INTRODUCTION

An inquiry into ancient Greek religion beyond polis religion necessarily starts from the question of what we mean by polis religion and the impact of this model on how we conceive of ancient Greek religion as a field of study. In current scholarship, particularly in the Anglo-American and Francophone worlds, polis religion has become a powerful interpretative model for the study of Greek religion. The model is now sufficiently well established that we need to explore its implications as well as the alternatives that complement or move beyond it. Surprisingly, however, the implications of the model are rarely discussed in the study of ancient Greek religion. There is no single account that directly and comprehensively responds to Sourvinou-Inwood's two methodological articles on polis religion – the most explicit conceptual formulation of the model.

This chapter offers a critical evaluation of where we stand. It identifies key problems in the scholarly use of the polis-religion model and examines how individual scholars have positioned their work in regard to these issues. Rather than rejecting the model outright, the chapter aims to move the debates forward by exploring its scope and limits. It examines polis religion in its different forms and formulations and discusses the ways in which some scholars have recently sought to overcome the ‘polis orientation’ implicit in large parts of the work done in this field.