Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T14:42:59.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Disciplined Improvisation to Extend Young Children’s Scientific Thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

A. Susan Jurow
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Science is more than special terminology and techniques; it is also about wonder, questioning, and discovering patterns in the natural world. In this chapter, we describe the ways that two K-1 teachers, Ms. Rosenthal and Ms. Rivera, designed their science instruction to inspire their students to feel the sense of wonder and curiosity that drives scientists, with the hope that this would help them understand the discipline and practices of science. They did this by creating a constructivist-oriented learning environment that encouraged students to explore objects, situations, and concepts deeply, for extended periods of time, and from multiple perspectives. Children made personal observations of these experiences through writing in journals, drawing pictures to compare what they thought might happen in a science experiment (i.e., their hypotheses) with what actually happened, and through talk that their teachers carefully documented and often displayed on the walls of the classroom.

In constructivist classrooms, the goal is to help students develop their own understanding so that they can use and apply knowledge in diverse contexts and draw connections among multiple representations of a given concept. True constructivist teaching always faces the teaching paradox because it is not “discovery learning,” an unstructured, learner-centered environment where students are left to themselves; it requires that teachers develop a structured environment — the term educators often use is scaffold — within which students are guided as they construct their own knowledge (Mayer, 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borko, H. & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.) (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.) (1993). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Engle, R. A. & Conant, F. C. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In Wilkinson, L. C. (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 153–181). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Forman, E. A. & Sink, W. (2006). Sociocultural approaches to learning science in classrooms. Commissioned paper for the National Academies Committee, “Science Learning Study, K-8.”
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children’s questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (1995/1996). Discourse, learning, and teaching. Review of Research in Education, 21, 49–95.Google Scholar
Lampert, M., Rittenhouse, P., & Grumbaugh, C. (1996). Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 731–764). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaels, S., Shouse, A., & Schweingruber, H. (2007). Ready, set, science!: Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nemirovsky, R. & Borba, M., (Eds.) (2004). Body activity and imagination in mathematics learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer [Special issue of Educational Studies in Mathematics].
Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., Jacoby, S. (1996). “When I come down I’m in the domain state”: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., Thompson, S. (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 328–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, K. (2003). Listening: A framework for teaching across differences. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×