Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:16:06.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Eucharistic ministry: controversies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

George Hunsinger
Affiliation:
Princeton Theological Seminary
Get access

Summary

“Church ministry and authority” would not be an item that ranks high in the hierarchy of truths. Barriers to eucharistic sharing would initially seem more formidable elsewhere. The real presence of Christ in the eucharist, for example, as well as whether, or in what sense, the Lord's Supper is a sacrifice, are questions that loomed large for the Reformation and continue to loom large today. Greater progress has now been made among Lutherans, Anglicans, and Roman Catholics on those matters than has yet to occur with the Reformed churches. Although promising resources for ecumenical convergence are available to the Reformed on real presence and eucharistic sacrifice, they remain largely untapped. Yet even if difficulties could be resolved at the conceptual level, entrenched habits of mind would still remain. As long as Zwingli remains our liturgical master, it will be hard for us in the Reformed tradition to benefit from the ecumenical progress occurring elsewhere.

The Reformed tradition has special problems to confront, both doctrinal and attitudinal, regarding eucharistic ministry. In recent decades the ministry issue has moved to the forefront of ecumenical discussion. It involves enormous perplexities. Although some of these are shared by Lutherans and Reformed alike, Lutherans may again find it easier than the Reformed to achieve convergence with historic traditions of ministry as found in Anglicanism, Roman Catholicism, and Eastern Orthodoxy.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Eucharist and Ecumenism
Let Us Keep the Feast
, pp. 189 - 219
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,The Council of Churches of the Netherlands, Intercommunion: The Asymmetrical Discussion Between Protestants and Catholics (Zoetermeer: Boekencentrum, 1999)Google Scholar
McSorley, Harry J., “The Roman Catholic Doctrine of the Competent Minister of the Eucharist in Ecumenical Perspective,” in Eucharist and Ministry: Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue, vol. iv, published jointly by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Lutheran World Federation (Washington, DC, and New York, 1970), pp. 120–37Google Scholar
Wicks, Jared, “The Significance of the ‘Ecclesial Communities’ of the Reformation,” Ecumenical Trends 30 (December 2001), pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
Kasper, Walter Cardinal, “Present Situation and Future of the Ecumenical Movement,” Information Service (Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity) 109 (2002), pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
Paul, JohnII, “Ecclesia de Eucharistia,” Origins 32 (May 1, 2003), pp. 753, 755–68.Google Scholar
McLelland, Joseph C., The Visible Words of God: An Exposition of the Sacramental Theology of Peter Martyr Vermigli (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1957), p. 148.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R., The Church and the Churches (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 37n.Google Scholar
The Apostolicity of the Church: Study Document of the Lutheran–Roman Catholic Commission on Unity (Minneapolis: Lutheran University Press, 2006).
Crumb, L. N., “Presbyterial Ordination and the See of Rome,” Church Quarterly Review 164 (1963), pp. 19–31Google Scholar
,Faith and Order Commission, Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry (Geneva: World Council of Churches, 1982)Google Scholar
The Reformed Family Worldwide: A Survey of Reformed Churches, Theological Schools, and International Organizations, ed. Bauswein, Jean-Jacques and Vischer, Lukas (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1999)
Thurian, Max, Visible Unity and Tradition (Baltimore: Helicon Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Outler, Albert C., “Do Methodists Have a Doctrine of the Church?,” in The Doctrine of the Church, ed. Kirkpatrick, Dow (Nashville: Abingdon, 1964), pp. 11–28.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Francis A., “Faith and Order: The Nature and Purpose of the Church,” Ecumenical Trends 32 (2003), pp. 145–52, on p. 149.Google Scholar
,Anglican–Reformed International Commission, God's Reign and Our Unity: Report of the Anglican–Reformed International Commission, 1981–1984 (London: SPCK; Edinburgh: Saint Andrew Press, 1984), No. 112Google Scholar
Apostolicity and Unity: Essays on the Porvoo Common Statement, ed. Tjorhom, Ola (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2002).
,Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Called to Common Mission (Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, 1998)Google Scholar
Rusch, William G., “Structures of Unity: The Next Ecumenical Challenge – A Possible Way Forward,” Ecclesiology 2 (2005), pp. 107–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madson, Meg, “The Episcopal No Spin Zone,” Dialog 39 (2000), pp. 293–95.Google Scholar
Root, Michael, “Bishops, Ministry, and the Unity of the Church in Ecumenical Dialogue: Deadlock, Breakthrough, or Both?,” Catholic Theological Society of America Proceedings 62 (2007), pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Allen, Horace T.. “One Visibly Catholic Church,” Theology Today 18 (1961), pp. 321–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Robert McAfee, The Ecumenical Revolution (Garden City: Doubleday, 1967), p. 149.Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Letter 346 (To the brethren at Wezel in 1554), in Selected Works of John Calvin, vol. vi, Letters, part 3, ed. Bonnet, Jules (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983), pp. 29–32Google Scholar
Richardson, Cyril, “The Presbyterian–Episcopalian Concordat,” Christendom (1939), pp. 252–59Google Scholar
Stewart, George, “Union from a Presbyterian Point of View,” Anglican Theological Review (1940), pp. 291–98Google Scholar
Grant, John Webster, “Leading a Horse to Water: Reflections on Church Union Conversations in Canada,” in Studies of the Church in History, ed. Davies, Horton (Allison Park: Pickwick Publications, 1983)Google Scholar
Campbell, Douglas F., “The Anglican and United Churches in Church Union Dialogue, 1943–75,” Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 17 (1988), pp. 303–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Presbyterian Church (USA), The Study Catechism, Full Version (Louisville: Witherspoon Press, 2003), Questions 36–41.Google Scholar
Ashley, Benedict M., “Gender and the Priesthood of Christ: A Theological Reflection,” The Thomist 57 (1993), pp. 343–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santer, Mark, “Communion, Unity and Primacy: An Anglican Response to Ut Unum Sint,” Ecclesiology 3 (2007), pp. 283–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, Michael, “The Gift of Authority,” The Ecumenical Review 52 (2000), pp. 57–71; on p. 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×