Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T14:12:48.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - New and old covert measures in the Concealed Information Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Eitan Elaad
Affiliation:
Ariel University Center, Israel
Bruno Verschuere
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ewout Meijer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Overview: In the concealed information polygraph test, suspects are well aware that they are being interrogated and that their physiological responses are being monitored. Such awareness may result in countermeasure attempts by guilty suspects while trying to escape detection. To combat countermeasures, it is possible to remove the standard polygraph sensors and replace them with covert respiration measures. The rationale is that guilty suspects would shift attention from their physiological reaction to the more familiar verbal and facial expressions. The present chapter introduces covert respiration measures and describes how they can be used to reduce countermeasures. Another question is whether covert respiration measures may serve to reduce excitement of overexcited examinees. The issue is further discussed. Attention is also given to early attempts to apply covert voice analysis and to more recent attempts to measure thermal imaging from a distance. Finally, ethical and moral considerations involved in using covert measures are discussed.

A well studied polygraph interrogation format, the Concealed Information Test (CIT) is designed to detect information that an individual tries to conceal (Lykken, 1974, 1998). Normally, suspects are presented with a series of multiple-choice questions, each having one correct alternative (e.g., a feature of the crime under investigation) and several incorrect (control) alternatives, chosen so that an innocent person would not be able to discriminate them from the correct alternative (Lykken, 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Memory Detection
Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test
, pp. 114 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its Disorders. New York: GuilfordGoogle Scholar
Bass, C., and Gardner, W. N. (1985). Respiratory and psychiatric abnormalities in chronic symptomatic hyperventilation. British Medical Journal, 290, 1387–1390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Shakhar, G., and Dolev, K. (1996). Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: effects of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Shakhar, G., and Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88,131–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, M., Branscomb, H. H., and Schwartz, G. E. (1979). Psychological stress evaluator – two tests of a vocal measure. Psychophysiology, 16, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cestaro, V. L., and Dollins, A. B. (1994). An analysis of voice responses for the detection of deception. Report No. DoDPI94-R-0001. Ft. McClellan, AL: Department of Defense Polygraph Institute.
Cristie, R. V. (1935). Some types of respiration in the neuroses. Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 28, 427–432.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (2001). Telling Lies. Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Elaad, E., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). Effects of mental countermeasures on psychophysiological detection in the Guilty Knowledge Test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 11(2), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elaad, E., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (2008). Covert respiration measures for the detection of concealed information. Biological Psychology, 77, 284–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elaad, E., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (2009). Countering countermeasures in the concealed information test using covert respiration measures. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elaad, E., and Cohenca, D. (2010). Reducing anxiety of anxious examinees in the concealed information test using unobtrusive respiration measures. Unpublished manuscript.
Elaad, E., Ginton, A., and Jungman, N., 1992. Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 757–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giesen, M., and Rollison, M. A. (1980). Guilty knowledge versus innocent associations: effects of trait anxiety and stimulus context on skin conductance. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P. (1983). Respiration, stress and cardiovascular function. Psychophysiology, 20, 284–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1982). Some psychological determinants of electrodermal responses to deception. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnsberger, J. D., Hollien, H., Martin, C. A., and Hollien, K. A. (2009). Stress and deception in speech: evaluating layered voice analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54, 642–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollien, H., Harnsberger, J. D., Martin, C. A., and Hollien, K. A. (2008). Evaluation of the NITV CVSA. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., Winbush, M., and Kircher, J. C. (1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 33, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, F. (1978). An experimental comparison of the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 338–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, F. (1979). Effect of different motivational instructions on detection of deception with the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacono, W. G., Boisvenu, G. A., and Fleming, J. A. E. (1984). Effects of diazepam and methylphenidate on the electrodermal detection of guilty knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalbfleisch, P. J. (1994). The language of detecting deceit. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knepp, M. M., and Friedman, B. H. (2008). Cardiac reactivity in high and low trait worry woman. Psychophysiogy, 45, S11 (abstract).Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detection industry. American Psychologist, 29, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lykken, D. T. (1998). A Tremor in the Blood. Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector, 2nd edn. New York: Plenum Trade.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (2003). The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Pavlidis, I., Eberhardt, N. L., and Levin, J. A. (2002). Seeing through the face of deception: thermal imaging offers a promising hands-off approach to mass security screening. Nature, 415, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollina, D. A., and Ryan, A. (2002). The relationship between facial skin surface temperature reactivity and traditional polygraph measures used in the psychophysiological detection of deception: a preliminary investigation, U.S. Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, Ft. Jackson, SC.
Pollina, D. A., Dollins, A. B., Senter, S. M., Brown, T. E., Pavlidis, I., Levine, J. A., and Ryan, A. H. (2006). Facial skin surface temperature changes during a “Concealed Information” test. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 34, 1182–1189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommers, M. S., Brown, T. E., Senter, S. M., and Ryan, A. H. Jr. (2002). Evaluating the reliability and validity of Vericator as a voice-based measure of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 45, 28 (abstract).Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. S. (1975). The measurement of state and trait anxiety: conceptual and methodological issues. In Levi, L. (ed.), Emotions – their Parameters and Measurement (pp. 713–725). New York: The Raven Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×