Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-8l2sj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:01:24.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Development of mycoherbicides and evaluation of potential risks (using Stagonospora as a model)

from V - Fungal biocontrol of pests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

M. Maurhofer
Affiliation:
Plant Pathology Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zurich LFW 8092 Zurich Switzerland
D. Boss
Affiliation:
Plant Pathology Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zurich LFW 8092 Zurich Switzerland
M. O. Ahonsi
Affiliation:
River Basin Research Center Gifu University Yanagido 1-1 Gifu 501-1193 Japan
G. Défago
Affiliation:
Plant Pathology Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zurich LFW 8092 Zurich Switzerland
G. D. Robson
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Pieter van West
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Geoffrey Gadd
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
Get access

Summary

Several weeds such as the bindweeds Convolvulus arvensis and Calystegia sepium, which belong to the economically most important weeds, are difficult to control with conventional physical and chemical methods. Biological control with fungal biocontrol agents (FBCA) offers a promising alternative. However, the employment of such FBCAs implies not only the identification of highly effective strains and the development of cheap formulation and production techniques, but also an extensive risk assessment including tracking of FBCAs and their toxic metabolites in the environment. Stagonospora convolvuli strain LA39 effectively controls field and hedge bindweed in the field. For this strain formulation and application techniques were developed and currently markers for environmental tracking of the fungus are being designed. A major metabolite produced by LA39 is elsinochrome A (ELA). To assess the risk of ELA production by LA39, different methods, such as toxicity tests, stability tests and methods for environmental monitoring, were developed. Our results revealed that ELA is toxic to a wide array of organisms. However, ELA was never detected in LA39 treated bindweed or crop plants, and the ELA content in the applied biocontrol product is far too low to result in a toxic concentration in the environment. Furthermore, ELA is quickly degraded by sunlight. In conclusion, LA39 is a promising candidate for the development of a successful biocontrol product against bindweed. Harmful side effects of ELA production can be excluded.

Type
Chapter
Information
Exploitation of Fungi , pp. 275 - 290
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahonsi, M. O., Maurhofer, M., Rüegg, D. & Défago, G. (2005). Relationship between aggressiveness of Stagonospora sp. isolates on field and hedge bindweeds, and in vitro production of fungal metabolites cercosporin, elsinochrome A and leptosphaerodione. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 111, 203–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchvarova, R. B., Reddy, V. S. & Benett, J. (1992). Cellular resistance in rice to cercosporin, a toxin of Cercospora. Phytopathology, 82(6), 642–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldt, B. E. & Sobhian, R. (1993). Release and establishment of Aceria malherbae (Acari: Eriophydiae) for control of field bindweed in Texas. Environmental Entomology, 22, 234–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callihan, R. H., Eberlein, C. V., McCaffrey, J. P. & Thill, D. C. (1990). Field bindweed: Biology and management. University of Idaho, Cooperative Extension System, College of Agriculture, Bulletin, # 719.
Chen, C-T., Nakanishi, K. & Natori, S. (1966). Biosynthesis of elsinochrome A, the perylenequinone from Elsinöe spp. 1. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 14, 1434–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daub, M. E. (1982). Cercosporin, a photosensitizing toxin from Cercospora species. Phytopathology, 72, 370–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daub, M. (1987). Resistance of fungi to the photosensitizing toxin, cercosporin. Phytopathology, 77 (11), 1515–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daub, M. E. & Ehrenshaft, M. (1993). The photoactivated toxin cercosporin as a tool in fungal photobiology. Physiologia Plantarum, 89, 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daub, M. E. & Ehrenshaft, M. (2000). The photoactive Cercospora toxin cercosporin: contributions to plant disease and fundamental biology. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 38, 461–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Défago, G., Ammon, H. U., Cagán, L., Draeger, B., Greaves, M. P., Guntli, D., Hoeke, D., Klimes, L., Lawrie, J., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., Nicolet, B., Pfirter, H. A., Tabacchi, R. & Tóth, P. (2001). Towards the biocontrol of bindweeds with a mycoherbicide. BioControl, 46, 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerriero, A., Dambrosio, M., Cuomo, V. & Pietra, F. (1991). A novel, degraded polyketidic lactone, leptosphaerolide, and its likely diketone precursor, leptosphaerodione: Isolation from cultures of the marine ascomycete Leptosphaeria oraemaris (Linder). Helvetica Chimica Acta, 74, 1445–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guntli, D., Burgos, S., Heeb, M., Pfirter, H. A. & Défago, G. (1999). Biological control of hedge bindweed (Calystegia sepium) with mycoherbicide Stagonospora convolvuli strain LA39 in combination with competition from red clover (Trifolium pratense). Biological Control, 15, 252–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guntli, D., Pfirter, H. A., Moënne-Loccoz, Y. & Défago, G. (1998). Stagonospora convolvuli LA39 for biocontrol of field bindweed infesting cotoneaster in a cemetery. HortScience, 33, 860–1.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V. & Herberger, J. P. (1977). In The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Ma, L., Tai, H., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z. H. & Ji, W. Z. (2003). Photodynamic inhibitory effects of three perylenequinones on human colorectal carcinoma cell line and primate embryonic stem cell line. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 9(3), 485–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maillet, J. (1988). Les liserons. Phytoma. Défense de Culture, 399, 11–15.Google Scholar
Nicolet, B. & Tabacchi, R. (1999). Secondary metabolites produced by Stagonospora sp., a potential biocontrol agent against bindweeds. In Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds II, eds. Lyr, H., Russell, P. E. & Sisler, H. D.. Andover, United Kingdom: Intercept Limited, pp. 469–76.Google Scholar
Pfirter, H. A., Ammon, H. U., Guntli, D., Greaves, M. P. & Défago, G. (1997). Towards the management of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) and hedge bindweed (Calystegia sepium) with fungal pathogens and cover crops. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 2, 61–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfirter, H. A. & Défago, G. (1998). The potential of Stagonospora sp. as a mycoherbicide for field bindweed. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfirter, H. A., Guntli, D., Ruess, M. & Défago, G. (1999). Preservation, mass production and storage of Stagnospora convolvuli a bioherbicide candidate for field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). BioControl, 44, 437–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, S. S. & Carter, J. (1977). Host specificity and biology of Galeruca rufa, a potential biocontrol agent for field bindweed. Environmental Entomology, 6, 155–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, S. S. & Platts, B. E. (1990). Host specificity of Aceria (Eriophyes) malherbe, (Acari: Eriophyidae), a biological control agent for the weed Convolvulus arvensis (Convolvulaceae). Entomophaga, 35, 459–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrobek, A., Boss, D., Butt, T. M., Défago, G. & Maurhofer, M. (2006). Evaluation of different biological test systems to assess the toxicity of metabolites from fungal biocontrol agents. Toxicology Letters, 161(1): 43–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, S. E. & Riley, W. R. (1982). The biology of Canadian weeds. 53. Convolvulus arvensis L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 62, 461–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, U., Merlini, L. & Nasini, G. (1987). Naturally occurring perylenequinones. In Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products 52, eds. Herz, W., Grisebach, H., Kirby, G. W. & Tamm, C. H.. Vienna: Springer Verlag, pp. 1–71.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, S., Okubo, A., Akiyama, Y. & Fuwa, K. (1975). Cercosporin, a novel photodynamic pigment isolated from Cercospora kikuchii. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 39(1), 287–8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×