Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T05:21:31.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - The fine-tuning problems of particle physics and anthropic mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

John F. Donoghue
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts
Bernard Carr
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

Open questions in particle physics

Each field has a set of questions which are universally viewed as important, and these questions motivate much of the work in the field. In particle physics, several of these questions are directly related to experimental problems. Examples include questions such as: Does the Higgs boson exist and, if so, what is its mass? What is the nature of the dark matter in the Universe? What is the mechanism that generated the net number of baryons in the Universe? For these topics, there is a well posed problem related to experimental findings or theoretical predictions. These are problems that must be solved if we are to achieve a complete understanding of the fundamental theory.

There also exists a different set of questions which have a more aesthetic character. In these cases, it is not as clear that a resolution is required, yet the problems motivate a search for certain classes of theories. Examples of these are the three ‘naturalness’ or ‘fine-tuning’ problems of the Standard Model; these are associated with the cosmological constant Λ, the energy scale of electroweak symmetry-breaking ν and the strong CP-violating angle θ. As will be explained more fully below, these are free parameters in the Standard Model that seem to have values 10 to 120 orders of magnitude smaller than their natural values and smaller than the magnitude of their quantum corrections.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] J., Barrow and F., Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
[2] C.J., Hogan. Why the universe is just so. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 (2000), 1149 [astro-ph/9909295].Google Scholar
[3] R. N., Cahn. The eighteen arbitrary parameters of the standard model in your everyday life. Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996), 951.Google Scholar
[4] J. F., Donoghue, E., Golowich and B. R., Holstein. Dynamics of the Standard Model (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
[5] R., Sundrum. Towards an effective particle-string resolution of the cosmological constant problem. JHEP, 9907 (1999), 001 [hep-ph/9708329].Google Scholar
[6] A., Linde. Inflation and quantum cosmology. In Results and Perspectives in Particle Physics, ed. M., Greco (Gif-sur-Yvette, France: Editions Frontières, 1989), p. 11.Google Scholar
[7] S., Weinberg. Theories of the cosmological constant. In Critical Dialogues in Cosmology, ed. N., Turok (Singapore: World Scientific, 1997).Google Scholar
[8] H., Martel, P. R., Shapiro and S., Weinberg. Likely values of the cosmological constant. Astrophys. J., 492 (1998), 29 [astro-ph/9701099].Google Scholar
[9] T., Banks, M., Dine and L., Motl. On anthropic solutions of the cosmological constant problem. JHEP, 0101 (2001), 031 [hep-th/0007206].Google Scholar
[10] J. D., Bjorken. Standard model parameters and the cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001), 085008 [hep-ph/0103349].Google Scholar
[11] V., Agrawal, S. M., Barr, J. F., Donoghue and D., Seckel. Anthropic considerations in multiple-domain theories and the scale of electroweak symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998), 1822 [hep-ph/9801253].Google Scholar
[12] V., Agrawal, S. M., Barr, J. F., Donoghue and D., Seckel. The anthropic principle and the mass scale of the standard model. Phys. Rev. D57 (1998), 5480 [hep-ph/9707380].Google Scholar
[13] F., Wilczek. This volume (2007).
[14] J., Garriga and A., Vilenkin. On likely values of the cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000), 083502 [astro-ph/9908115].Google Scholar
[15] J., Garriga and A., Vilenkin. Solutions to the cosmological constant problems. Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001), 023517 [hep-th/0011262].Google Scholar
[16] J. F., Donoghue. Random values of the cosmological constant. JHEP 0008 (2000), 022 [hep-ph/0006088].Google Scholar
[17] M. R., Douglas. The statistics of string M theory vacua. JHEP, 0305 (2003), 046 [hep-th/0303194].Google Scholar
[18] S., Ashok and M. R., Douglas. Counting flux vacua. JHEP, 0401 (2004), 060 [hep-th/0307049].Google Scholar
[19] L., Susskind. This volume (2007) [hep-th/0302219].
[20] T., Banks, M., Dine and E., Gorbatov. Is there a string theory landscape?JHEP, 0408 (2004), 058 [hep-th/0309170].Google Scholar
[21] R., Kallosh and A., Linde. M-theory, cosmological constant and anthropic principle. Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003), 023510 [hep-th/0208157].Google Scholar
[22] R., Bousso and J., Polchinski. Quantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant. JHEP, 0006 (2000), 006 [hep-th/0004134].Google Scholar
[23] J. D., Brown and C., Teitelboim. Neutralization of the cosmological constant by membrane creation. Nucl. Phys. B 297 (1988), 787.Google Scholar
[24] J. D., Brown and C., Teitelboim. Dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant. Phys. Lett. B 195 (1987), 177.Google Scholar
[25] J. F., Donoghue. Dynamics of M-theory vacua. Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004), 106012; erratum 129901 [hep-th/0310203].Google Scholar
[26] A. D., Linde. Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflationary universe. Phys. Lett. B 175 (1986), 395.Google Scholar
[27] A. D., Linde. Eternal chaotic inflation. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1 (1986), 81.Google Scholar
[28] A. H., Guth. Inflation and eternal inflation. Phys. Rep. 333 (2000), 555 [astro-ph/0002156].Google Scholar
[29] J. F., Donoghue. The weight for random quark masses. Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998), 5499 [hep-ph/9712333].Google Scholar
[30] J. F., Donoghue, K., Dutta and A., Ross. Quark and lepton masses in the landscape. Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006), 113002.Google Scholar
[31] D., Cremades, L. E., Ibanez and F., Marchesano. Towards a theory of quark masses, mixings and CP-violation. (2002) [hep-ph/0212064].Google Scholar
[32] D., Cremades, L. E., Ibanez and F., Marchesano. Yukawa couplings in intersecting D-brane models. JHEP, 0307 (2003), 038 [hep-th/0302105].Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×