Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:37:02.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - William G. Cochran's Contributions to the Design, Analysis, and Evaluation of Observational Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Donald B. Rubin
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

William G. Cochran worked on statistically rich and scientifically important problems. Throughout his career he participated in the design, analysis, and evaluation of statistical studies directed at important real world problems. The field of observational studies is a perfect example of a general topic that Cochran helped to define and advance with many contributions. Cochran's work provides an essential foundation for continuing research in this important area of statistics.

An observational study, for purposes here, is a study intended to assess causal effects of treatments where the rule that governs the assignment of treatments to units is at least partially unknown. Thus a randomized experiment on rats for the effect of smoke inhalation on lung cancer is a controlled experiment rather than an observational study, but an analysis of health records for samples of smokers and nonsmokers from the U.S. population is an observational study. The obvious problem created by observational studies is that there may exist systematic differences between the treatment groups besides treatment exposure, and so any observed differences between the groups (e.g., between smokers and nonsmokers) with respect to an outcome variable (e.g., incidence of lung cancer) might be due to confounding variables (e.g., age, genetic susceptibility to cancer) rather than the treatments themselves. Consequently, a primary objective in the design and analysis of observational studies is to control, through sampling and statistical adjustment, the possible biasing effects of those confounding variables that can be measured: a primary objective in the evaluation of observational studies is to speculate about the remaining biasing effects of those confounding variables that cannot be measured.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×