Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T05:29:17.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Forests, Carbon, and the Global Environment: New Directions in Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Daniel G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Derek T. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Nancy H. F. French
Affiliation:
Michigan Technological University
Bradley C. Reed
Affiliation:
United States Geological Survey, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

At this time, there is a convergence between two related and serious global concerns: (1) the emerging climate crisis brought on by fossil fuel combustion and land-use change and (2) an economy reliant on increasingly scarce and nonrenewable fossil fuels for energy and materials. Both of these concerns are pushing science and policy to begin discussing and understanding the implications of a future economy in a carbon (C)-constrained world, where both opportunities and challenges abound (World Economic Forum 2009). The two concerns are related. First, there is clear evidence that climate change is caused by the human use of fossil C (for energy and feedstock for materials, such as plastic) and deforestation (IPCC 2007b). In turn, climate change has potentially profound effects on C storage in agriculture and forests. The need to mitigate climate change has created political and policy pressure to reduce the use of fossil C through the development of renewable fuels and materials from biological feedstocks, mostly from land-based biomass in crops and forests (IPCC 2007a). In addition, land dedicated to agriculture that is threatened by climate change will be increasingly threatened by competition to grow biomass feedstocks (Rathmann, Szklo, and Schaeffer 2010). Indeed, some common crops used traditionally as a food source are being reengineered for fuels: corn, soybeans, oil palm, and sugarcane, to name a few (Naylor et al. 2007). Moreover, land once devoted to agriculture is increasingly being converted to nonagricultural biomass for fuel and materials. Natural forests are being converted to biofuel feedstock plantations (Danielsen et al. 2008). Therefore, the two concerns are intimately related to land-use change and its relationship to the C cycle.

Type
Chapter
Information
Land Use and the Carbon Cycle
Advances in Integrated Science, Management, and Policy
, pp. 505 - 522
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. 2011. Business lessons from a radical industrialist. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, K., Evans, T., and Richards, K. 2009. National forest carbon inventories: Policy needs and assessment capacity. Climatic Change, 93:69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A. 1995. Shifting cultivation and “deforestation”: A study from Indonesia. World Development, 23(10):1713–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W.D., and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., eds. 2009. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Arora, V.K., and Boer, G.J. 2010. Uncertainties in the 20th century carbon budget associated with land use change. Global Change Biology, 16:3327–3348, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asner, G., Knapp, D., Broadbent, E., Oliveira, P., Keller, M., and Silva, J. 2005. Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science, 310(5747):480–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carbon Disclosure Project. 2011. 2011 Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) Global 500: Accelerating low carbon growth. New York: PwC.Google Scholar
Chomitz, K.M., and Gray, D.A. 1996. Roads, land use, and deforestation: A spatial model applied to Belize. World Bank Economic Review, 10(3):487–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Climate Investment Funds. 2010. Creating a climate smart world: 2010 annual report.
Danielsen, F., Beukema, H., Burgess, N., Parish, F., Bruhl, C., Donald, P.,…Fitzherbert, E. 2008. Biofuel plantations on forested lands: Double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate. Conservation Biology, 23(2):348–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz, D., Hamilton, K., and Johnson, E. 2011. State of the forest carbon markets 2011. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace.Google Scholar
Edward, P. 2006. The ethical poverty line: A moral quantification of absolute poverty. Third World Quarterly, 27(2):377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D.C., and Winston, A.S. 2009. Green to gold: How smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
FAO. 2006. Global forest resources assessment 2005. Main report. FAO Forestry Paper, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
FAO. 2010. Global forest resources assessment 2010. Main report. FAO Forestry Paper, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Geist, H.J., and Lambin, E.F. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience, 52(2):143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, H.K., Ruesch, A.S., Achard, F., Clayton, M.K., Holmgren, P., Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.A. 2010. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38):16732–16737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guijt, I., and Woodhill, J. 2002. A guide for project M&E: Managing for impact in rural development. Washington, DC: International Fund for Agricultural Development.Google Scholar
Gutman, G., Janetos, A., Justice, C., Moran, E., Mustard, J., Rindfuss, R.,…Cochrane, M., eds. 2004. Land change science: Observing, monitoring and understanding trajectories of change on the Earth's surface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M.C., Stehman, S., Potapov, P., Loveland, T., Townshend, J., Defries, R.,…DiMiceli, C. 2008. Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(27):9439–9444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, G.J., and Castilla, G. 2008. Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): A new name for a new discipline? In Object-Based Image Analysis – spatial concepts for knowledge-driven remote sensing applications, ed. Blaschke, T., Lang, S., and Hay, G.J.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
Houghton, R.A. 2010. How well do we know the flux of CO2 from land-use change? Tellus B, 62:337–351, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R.A., Skole, D.L., Nobre, C.A., Hackler, J.L., Lawrence, K.T., and Chomentowski, W.H. 2000. Annual fluxes of carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature, 403:301–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IPCC. 2001. Climate change 2001: Synthesis report, ed. R.T. Watson and the Core Writing Team. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2007a. Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change, ed. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, and L.A. Meyer. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. 2007b. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report, ed. R.K. Pachauri and A. Reisinger. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
Jindal, R., Swallow, B., and Kerr, J. 2008. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges. Natural Resources Forum, 32:116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: An overview. Agroforest Systems, 76:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshava, N. 2003. A survey of spectral unmixing algorithms. Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 14(1):55–77.Google Scholar
Kinzig, P., Perrings, C., Chapin, F.S. III, Polasky, S., Smith, V.K., Tilman, D., and Turner, B.L. II. 2011. Paying for ecosystem services – promise and peril. Science, 334:603–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kossoy, A., and Ambrosi, P. 2010. State and trends of the carbon market 2010. World Bank. .Google Scholar
Malhi, Y., and Román-Cuesta, R.M. 2008. Analysis of lacunarity and scales of spatial homogeneity in IKONOS images of Amazonian tropical forest canopies. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(5):2074–2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matricardi, E., Skole, D., Pedlowski, M., and Chomentowski, W. In press. Assessment of forest disturbance by selective logging and forest fires in the Brazilian Amazon using Landsat data. International Journal of Remote Sensing.
Matricardi, E., Skole, D., Pedlowski, M., Chomentowski, W., and Fernandes, L. 2010. Assessment of tropical forest degradation by selective logging and fire using Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(5):1117–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagnini, F., and Nair, P. 2004. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 61:281–295.Google Scholar
Nair, P., Kumar, B., and Nair, V. 2009. Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 172:10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, R., Liska, A., Burke, M., Falcon, W., Gaskell, J., Rozelle, S., and Cassman, K. 2007. The ripple effect: Biofuels, food security, and the environment. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 49(9):30–43.Google Scholar
Nepstad, D., Verissimo, A., Alencar, A., Nobre, C., Lima, E., Lefebvre, P.,…Brooks, V. 1999. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature, 398:505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, M. 2011. Carbon funds 2011. London: Environmental Finance Publications.Google Scholar
Palace, M., Keller, M., Asner, G.P., Hogen, S., and Braswell, B. 2008. Amazon forest structure from IKONOS satellite data and the automated characterization of forest canopy properties. Biotropica, 40:141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters-Stanley, M., Hamilton, K., Marcello, T., and Sjardin, M. 2011. Back to the future state of the voluntary carbon markets 2011. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace/Forest Trends, Bloomberg New Energy Finance.Google Scholar
Place, F., Ssenteza, J., and Otsuka, K. 2001. Customary and private land management in Uganda. In Land tenure and natural resource management: A comparative study of agrarian communities in Asia and Africa, ed. Otsuka, K. and Place, F.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 195–233.Google Scholar
Rathmann, R., Szklo, A., and Schaeffer, R. 2010. Land use competition for production of food and liquid biofuels: An analysis of the arguments in the current debate. Renewable Energy, 35:14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skole, D.L., Cochrane, M.A., Matricardi, E., Chomentowski, W.H., Pedlowski, M., and Kimble, D. 2004. Pattern to process in the Amazon region: Measuring forest conversion, regeneration, and degradation. In Land change science: Observing, monitoring and understanding trajectories of change on the Earth's surface, ed. Gutman, G., Janetos, A.C., Justice, C.O., Moran, E.F., Mustard, J.F., Rindfuss, R.R.,…Cochrane, M.A.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 77–95.Google Scholar
Skole, D., and Tucker, C. 1993. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science, 260(5116):1905–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN. 2011. Global drylands: A UN system-wide response. New York: United Nations Environment Management Group.Google Scholar
UNDP. 2009. Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluation for development results. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
USAID. 2007. USAID PES sourcebook: Lessons and best practices for pro-poor payment for ecosystem services. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Winston, A.S. 2009. Green recovery: Get lean, get smart, and emerge from the downturn on top. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2011. State and trends of the carbon market 2011. Washington, DC: World Bank Carbon Finance Unit.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. 2009. Task force on low-carbon prosperity: Summary of recommendations. .
Zomer, R.J., Trabucco, A., Coe, R., and Place, F. 2009. Trees on farms: Analysis of the global extent and geographical patterns of agroforestry. ICRAF Working Paper no. 89. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×