Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T17:55:41.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - With or without the Law: The Changing Meaning of Ordinary Legal Work in China, 1979–2003

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Sida Liu
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Margaret Y. K. Woo
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Mary E. Gallagher
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Until 1979, China had never been a country with a highly differentiated legal system. From the Law Classics (Fa jing) in the Warring State period (480–221 b.c.) to the Great Qing Criminal Code (Da Qing lü li, effective during 1740–1910), the two-millennium history of codification in imperial China had always been characterized by a strong emphasis on criminal law; most noncriminal disputes were adjudicated according to the Confucian ethics (li) and social customs, without referring to any legal code. Meanwhile, in the Chinese political system there was no separate judiciary from the government, and the local magistrate was both the administrative leader and the judge for crimes and social disputes. Accordingly, no formal legal profession was found in imperial China. In certain periods, there were “litigation masters” (song shi) who provided help to the people in litigation, but they were neither organized into a legal profession in the Western sense nor recognized by the state. Ordinary social order largely was maintained in a harmonious and unified way through non-legal means. However, in the twentieth century, this social order was almost completely broken down because of the incessant revolutions, culminating in the Cultural Revolution during 1966–76.

Since the late 1970s, the Chinese legal system has experienced a series of fundamental changes. Tens of thousands of laws, regulations, judicial interpretations, ministry regulations, and local regulations have been promulgated, starting with the Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law in 1979.

Type
Chapter
Information
Chinese Justice
Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China
, pp. 234 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ch'u, T'ung-tsu, Law and Society in Traditional China (Paris: Mouton, 1961).Google Scholar
Weifang, He, “Quanneng xing yamen: Chuantong yu yingxiang” (Omnipotent Government: Tradition and Effect), Nanfang zhoumo (Southern Weekend), January 16, 1998, reprinted in He Weifang, Sifa de linian yu zhidu (The Concepts and Systems of Judicature) (Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe, 1998), pp. 244–246.Google Scholar
Macauley, Melissa, Social Power and Legal Culture: Litigation Masters in Late Imperial China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Jiangzhou, Dang, Zhongguo songshi wenhua: Gudai lüshi xianxiang jiedu (The Culture of Litigation Masters in China: Interpretations on the Phenomenon of Ancient Lawyers) (Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 2005).Google Scholar
Dingjian, Cai, “Development of the Chinese Legal System Since 1979 and its Current Crisis and Transformation,” Cultural Dynamic 11, no. 2 (1999): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan, Unhooking from the State: Chinese Lawyers in Transition (Ph.D. diss., Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, 2003)Google Scholar
Liu, Sida, “Beyond Global Convergence: Conflicts of Legitimacy in a Chinese Lower Court,” Law & Social Inquiry 31, no. 1 (2006): 75–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan, “The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice: Chinese Lawyers at Work,” Law & Society Review 40, no. 1 (2006): 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E., “Mobilizing the Law in China: ‘Informed Disenchantment’ and the Development of Legal Consciousness,” Law & Society Review 40, no. 4 (2006): 783–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xin, He, “Yunzuo buliang de jiceng fayuan” (Dysfunctional Courts), Falü he shehui kexue (Law and Social Science), vol. 1, ed. Li, Su (Beijing: Falü chubanshe, 2006), pp. 30–65.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin J. and Li, Lianjiang, Rightful Resistance in Rural China (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan, “Justice from Above or Justice from Below? Popular Strategies for Resolving Grievances in Rural China,” The China Quarterly, no. 193 (2008): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Su, Song fa xiaxiang: Zhongguo jiceng sifa zhidu yanjiu (Bringing Law to the Countryside: Research on the Grassroots Judicial System of China) (Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe, 2000)Google Scholar
Upham, Frank K., “Who Will Find the Defendant if He Stays with His Sheep? Justice in Rural China,” Yale Law Journal 114, no. 7 (2005): 1675–1718.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall, China's Long March toward Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max, Economy and Society, ed. Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), pp. 654–658.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, ed. Rheinstein, Max (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954), p. 354.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Law as a Social System (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Theory of Communicative Action, trans. McCarthy, T. (Boston: Beacon Press, 2 vols., 1984, 1987).Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z., A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1990), p. 21.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S., The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R., Law in Everyday Life (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E., Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara, Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court (New York: Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin D. and Felstiner, William L. F., Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth, The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think Like a Lawyer” (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, John M. and O'Barr, William M., Just Words: Law, Language, and Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan, “Dear Lawyer Bao: Everyday Problems, Legal Advice, and State Power in China,” Social Problems 55, no. 1 (February 2008): 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ching Kwan, Against the Law: Labor Protests in China's Rustbelt and Sunbelt (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Maine, Henry S., Ancient Law (Boston: Beacon Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Alford, William P., “Tasselled Loafers for Barefoot Lawyers: Transformation and Tension in the World of Chinese Legal Workers,” The China Quarterly, no. 141 (1995): 22–38
Yulin, Fu, Nongcun jiceng falü fuwu yanjiu (Research on Rural Basic-Level Legal Services) (Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe, 2006)Google Scholar
Yaxin, Wang, “Nongcun falü fuwu wenti shizheng yanjiu (I)” (Empirical Research on the Problem of Rural Legal Services [I]), Fazhi yu shehui fazhan (Law and Social Development), no. 3 (2006): 3–46
Xing, Ying, “‘Ying fa ru xiang’ yu ‘jiejin zhengyi’: Dui Zhongguo xiangcun ‘chijiao lüshi’ de ge'an yanjiu” (‘Welcoming Law into the Countryside’ and ‘Access to Justice’: A Case Study of the ‘Barefoot Lawyers’ in Rural China), Zhengfa luntan (Tribune of Political Science and Law), no. 1 (2007): 79–94

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×