Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:04:46.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Roland Kläger
Affiliation:
Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaken, Anne, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: The Case of International Investment Law’, Finnish YIL XVII (2006), p. 91.Google Scholar
Aaken, Anne, ‘Defragmentation of Public International Law through Interpretation: A Methodological Proposal’, Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 16 (2009), p. 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aaken, Anne, ‘International Investment Law between Commitment and Flexibility: A Contract Theory Analysis’, J. Int'l Econ. L. 12 (2009), p. 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aaken, Anne and Kurtz, Jürgen, ‘The Global Financial Crisis and International Economic Law’, University of St Gallen Law and Economics Working Paper (2009), No. 4, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1417957, accessed 8 November 2010.
Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘Whither the International Community?’, EJIL 9 (1998), p. 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adede, A. O., ‘The Minimum Standards in a World of Disparities’, in Macdonald, R. S. J. and Johnston, D. M. (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (The Hague: Kluwer, 1983), p. 1001.Google Scholar
Afilalo, Ari, ‘Constitutionalization through the Back Door: A European Perspective on NAFTA's Investment Chapter’, NYU J. Int'l L. & Pol. 34 (2001), p. 1.
Afilalo, Ari, ‘Towards a Common Law of International Investment: How NAFTA Chapter 11 Panels Should Solve their Legitimacy Crisis’, Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 17 (2004), p. 51.Google Scholar
Aguilar Alvarez, Guillermo and Park, W. W., ‘The New Face of Investment Arbitration: NAFTA Chapter 11’, Yale J. Int'l L. 28 (2003), p. 365.Google Scholar
Akehurst, Michael, ‘Custom as a Source of International Law’, BYIL 47 (1974–75), p. 1.
Alvarez Alvarez, Guillermo and Reisman, William M. (eds.), The Reasons Requirement in International Investment Arbitration: Critical Case Studies (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008).CrossRef
Akehurst, Michael, ‘Equity and General Principles of Law’, ICLQ 25 (1976), p. 801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alenfeld, Justus, Die Investitionsförderungsverträge der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Frankfurt: Athenaeum, 1971).Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Kress, Ken, ‘Against Legal Principles’, Iowa L. Rev. 82 (1997), p. 739.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, Theorie der juristischen Argumentation: Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung, 1st edn (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1978).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, Theorie der Grundrechte (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1985).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs: Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1995).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, ‘On the Structure of Legal Principles’, Ratio Juris 13 (2000), p. 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (trans. Julian, Rivers) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, ‘Die logische Analyse juristischer Entscheidungen’, in Alexy, R., Koch, H.-J, Kuhlen, L and Rüßmann, H (eds.), Elemente einer juristischen Begründungslehre (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003), p. 9.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert and Dreier, Ralf, ‘Statutory Interpretation in the Federal Republic of Germany’, in MacCormick, D. N. (ed.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1991), p. 73.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, Koch, Hans-Joachim, Kuhlen, Lothar and Rüßmann, Helmut (eds.), Elemente einer juristischen Begründungslehre (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003).
,ALI, Restatement of the Law (Second): Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1965).
,ALI, Restatement of the Law (Third): Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1986).
Allott, Philip, Eunomia: New Order for a New World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Al-Sanhoury, A.-A., Le Standard Juridique, Recueil d'études sur les sources du droit en l'honnour de François Gény, Les sources générales des systèmes juridiques actuels (Paris, 1934), Vol. II.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Jiménez, Alberto, ‘The Methanex Final Award: An Analysis from the Perspectives of Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Foreign Investors’, Journal of International Arbitration 23 (2006), p. 427.Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan F., ‘State Breaches of Contracts with Aliens and International Law’, AJIL 58 (1964), p. 881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenas, Mads and Zleptnig, Stefan, ‘Proportionality: WTO Law in Comparative Perspective’, Tex. Int'l L.J. 42 (2007), p. 371.Google Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio, ‘La responsabilité internationale des États à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers’, RGDIP 13 (1906), pp. 5–29 and 285–309.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto, ‘Diskursethik als Verantwortungsethik: Eine postmetaphysische Transformation der Ethik Kants’, in Schönrich, G and Kato, Y. (eds.), Kant in der Diskussion der Moderne (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1996), p. 326.Google Scholar
,Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics.
Atienza, Manuel and Ruiz Manero, Juan, A Theory of Legal Sentences (Boston: Kluwer, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John, Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law, 5th edn (London: Murray, 1885), Vol. II.Google Scholar
Ávila, Humberto B., Theorie der Rechtsprinzipien (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2006).Google Scholar
Baccari, Jake A., ‘The Loewen Claim: A Creative Use of NAFTA's Chapter 11’, U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 34 (2003), p. 465.Google Scholar
Ballestrem, Karl (ed.), Internationale Gerechtigkeit (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 2001).CrossRef
Banz, Michael, Völkerrechtlicher Eigentumsschutz durch Investitionsschutzabkommen: insbesondere die Praxis der Bundesrepublik Deutschland seit 1959 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1988).Google Scholar
Barry, Brian, Theories of Justice: A Treatise on Social Justice (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’, JWT 35 (2001), p. 499.Google Scholar
Baxter, R. R., ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’, BYIL 41 (1965–66), p. 275.Google Scholar
Baxter, R. R., ‘Treaties and Custom’, RdC 129 (1970 I), p. 25.Google Scholar
Been, Vicki, ‘NAFTA's Investment Protections and the Division of Authority for Land Use and Environmental Control’, Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 20 (2002), p. 19.Google Scholar
Behrens, Peter, ‘Towards the Constitutionalization of International Investment Protection’, ArchVR 45 (2007), p. 153.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Belman, Murray J., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under NAFTA's Investment Chapter’, Remarks, ASIL Proc. 96 (2002), p. 12.Google Scholar
Berger, Rolf, ‘Vermögensschutz im Ausland durch Investitionsförderungsverträge’, AWD 11 (1965), p. 1.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul S. (ed.), The Globalization of International Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).
Bernstorff, Jochen, ‘Sisyphus was an International Lawyer: On Martti Koskenniemi's “From Apology to Utopia” and the Place of Law in International Politics’, German L. J. 7 (2006), p. 1015.Google Scholar
Beveridge, Fiona (ed.), Globalization and International Investment (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005).
Bezdek, Bianca, ‘Czech Republic: Broadcasting – Treaties and Laws: Case Comment’, Ent. L.R. 13 (2002), pp. N25–29.Google Scholar
Bishop, Doak R., Crawford, James and Reisman, W. M. (eds.), Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary (The Hague: Kluwer, 2005).
Bishop, R. D. and Luzi, Roberto A., ‘Investment Claims: First Lessons from Argentina’, in Weiler, T (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May, 2005), p. 425.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K., ‘Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims’, Va J. Int'l L. 45 (2005), p. 809.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, Albert, Grundprobleme und Methoden des Völkerrechts (Freiburg: Alber, 1982).Google Scholar
Böckstiegel, Karl-Heinz, ‘The Role of Arbitrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Berg, A. J (ed.), International Commercial Arbitration: Important Contemporary Questions, ICCA Congress Series (2003), Vol. 11, p. 366.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel, ‘Rules vs. Standards in International Environmental Law’, ASIL Proc. 98 (2004), p. 275.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean, Les six livres de la république (1576).
Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Constitutional Principles’, in Bogdandy, A and Bast, J (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Oxford: Hart, 2006), p. 3.Google Scholar
Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Oxford: Hart, 2006).
Bogdandy, Armin and Cruz Villalón, Pedro (eds.), Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum: Grundlagen und Grundzüge staatlichen Verfassungsrechts (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2007), Vol. 1.
Bonk, Heinz J., ‘§ 59’, in Stelkens, P., Bonk, H. J. and Sachs, M. (eds.), Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz: Kommentar, 7th edn (Munich: Beck, 2008).Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad or the Law of International Claims (New York: The Banks Law Publishing Co., 1922).Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘The Law of Responsibility of States for Damage Done in their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners’, AJIL Spec. Suppl. 23 (1929), p. 131.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘The “Minimum Standard” of the Treatment of Aliens’, Mich. L. Rev. 38 (1940), p. 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Anthony W. and Ewing, Keith D., Constitutional and Administrative Law, 13th edn (Harlow: Longman, 2003).Google Scholar
Breemer, J. D., ‘Playing the Expectations Game: When are Investment-Backed Land Use Expectations (un)reasonable in State Courts?’, Urb. Law. 38 (2006), p. 81.
Brierly, James Leslie, ‘The Judicial Settlement of International Disputes’, in Lauterpacht, H. and Waldock, C. H. M. (eds.), The Basis of Obligation in International Law: And other Papers by the late James Leslie Brierly (Oxford: Clarendon, 1958), p. 93.Google Scholar
Bröhmer, Jürgen, Transparenz als Verfassungsprinzip: Grundgesetz und Europäische Union (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H., II, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under NAFTA's Investment Chapter’, Remarks, ASIL Proc. 96 (2002), p. 9.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H., II, ‘S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada: Case Report’, AJIL 98 (2004), p. 339.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H., II, ‘Why FTC Notes of Interpretation Constitute a Partial Amendment of NAFTA Article 1105’, Va J. Int'l L. 46 (2006), p. 347.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, 7th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Brugger, Winfried, Einführung in das öffentliche Recht der USA (Munich: Beck, 1993).Google Scholar
Buchwald, Delf, Der Begriff der rationalen juristischen Begründung (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1990).Google Scholar
Buchwald, Delf, ‘Die canones der Auslegung und rationale juristische Begründung’, ARSP (1993), p. 16.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke-White, William W., ‘The Argentine Financial Crisis: State Liability under BITs and the Legitimacy of the ICSID System’, in Waibel, M, Kaushal, A, Chung, K.-H. and Balchin, C. (eds.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer, 2010), p. 407.Google Scholar
Burke-White, William W. and Staden, Andreas, ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Va J. Int'l L. 48 (2008), p. 307.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Wolfgang, Die Bedeutung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen in einem lateinamerikanischen Entwicklungsland und ihre rechtliche Behandlung: Dargestellt am Beispiel Mexikos (Tübingen, 1971).Google Scholar
Bydlinski, Franz, Fundamentale Rechtsgrundsätze: Zur rechtsethischen Verfassung der Sozietät (Vienna: Springer, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bydlinski, Franz, Juristische Methodenlehre und Rechtsbegriff, 2nd edn (Vienna: Springer, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caflisch, Lucius, ‘La pratique Suisse en matière de droit international public 1979’, Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für internationales Recht 36 (1980), p. 138.Google Scholar
Calvo, Carlos, Le droit international théorique et pratique: Précédé d'un exposé historique des progrés de la science du droit des gens, 4th edn (Paris: Guillaumin, 1887/1888).Google Scholar
Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm, Systemdenken und Systembegriff in der Jurisprudenz: Entwickelt am Beispiel des deutschen Privatrechts (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1969).Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, Enzo and Bonafé, Beatrice, ‘Fragmenting International Law through Compromissory Clauses?: Some Remarks on the Decision of the ICJ in the Oil Platforms Case’, EJIL 16 (2005), p. 481.CrossRef
Carreau, Dominique, Flory, Thiébaut and Juillard, Patrick, Droit international économique, 3rd edn (Paris: LGDJ, 1990).Google Scholar
Carreau, Dominique and Juillard, Patrick, Droit internationale économique, 3rd edn (Paris: LGDJ, 2007).Google Scholar
Carty, Anthony, ‘Critical International Law: Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law’, EJIL 2 (1991), p. 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, Deborah Z., ‘The “Constitutionalization” of international Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade’, EJIL 12 (2001), p. 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law: As Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Stevens, 1953).Google Scholar
Cheng, Tai-Heng, ‘Power, Authority and International Investment Law’, Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 20 (2005), p. 465.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tai-Heng, ‘Precedent and Control in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, Fordham Int'l L.J. 30 (2007), p. 1014.Google Scholar
Choudhury, Barnali, ‘Evolution or Devolution? – Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law’, JWIT 6 (2005), p. 297.Google Scholar
Chung, Olivia, ‘The Lopsided International Investment Law Regime and Its Effects on the Future of Investor-State Arbitration’, Va J. Int'l L. 47 (2007), p. 953.Google Scholar
Coe, Jack J., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under NAFTA's Investment Chapter’, Remarks, ASIL Proc. 96 (2002), p. 17.Google Scholar
Coleman, Andrew and Maogoto, Jackson, ‘After the Party, is there a Cure for the Hangover?: The Challenges of the Global Economy to Westphalian Sovereignty’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration 20 (2003), p. 35.Google Scholar
Collins, David, ‘Review of 2006 ICSID Decisions’, Manchester J. Int'l Econ. L. 3 (2006), p. 111.Google Scholar
Comeaux, Paul E. and Kinsella, Stephan N., Protecting Foreign Investment under International Law: Legal Aspects of Political Risk (Dobbs Ferry, New York: Oceana Publications, 1997).Google Scholar
Coomans, Fons, ‘The Ogoni Case Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights', ICLQ 52 (2003), p. 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordonier Segger, Marie-Claire and Khalfan, Ashfaq, Sustainable Development Law: Principles, Practices and Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corten, Olivier, ‘The Notion of “Reasonable” in International Law: Legal Discourse, Reason and Contradictions’, ICLQ 48 (1999), p. 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cot, Jean-Pierre, ‘Margin of Appreciation’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2nd edn (Online Publication) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), available at www.mpepil.com, accessed 8 November 2010.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas and Schefer, Krista N., ‘Good Faith and the Protection of Legitimate Expectations in the WTO’, New Directions in International Economic Law (2000), p. 47.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul, EU Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘Is There a Need for an Appellate System?’, in Ortino, F., Sheppard, A. and Warner, H. (eds.), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues I (London: BIICL, 2006), Vol. 1, p. 15.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration’, TDM 6 (2009), issue 1.Google Scholar
Cremer, Hans-Joachim, ‘John Rawls’ “The Law of Peoples”: Ein tauglicher Ansatz für eine Philosophie der internationalen Beziehungen?', in Cremer, H.-J, Giegerich, T., Richter, D. and Zimmermann, A. (eds.), Tradition und Weltoffenheit des Rechts: Festschrift für Helmut Steinberger (Berlin: Springer, 2002), p. 97.Google Scholar
Cremona, John J., ‘The Proportionality Principle in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, in Beyerlin, U., Bothe, M., Hofmann, R. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Völkerrecht, Europarecht, Staatsrecht. Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt (Berlin: Springer, 1995), p. 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croley, Steven P. and Jackson, John H., ‘WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments’, AJIL 90 (1996), p. 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahm, Georg, Delbrück, Jost and Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht: Die Grundlagen. Die Völkerrechtssubjekte, 2nd edn (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1989), Vol. I/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahm, Georg, Delbrück, Jost and Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht: Der Staat und andere Völkerrechtssubjekte. Räume unter internationaler Verwaltung, 2nd edn (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2002), Vol. I/2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Delbrück, Jost, ‘Proportionality’, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Consolidated Library Edn (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997), Vol. III/V, p. 1140.Google Scholar
Desmedt, Axel, ‘Proportionality in WTO Law’, J. Int'l Econ. L. (2001), p. 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhooge, Lucien J., ‘The North American Free Trade Agreement and the Environment: The Lessons of Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States’, Minn. J. Global Trade 10 (2001), p. 209.Google Scholar
Dhooge, Lucien J., ‘The Loewen Group v. United States: Punitive Damages and the Foreign Investment Provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement’, Conn. J. Int'l L. 19 (2004), p. 495.Google Scholar
Di Rosa, Paolo, ‘The Recent Wave of Arbitrations against Argentina under Bilateral Investment Treaties: Background and Principal Legal Issues’, U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 36 (2004), p. 41.Google Scholar
Dodge, William S., ‘Metalclad Corporation v. Mexico: Case Report’, AJIL 95 (2001), p. 910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, William S., ‘Loewen Group, Inc. v. United States and Mondev International Ltd. v. United States: Case Report’, AJIL 98 (2004), p. 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doehring, Karl, Die allgemeinen Regeln des völkerrechtlichen Fremdenrechts und das deutsche Verfassungsrecht (Heidelberg: Heymanns, 1963).Google Scholar
Doehring, Karl, ‘Gewohnheitsrecht aus Verträgen’, ZaöRV 36 (1976), p. 77.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, Eigentum, Enteignung und Entschädigung im geltenden Völkerrecht (Berlin: Springer, 1985).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?’, NYU Envtl L.J. 11 (2002), p. 64.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Wirtschaftliche Souveränität im Zeitalter der Globalisierung’, in Cremer, H.-J., Giegerich, T., Richter, D. and Zimmermann, A. (eds.), Tradition und Weltoffenheit des Rechts: Festschrift für Helmut Steinberger (Berlin: Springer, 2002), p. 137.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Generalklauseln in Investitionsschutzverträgen’, in Frowein, J. A. (ed.), Verhandeln für den Frieden: Liber Amicorum Tono Eitel (Berlin: Springer, 2003), p. 291.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties’, Int'l Law. 39 (2005), p. 87.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Meistbegünstigungsklauseln in Investitionsschutzverträgen’, in Bröhmer, J (ed.), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70. Geburtstag am 21. Januar 2005 (Cologne: Heymanns, 2005), p. 47.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘National Treatment: New Developments’, in ICSID, OECD and UNCTAD (eds.), Making the Most of International Investment Agreements: A Common Agenda (Paris: 2005).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘The Impact of International Investment Treaties on Domestic Administrative Law’, NYUJ Int'l L. & Pol. 37 (2005), p. 953.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Law’, Remarks, ASIL Proc. 100 (2006), p. 69.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Wirtschaft und Kultur im Völkerrecht’, in Graf Vitzthum, W. (ed.), Völkerrecht, 4th edn (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007), p. 491.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph H., Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf and Stevens, Margrete, Bilateral Investment Treaties (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar
Dougherty, Kara, ‘Methanex v. United States: The Realignment of NAFTA Chapter 11 with Environmental Regulation’, Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 27 (2007), p. 735.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, BYIL 74 (2003), p. 151.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, ‘Nothing if Not Critical for Investment Treaty Arbitration: Occidental, Eureko and Methanex’, Arb. Int'l 22 (2006), p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick, ‘The Quest to Define “Fair and Equitable Treatment” for Investors under International Law: The Case of the NAFTA Chapter 11 Pope & Talbot Awards’, JWIT 3 (2002), p. 151.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice’, NYU J. Int'l L. & Pol. 31 (1999), p. 791.Google Scholar
Dupuy, René-Jean, ‘Communauté internationale et disparités de développement’, RdC 165 (1979 IV), p. 9.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Law's Empire (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘The Rule of (Administrative) Law in International Law’, Law & Contemp. Probs 68 (2005), p. 127.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Clyde, ‘Denial of Justice in International Law’, AJIL 22 (1928), p. 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Clyde, The Responsibility of States in International Law (New York: University Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Lockhart, Nicolas, ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’, J. Int'l Econ. L. 7 (2004), p. 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilmansberger, Thomas, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties and EU Law’, CMLR 46 (2009), p. 383.Google Scholar
Emmerich-Fritsche, Angelika, Vom Völkerrecht zum Weltrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engländer, Armin, Diskurs als Rechtsquelle?: Zur Kritik der Diskurstheorie des Rechts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002).Google Scholar
Esser, Josef, Grundsatz und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts, 2nd edn (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1964).Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel C., ‘Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law’, Yale L.J. 115 (2006), p. 1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falsafi, Alireza, ‘The International Minimum Standard of Treatment of Foreign Investors’ Property: A Contingent Standard', Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 30 (2007), p. 317.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo, ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’, Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 36 (1998), p. 529.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo, ‘The Meaning of International Constitutional Law’, in Macdonald, R. S. J and Johnston, D. M. (eds.), Towards World Constitutionalism: Issues in the Legal Ordering of the World Community (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2005), p. 837.Google Scholar
Fastenrath, Ulrich, Lücken im Völkerrecht: Zu Rechtscharakter, Quellen, Systemzusammenhang, Methodenlehre und Funktionen des Völkerrechts (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatouros, Argyres A., Government Guarantees for Foreign Investors (Columbia: Columbia University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Fauchald, Ole K., ‘The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals: An Empirical Analysis’, EJIL 19 (2008), p. 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fietta, Stephen, ‘Most Favoured Nation Treatment and Dispute Resolution under Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Turning Point’, Int. ALR 8 (2005), p. 131.Google Scholar
Fietta, Stephen, ‘Expropriation and the “Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ “Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration', Journal of International Arbitration 23 (2006), p. 375.Google Scholar
Fietta, Stephen, ‘International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. The United Mexican States: An Indication of the Limits of the “Legitimate Expectation” Basis of Claim under Article 1105 of NAFTA?’, TDM 3 (2006), issue 2.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, ‘Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Mich. J. Int'l L. 25 (2004), p. 999.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2006).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, ‘Fragmentierung des Weltrechts: Vernetzung globaler Regimes statt etatistischer Rechtseinheit’, in Albert, M. and Stichweh, R. (eds.), Weltstaat und Weltstaatlichkeit: Beobachtungen globaler politischer Strukturbildung (Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss., 2007), p. 37.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald G., ‘The Meaning of the Term “Denial of Justice”’, BYIL 13 (1932), p. 93.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, ‘The Practical Working of the Law of Treaties’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 173.Google Scholar
Focarelli, Carlo, ‘Denial of Justice’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2nd edn (Online Publication) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), available at: www.mpepil.com, accessed 8 November 2010.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer, Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung: Elemente einer konstruktivistischen Theorie der Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2007).Google Scholar
Foy, Patrick G. and Deane, Robert J. C., ‘Foreign Investment Protection under Investment Treaties: Recent Developments under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement’, ICSID Rev. – FILJ 16 (2001), p. 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frakes, Vincent L., ‘In the Driver's Seat – NAFTA's Chapter 11 as a Judicial Vehicle for the Expansion of Investor Rights’, Bus. L. Brief (Am. U.) 1 (2005), p. 49.Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco, ‘Equity in International Law’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2nd edn (Online Publication) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), available at: www.mpepil.com, accessed 8 November 2010.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., ‘Occidental Exploration & Production Co. v. Republic of Ecuador’, Case Report, AJIL 99 (2005), p. 675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Susan D., ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions’, Fordham L. Rev. 73 (2005), p. 1521.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., ‘The Role of International Arbitrators’, ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 12 (2006), p. 499.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., ‘Empirically Evaluating Claims about Investment Treaty Arbitrations’, NCL Rev. 86 (2007), p. 1.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law’, Pac. McGeorge Bus. & Dev. L.J. 19 (2007), p. 337.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Fairness in the International Legal and Institutional System: General Course on Public International Law’, RdC 240 (1993 III), p. 9.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’, AJIL 102 (2008), p. 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Alwyn V., The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice (Liége: Vaillant-Carmanne, 1938).Google Scholar
Frick, Helmut, Bilateraler Investitionsschutz in Entwicklungsländern: Ein Vergleich der Vertragssysteme der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1975).Google Scholar
Friedmann, Wolfgang, The Changing Structure of International Law (London: Stevens, 1964).Google Scholar
Gagné, Gilbert and Morin, Jean-Frédéric, ‘The Evolving American Policy on Investment Protection: Evidence from recent FTAs and the 2004 Model BIT’, J. Int'l Econ. L. 9 (2006), p. 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, Sanford E., ‘Methanex Corp. v. United States: Case Report’, AJIL 100 (2006), p. 683.Google Scholar
Gantz, David A., ‘Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Government of Canada – Case Report’, AJIL 97 (2003), p. 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Carlos G., ‘All the Other Dirty Little Secrets: Investment Treaties, Latin America, and the Necessary Evil of Investor-State Arbitration’, Fla J. Int'l L. 16 (2004), p. 301.Google Scholar
García Amador, F. V., ‘State Responsibility’, Document A/CN.4/106, ILC Yearbook (1957 II), p. 104.
García-Bolívar, Omar E., ‘The Teleology of International Investment Law: The Role of Purpose in the Interpretation of International Investment Agreements’, JWIT 6 (2005), p. 751.Google Scholar
Garner, Bryan A. (ed.), Black's Law Dictionary, 8th edn (St Paul: Thomson West, 2004).
Gehring, Markus W. and Cordonier Segger, Marie-Claire (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Trade Law (The Hague: Kluwer, 2005).
Gehring, Markus W., Cordonier Segger, Marie-Claire and Newcombe, Andrew (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (The Hague: Kluwer, 2011).
Godshall, Lauren E., ‘In the Cold Shadow of Metalclad: The Potential for Change to NAFTA's Chapter Eleven’, NYU Envtl L.J. 11 (2002), p. 264.Google Scholar
Griebel, Jörn, Internationales Investitionsrecht: Lehrbuch für Studium und Praxis (Munich: Beck, 2008).Google Scholar
Grierson-Weiler, Todd and Laird, Ian A., ‘Standards of Treatment’, in Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 259.Google Scholar
Gudgeon, K. S., ‘United States Bilateral Investment Treaties: Comments on their Origin, Purposes, and General Treatment Standards’, Int'l Tax & Bus. Law. 4 (1986), p. 105.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, 1st edn (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1992).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998).Google Scholar
Hafner, Gerhard, ‘Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law’, Mich. J. Int'l L. 25 (2004), p. 849.Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Kay, ‘Foreign Investment Protection in Developing Countries in Public International Law’, in Oppermann, T. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), Reforming the International Economic Order: German Legal Comments (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1987), p. 99.Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Kay (ed.), Die allgemeinen Regeln des völkerrechtlichen Fremdenrechts: Bilanz und Ausblick an der Jahrtausendwende (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 2000).
Hailbronner, Kay, ‘Der Staat und der Einzelne als Völkerrechtssubjekte’, in Graf Vitzthum, W. (ed.), Völkerrecht, 4th edn (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007), p. 157.Google Scholar
Hale, Thomas N. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Transparency: Possibilities and Limitations’, Fletcher F. World Aff. 30 (2006), p. 153.Google Scholar
Hallward-Driemeier, Mary, ‘Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract FDI? Only a bit … and they could bite’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3121 (2003).
Han, Xiuli, ‘The Application of the Principle of Proportionality in Tecmed v. Mexico’, Chinese JIL 6 (2007), p. 635.Google Scholar
Hansen, Patricia I., ‘Transparency, Standards of Review, and the Use of Trade Measures to Protect the Global Environment’, Va J. Int'l L. 39 (1999), p. 1017.Google Scholar
Happ, Richard and Rubins, Noah, ‘Awards and Decisions of ICSID Tribunals in 2005’, GYIL 48 (2005), p. 581.Google Scholar
Happ, Richard and Rubins, Noah, ‘Awards and Decisions of ICSID Tribunals in 2006’, GYIL 49 (2006), p. 623.Google Scholar
Harbine, Jenny, ‘NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration: Deciding the Price of Free Trade’, Ecology L.Q. 29 (2002), p. 371.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol, ‘Global Administrative Law: Quest for Principles and Values’, EJIL 17 (2006), p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus, The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1961).Google Scholar
Hector, Pascal, Das völkerrechtliche Abwägungsgebot: Abgrenzung der Souveränitätssphären durch Verfahren (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1992).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F., Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts: Mit Hegels eigenhändigen Randbemerkungen in seinem Handexemplar der Rechtsphilosophie (Hamburg: Meiner [4th edn 1955], 1821).Google Scholar
Heiskanen, Veijo, ‘“Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures” as a Cause of Action under the Energy Charter Treaty’, Int. ALR 10 (2007), p. 104.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, International Law: Politics and Values (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar
Herdegen, Matthias, ‘Das “konstruktive Völkerrecht” und seine Grenzen: die Dynamik des Völkerrechts als Methodenfrage’, in Dupuy, P.-M., Fassbender, B., Shaw, M. N. and Sommermann, K.-P. (eds.), Völkerrecht als Wertordnung: Festschrift für Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: Engel, 2006), p. 899.Google Scholar
Herdegen, Matthias, Völkerrecht, 7th edn (Munich: Beck, 2008).Google Scholar
Herdegen, Matthias, Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 8th edn (Munich: Beck, 2009).Google Scholar
Hesse, Konrad, Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 20th edn (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1995).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’, RdC 176 (1982 III), p. 259.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How we Use It (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Time and the Law: International Perspectives on an Old Problem’, ICLQ 46 (1997), p. 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilf, Meinhard, ‘Power, Rules and Principles – Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?’, J. Int'l Econ. L. 4 (2001), p. 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilf, Meinhard and Hörmann, Saskia, ‘Die WTO – Ein Gefahr für die Verwirklichung von Menschenrechten?’, ArchVR 43 (2005), p. 397.Google Scholar
Hilf, Meinhard and Oeter, Stefan, WTO-Recht: Rechtsordnung des Welthandels (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2005).Google Scholar
Hilf, Meinhard and Puth, Sebastian, ‘The Principle of Proportionality on its Way into WTO/GATT Law’, in Bogdandy, A., Mavroidis, P. C. and Mény, Y. (eds.), European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002), p. 199.Google Scholar
Hill, Sarah F., ‘The “Necessity Defense” and the Emerging Arbitral Conflict in its Application to the U.S. – Argentina Bilateral Investment Treaty’, L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 13 (2007), p. 547.Google Scholar
Hilpold, Peter, ‘Das Transparenzprinzip im internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Beziehungsgeflechts zwischen EU und WTO’, EuR (1999), p. 597.Google Scholar
Hilpold, Peter, ‘Human Rights and WTO Law: From Conflict to Coordination’, ArchVR 45 (2007), p. 484.Google Scholar
Hindelang, Steffen, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties, Custom and a Healthy Investment Climate – The Question of Whether BITs Influence Customary International Law Revisited’, JWIT 5 (2004), p. 789.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, Lothar, Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit (Göttingen: Schwartz, 1981).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (1651).
Hobér, Kaj, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Determining Compensation’, TDM 4 (2007), issue 6.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Anne K., ‘Indirect Expropriation’, in Reinisch, A. (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huiping, Chen, ‘Comments on the MAI's General Principles for the Treatment of Foreign Investors and Their Investments: A Chinese Scholar's Perspective’, in Nieuwenhuys, E. C. and Brus, M. M. T. A. (eds.), Multilateral Regulation of Investment (The Hague: Aspen, 2001), p. 67.Google Scholar
Huu-Tru, Nguyen, ‘Le réseau Suisse d'accords bilatéraux d'encouragement et de protection des investissements’, RGDIP 92 (1988), p. 577.Google Scholar
,ICSID, ‘Possible Improvements of the Framework for ICSID Arbitration’, Discussion Paper (2004), available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/ViewNewsReleases.jsp, accessed 9 November 2010.
Ihering, Rudolf, Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung, 4th edn, 8th reprint, Part 2 (Basel: Schwabe, 1883).Google Scholar
,ILA, Final Conference Report New Delhi: ILA Committee on the Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development (2002), available at: www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/25, accessed 8 November 2010.
,ILA, New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law Relating to Sustainable Development: 70th Conference of the ILA, Published as Annex to UN Document A/57/329 (New Delhi: 2002).
,ILA, Toronto Conference: Second Report of the ILA Committee on the International Law on Sustainable Development (2006), available at: www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/1017, accessed 8 November 2010.
,ILA, Rio de Janeiro Conference: Third Report of the ILA Committee on International Law of Sustainable Development (2008), available at: www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/1017, accessed 8 November 2010.
,ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses’, Document A/33/10, ILC Yearbook (1978 II), p. 7.
,ILC, ‘Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’, ILC Report A/61/10, Chapter XII (2006).
,IMF, Balance of Payments Manual, 5th edn (Washington: IMF, 1993).Google Scholar
Ipsen, Knut, Völkerrecht, 5th edn (Munich: Beck, 2004).Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., World Trade and the Law of GATT (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969).Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., Restructuring the GATT System (London: Pinter Publishers, 1990).Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2nd edn (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, M. W., ‘Equity in International Law’, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Consolidated Library Edn (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995), Vol. II/V, p. 109.Google Scholar
Jarass, Hans D., ‘Article 3’, in Jarass, H. D. and Pieroth, B. (eds.), Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Kommentar, 8th edn (Munich: Beck, 2006).Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, Kanishka, ‘Globalization, Law, and the Transformation of Sovereignty: The Emergence of Global Regulatory Governance’, Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 6 (1999), p. 425.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. W., ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’, BYIL 30 (1953), p. 401.Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert Y.General Course on Principles of International Law’, RdC 121 (1967 II), p. 321.Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert Y. and Watts, Arthur, Oppenheim's International Law, 9th edn (Harlow: Longman, 1992), Vol. I.Google Scholar
Jiménez de Aréchaga, Eduardo, ‘The Work and the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice 1947–1986’, BYIL 58 (1987), p. 1.Google Scholar
Juillard, Patrick, ‘L’évolution des sources du droit des investissements', RdC 250 (1994 VI), p. 9.Google Scholar
Juillard, Patrick, ‘Calvo Doctrine/Calvo Clause’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2nd edn (Online Publication) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), available at: www.mpepil.com, accessed 8 November 2010.Google Scholar
Kadelbach, Stefan and Kleinlein, Thomas, ‘Inernational Law – a Constitution for Mankind?: An Attempt at a Re-appraisal with an Analysis of Constitutional Principles’, GYIL 50 (2007), p. 303.Google Scholar
Kalb, Johanna, ‘Creating an ICSID Appellate Body’, UCLA J. Int'l L. & Foreign Aff. 10 (2005), p. 179.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Zum ewigen Frieden: Ein philosophischer Entwurf (1795).
Kantor, Mark, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Echoes of FDR's Court-Packing Plan in the International Law Approach towards Regulatory Expropriation’, The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 5 (2006), p. 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, Louis, ‘Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’, Duke L.J. 42 (1992), p. 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Was ist Gerechtigkeit? (Vienna: Reclam [reprinted 2007], 1953).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd edn (Vienna: Deuticke, 1960).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans and Tucker, Robert W., Principles of International Law, 2nd edn (New York: Holt, 1967).Google Scholar
Kennedy, David, International Legal Structures (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1987).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de siècle (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Kentin, Esther, ‘Economic Crisis and Investment Arbitration: The Argentine Cases’, in Kahn, P. and Wälde, T. W. (eds.), Les aspects nouveaux du droit des investissements internationaux – New Aspects of International Investment Law (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2007), p. 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little Brown, 1977).Google Scholar
Kewenig, Wilhelm, Der Grundsatz der Nichtdiskriminierung im Völkerrecht der internationalen Handelsbeziehungen: Der Begriff der Diskriminierung (Frankfurt: Athenaeum, 1972), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Khalil, Mohamed I., ‘Treatment of Foreign Investment in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, ICSID Rev. – FILJ 8 (1992), p. 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. and Aliber, Robert Z., Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises, 5th edn (Hoboken: Wiley, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law & Contemp. Probs 68 (2005), p. 15.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict and Schill, Stephan W., ‘Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law’, IILJ Working Paper 2009, No. 6, available at: www.iilj.org/publications/2009-6Kingsbury-Schill.asp, accessed 8 November 2010.
Kirkman, Courtney C., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Methanex v. United States and the Narrowing Scope of NAFTA Article 1105’, Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 34 (2002), p. 343.Google Scholar
Kischel, Uwe, State Contracts: Völker-, schieds- und internationalprivatrechtliche Aspekte des anwendbaren Rechts (Stuttgart: Boorberg, 1992).Google Scholar
Kishoiyian, Bernard, ‘The Utility of Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Formulation of Customary International Law’, Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 14 (1994), p. 327.Google Scholar
Kläger, Roland, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’, JWIT 11 (2010), p. 435.Google Scholar
Kläger, Roland, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment and Sustainable Development’, in Gehring, M. W., Segger, M.-C.Cordonier and Newcombe, A. (eds.), Sustainable Development in International Investment Law (The Hague: Kluwer, 2011).Google Scholar
Klein, Eckart, ‘Die Internationalen und die Supranationalen Organisationen’, in Graf Vitzthum, W. (ed.), Völkerrecht, 4th edn (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007), p. 265.Google Scholar
Klein Bronfman, Marcela, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Evolving Standard’, Max Planck UNYB 10 (2006), p. 609.Google Scholar
Koch, Hans-Joachim and Rüßmann, Helmut, Juristische Begründungslehre: Eine Einführung in Grundprobleme der Rechtswissenschaft (Munich: Beck, 1982).Google Scholar
Kohona, Palitha T. B., ‘Investment Protection Agreements: An Australian Perspective’, JWT 21 (1987), p. 79.Google Scholar
Kokott, Juliane, ‘States, Sovereign Equality’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2nd edn (Online Publication) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), available at: www.mpepil.com, accessed 8 November 2010.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, ‘Principles as Sources of International Law: With Special Reference to Good Faith’, NILR 53 (2006), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolo, Abba, ‘Investor Protection vs Host State Regulatory Autonomy during Economic Crisis: Treatment of Capital Transfers and Restrictions under Modern Investment Treaties’, JWIT 8 (2007), p. 457.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Politics of International Law’, EJIL 1 (1990), p. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Police in the Tempel: Order, Justice and the UN: A Dialectical View’, EJIL 6 (1995), p. 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘General Principles: Reflexions on Constructivist Thinking in International Law’, in Koskenniemi, M. (ed.), Sources of International Law (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 2000), p. 359.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘What is International Law for?’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 89.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument, Reissue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, UN Document A/CN.4/L.682 (Geneva: 2006).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Legal Theory and Doctrine’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2nd edn (Online Publication) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), available at: www.mpepil.com, accessed 8 November 2010.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti and Leino, Päivi, ‘Fragmentation of International Law?: Postmodern Anxieties’, Leiden J. Int'l L. 15 (2002), p. 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotera, Akira, ‘Regulatory Transparency’, in Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Krafft, Matthias-Charles, ‘Les accords bilatéraux sur la protection des investissements conclus par la Suisse’, in Dicke, D. C. (ed.), Foreign Investment in the Present and a New International Economic Order (Fribourg: University Press, 1987), p. 72.Google Scholar
Krajewski, Markus, Wirtschaftsvölkerrecht (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 2006).Google Scholar
Krajewski, Markus and Ceyssens, Jan, ‘Internationaler Investitionsschutz und innerstaatliche Regulierung: Eine Untersuchung anhand der bilateralen Investitionsabkommen Deutschlands’, ArchVR 45 (2007), p. 180.Google Scholar
Kreindler, Richard, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment – A Comparative International Law Approach’, TDM 3 (2006), issue 3.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico and Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, EJIL 17 (2006), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfol, Zouhair A., Protection of Foreign Investment: A Study in International Law (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1972).Google Scholar
Krugmann, Michael, Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit im Völkerrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004).Google Scholar
Kühn, Wolfgang and Gantenberg, Ulrike, ‘Die CME Saga – Ein internationaler Investitionsstreit’, SchiedsVZ (2004), p. 1.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, ‘National Treatment, Foreign Investment and Regulatory Autonomy: The Search for Protectionism or Something More?’, in Kahn, P. and Wälde, T. W. (eds.), Les aspects nouveaux du droit des investissements internationaux – New Aspects of International Investment Law (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2007), p. 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, Ian A., ‘Betrayal, Shock and Outrage – Recent Developments in NAFTA Article 1105’, Asper Rev. Int'l Bus. & Trade L. 3 (2003), p. 185.Google Scholar
Larenz, Karl, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 6th edn (Berlinet al.: Springer, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larenz, Karl and Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 3rd edn (Berlin: Springer, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, Elihu, Aspects of the Administration of International Justice (Cambridge: Grotius Publications, 1991).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon, 1933).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens & Sons, 1958).Google Scholar
Laviec, Jean-Pierre, Protection et promotion des investissements: Étude de droit internationale économique, Publications de l'Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, Genève (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Jessica C., ‘Chicken Little Revisited: NAFTA Regulatory Expropriations after Methanex’, Ga L. Rev. 41 (2006), p. 261.Google Scholar
Leben, Charles, ‘L’évolution du Droit International des Investissements: Un accord multilateral sur l'investissement: d'un forum de négociation à l'autre, organised by the Société Française pour le Droit International', Journée d'études (1999), p. 7.Google Scholar
Legrand, Pierre, ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, Maastricht J. Europ. & Comp. L. 4 (1997), p. 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberti, Lahra, ‘Investissements et droits de l'homme’, in Kahn, P. and Wälde, T. W. (eds.), Les aspects nouveaux du droit des investissements internationaux – New Aspects of International Investment Law (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2007), p. 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillich, Richard B., ‘Duties of States Regarding the Civil Rights of Aliens’, RdC 161 (1978 III), p. 329.Google Scholar
Lillich, Richard B., ‘The Current Status of the Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens’, in Lillich, R. B. (ed.), International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1983), p. 1.Google Scholar
Lillich, Richard B., The Human Rights of Aliens in Contemporary International Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, On the Interpretation of Treaties: The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissitzyn, Oliver J., ‘The Meaning of the Term Denial of Justice in International Law’, AJIL 30 (1936), p. 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Looschelders, Dirk and Olzen, Dirk, ‘§ 242 BGB’, in Looschelders, D. and Martinek, M. (eds.), J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: Einleitung zu §§ 241 ff, §§ 241–243 (Einleitung zum Schuldrecht, Treu und Glauben) (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005).Google Scholar
Looschelders, Dirk and Roth, Wolfgang, Juristische Methodik im Prozeß der Rechtsanwendung: Zugleich ein Beitrag zu den verfassungsrechtlichen Grundlagen von Gesetzesauslegung und Rechtsfortbildung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments’, in Boyle, A. E. and Freestone, D. A. C. (eds.), International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘The Politics of Law-Making: Are the Method and Character of Norm Creation Changing?’, in Byers, M. (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 206.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Law’, Remarks, ASIL Proc. 100 (2006), p. 73.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas F., ‘Investment Agreements and International Law’, Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 42 (2003), p. 123.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas F., International Economic Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Die Weltgesellschaft’, ARSP 57 (1971), p. 1.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Donald N., Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon, 1978).Google Scholar
Macdonald, Ronald S. J., ‘The Margin of Appreciation in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, in Istituto di Diritto Internazionale e della Navigazione (ed.), Le droit international a l'heure de sa codification: Etudes en l'honneur de Roberto Ago (Milan: Giuffrè, 1987), Vol. III, p. 187.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Maniruzzaman, A. F. M., ‘Expropriation of Alien Property and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in International Law of Foreign Investment: An Overview’, J. Transnat'l L. & Pol'y 8 (1998), p. 57.Google Scholar
Mann, Frederick A., ‘British Treaties for the Formation and Protection of Investment’, BYIL 24 (1981), p. 241.Google Scholar
Mann, Frederick A., Further Studies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990).Google Scholar
Mann, Frederick A., The Legal Aspect of Money: With special reference to Comparative Private and Public International Law, 5th edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 1992).Google Scholar
Mann, Howard, International Investment Agreements, Business and Human Rights: Key Issues and Opportunities (2008), available at: www.iisd.org/pdf/2008/iia_business_human_rights.pdf, accessed 8 November 2010.
Mann, Howard, Moltke, Konrad, Peterson, Luke E. and Cosbey, Aaron, IISD Model International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable Development: Negotiators' Handbook, 2nd edn (2006), available at: www.iisd.org/pdf/2005/investment_model_int_handbook.pdf, accessed 8 November 2010.
Marceau, Gabrielle, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’, EJIL 13 (2002), p. 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Elizabeth A. and Law, Jonathan (eds.), Oxford Dictionary of Law, 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Martin, Rex and Reidy, David A. (eds.), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L., Merrill, Richard A. and Shane, Peter M., Administrative Law: The American Public Law System, 4th edn, 2nd reprint (St Paul, Minn.: West Group, 2001).Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘Governance of International Trade under World Trade Organization Agreements: Relationships between World Trade Organization Agreements and Other Trade Agreements’, JWT 38 (2004), p. 185.Google Scholar
Maurer, Hartmut, Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 16th edn (Munich: Beck, 2006).Google Scholar
Mayeda, Graham, ‘Playing Fair: The Meaning of Fair and Equitable Treatment in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, JWT 41 (2007), p. 273.Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S., Lasswell, Harold D. and Chen, Lung-Chu, Human Rights and World Public Order: The Basic Policies of an International Law of Human Dignity (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
McGhie, Teresa, ‘Bilateral and Multilateral Investment Treaties’, in Bradlow, D. D. and Escher, A. (eds.), Legal Aspects of Foreign Direct Investment (The Hague, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999), p. 107.Google Scholar
McKean, W. A., ‘The Meaning of Discrimination in International and Municipal Law’, BYIL 44 (1970), p. 177.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’, ICLQ 54 (2005), p. 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, Shore, Laurence and Weininger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melloni, Mattia, The Principle of National Treatment in the GATT: A Survey of the Jurisprudence, Practice and Policy (Brussels: Bruylant, 2005).Google Scholar
Merkt, Hanno, Investitionsschutz durch Stabilisierungsklauseln: Zur intertemporalen Rechtswahl in state contracts (Heidelberg: Verlag Recht & Wirtschaft, 1990).Google Scholar
Meyer-Ladewig, Jens (ed.), Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten: Handkommentar, 1. Aufl. (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003).
Michael, Lothar, ‘Gleichheitsrechte als grundrechtliche Prinzipien’, in Sieckmann, J.-R. (ed.), Die Prinzipientheorie der Grundrechte: Studien zur Grundrechtstheorie Robert Alexys (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007), p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, Frank I., ‘Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law’, Harv. L. Rev. 80 (1967), p. 1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 2nd edn (New York: Knopf, 1954).Google Scholar
Mosler, Hermann, ‘Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung’, ZaöRV (1976), p. 6.Google Scholar
Mosler, Hermann, The International Society as a Legal Community (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1980).Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T., ‘“Caveat Investor”? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’, ICLQ 55 (2006), p. 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T., Multinational Enterprises and the Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T., ‘Policy Issues’, in Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Friedrich and Christensen, Ralph, Juristische Methodik: Grundlagen Öffentliches Recht, 9th edn (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Müller, Jörg P., Vertrauensschutz im Völkerrecht (Cologne: Heymanns, 1971).Google Scholar
Nanda, Ved P., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under NAFTA's Investment Chapter’, Remarks, ASIL Proc. 96 (2002), p. 19.Google Scholar
Nettesheim, Martin, ‘Von der Verhandlungsdiplomatie zur internationalen Verfassungsordnung: Überlegungen zum Entwicklungsstand des internationalen Wirtschaftsrechts’, Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie 19 (2000), p. 48.Google Scholar
Nettesheim, Martin, ‘Das kommunitäre Völkerrecht’, JZ (2002), p. 569.Google Scholar
Nettesheim, Martin, ‘Art. 1 EGV’, in Grabitz, E., Hilf, M. and Nettesheim, M. (eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union, 38th edn (Munich: Beck, 2009), Vol. I.Google Scholar
Neumann, Jan, Die Koordination des WTO-Rechts mit anderen völkerrechtlichen Ordnungen: Konflikte des materiellen Rechts und Konkurrenzen der Streitbeilegung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2002).Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric and Spess, Laura, ‘Do Bilateral Investment Treaties increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries?’, World Development 33 (2005), p. 1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew and Paradell, Lluís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, 2009).Google Scholar
Niesen, Peter and Herborth, Benjamin (eds.), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2007).
Notter, Markus P., Völkerrechtlicher Investitionsschutz: Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der bilateralen Investitionsschutzverträge der Schweiz (Zürich, 1989).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Arthur, A Concise History of the Law of Nations, revised edn (New York: Macmillan, 1954).Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. F., Good Faith in International Law (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1991).Google Scholar
Oeter, Stefan, ‘Souveränität – ein überholtes Konzept?’, in Cremer, H.-J., Giegerich, T., Richter, D. and Zimmermann, A. (eds.), Tradition und Weltoffenheit des Rechts: Festschrift für Helmut Steinberger (Berlin: Springer, 2002), p. 259.Google Scholar
Oeter, Stefan, ‘The International Legal Order and its Judicial Function: Is there an International Community – despite the Fragmentation of Judicial Dispute Settlement?’, in Dupuy, P.-M., Fassbender, B., Shaw, M. N. and Sommermann, K.-P. (eds.), Völkerrecht als Wertordnung: Festschrift für Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: Engel, 2006), p. 583.Google Scholar
Ohler, Christoph, ‘Der Schutz des privaten Eigentums als Grundlage der internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung’, JZ (2006), p. 875.Google Scholar
Olasolo, Hector, ‘Have Public Interests been Forgotten in NAFTA Chapter 11 Foreign Investor / Host State Arbitration?: Some Conclusions from the Judgement of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the Case of Mexico v. Metalclad’, L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 8 (2002), p. 189.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘The Normative Basis of “Fair and Equitable Treatment”: General International Law of Foreign Investment?’, ArchVR 46 (2008), p. 74.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Natural Law and Justice’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2nd edn (Online Publication) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), available at: www.mpepil.com, accessed 8 November 2010.Google Scholar
Orellana, Marcos A., ‘Science, Risk and Uncertainty: Public Health Measures and Investment Disciplines’, in Kahn, P. and Wälde, T. W. (eds.), Les aspects nouveaux du droit des investissements internationaux – New Aspects of International Investment Law (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2007), p. 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oschmann, Friedrich, Calvo-Doktrin und Calvo-Klauseln: Wechselnde Realitäten im internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht Lateinamerikas (Heidelberg: Verlag Recht & Wirtschaft, 1993).Google Scholar
Osterkamp, Thomas, Juristische Gerechtigkeit: Rechtswissenschaft jenseits von Positivismus und Naturrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).Google Scholar
Panetta, Frank, Ausländische Direktinvestitionen und Welthandelsordnung (Heidelberg, 2003).Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas L. and Ahrensdorf, Peter J., Justice Among Nations: On the Moral Basis of Power and Peace (Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1999).Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan, ‘Arbitration without Privity’, ICSID Rev. – FILJ 10 (1995), p. 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsson, Jan, Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L., Die internationale Gemeinschaft im Völkerrecht: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung des Völkerrechts im Zeitalter der Globalisierung (Munich: Beck, 2001).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’, AJIL 95 (2001), p. 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘Article 38’, in Zimmermann, A., Tomuschat, C. and Oellers-Frahm, K. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 677.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, Elemente einer Theorie der Verfassung Europas (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2001).Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Global Constitutionalism in a Nutshell’, in Dicke, K., Hobe, S., Meyn, K.-U., Peters, A., Riedel, E., Schütz, H.-J. and Tietje, C. (eds.), Weltinnenrecht: Liber Amicorum Jost Delbrück (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2005), p. 535.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘The Transformation of the World Trading System through the 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization’, EJIL 6 (1995), p. 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Luke E., ‘Siemens waives Rights under Arbitral Award against Argentina’, Investment Arbitration Reporter 2 (2009), No. 14.Google Scholar
Pfaff, Christina, ‘Investment Protection by Other Mechanism: The Role of Human Rights Institutions and the WTO’, in Hofmann, R. and Tams, C. (eds.), The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock after 40 Years (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007), p. 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, Ed, ‘Shell pays out $15.5m over Saro-Wiwa killing’, The Guardian, 9 June 2009.
Pogge, Thomas W., Realizing Rawls (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W. and Moellendorf, Darrel (eds.), Global Justice: Seminal Essays (St Paul: Paragon House, 2008).Google Scholar
Porterfield, Matthew C., ‘An International Common Law of Investor Rights?’, U. Pa J. Int'l Econ. L. 27 (2006), p. 79.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe, ‘Mechanical Jurisprudence’, Colum. L. Rev. 8 (1908), p. 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, Roscoe, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law, revised edn (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Prechal, Sacha and Leeuw, Madeleine, ‘Dimensions of Transparency: The Building Blocks for a New Legal Principle?’, Review of European Administrative Law 0 (2007), p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preiswerk, Roy, La protection des investissements privés dans les traités bilatéraux (Zürich: Polygraph, 1963).Google Scholar
Preiswerk, Roy, ‘New Developments in Bilateral Investment Protection: With Special Reference to Belgian Practice’, Revue Belge de Droit International 3 (1967), p. 173.Google Scholar
Puvimanasinghe, Shyami F., Foreign Investment, Human Rights and the Environment: A Perspective from South Asia on the Role of Public International Law for Development (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaritsch, Helmut, ‘Bodins Souveränität und das Völkerrecht’, ArchVR 17 (1977/1978), p. 257.Google Scholar
Qureshi, Asif H., ‘An Appellate System in International Investment Arbitration?’, in Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 1154.Google Scholar
Radi, Yannick, ‘The Application of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause in the Dispute Settlement Provisions of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Domesticating the “Trojan Horse”’, EJIL 18 (2007), p. 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio, ‘The Increasingly Marginal Appreciation of the Margin-of-Appreciation Doctrine’, German L. J. 7 (2006), p. 611.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples: With “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited” (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Legal Principles and the Limits of Law’, Yale L.J. 81 (1972), p. 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, Alan and Hunter, Martin, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, 4th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Reimer, Franz, Verfassungsprinzipien: Ein Normtyp im Grundgesetz (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2001).Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, ‘Expropriation’, in Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 407.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, ‘Legality of Expropriations’, in Reinisch, A. (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W. M. and Arsanjani, Mahnoush H., ‘The Question of Unilateral Governmental Statements as Applicable Law in Investment Disputes’, in Dupuy, P.-M., Fassbender, B., Shaw, M. N. and Sommermann, K.-P. (eds.), Völkerrecht als Wertordnung: Festschrift für Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: Engel, 2006), p. 409.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joshua, ‘The Emergence of Positive Obligations in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, U. Miami Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 13 (2006), p. 403.Google Scholar
Roth, Andreas H., The Minimum Standard of International Law Applied to Aliens (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1949).Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Kim and Schultz, Jenny, ‘Bringing Law and Order to International Trade: Administrative Law Principles and the GATT/WTO’, St John's J. Legal Comment. 11 (1996), p. 271.Google Scholar
Rubins, Noah, ‘Loewen v. United States: The Burial of an Investor-State Arbitration Claim’, Arb. Int'l 21 (2005), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubins, Noah and Kinsella, N. S., International Investment, Political Risk and Dispute Resolution: A Practitioner's Guide (Dobbs Ferry, New York: Oceana Publications, 2005).Google Scholar
Ruffert, Matthias, ‘Perspektiven des Internationalen Verwaltungsrechts’, in Möllers, C., Voßkuhle, A. and Walter, C. (eds.), Internationales Verwaltungsrecht: Eine Analyse anhand von Referenzgebieten (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007).Google Scholar
Rüthers, Bernd, Rechtstheorie: Begriff, Geltung und Anwendung des Rechts, 3rd edn (Munich: Beck, 2007).Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, Giorgio, ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’, RdC 269 (1997), p. 251.Google Scholar
Sachs, Lisa E. and Sauvant, Karl P., ‘BITs, DTTs, and FDI Flows: An Overview’, in Sauvant, K. P. and Sachs, L. E. (eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. xxvii.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W., ‘BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries’, Int'l Law. 24 (1990), p. 655.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W., ‘Towards a Global Treaty on Foreign Investment: The Search for a Grand Bargain’, in Horn, N. (ed.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004), p. 51.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W. and Sullivan, Nicholas P., ‘Do BITs really work?: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and their Grand Bargain’, Harv. Int'l L. J. 46 (2005), p. 67.Google Scholar
Salgado, Víctor R., ‘The Case against Adopting BIT Law in the FTAA Framework’, Wis. L. Rev. (2006), p. 1025.Google Scholar
Samra, Harout, ‘Five Years Later: The CMS Award Placed in the Context of the Argentine Financial Crisis and the ICSID Arbitration Boom’, Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 38 (2007), p. 667.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J., Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe, Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd edn (reprint) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P. and Sachs, Lisa E. (eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘Entangled Treaty and Custom’, in Dinstein, Y. (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1989), p. 717.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1991).Google Scholar
Schanze, Erich, Investitionsverträge im internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht (Frankfurt: Metzner, 1986).Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry G. and Blokker, Niels M., International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity, 4th edn (Boston, Mass.: Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘From Calvo to CMS: Burying an International Law Legacy – Argentina's Currency Reform in the Face of Investment Protection: The ICSID Case CMS v. Argentina’, SchiedsVZ (2005), p. 285.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Völkerrechtlicher Investitions- und Eigentumsschutz in der ICSID-Entscheidung TECMED: Zur ICSID-Entscheidung Tecmed v. Mexico, 29.5.2003 – ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, ILM 43 (2004), 133’, RIW (2005), p. 330.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’, TDM 3 (2006), issue 5.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘“Fair and Equitable Treatment” as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’, in Hofmann, R. and Tams, C. (eds.), The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock after 40 Years (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007), p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘International Investment Law and the Host State's Power to Handle Economic Crises: Comment on the ICSID Decision in LG&E v. Argentina’, Journal of International Arbitration 24 (2007), p. 265.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Enabling Private Ordering: Function, Scope and Effects of Umbrella Clauses in International Investment Treaties’, Minn. J. Int'l L. 18 (2009), p. 1.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlink, Bernhard, ‘Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit’, in Badura, P. and Dreier, H. (eds.), Festschrift 50 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht: Klärung und Fortbildung des Verfassungsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001), Vol. II, p. 445.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Aßmann, Eberhard, ‘Die Herausforderung der Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft durch die Internationalisierung der Verwaltungsrechtsbeziehungen’, Der Staat (2006), p. 315.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David, ‘Investment Rules and the Rule of Law’, Constellations 8 (2001), issue 4, p. 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiderman, David, Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy's Promise (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Schønberg, Søren J., Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schorkopf, Frank, ‘§ 53 Recht auf ein faires Verfahren’, in Heselhaus, S. M. and Nowak, C. (eds.), Handbuch der Europäischen Grundrechte (Munich: Beck, 2006), p. 1414.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., ‘The Waning of the Sovereign State: Towards a New Paradigm for International Law?’, EJIL 4 (1993), p. 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., The ICSID Convention: A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’, TDM 2 (2005), issue 5.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’, JWIT 6 (2005), p. 357.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): Interactions with other Standards’, TDM 4 (2007), issue 5.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H. and Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘The Concept of Property in Human Rights Law and Investment Law’, in Breitenmoser, S., Ehrenzeller, B., Sassòli, M., Stoffel, W. and Pfeiffer, B. Wagner (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Zürich: Dike-Verlag, 2007), p. 743.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard, Administrative Law, 2nd edn (Boston: Little Brown, 1984).Google Scholar
Schwarze, Jürgen, ‘The Principle of Proportionality and the Principle of Impartiality in European Administrative Law’, Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico 53 (2003), p. 53.Google Scholar
Schwarze, Jürgen, European Administrative Law, revised 1st edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006).Google Scholar
Schwarze, Jürgen, ‘Strenge richterliche Verfahrenskontrolle bei weitem administrativem Ermessen: Anmerkungen zur Entscheidungspraxis der Gemeinschaftsgerichte auf dem Gebiet des europäischen Wirtschaftsrechts’, in Fischer, P., Karollus, M. M. and Stadlmeier, S. (eds.), Die Welt im Spannungsfeld zwischen Regionalisierung und Globalisierung: Feschrift für Heribert Franz Köck (Vienna: Linde, 2009), p. 321.Google Scholar
Schwarze, Jürgen and Bieber, Roland (eds.), Eine Verfassung für Europa: Von der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zur Europäischen Union (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1984).
Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘The Province and Standards of International Economic Law’, Int'l L.Q. 2 (1948), p. 402.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘The Abs-Shawcross Draft Convention on Investments Abroad: A Critical Commentary’, Current Legal Problems 14 (1961), p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg, Power Politics: A Study of World Society, 3rd edn (London: Stevens, 1964).Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘The Principles and Standards of International Economic Law’, RdC 117 (1966 I), p. 1.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg, Foreign Investments and International Law (London: Stevens, 1969).Google Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘On Whether the Breach by a State of a Contract with an Alien is a Breach of International Law’, in Schwebel, S. M. (ed.), Justice in International Law: Selected Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘The Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law’, ASIL Proc. 98 (2004), p. 27.Google Scholar
Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, Investitionen in Entwicklungsländern und das Völkerrecht mit einer Bibliographie über Staatseingriffe in ausländisches Privateigentum (Cologne et al.: Heymanns, 1963).Google Scholar
Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, International Economic Law, 3rd edn (The Hague: Kluwer, 1999).Google Scholar
Senti, Richard, WTO: System und Funktionsweise der Welthandelsordnung (Zürich: Schulthess Jur. Medien, 2000).Google Scholar
Seymour, Courtney N.The NAFTA Metalclad Appeal: Subsequent Impact or Inconsequential Error? … Only Time Will Tell’, U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 34 (2002), p. 189.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’, EJIL 16 (2005), p. 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Rajeev and Fine, Joanna, ‘CMS v Argentina: A Harbinger of Things to Come’, Int. TLR 12 (2006), p. 36.Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law, 6th edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, Donald R., The Calvo Clause: A Problem of Inter-American and International Law and Diplomacy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, ‘Decision Regarding Communication 155/96 (Social and Economic Rights Action Center and Center for Economic and Social Rights v. Nigeria)’, AJIL 96 (2002), p. 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shihata, Ibrahim F. I., Legal Treatment of Foreign Investment: The World Bank Guidelines (Dordrecht: Brill, 1993).Google Scholar
Shrijver, Nico, ‘The Changing Nature of State Sovereignty’, BYIL 70 (1999), p. 65.Google Scholar
Shuman, Samuel I., ‘Justification of Judicial Decisions: Essays in Honour of Hans Kelsen’, Cal. L. Rev. 59 (1971), p. 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieckmann, Jan-Reinard, Regelmodelle und Prinzipienmodelle des Rechtssystems (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1990).Google Scholar
Sieckmann, Jan-Reinard, ‘Principles as Normative Arguments’, in Dahlmann, C. and Krawietz, W. (eds.), Values, Rights and Duties in Legal and Philosophical Discourse. Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 21 (Berlin: 2005), p. 197.Google Scholar
Sieckmann, Jan-Reinard, Recht als normatives System: Die Prinzipientheorie des Rechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest’, RdC 250 (1994 VI), p. 217.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Paulus, Andreas L., ‘The “International Community”: Facing the Challenge of Globalization’, EJIL 9 (1998), p. 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simson, Werner, Die Souveränität im rechtlichen Verständnis der Gegenwart (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1965).Google Scholar
Sinclair, Anthony C., ‘The Origins of the Umbrella Clause in the International Law of Investment Protection’, Arb. Int'l 20 (2004), p. 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Ian M., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B. and Baxter, Richard R., ‘Harvard Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens’, AJIL 55 (1961), p. 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, Jane, ‘Good Faith in Private Law’, Current Legal Problems (1999), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stati, Marcel O., Le Standard Juridique (Paris: Duchemin, 1927).Google Scholar
Stein, Torsten and Buttlar, Christian, Völkerrecht, 12th edn (Cologne: Heymanns, 2009).Google Scholar
Steinberger, Helmut, ‘Sovereignty’, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law: States, Responsibility of States, International Law and Municipal Law (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1987), Vol. 10/12, p. 397.Google Scholar
Stern, Klaus, Das Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Allgemeine Lehren der Grundrechte (Munich: Beck, 1988), Vol. III/1.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E., ‘Multinational Corporations: Balancing Rights and Responsibilities’, ASIL Proc. 101 (2007), p. 3.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, ‘What is a Supranational Constitution?: An Essay in International Relations Theory’, Review of Politics 56 (1994), p. 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec and Mathews, Jud, ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’, Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 47 (2008), p. 72.Google Scholar
Strache, Karl-Heinz, Das Denken in Standards: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Typologik (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Kathleen M., ‘Foreword: The Justice of Rules and Standards’, Harv. L. Rev. 106 (1992), p. 22.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Problems with Rules’, Cal. L. Rev. 83 (1995), p. 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, Edna, ‘The Energy Charter Treaty's Investor Protection Provisions: Potential to Foster Solutions to Global Warming and Promote Sustainable Development’, ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 14 (2008), p. 391.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J., ‘Is There A Need for an ICSID Appellate Structure?’, in Hofmann, R. and Tams, C. (eds.), The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock after 40 Years (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007), p. 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, John, ‘International Law and the Limits of Fairness’, EJIL 13 (2002), p. 993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, Standards und Direktiven in Generalklauseln (Frankfurt: Athenaeum, 1971).Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, ‘Generalklauseln als sozio-normative Modelle’, in Lüderssen, K., Noelle-Neumann, E., Raiser, T., Teubner, G. and Zielcke, A. (eds.), Generalklauseln als Gegenstand der Sozialwissenschaften (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1978), p. 13.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, ‘§ 242 BGB’, in Wassermann, R. (ed.), Alternativkommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch (Allgemeines Schuldrecht) (Neuwied, Darmstadt: Luchterhand, 1980), Vol. 2/6.Google Scholar
Thiele, Carmen, ‘Fragmentierung des Völkerrechts als Herausforderung für die Staatengemeinschaft’, ArchVR 46 (2008), p. 1.Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh W. A., International Customary Law and Codification: An Examination of the Continuing Role of Custom in the Present Period of Codification of International Law (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1972).Google Scholar
Thomas, J. C., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under NAFTA's Investment Chapter’, Remarks, ASIL Proc. 96 (2002), p. 14.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. C., ‘Reflection on Art. 1105 of NAFTA: History, State Practice and the Influence of Commentators’, ICSID Rev. – FILJ 17 (2002), p. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thürer, Daniel, ‘Modernes Völkerrecht: Ein System im Wandel und Wachstum – Gerechtigkeitsgedanke als Kraft der Veränderung?’, ZaöRV (2000), p. 557.Google Scholar
Tobin, Jennifer and Susan, Rose-Ackerman, ‘Foreign Direct Investment and the Business Environment in Developing Countries: The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Yale Law School Economics and Public Policy Research Paper No. 293 (2005), available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=557121, accessed 8 November 2010.
Tollefson, Chris, ‘Metalclad v. United Mexican States Revisited: Judicial Oversight of NAFTA's Chapter Eleven Investor-State Claim Process’, Minn. J. Global Trade 11 (2002), p. 183.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Obligations Arising for States Without or Against their Will’, RdC 241 (1993 IV), p. 195.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, ‘International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century’, RdC 281 (1999), p. 9.Google Scholar
Tschentscher, Axel, Prozedurale Theorien der Gerechtigkeit: Rationales Entscheiden, Diskursethik und prozedurales Recht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000).Google Scholar
Tschofen, Franziska, ‘Multilateral Approaches to the Treatment of Foreign Investment’, ICSID Rev. – FILJ 8 (1992), p. 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudor, Ioana, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UN, Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development: World Summit on Sustainable Development, UN Doc. A/CONF.199/20 (New York: United Nations, 2002).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Transnational Corporations and Integrated International Production, World Investment Report (New York: United Nations, 1993).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, International Investment Instruments: A Compendium, Vol. III: Regional Integration, Bilateral and Non-governmental Instruments, UNCTAD/DTCI/30 (Vol. III) (New York: United Nations, 1996).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. III) (New York: United Nations, 1999).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/10 (Vol. III) (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 1999).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, National Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV) (New York: United Nations, 1999).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties 1959–1999, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2 (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2000).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Taking of Property, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15 (New York: United Nations, 2000).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives, World Investment Report (New York: United Nations, 2003).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, International Investment Agreements: Key Issues, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/2004/10 (Vol. 1) (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2004).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Transparency, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/2003/4 (New York: United Nations, 2004).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995–2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/2006/5 (New York: United Nations, 2007).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, International Investment Rule-Making: Stocktaking, Challenges and the Way Forward, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT2007/3 (New York: United Nations, 2008).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Latest Developments in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, UNCTAD/WEB/ITE/IIA/2008/3, IIA Monitor, No. 1 (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2008).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Transnational Corporations and the Infrastructure Challenge: World Investment Report 2008 (New York: United Nations, 2008).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Recent Developments in International Investment Agreements (2008–June 2009), UNCTAD/WEB/DIAE/IA/2009/8, IIA Monitor, No. 3 (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2009).Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, ‘The Impact on Foreign Direct Investment of BITs’, in Sauvant, K. P. and Sachs, L. E. (eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UNCTAD, World Investment Prospect Survey 2009–2011, UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2009/8 (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2009).Google Scholar
Vadi, Valentina S., ‘Cultural Heritage and International Investment Law: A Stormy Relationship’, Int. J. of Cultural Property 15 (2008), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, Detlef F., ‘Minimum Standard’, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Consolidated Library Edn (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997), Vol. III/V, p. 382.Google Scholar
Harten, Gus, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Harten, Gus, and Martin, Loughlin, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’, EJIL 17 (2006), p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘The Bilateral Investment Treaty Program of the United States’, Cornell Int'l L.J. 21 (1988), p. 201.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., United States Investment Treaties: Policy and Practice (Deventer, Boston: Kluwer, 1992).Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘Investment Liberalization and Economic Development: The Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 36 (1998), p. 501.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘A Brief History of International Investment Agreements’, U.C. Davis J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 12 (2005), p. 157.Google Scholar
Vasciannie, Stephen, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’, BYIL 70 (1999), p. 99.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer, The Law of Nations or the Principles of the Natural Law: Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns, Translation of the edn of 1758 by Ch. Fenwick, G. (Washington: The Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1916).Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft (Vienna: Springer, 1926).Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, ‘Les règles internationales concertant le traitement des étrangers’, RdC 37 (1931 III), p. 322.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred and Bruno, Simma, Universelles Völkerrecht, 3rd edn (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VerLoren van Themaat, Pieter, The Changing Structure of International Economic Law: A Contribution of Legal History, of Comparative Law, and of General Legal Theory to the Debate on a New International Economic Order (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1981).Google Scholar
Verrill, Charles O., Jr, ‘Are WTO Violations also Contrary to the Fair and Equitable Treatment Obligations in Investor Protection Agreements?’, ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 11 (2005), p. 287.Google Scholar
Vesel, Scott, ‘Clearing a Path Through a Tangled Jurisprudence: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses and Dispute Settlement Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Yale J. Int'l L. 32 (2007), p. 125.Google Scholar
Vicuña, Francisco O., ‘Regulatory Authority and Legitimate Expectations: Balancing the Rights of the State and the Individual under International Law in a Global Society’, International Law Forum 5 (2003), p. 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vierdag, Egbert W., The Concept of Discrimination in International Law: With Special Reference to Human Rights (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiger, Mark E., Customary International Law and Treaties: A Study of their Interactions and Interrelations with Special Consideration of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law Treaties (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1985).Google Scholar
Virally, Michel, ‘The Sources of International Law’, in Sørensen, M. (ed.), Manual of Public International Law (London: Macmillan, 1968), p. 116.Google Scholar
Visscher, Charles, ‘Le déni de justice en droit international’, RdC 52 (1935 II), p. 369.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf, ‘Begriff, Geschichte und Rechtsquellen des Völkerrechts’, in Graf Vitzthum, W. (ed.), Völkerrecht, 4th edn (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf (ed.), Völkerrecht, 4th edn (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007).CrossRef
Voland, Thomas, ‘Freitag, der Dreizehnte: Die Neuregelung des Außenwirtschaftsrechts zur verschärften Kontrolle ausländischer Investitionen’, EuZW (2009), p. 519.Google Scholar
Voyiakis, Emmanuel, ‘Access to Court v State Immunity’, ICLQ 52 (2003), p. 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voyiakis, Emmanuel, ‘International Law and the Objectivity of Value’, Leiden J. Int'l L. 22 (2009), p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wälde, Thomas W., ‘Energy Charter Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration – Controversial Issues’, JWIT 5 (2004), p. 373.Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas W., ‘Investment Arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty: An Overview of Selected Key Issues based on Recent Litigation Experience’, in Horn, N. (ed.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004), p. 193.Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas W., ‘The “Umbrella” (or Sanctity of Contract/Pacta sunt Servanda) Clause in Investment Arbitration: A Comment on Original Intentions and Recent Cases’, TDM 1 (2004), issue 4.Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas W., ‘The Specific Nature of Investment Arbitration: Report of the Director of Studies of the English-Speaking Section of the Centre’, in Kahn, P. and Wälde, T. W. (eds.), Les aspects nouveaux du droit des investissements internationaux – New Aspects of International Investment Law (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2007), p. 43.Google Scholar
Walker, Herman, Jr, ‘Modern Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation’, Minn. L. Rev. 42 (1958), p. 805.Google Scholar
Wallace, Cynthia D., The Multinational Enterprise and Legal Control: Host State Sovereignty in an Era of Economic Globalization, 2nd edn (The Hague: Nijhoff, 2002).Google Scholar
Walter, André, ‘The Investor's Expectations in International Investment Law’, in Reinisch, A. and Knahr, C. (eds.), International Investment Law in Context (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2008), p. 175.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic, 1983).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Warbrick, Colin and Tierney, Stephen, Towards an ‘International Legal Community’? (London: BIICL, 2006).Google Scholar
Wehberg, Hans, ‘Pacta Sunt Servanda’, AJIL 53 (1959), p. 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Todd, ‘NAFTA Investment Arbitration and the Growth of International Economic Law’, Can. Bus. L.J. 36 (2002), p. 405.Google Scholar
Weiler, Todd, ‘Dodging Bullets: A First Look at the Award in The Loewen Group and Raymond Loewen v. USA’, JWI 4 (2003), p. 659.Google Scholar
Weiler, Todd, ‘NAFTA Article 1105 and the Principles of International Economic Law’, Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 42 (2003), p. 35.Google Scholar
Weiler, Todd, ‘Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v. Mexico’, in Weiler, T. (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May, 2005), p. 701.Google Scholar
Westberg, John A. and Marchais, Bertrand P., ‘General Principles Governing Foreign Investment as Articulated in Recent International Tribunal Awards and Writing of Publicists’, ICSID Rev. – FILJ 7 (1992), p. 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westcott, Thomas J., ‘Recent Practice on Fair and Equitable Treatment’, JWIT 8 (2007), p. 409.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz, ‘Geschichtliche Wurzeln des Prinzips der verhältnismäßigen Rechtsanwendung’, in Lutter, M., Stimpel, W. and Wiedemann, H. (eds.), Festschrift für Robert Fischer (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979), p. 867.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert R., The International Law Standard in Treaties of the United States (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Jarrod, ‘Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treaty Violations, and the Divide between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes’, Geo. Mason L. Rev. 14 (2006), p. 135.Google Scholar
Woolf, Harry, Jowell, Jeffrey and Sueur, Andrew, De Smith's Judicial Review, 6th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007).Google Scholar
Wróblewski, Jerzy, ‘Legal Decision and its Justification’, in Hubien, H. (ed.), Legal Reasoning: Proceedings of the World Congress for Legal and Social Philosophy (Brussels: Bruylant, 1971), p. 409.Google Scholar
,WTO, Ministerial Declaration: Ministerial Conference in Doha, 9–14 November 2001, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 (WTO, 2001).Google Scholar
,WTO Working Group on the Relationship between Trade and Investment, Non-Discrimination, Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment and National Treatment: Note by the Secretariat, WT/WGTI/W/118 (Geneva: 2002).Google Scholar
Yannaca-Small, Catherine, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment (2004), No. 3, available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/53/33776498.pdf, accessed 8 November 2010.
Yannaca-Small, Catherine, ‘Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment (2006), No. 3, available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/3/20/37579220.pdf, accessed 8 November 2010.
Yee, Marisa, ‘The Future of Environmental Regulation after Article 1110 of NAFTA: A Look at the Methanex and Metalclad Cases’, Hastings W.-N.W. J. Envtl L. & Pol'y 9 (2002), p. 85.Google Scholar
Yu, Hong-Lin and Laurence, Shore, ‘Independence, Impartiality, and Immunity of Arbitrators: US and English Perspectives’, ICLQ 52 (2003), p. 935.Google Scholar
Zagel, Gudrun, Auslandsinvestitionen in Lateinamerika: Völkerrechtliche und staatliche Regelungen zwischen Protektionismus und Neoliberalismus (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1999).Google Scholar
Zhou, Jian, ‘National Treatment in Foreign Investment Law: A Comparative Study from a Chinese Perspective’, Touro Int'l L. Rev. 10 (2000), p. 39.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard and Simon, Whittaker (eds.), Good Faith in European Contract Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Zoellner, Carl-Sebastian, ‘Transparency: An Analysis of an Evolving Fundamental Principle in International Economic Law’, Mich. J. Int'l L. 27 (2006), p. 579.Google Scholar
Zoller, Elisabeth, La Bonne Foi en Droit International Public (Paris: Pedone, 1977).Google Scholar
Zweigert, Konrad and Kötz, Hein, Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 1998).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Roland Kläger
  • Book: 'Fair and Equitable Treatment' in International Investment Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974915.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Roland Kläger
  • Book: 'Fair and Equitable Treatment' in International Investment Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974915.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Roland Kläger
  • Book: 'Fair and Equitable Treatment' in International Investment Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974915.012
Available formats
×