Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 From Sympathy to Altruism: The Roots of Philanthropic Discourse
- 2 Dickensian Realism and Telescopic Philanthropy
- 3 Hawthorne's ‘Cold Fancy’ and the Revision of Sympathetic Exchange
- 4 Altruism's Conquest of Modern Generalisation in George Eliot
- 5 William Dean Howells's ‘Altrurian’ Aesthetic in the Modern Marketplace
- Coda
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - Altruism's Conquest of Modern Generalisation in George Eliot
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 From Sympathy to Altruism: The Roots of Philanthropic Discourse
- 2 Dickensian Realism and Telescopic Philanthropy
- 3 Hawthorne's ‘Cold Fancy’ and the Revision of Sympathetic Exchange
- 4 Altruism's Conquest of Modern Generalisation in George Eliot
- 5 William Dean Howells's ‘Altrurian’ Aesthetic in the Modern Marketplace
- Coda
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
That a new epoch is dawning, that a new form of social life is growing up out of the ruins of feudalism, the most superficial observer cannot fail to see.
G. H. Lewes, Comte's Philosophy of the Sciences (1853)‘If I went into parliament, as I have been asked to do, I should sit on the independent bench, as Wilberforce did, and work at philanthropy.’
Mr Casaubon bowed, and observed that it was a wide field.
George Eliot, Middlemarch (1871–2)Historical Epistemology and a ‘Real Knowledge of the People’
Social histories that note the changing role of philanthropy over the course of the nineteenth century emphasise its variability as a social and political force. The culture of altruism and the professionalised, institutionalised philanthropic practice to which it gave rise were a modernising agency in the nineteenth-century history of class relations. In theory, the notion of social rehabilitation revised earlier conceptions of philanthropy (or charity) by replacing an organic, status-based paternalism with a liberal contractarianism that insisted, for instance, on a distinction between pauperism and poverty (the one being a moral condition, the other economic) as a means of assessing what Victorians called helpability. In other words, philanthropic discourse and practice registered the epistemological shift that defined the relationship between the individual and modern capitalist society.
That mid-Victorians were conscious of a new social order there can be no doubt. The first epigraph is indicative in which G. H. Lewes reflects on the advent of a distinctive model of social relations in the context of his promotion of positivism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Philanthropy in British and American FictionDickens Hawthorne Eliot and Howells, pp. 139 - 170Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2007