Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:06:32.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Neoclassical realism and the national interest: presidents, domestic politics, and major military interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Colin Dueck
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Steven E. Lobell
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Norrin M. Ripsman
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Presidents of the United States have frequently decided to engage in military interventions abroad, but existing explanations of such intervention tend to emphasize either third-image (international) or second-image (domestic) factors. Third-image theories of intervention point to factors such as the international distribution of power and external threats. Second-image theories of intervention point to factors such as electoral incentives, together with the governing coalition's economic or political interests in war. However, as Jeffrey Taliaferro, Steven Lobell, and Norrin Ripsman argue in chapter 1, neoclassical realist theories generate more explanatory leverage over the national security behavior of states by incorporating both the domestic and international milieus. In this chapter I put forward a neoclassical realist model and show exactly how, why, and to what extent domestic politics matters in shaping US military interventions abroad. According to this model, when facing the possibility of major military intervention, presidents usually begin by consulting what they perceive to be the national security interests of the United States. Subsequently however, they consider how best to pursue those conceptions of the national interest in the light of domestic political incentives and constraints. These constraints frequently lead presidents to implement the precise conduct, framing, and timing of US intervention in a manner that may appear puzzling or anomalous from a neorealist perspective. In this sense, domestic politics “matters,” not as a primary cause of intervention, but rather as a powerful influence on its exact form.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Waltz, Kenneth N., Man, the State, and War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959)Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth, Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979), pp. 116–28Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, “Politics at the Water's Edge: Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad,” International Organization 52, no. 2 (spring 1998), pp. 307–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen, Defending the National Interest (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978)Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, “The Richness of the tradition of Political Realism,” International Organization 38, no. 2 (spring 1984), pp. 287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Gideon, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51, no. 1 (October 1998), pp. 144–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, Lewis, The Functions of Social Conflict (New York: Free Press, 1956)Google Scholar
Levy, Jack, “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique,” in Midlarsky, Manus, ed., Handbook of War Studies (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989), pp. 259–88Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Peter, Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Milner, Helen, Resisting Protectionism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Hiscox, Michael, International Trade and Political Conflict (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. and Job, Brian L., “The President and the Political Use of Force,” American Political Science Review 80, no. 2 (June 1986), pp. 541–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton and Bickers, Kenneth N., “Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36, no. 1 (March 1992), pp. 25–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin, “The Politics of Threat Perception and the Use of Force: A Political Economy Model of US Uses of Force, 1949–1994,” International Studies Quarterly 42, no. 3 (September 1998), pp. 567–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard, Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991), pp. 57–67, 77–8Google Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor, Elections and War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999), pp. 49–50, 78–9, 126–27, 142–5Google Scholar
Mueller, John, War, Presidents and Public Opinion (New York: John Wiley, 1973), pp. 60, 65Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), pp. 35, 38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, , “Politics at the Water's Edge”; James Meernik, “Presidential Decision Making and the Political Use of Military Force,” International Studies Quarterly 38, no. 1 (March 1994), pp. 121–38Google Scholar
Rose, , “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy”; Randall Schweller, “The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism,” in Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius, eds., Progress in International Relations Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), pp. 311–47Google Scholar
Taliaferro, Jeffrey, “Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited,” International Security 25, no. 3 (winter 2000/1), pp. 128–61, at pp. 132–5, 142–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed, From Wealth to Power (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998), chap. 2Google Scholar
Dueck, Colin, “Realism, Culture and Grand Strategy: Explaining America's Peculiar Path to World Power,” Security Studies 14, no. 2 (winter 2004/5), pp. 195–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Thomas, Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986), pp. 3–7, 13, 28Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles, The Vulnerability of Empire (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), pp. 22–3Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, Lake, David A., and Ikenberry, G. John, “Toward a Realist Theory of State Action,” International Studies Quarterly 33, no. 4 (December 1989), pp. 457–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., “Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing,” International Security 29, no. 2 (fall 2004), pp. 159–201, at pp. 161, 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin and Shapiro, Robert, The Rational Public (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), pp. 348–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, Jon, Selling Intervention and War: The Presidency, the Media, and the American Public (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), pp. 4–5, 16–17Google Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn, A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Porter, Gareth, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Dueck, Colin, “Ideas and Alternatives in American Grand Strategy, 2000–2004,” Review of International Studies 30, no. 4 (October 2004), pp. 511–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncharov, Sergei, Lewis, John, and Litai, Xue, Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao, and the Korean War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993), pp. 130–54Google Scholar
Weathersby, Kathryn, “The Soviet Role in the Early Phase of the Korean War: New Documentary Evidence,” Journal of American–East Asian Relations 2, no. 4 (winter 1993), pp. 425–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamby, Alonzo, Beyond the New Deal: Harry S. Truman and American Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1973), pp. 408–9Google Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, The Wrong War: American Policy and the Dimensions of the Korean Conflict, 1950–1953 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985), pp. 62–3Google Scholar
Kepley, David, The Collapse of the Middle Way: Senate Republicans and the Bipartisan Foreign Policy, 1948–1952 (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), pp. 69–85Google Scholar
Pelz, Stephen, “US Decisions on Korean Policy, 1943–1950: Some Hypotheses,” in Cumings, Bruce, ed., Child of Conflict: The Korean–American Relationship, 1943–1953 (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1983), pp. 119–31Google Scholar
Caridi, Ronald, The Korean War and American Politics (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1968), pp. 33–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Robert, Tumultuous Years: The Presidency of Harry S. Truman, 1949–1953 (New York: W. W. Norton, 1982), p. 209Google Scholar
Dobbs, Charles, The Unwanted Symbol: American Foreign Policy, the Cold War and Korea, 1945–1950 (Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1981), pp. 160–92Google Scholar
Matray, James, The Reluctant Crusade: American Foreign Policy in Korea, 1941–1950 (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1985), pp. 251–8Google Scholar
Stueck, William, Road to Confrontation: American Policy toward China and Korea, 1947–1950 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981), p. 186Google Scholar
Bernstein, Barton, “The Truman Administration and the Korean War,” in Lacey, Michael, ed., The Truman Presidency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 426Google Scholar
Gallup, George, The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion, 1935–1971 (New York: Random House, 1972), vol. II, pp. 962–4, 998–9Google Scholar
Schilling, Warner, Hammond, Paul, and Snyder, Glenn, Strategy, Politics, and Defense Budgets (New York: Columbia University Press, 1962), pp. 351–9Google Scholar
McCoy, Donald, The Presidency of Harry S. Truman (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1984), p. 230Google Scholar
Gaddis, John, Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of Postwar American National Security Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), p. 109Google Scholar
Hogan, Michael, A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, 1945–1954 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 266, 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Nancy, Patterns in the Dust: Chinese-American Relations and the Recognition Controversy, 1949–1950 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), p. 197Google Scholar
Kaufman, Burton, The Korean War: Challenges in Crisis, Credibility and Command (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1986), pp. 84–6Google Scholar
Kearns, Doris, Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream (New York: Harper and Row, 1976), pp. 252–3, at p. 252Google Scholar
Berman, Larry, Planning a Tragedy: The Americanization of the War in Vietnam (New York: W. W. Norton, 1982)Google Scholar
Bornet, Vaughn D., The Presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1983), pp. 64–75Google Scholar
Herring, George, America's Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975, 4th edn (Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2002), p. 136Google Scholar
Hunt, Michael, Lyndon Johnson's War: America's Cold War Crusade in Vietnam, 1945–1968 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1996), pp. 75–106Google Scholar
Schulzinger, Robert, A Time for War: The United States and Vietnam, 1941–1975 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 132Google Scholar
Beschloss, Michael, Taking Charge: The Johnson White House Tapes, 1963–1964 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997), p. 365Google Scholar
Dallek, Robert, Lyndon B. Johnson: Portrait of a President (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 224–5Google Scholar
Logevall, Fredrik, Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of the War in Vietnam (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), pp. 275–9Google Scholar
Lunch, William L. and Sperlich, Peter W., “American Public Opinion and the War in Vietnam,” Western Political Quarterly 32, no. 1 (March 1979), pp. 21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helsing, Jeffrey, Johnson's War/Johnson's Great Society: The Guns and Butter Trap (Westport: Praeger, 2000), pp. 255–6Google Scholar
McMaster, H. R., Dereliction of Duty (New York: Harper Perennial, 1997), pp. 324–33Google Scholar
Moise, Edwin, Tonkin Gulf and the Escalation of the Vietnam War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996), pp. xi–xvGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Ivo and Lindsay, James, America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Halper, Stefan and Clarke, Jonathan, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Chaim, “Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War,” International Security 29, no. 1 (summer 2004), pp. 5–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, James, Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet (New York: Viking, 2004)Google Scholar
Packer, George, The Assassins' Gate: America in Iraq (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005)Google Scholar
Western, Jon, Selling Intervention and War: The Presidency, the Media, and the American Public (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), chap. 6Google Scholar
Edwards, George, III “Riding High in the Polls: George W. Bush and Public Opinion,” in Campbell, Colin and Rockman, Bert, eds., The George W. Bush Presidency: Appraisals and Prospects (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2004), p. 23Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob, Plan of Attack (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2004), p. 168Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, David D. and Nagourney, Adam, “In an Election Year, a Shift in Public Opinion on the War,” New York Times, March 27, 2006, p. A12Google Scholar
Gordon, Philip H., “Bush's Middle East Vision,” Survival 45, no. 1 (spring 2003), pp. 155–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, Michael, “Bush and the World,” Foreign Affairs 81, no. 5 (September/October 2002), pp. 18–43, at pp. 18–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judis, John, “Why Iraq?The American Prospect (March 2003), pp. 12–13Google Scholar
Lemann, Nicholas, “How It Came to War,” The New Yorker, March 31, 2003, pp. 36–40, at pp. 37–8Google Scholar
Mueller, John, “The Iraq Syndrome,” Foreign Affairs 84, no. 6 (November/December 2005), pp. 44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×