (eds) (1995), Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 4, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (1987), ‘Crime prevention in England: Themes and issues’, in Challinger, D. (ed.), Preventing Property Crime, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (1994), ‘Proximal circumstances: A mechanism-based classification of crime prevention’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 2, pp. 185–232.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2000), ‘The conjunction of criminal opportunity: A tool for clear, joined up thinking about community safety and crime reduction’, in Ballintyne, S., Pease, K. & McLaren, V. (eds), Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety, Institute of Public Policy Research, London, pp. 30–66.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2001), ‘The conjunction of criminal opportunity: A framework for crime reduction toolkits’, available at the UK Crime Reduction website <www.crimereduction.gov.uk> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Ekblom, P. (2002a), ‘From the source to the mainstream is uphill: The challenge of transferring knowledge of crime prevention through replication, innovation and anticipation’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 13, pp. 131–203.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2002b), ‘Towards a European knowledge base’, European Crime Prevention Network Conference 7–8 October 2002, Denmark, vol. 1, Danish Crime Prevention Council, Glostrup, pp. 62–97.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2003), 5Is Introduction and Illustrative Guide, Home Office UK <www.crimereduction.gov.uk/learningzone/5isintro.htm> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Farrell, G. & Roman, J. (2006), ‘Crime as pollution: Proposal for market-based incentives to reduce crime externalities’, in Moss, K. & Stephens, M. (eds), Crime Reduction and the Law, Routledge, London, pp. 135–55.Google Scholar
Farrell, G., Bowers, K. J. & Johnson, S. D. (2005), ‘Cost-benefit analysis for crime science: Making cost-benefit analysis useful through a portfolio of outcomes’, in Smith, M. J. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 56–81.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1995), ‘The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 36, pp. 929–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrington, D. P. (2000), ‘Explaining and preventing crime: The globalization of knowledge’, Criminology, vol. 38, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P. & Welsh, B. C. (2003), ‘Family-based prevention of offending: A meta-analysis’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 36, pp. 127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feins, J. D., Epstein, J. C. & Widom, R. (1997), Solving Crime Problems in Residential Neighbourhoods. Comprehensive Changes in Design, Management and Use, National Institute of Justice Issues and Practices, US Department of Justice, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Felson, M. (1995), ‘Those who discourage crime’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 4, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
Felson, M. (2002), Crime and Everyday Life, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Felson, M. (2006), Crime and Nature, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. (1997), ‘Youth, crime and cultural space’, Social Justice, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. (2005), ‘“Working together”: Neighbourhood Watch, reassurance policing and the potential of partnerships’, Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 303, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Forrester, L. (1993), ‘Youth-generated cultures in western Sydney’, in White, R. (ed.), Youth Subcultures: Theory, History and the Australian Experience, National Clearinghouse for Youth Studies, Hobart.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991), ‘Governmentality’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. & Miller, P. (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in governmentality with two lectures by, and an interview with, Michel Foucault, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, A. & Homel, R. (2006), ‘Societal access routes and developmental pathways: Putting social structure and young people's voice into the analysis of pathways into and out of crime’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, A. & Homel, R. (2007), Pathways and Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Practice, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Freiberg, A. (2001), ‘Affective versus effective justice: Instrumentalism and emotionalism in criminal justice’, Punishment and Society, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 256–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiberg, K., Homel, R. & Lamb, C. (2007), ‘The pervasive impact of poverty on children: Tackling family adversity and promoting child development through the Pathways to Prevention Project’, in France, A. & Homel, R. (eds), Pathways and Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Practice, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 226–46.Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2004), Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gabor, T. (1990), ‘Crime displacement and situational crime prevention: Toward the development of some principles’, Canadian Journal of Criminology, vol. 32, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (1996), ‘The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (1999), ‘The common place and the catastrophic: Interpretations of crime in late modernity’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 353–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (2000) ‘Ideas, institutions and situational crime prevention’, in Hirsch, A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2001), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gastman, R., Rowland, D. & Sattler, T. (2006), Freight Train Graffiti, Thames & Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Geason, S. & Wilson, P. (1990), Preventing Graffiti and Vandalism, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
George, A. L. & Bennett, A. (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Gilling, D. (1996), ‘Problems with the problem orientated approach’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 5, pp. 7–23.Google Scholar
Gilling, D. (1997), Crime Prevention: Theory, Policies and Politics, UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
Gilling, D. & Hughes, G. (2002), ‘The community safety profession: Towards a new expertise in the governance of crime, disorder and safety in the UK?’, Community Safety Journal, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 4–12.Google Scholar
Glenorchy City Council (2003), Face the Challenge, Take the Risk, Enjoy the Ride: A Local Government Guide to Youth Participation, Tasmania Department of Education, Tasmania Office of Youth Affairs, Glenorchy City, Hobart.
Goldblatt, P. & Lewis, C. (1998), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study No. 187, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Goodnow, J. J. (2006), ‘Adding social contexts to developmental analysis of crime prevention’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 327–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. (2000), ‘Criminal business organizations, street gangs and “wanna-be” groups: A Vancouver perspective’, Canadian Journal of Criminology, January, pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. & Hirschi, T. (1990), A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Grabosky, P. & James, M. (eds) (1995), The Promise of Crime Prevention: Leading Crime Prevention Programs, Canberra, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Graham, J. & Bennett, T. (1995), Crime Prevention Strategies in Europe and North America, European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Grant, F. & Grabosky, P. (eds) (2000), The Promise of Crime Prevention: Leading Crime Prevention Programs, 2nd edn, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Gray, D., Shaw, G., d'Abbs, P., Brooks, D., Stearne, A., Mosey, A. & Spooner, C. (2006), Policing, Volatile Substance Misuse, and Indigenous Australians, National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund, Monograph Series No. 16, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1996), Policing Places with Drug Problems, Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Guerette, R. T. (2005), Migrant death and the border safety initiative: An application of situational crime prevention to inform policy and practice, Dissertation, Rutgers State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
Haggerty, K. D. (2007), ‘Book review: The novelty of crime science’, Policing and Society, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 83–8.Google Scholar
Halsey, M. (2001), ‘An aesthetic of prevention’, Criminal Justice, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, M. & Young, A. (2002), ‘The meanings of graffiti and municipal administration’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, M. & Young, A. (2006), “‘Our desires are ungovernable”: Writing graffiti in urban space’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton-Smith, N. (2002), ‘Anticipating consequences: Developing a strategy for the targeted measurement of displacement and diffusion of benefits’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Evaluation for Crime Prevention: Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 14, Criminal Justice Press, New York/ Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 11–52.Google Scholar
Hanmer, J., Griffiths, S. & Jerwood, D. (1999), Arresting Evidence: Domestic Violence and Repeat Victimisation, Police Research Series Paper 104, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968), ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science, vol. 162, no. 3859, pp. 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Hauber, A., Hofstra, B., Toornvliet, L. & Zandbergen, A. (1996), ‘Some new forms of functional social control in the Netherlands and their effects’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. (1999), ‘Preventing crime and violence through communities that care’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 7, pp. 443–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W. & Catalano, R. F. (1995), ‘Preventing substance abuse’, in Tonry, M. & Farrington, D. F. (eds), Building A Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 343–427.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. & Catalano, R. F. (1992), Communities that Care: Action for Drug Abuse Prevention, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. & Catalano, R. F. et al. (1999), ‘Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviours by strengthening protection during childhood’, Archives of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 226–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F. & Arthur, M. (2002), ‘Promoting science-based prevention in communities’, Addictive Behaviors, vol. 90, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. (2002), ‘The vilification and pleasures of youthful transgression’, in Muncie, J., Hughes, G. & McLaughlin, E. (eds), Youth Justice: Critical Readings, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
Healey, K. (ed.) (1996), Youth Gangs, Spinney Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hedderman, C. & Williams, C. (2001), Making Partnerships Work: Emerging Findings from the Reducing Burglary Initiative, Home Office Briefing Note 1/01, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.Google Scholar
Henderson, M., Henderson, P. & Associates Pty Ltd (2001), Preventing Repeat Residential Burglary, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hesseling, R. B. P. (1994), ‘Displacement: A review of the empirical literature’, in Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, vol. 3, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 197–230.Google Scholar
Heywood, P. & Crane, P. with Egginton, A. & Gleeson, J. (1997), Young People in Major Centres: A Policy Investigation and Development Project for Brisbane City Council – Draft 1: Planning & Management Guidelines, Brisbane City Council.Google Scholar
Heywood, P. & Crane, P. with Egginton, A. & Gleeson, J. (1998), Out and About: In or Out? Better Outcomes from Young People's Use of Public and Community Space in the City of Brisbane – Vol. 2: Policies, Implementation Strategies and Tools, Community Development Team West, Brisbane City Council.Google Scholar
Hil, R. (1999), ‘Beating the developmental path: Critical notes on the pathways to prevention report’, Youth Studies Australia, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 49–50.Google Scholar
Hill, I. & Pease, K. (2002) ‘The wicked issues: Displacement and sustainability’, in Ballintyne, S., Pease, K., & McLaren, V. (eds), Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety, Institute of Public Policy Research, London, pp. 131–41.Google Scholar
Hirsch, V. A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds) (2000), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoefnagels, P. (1997), The Prevention Pioneers: History of the Hein Roethof Prize 1987–1996, Ministry of Justice, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hofstra, B. & Shapland, J. (1997), ‘Who is in control?’, Policing and Society, vol. 6, pp. 265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homel, P. (2004), ‘The whole of government approach to crime prevention’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 287, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Homel, P. (2005), ‘A short history of crime prevention in Australia’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 355–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homel, P. (2006), ‘Joining up the pieces: What central agencies need to do to support effective local crime prevention’, in Knutsson, J. & Clarke, R. V. (eds), ‘Putting theory to work: Implementing situational crime prevention and problem-oriented policing’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 20, Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp. 111–38.Google Scholar
Homel, P., Nutley, S., Webb, B. & Tilley, N. (2004), Investing to Deliver: Reviewing the Implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Programme, Home Office Research Study 281, London.Google Scholar
Homel, P., Nutley, S., Tilley, N. & Webb, B. (2005), Making it Happen from the Centre: Managing for the Regional Delivery of Local Crime Reductions Outcomes, Home Office Online Report 54/04, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Homel, R. (2005a), ‘Developmental crime prevention’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 71–106.Google Scholar
Homel, R. (2005b), ‘Moving developmental prevention from “Success in miniature” to mainstream practice that improves outcomes: Can it be done?’, Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology conference, Delivering Crime Prevention: Making the Evidence Work, Sydney, 21–22 November 2005.Google Scholar
Homel, R. et al. (1999), Pathways to Prevention: Developmental and Early Intervention Approaches to Crime, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Homel, R., Freiberg, K., Lamb, C., Leech, M., Batchelor, S., Carr, A., Hay, I., Teague, R. & Elias, G. (2006a), ‘The Pathways to Prevention Project: Doing developmental prevention in a disadvantaged community’, Australian Institute of Criminology Trends and Issues paper 323, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, at <www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi2/tandi323t.html> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Homel, R., Freiberg, K., Lamb, C., Leech, M., Hampshire, A., Hay, I., Elias, G., Carr, A., Manning, M., Teague, R. & Batchelor, S. (2006b), The Pathways to Prevention Project: The First Five Years, 1999–2004, Griffith University and Mission Australia, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (2001), ‘Community crime prevention in Britain: A strategic overview’, Criminal Justice, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. (2003), ‘The reducing burglary initiative and how scientific crime prevention got it wrong’, Paper presented at the 17th Annual Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology Conference, Controlling Crime Risks and Responsibilities, 1–3 October, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (2004), ‘Pretend it works: Evidence and governance in the evaluation of the reducing burglary initiative’, Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. (2005), Sustainability in Crime Prevention: A Nautical Tale, Address to the 10th Anniversary Colloquium of the International Centre for the Prevention of Crime, Paris, 1–2 December 2004, copy obtained from the author.Google Scholar
Hope, T. & Karstedt, S. (2003), ‘Towards a new social prevention’, in Kury, H. & Obergfell-Fuchs, J. (eds), Crime Prevention: New Approaches, Mainzer Schriften zur Situation von Kriminalitaetsopfern, Weisser Ring, Mainz, pp. 461–89.Google Scholar
Hope, T. & Murphy, D. J. I. (1983), ‘Problems of implementing crime prevention: The experience of a demonstration project’, Howard Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. & Shaw, M. (eds) (1988), Communities and Crime Reduction, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Hope, T. & Sparks, R. (2000), ‘For a sociological theory of situations (or how useful is pragmatic criminology?)’, in Hirsch, A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 175–91.Google Scholar
Hough, M. (2004), ‘Modernization, scientific rationalism and the crime reduction programme’, Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, M. (2006), ‘Not seeing the wood for the trees: Mistaking tactics for strategy in crime reduction initiatives’, in Knutsson, J. & Clarke, R. V. (eds), ‘Putting theory to work: Implementing situational crime prevention and problem-oriented policing’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 20, Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp. 139–62.Google Scholar
Hough, M. & Tilley, N. (1998), Auditing Crime and Disorder: Guidance for Local Partnerships, Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 91, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Howell, J. (2000), Youth Gang Programs and Strategies: Summary, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. (1998), Understanding Crime Prevention: Social Control, Risk and Late Modernity, Open University Press, Buckingham.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2002a), ‘Crime and disorder reduction partnerships: The future of community safety’, in Hughes, G., McLaughlin, E. & Muncie, J. (eds), Crime Prevention and Community Safety: New Directions, Sage Publications in association with Open University Press, London, pp. 123–42.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2002b), ‘Plotting the rise of community safety: Critical reflections on research, theory and politics’, in Hughes, G. & Edwards, A. (eds), Crime Control and Community: The New Politics of Public Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 20–45.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2004), ‘Straddling adaptation and denial: Crime and disorder reduction partnerships in England and Wales’, Cambrian Law Review, vol. 35, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2007), The Politics of Crime and Community, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. & Edwards, A. (2001), ‘Defining community safety expertise’, Crime Justice Matters, no. 45, Autumn, pp. 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. & Gilling, D. (2004), ‘Mission impossible? The habitus of the community safety manager and the new expertise in local partnership governance of crime and safety’, Criminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International CPTED Association <www.cpted.net/default.html> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Irving, C. (1993), Wide-body: The Triumph of the 747, W. Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
Iveson, K. (2000), ‘Beyond designer diversity: Planners, public space and a critical politics of difference’, Urban Policy and Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1961), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Sage Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. & Lindblad, T. B. (eds) (2003), Overground: 9 Scandinavian Graffiti Writers, Dokument Forlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science <www.jdi.ucl.ac.uk/> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Jordan, B. (1996), A Theory of Poverty and Social Exclusion, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1988), The Seductions of Crime, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
King, M. (1988), How to Make Crime Prevention Work: The French Experience, NACRO, London.Google Scholar
Klein, M. W. (1995), The American Street Gang, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Klein, M. W. (2002), ‘Street gangs: A cross-national perspective’, in Huff, R. (ed.), Gangs in America, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Klein, M., Kerner, H.-J., Maxon, C. & Weitekamp, E. (eds) (2001), The Eurogang Paradox: Street Gangs and Youth Groups in the U.S. and Europe, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsson, J. (ed.) (2003), ‘Problem oriented policing: From innovation to mainstream’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 15, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York.Google Scholar
Koch, B. C. M. (1998), The Politics of Crime Prevention, Ashgate, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Laub, J. H. (2004), ‘The life course of criminology in the United States’, Criminology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S. & Sampson, R. J. (1998), ‘Trajectories of change in criminal offending: good marriage and the desistance process’, American Sociological Review, vol. 63, pp. 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, G. (2001), Scientist or Politicians: Who has the Answer to Crime?, Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, School of Public Policy, University College London, <www.jdi.ucl.ac.uk> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Laycock, G. (2002), ‘Methodological issues in working with policy advisors and practitioners’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Analysis for Crime Prevention, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 13, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, pp. 205–37.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. (2005a), ‘Defining Crime Science’, in Smith, M. J. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. (2005b), ‘Deciding what to do’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 674–98.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. (2006), ‘Implementing crime reduction measures: Conflicts and tensions’, in Knutsson, J. & Clarke, R. V. (eds), Putting Theory to Work: Implementing Situational Crime Prevention and Problem-oriented Policing, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 20, Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
Laycock, G. & Webb, B. (2003), ‘Conclusions: The role of the centre’, in Bullock, K. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Reduction and Problem-oriented Policing, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 285–301.Google Scholar
Lee, M. (2006), ‘Public dissent and governmental neglect: Isolating and excluding Macquarie Fields’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32–50.Google Scholar
Lee, M. & Herborn, P. (2003), ‘The role of place management in crime prevention: Some reflections on governmentality and government strategies’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–39.Google Scholar
Loeber, R., Farrington, D., Stouthamer-Loeber, M. et al. (2003), ‘The development of male offending: Key findings from fourteen years of the Pittsburgh Youth Study’, in Thornberry, T. P. & Krohn, M. (eds), Taking Stock of Delinquency: An Overview of Findings from Contemporary Longitudinal Studies, Kluwer, New York, pp. 93–130.Google Scholar
Low, S. (2003), Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Lum, C. & Yang, S. N. (2005), ‘Why do researchers in crime and justice choose non-experimental methods’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 1, pp. 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madjulla Incorporated (2004), A Report of the Derby/West Kimberely Project: Working with Adolescents to Prevention Domestic Violence, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.
Maguire, M. (2004), ‘The crime reduction programme in England and Wales: Reflections on the vision and the reality’, Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 213–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, K. (1999), ‘Growing up in cities as a model of participatory planning and “place-making” with young people’, Youth Studies Australia, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
Malone, K. & Hasluck, L. (2002), ‘Australian youth: Aliens in a suburban environment’, in Chawla, L. (ed.), Growing Up in an Urbanising World, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
Matassa, M. & Newburn, T. (2003), ‘Problem-oriented evaluation: Evaluating problem oriented policing initiatives’, in Bulluck, K. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Reduction and Problem Oriented Policing, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 183–216.Google Scholar
Mawby, R. (1977), ‘Defensible space: A theoretical and empirical appraisal’, Urban Studies, vol. 14, pp. 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, P. (1979), ‘Defensible space: The current status of crime prevention theory’, Howard Journal, vol. 18, pp. 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Price, J. & Roehl, J. (2000), ‘Civil remedies and drug control’, Evaluation Review, vol. 24, pp. 212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Soole, D. & Rombouts, S. (2006), ‘Street-level drug law enforcement: A meta-analytical review’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 409–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCamley, P. (2002), ‘Minimising subjectivity: A new risk assessment model for CPTED’, CPTED Journal: The Journal of International Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Association, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
McCord, J. (2003), ‘Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 587, no. 1, pp. 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCord, N. & McCord, J. (1959), Origins of Crime: A New Evaluation of the Cambridge-Somerville Study, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
McDonald, K. (1999), Struggles for Subjectivity: Identity, Action and Youth Experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, E. (2002) ‘Same beds, different dreams: Postmodern reflections on crime prevention and community safety’, in Hughes, G. & Edwards, A. (eds), Crime Control and Community: The New Politics of Public Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, E., Muncie, J. & Hughes, G. (2001), ‘The permanent revolution: New labour, new public management and the modernization of criminal justice’, Criminal Justice: International Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memmott, P., Stacy, R., Chambers, C. & Keys, C. (2001), Violence in Indigenous Communities, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. (1981), ‘Defensible space undefended: Social factors in crime prevention through environmental design’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1938), ‘Social structure and anomie’, American Sociological Review, vol. 3, pp. 672–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. (2001), The Politics of Community Crime Prevention: Implementing Operation Weed and Seed in Seattle, Ashgate, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
Minnery, J. & Lim, B. (2005), ‘Measuring crime prevention through environmental design’, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 330–41.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. (1993), ‘Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy’, Psychological Review, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. (1991), Safer Communities: The Local Delivery of Crime Prevention Through the Partnership Approach, Standing Conference on Crime Prevention, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Moss, K. & Pease, K. (2004), ‘Data sharing in crime prevention: How and why’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, D. S. (2001), ‘Measuring the economic benefits of developmental prevention programs’, in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 28, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 347–84.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., Piquero, A. P., Scott, E. S. & Steinberg, L. (2006), ‘Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 627–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council (2005), ‘Target thefts impacted by immobilizers’, Theft Matters Bulletin, October 2005, National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council, Melbourne, at <www.carsafe.com.au> (accessed 27 February 2008).
National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council (2006), Annual Report: The Benefits of Theft-Reform, National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council, Melbourne, at <www.carsafe.com.au> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Netherlands Ministry of Justice (1985), Society and Crime: A Policy Plan for The Netherlands, Ministry of Justice, The Hague.
New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs & Planning (1999), Urban Design Guidelines with Young People in Mind, Department of Urban Affairs & Planning, Sydney.
New South Wales Police Service (2001), Safer by Design: Evaluation Document One, NSW Police Service <www.police.nsw.gov.au/community_issues>(accessed 27 February 2008).
New South Wales Shopping Centre Protocol Project (2005), Creating the Dialogue: A Guide to Developing a Local Youth Shopping Centre Protocol, New South Wales Attorney General's Crime Prevention Division, Sydney.
New Zealand Crime Prevention Unit (1994), The New Zealand Crime Prevention Strategy. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Parliament Buildings, Wellington NZ Crime Prevention Unit.
New Zealand Ministry of Justice (2003), Review of the Safer Community Council Network: Future Directions, Wellington, New Zealand.
New Zealand Ministry of Justice (2005), National Guidelines for Crime Prevention through Environmental Design in New Zealand, Part 2 Implementation Guide, at <www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/2005/cpted-part-2/index.html> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Newman, O. (1972), Defensible Space: People and Design in the Violent City, Architectural Press, London.Google Scholar
Newman, O. (1975), ‘Reactions to the “Defensible Space” Study and some further readings’, International Journal of Mental Health, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, O. (1996), Creating Defensible Space, US Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Nutley, S. & Homel, P. (2006), ‘Delivering evidence-based policy and practice: Lessons from the implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Program’, Evidence and Evaluation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
O'Malley, P. (1992), ‘Risk power and crime prevention’, Economy and Society, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 252–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, P. (1994), ‘Neo-liberal crime control – political agendas and the future of crime prevention in Australia’, in Chappell, D. & Wilson, P. (eds), The Australian Criminal Justice System: The Mid 1990s, Butterworths, Sydney, pp. 283–98.Google Scholar
O'Malley, P. & Sutton, A. (eds), (1997), Crime Prevention in Australia: Issues in Policy & Research, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Olds, D., Henderson, C., Cole, R., Eckenrode, J., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D., Pettitt, L., Sidora, K., Morris, P. & Powers, J. (1998), ‘Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children's criminal and anti-social behaviour: 15-year follow up of a randomized controlled trial’, Journal of the American Medical Association, October, vol. 14, pp. 1238–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olds, D., Henderson, C., Kitzman, H., Eckenrode, J., Cole, R. & Tatelbaum, R. (1999), ‘Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses: Recent findings’, The Future of Children, Home Visiting: Recent Program Evaluations, vol. 9, no. 1, Summer/Spring.Google ScholarPubMed
Olweus, D. (1993), Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do, Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Painter, K. (1992), ‘Different worlds: The spatial, temporal and social dimensions of female victimization’, in Evans, D., Fyfe, N. & Herbert, D. (eds), Crime, Policing and Place: Essays in Environmental Criminology, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Painter, K. & Farrington, D. P. (1997), ‘The crime reducing effect of improved street lighting: The Dudley Project’, in Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, Harrow & Hestor, New York.Google Scholar
Paneth, N. (2004), ‘Assessing the contributions of John Snow to epidemiology: 150 years after removal of the Broad Street pump handle’, Epidemiology, vol. 15, no. 5, September, pp. 514–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panton, S. (1998), The Local Crime Prevention Committee Program, Evaluation Report, Crime Prevention Unit, Attorney General's Department, South Australia.Google Scholar
Pappas, C. (2001), U.S. Gangs: Their Changing History and Contemporary Solutions. Youth Advocate Program International Resource Paper, Youth Advocate Program International, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Parmar, A. & Sampson, A. (2006), ‘Evaluating domestic violence initiatives’, British Journal of Criminology, Advance Access published on 14 December 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parramatta Local Government Area (2001), Draft Community Safety and Crime Prevention Plan 2001–2004, Parramatta City Council, New South Wales.
Pavlich, G. (1999), ‘Preventing crime: “Social” versus “community” governance in Aotearoa/New Zealand’, in Smandych, R. (ed.), Governable Places: Readings on Governmentality and Crime Control, Ashgate, Dartmouth, pp. 103–31.Google Scholar
Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997), Realistic Evaluation, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Pawson, R. (2002), ‘Evidence-based policy: In search of a method’, Evaluation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, R. (2003), ‘Nothing as practical as a good theory’, Evaluation, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, R. (2006), Evidence-based Policy: A Realistic Perspective, Sage Publications, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, K. (2001), ‘Distributive justice and crime’, European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 413–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrosino, A. & Farrington, D. (2001), ‘The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 578, no. 1, pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
Petrosino, A. & Soydan, H. (2005), ‘The impact of program developers as evaluators on criminal recidivism: Results from meta-analysis of experimental and quasi-experimental research’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 1, pp. 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrosino, A., Petrosino, C. T & Buehler, J. (2003), ‘“Scared Straight” and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency’ (Updated C2 Review), in The Campbell Collaboration Reviews of Intervention and Policy Evaluations (C2-RIPE), November, 2003, Campbell Collaboration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Polk, K. (1997), ‘A community and youth development approach to youth crime prevention’, in O'Malley, P. & Sutton, A. (eds), Crime Prevention in Australia: Issues in Policy & Research, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Posavac, E. J. & Carey, R. C. (1997), Program Evaluation: Methods and Case Studies, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Poyner, B. (1983), Design Against Crime: Beyond Defensible Space, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Poyner, B. (2006), Crime Free Housing in the 21st Century, UCI Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London.Google Scholar
Presdee, M. (2000), Cultural Criminology and the Carnival of Crime, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presdee, M. & Walters, R. (1998), ‘The perils and politics of criminological research and the threat to academic freedom’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 10 no. 2, pp. 156–67.Google Scholar
Putt, A. D. & Springer, J. F. (1998), Policy Research: Concepts, Methods and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Quah, J. (1992), ‘Crime prevention Singapore style’, Asian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 149–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queensland Police Service (2006), Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: An Introduction to CPTEWD Guidelines for Queensland, Queensland Police Service in partnership with the Queensland Department of Communities and Department of Local Government, Planning, Sport and Recreation.
Rigby, K. (2002), A Meta-evaluation of Methods and Approaches to Reduce Bullying in Pre-Schools and Early Primary School in Australia, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1992), ‘Public opinion, crime and criminal justice’, in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 16, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 99–180.Google Scholar
Robinson, C. (2000), ‘Creating space, creating self: Street-frequenting youth in the city and suburbs’, Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 429–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. (1987), ‘The theory and research behind Neighbourhood Watch: Is it a sound fear and crime reduction strategy?’, Crime & Delinquency, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 103–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (1991), National Report (vol. 1, by Commissioner Elliott Johnston), Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Salvadori, I. (1997), ‘A dragon in the neighbourhood: City planning with children in Milan, Italy’, Social Justice, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 192–202.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. (1997), ‘Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy’, Science, vol. 277, no. 5328, pp. 918–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. & Laub, J. (2003), ‘Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70’, Criminology, 41(3), pp. 555–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandercock, L. (1983), ‘Who gets what out of public participation?’, in Sandercock, L. & Berry, M. (eds), Urban Political Economy: The Australian Case, George Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Sandercock, L. (1997), ‘From main street to fortress: The future of malls as public spaces – OR – “shut up and shop”’, Just Policy, no. 9, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Sansfacon, D. & Waller, I. (2001), ‘Recent evolution of governmental crime prevention strategies and implications for evaluation and economic analysis’, in Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. and Sherman, L. W. (eds), Costs and Benefits of Preventing Crime, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 225–47.Google Scholar
Sarre, R. and Prenzler, T. (2005), The Law of Private Security in Australia, Thomson/LBC, Pyrmont, NSW.
Saville, G. & Cleveland, G. (1997), 2nd Generation CPTED: An Antidote to the Social Y2K Virus of Urban Design, Paper presented at the 2nd Annual International CPTED Conference, Orlando, Florida, 3–5 December.
Saville, G. & Cleveland, G. (2003a), ‘An introduction to 2nd generation CPTED: Part 1’, CPTED Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 1, March, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Saville, G. & Cleveland, G. (2003b), ‘An introduction to 2nd generation CPTED: Part 2’, CPTED Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 2, June, pp. 4–8.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. H. & Kitchen, T. (2002), Planning for Crime Prevention: A Transatlantic Perspective, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V. & Weikart, D. P. (1993), Significant Benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through Age 27, Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 10, High/Scope Press, Ypsilanti.
Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R. & Nores, M. (2005), Lifetime Effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through Age 40, Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 14, High/Scope Press, Ypsilanti.
Shaftoe, H. & Read, T. (2005), ‘Planning out crime: The appliance of science or an act of faith’, in Tilley, N. (ed.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 245–65.Google Scholar
Shapland, J. (2000), ‘Situational prevention: Social values and social viewpoints’, in Hirsch, A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 113–24.Google Scholar
Shaw, G., Biven, A., Gray, D., Mosey, A., Stearne, A. & Perry, J. (2004), An Evaluation of the Comgas Scheme: They Sniffed it and They Sniffed it – but it Just Wasn't There, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.Google Scholar
Shearing, C. & Stenning, P. (1992), ‘From the Panopticon to Disneyworld: The development of discipline’, in R. Clarke (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, Harrow and Heston, New York.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (2006), ‘To develop and test: the inventive difference between evaluation and experimentation’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W. & Strang, H. (2004), ‘“Verdicts of interventions”? Interpreting results from randomised controlled experiments in criminology’, American Behavioural Scientist, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 575–607.CrossRef
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (2002), Evidence Based Crime Prevention, Routledge, London & New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P. & Bushway, S. (1997), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006), ‘Preventing crime’, in Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. & MacKenzie, D. L. (eds), Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, rev. edn, Routledge, London & New York.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (2000), Crime Prevention: The Singapore Approach, Resource Material Series No. 56, Tokyo, UNAFEI.
Skogan, W. G. (1988), ‘Community organisations and crime’, in Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 39–78.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (1990), Disorder and Decline, University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1996), Crime Prevention through Environmental Design in Parking Facilities, National Institute of Justice, Research in Brief, April 1996, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Smith, M. J. & Tilley, N. (eds) (2005), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
South Australia Department of Planning and Urban Transport (2004), Designing Out Crime: Design Solutions for Safer Neighbourhoods, South Australia Department of Planning and Urban Transport, Adelaide.
South Australian Attorney-General's Department (1989), Confronting Crime: The South Australian Crime Prevention Strategy, Attorney-General's Department, Adelaide.
South Australian Crime Prevention Unit (2007), ‘Crime Prevention and Community Safety Grants Program: Guidelines 2007’, Attorney-General's Department, Adelaide <www.cpu.sa.gov.au> (accessed on 6 June 2007).
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. & Dillon, L. (2003), Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence, National Centre for Social Research, Cabinet Office, London.Google Scholar
Stenson, K. (2005), ‘Sovereignty, biopolitics and the local government of crime in Britain’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 265–87.CrossRef
Sutton, A. (1991), ‘The Bonnemaison Model: Theory and application’, in Halstead, B. (ed.), Youth Crime Prevention: Proceedings of a Policy Forum Held 28th & 29th August 1990, Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (1994a), ‘Community crime prevention: A national perspective’, in Chappell, D. & Wilson, P. (eds), The Australian Criminal Justice System: The Mid 1990s, Butterworths, Australia, pp. 213–34.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (1994b), ‘Crime prevention: Promise or threat?’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 27, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, A. (1996), ‘Taking out the interesting bits? Problem solving and crime prevention’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 5, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (1997), ‘Crime prevention: Policy dilemmas – A personal account’, in O'Malley, P. & Sutton, A. (eds), Crime Prevention in Australia: Issues in Policy and Research, Federation Press, Sydney, pp. 12–37.Google Scholar
Sutton A. (2000a), ‘Crime prevention: A viable alternative to the justice system?’, in Chappell, D. & Wilson, P. (eds), Crime and the Criminal Justice System in Australia: 2000 and Beyond, Butterworths, Australia, pp. 316–31.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (2000b), ‘Drugs and dangerousness: Perception and management of risk in the neo-liberal era’, in Brown, M. & Pratt, J. (eds), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order, Routledge, London, pp. 165–80.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. & Cherney, A. (2002), ‘Prevention without politics: The cyclical progress of crime prevention in an Australian state’, Criminal Justice: International Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 325–44.
Sutton, A. & Cherney, A. (2003), ‘Crime prevention and community safety: Some grass roots perspectives’, Paper presented at the Crime Prevention Victoria Conference, Crime Prevention for a Safer Victoria: A Consultative Symposium, 29–30 September 2003, Carlton Crest, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. & Wilson, D. (2004), ‘Open-street CCTV in Australia: The politics of resistance and expansion’, Surveillance and Society, vol. 2, nos 2/3, pp. 310–22, at <www.surveillance-and-society.org/cctv.htm> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Taylor, R. & Gottfredson, S. (1986), ‘Environmental design, crime and prevention: An examination of community dynamics’, in Reiss, A. & Tonry, M. (eds), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 8, pp. 387–416, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tierney, J. P., Grossman, J. B. & Resch, N. L. (1995), Making a Difference: An Impact Evaluation of Big Brothers, Big Sisters, Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2001), ‘Evaluation and evidence led crime reduction policy and practice’, in Matthews, R. & Pitts, J. (eds), Crime Disorder and Community Safety, Routledge, London, pp. 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, N. (2002), ‘The rediscovery of learning: Crime prevention and scientific realism’, in Hughes, G. & Edwards, A. (eds), Crime Control and Community: The New Politics of Public Safety, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 63–85.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2004a), ‘Karl Popper: A philosopher for Ronald Clarke's situational crime prevention’, Israel Studies in Criminology: Tradition and Innovation in Crime and Criminal Justice, vol. 8, de Sitter Publications, Canada.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2004b), ‘Applying theory-driven evaluation to the British Crime Reduction Programme: The theories of the programme and its evaluation’, Criminal Justice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, N. (2005), ‘Driving down crime at motorway service areas’, in Smith, M. J. & Tilley, N. (eds), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, pp. 104–25.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. (2006), ‘Knowing and doing: Guidance and good practice in crime prevention’, in Knutsson, J. & Clarke, R. V. (eds), Putting Theory to Work: Implementing Situational Crime Prevention and Problem-oriented Policing, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 20, Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp. 217–52.Google Scholar
Tilley, N. & Laycock, G. (2000), ‘Joining up research, policy and practice about crime’, Policy Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 214–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, M. & Farrington, D. P. (1995), ‘Strategic approaches to crime prevention’, in Tonry, M. & Farrington, D. P. (eds), Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Toumbourou, J. W. (1999), ‘Implementing communities that care in Australia: A community mobilisation approach to crime prevention’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, Australian Institute of Criminology, July at <www.aic.gov.au> (accessed 27 February 2008).Google Scholar
Tremblay, R. & Craig, W. (1995), ‘Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention’, Crime and Justice, vol. 19, pp. 151–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trench, S., Tanner, O. & Tiesdell, S. (1992), ‘Safer cities for women: Perceived risks and planning measures’, Town Planning Review, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloch, J., Lupton, D., Blood, W., Tulloch, M., Jennett, C. & Enders, M. (1998a), Fear of Crime: Audit of the Literature and Programs, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra.
Tulloch, J., Lupton, D., Blood, W., Tulloch, M., Jennett, C. & Enders, M. (1998b), Fear of Crime: The Fieldwork Research, National Campaign Against Violence and Crime, Canberra.Google Scholar
United Kingdom National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal (2000), Report of Policy Action Team 8: Anti-social Behaviour, Home Office, London.
United States Bureau of Justice Assistance (1997), Addressing Community Gang Problems: A Model for Problem Solving, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice, Washington DC.
United States Bureau of Justice Assistance (1998), Addressing Community Gang Problems: A Practical Guide, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice, Washington DC.
Andel, H. (1988), Crime Prevention that Works: The Care of Public Transport in the Netherlands, Ministry of Justice Research and Documentation Centre, The Hague.Google Scholar
van Andel, H. (1992), ‘The care of public transport in the Netherlands’, in Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, Harrow & Heston, New York, pp. 151–63.Google Scholar
Bunt, H. G. & Schoot, C. R. A. (2003), Prevention of Organised Crime: A Situational Approach, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Dijk, J. (1995), ‘In search of synergy: Coalition-building against crime in the Netherlands’, Security Journal, vol. 6, pp. 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, J. & Waard, J. (1991), ‘A two dimensional typology of crime prevention projects: With a bibliography’, Criminal Justice Abstracts, vol. 23, pp. 483–503.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, J. J. M. & Junger-Tas, J. (1988), ‘Trends in crime prevention in The Netherlands’, in Hope, T. & Shaw, M. (eds), Communities and Crime Reduction, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
van Swaaningen, R. (2002), ‘Towards a replacement discourse on community safety: Lessons from The Netherlands’, in Hughes, G., McLaughlin, E. & Muncie, J. (eds), Crime Prevention and Community Safety: New Directions, Sage Publications in association with Open University Press, London, pp. 260–78.Google Scholar
Vinson, T. (2004), Community Adversity and Resilience: The distribution of social disadvantage in Victoria and New South Wales and the mediating role of social cohesion, The Ignatius Centre for Social Policy and Research, Jesuit Social Services, Richmond, Victoria.Google Scholar
Vinson, T. & Baldry, E. (1999), ‘The spatial clustering of child maltreatment: Are micro-social environments involved?’, Paper presented at the Children and Crime: Victims and Offenders Conference, Australian Institute of Criminology, Brisbane, 17–18 June 1999.
Vinson, T. & Homel, R. (1975), Indicators of Community Well-Being, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A., Garland, D. & Wakefield, A. (eds) (2000), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
WA Office of Crime Prevention <www.crimeprevention.wa.gov.au> (accessed 27 February 2008).
Walker, J. & McDonald, D. (1995), ‘The over-representation of Indigenous people in custody in Australia’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 47, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Walker, L. (1998), ‘Chivalrous masculinity among juvenile offenders in Western Sydney: A new perspective on working class men and crime’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 279–93.Google Scholar
Walker, L., Butland, D. & Connell, R. (2000), ‘Boys on the road: Masculinities, car culture and road safety education’, Journal of Men's Studies, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, I. (1988), Current Trends in European Crime Prevention including France, England and the Netherlands: Towards National Commitment, Local Inter-agency Involvement and Support of Effective Crime Prevention, Department of Justice, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Walmsley, R. (2003), World Prison Population List, 4th edn, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London.Google Scholar
Walters, R. (2003), Deviant Knowledge: Criminology, Politics and Policy, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, D. (2002), ‘Law and order blues’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherburn, D. (2004), Law and Order in Australia: Rhetoric and Reality, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, D. & Lind, B. (1998), ‘Poverty, parenting, peers and crime-prone neighbourhoods’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 85, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, D. & Lind, B. (2001), Delinquent-Prone Communities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1991), ‘Science as a vocation’, in Gerth, H. H. & Mills, C. Wright (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Weekend Australian (2007), ‘Petrol sniffing scourge defeated’, 17–18 March, pp. 1–2.
Weiss, C. H. (1995), ‘Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families’, in Connell, J. P., Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L. B. & Weiss, C. H. (eds), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Concepts, Methods and Contexts, Aspen Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (1999), ‘“Value for money”: A review of the costs and benefits of situational crime prevention’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 39, pp. 345–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2000), ‘Monetary costs and benefits of crime prevention programs’, in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 27, pp. 305–61, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2001), ‘Towards an evidence-based approach to preventing crime’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 578, no. 1, pp. 158–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2002), Crime Prevention Effects of Closed Television: A Systematic Review, Home Office Research Study 252, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2004), ‘Surveillance for crime prevention in public space: Results and policy choices in Britain and America’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 497–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2006), ‘Closed-circuit television surveillance’, in Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (eds), Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims and Places, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. P. & Sherman, L. W. (eds) (2001), Costs and Benefits of Preventing Crime, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
West, D. J. (1973), Who Becomes Delinquent?, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Western Australian Planning Commission (2006), Designing Out Crime: Planning Guidelines, Western Australian Planning Commission.
Whelan, J. (2001), The dynamics of community reputation: A case study, Sociology Honours thesis, School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania, Hobart.Google Scholar
White, R. (1990), No Space of their Own: Young People and Social Control in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
White, R. (1998), Public Spaces for Young People: A Guide to Creative Projects and Positive Strategies, Australian Youth Foundation and National Campaign Against Violence and Crime, Sydney.Google Scholar
White, R. (1999a), ‘Public spaces, social planning and crime prevention’, Urban Policy and Research, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. (1999b), Hanging Out: Negotiating Young People's Use of Public Space, National Crime Prevention, Attorney General's Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
White, R. (2001), ‘Graffiti, crime prevention and cultural space’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 253–68.Google Scholar
White, R. (2006a), ‘Youth gang research in Australia’, in Short, J. & Hughes, L. (eds), Studying Youth Gangs, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
White, R. (2006b), ‘Swarming and the dynamics of group violence’, Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 326, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
White, R. (2007a), Seniors in Shopping Centres: Preliminary Report of Findings, National Seniors Productive Ageing Centre, Brisbane.Google Scholar
White, R. (2007b), Anti-Gang Strategies and Interventions, ARACY Gangs Briefing Paper No. 2, Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, Perth.Google Scholar
White, R. with Aumair, M., Harris, A. & McDonnel, L. (1997), Any Which Way You Can: Youth Livelihood, Community Resources and Crime, Australian Youth Foundation, Sydney.Google Scholar
White, R. & Coventry, G. (2000), Evaluating Community Safety: A Guide, Department of Justice Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
White, R., Kosky, B. & Kosky, M. (2001), MCS Shopping Centre Project: A Youth-Friendly Approach to Shopping Centre Management, Australian Clearinghouse for Youth Studies, Hobart.Google Scholar
White, R. & Perrone, S. (2005), Crime and Social Control: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
White, R. & Sutton, A. (1995), ‘Crime prevention, urban space and social exclusion’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. & Sutton, A. (2001), ‘Social planning for mall redevelopment: An Australian case study’, Local Environments, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. & Wyn, J. (2008), Youth and Society: Exploring the Social Dynamics of Youth Experience, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wikstrom, Per-Olof. H. (2007), ‘Doing without knowing: Common pitfalls in crime prevention’, in Farrell, G., Bowers, K., Johnson, S. & Townsley, M. (eds), Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 21, pp. 59–80, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York.Google Scholar
Wikstrom, Per-Olof H. & Torstensson, M. (1999), ‘Local crime prevention and its national support: organisation and direction’, European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 7, pp. 459–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, P. (2002), ‘Criminology in the twenty-first century: Public good or private interest’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 35, no. 22, pp. 238–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, P. & Pease, K. (2000), ‘Crime prevention and community safety: Tweedledum and Tweedledee?’, in Ballintyne, S., Pease, K. & McLaren, V. (eds), Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety, Institute of Public Policy Research, London, pp. 21–9.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. (2005), The Impact of Inequality: How to Make Sick Societies Healthier, New Press, New York.Google Scholar
Willemse, H. 1994, ‘Developments in Dutch crime prevention’, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 2, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sutton, A. (2003), Open Street CCTV in Australia: A Comparative Study of Establishment and Operation (Report on a Criminology Research Council Funded Project), University of Melbourne Department of Criminology, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. B. (2001), ‘Meta-analytical methods for criminology’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 578, no. 1, pp. 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. & Kelling, G. L. (1982), ‘Broken windows: The police and neighbourhood safety’, Atlantic Monthly, March, pp. 29–38.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (1982), Black Death, White Hands, George Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. & Wileman, B. (2005), ‘Developing a safe city strategy based on CPTED research: An Australian case study’, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 319–29.Google Scholar
Wolverhampton Crime & Disorder Co-ordination Group (2001), Wolverhampton Youth Safety Strategy: Building Safer Communities, Wolverhampton City Council, UK.
World Corporal Punishment Research (corpun), (2007), ‘Singapore: Judicial and prison caning’, <www.corpun.com> (accessed on 17 June 2007).
Worpole, K. & Greenhalgh, L. (1996), The Freedom of the City, Demos, London.Google Scholar
Wortley, R. (2002), Situational Prison Control: Crime Prevention in Correctional Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, B. (1996), ‘May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide’, in Lash, S. (ed.), Risk, Environment and Modernity, Sage Publications, New York, pp. 44–83.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi.Google Scholar
Young, J. (1986), ‘The failure of criminology’, in Mathews, R. and Young, J. (eds), Confronting Crime, Sage Publications, London, pp. 4–30.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Adam Sutton, University of Melbourne, Adrian Cherney, Queensland University of Technology, Rob White, University of Tasmania
  • Book: Crime Prevention
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804601.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Adam Sutton, University of Melbourne, Adrian Cherney, Queensland University of Technology, Rob White, University of Tasmania
  • Book: Crime Prevention
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804601.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Adam Sutton, University of Melbourne, Adrian Cherney, Queensland University of Technology, Rob White, University of Tasmania
  • Book: Crime Prevention
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804601.011
Available formats
×