Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:11:06.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Coastal Dunes and Vegetation Dynamics

from Part IV - Coupling Fluvial and Aeolian Geomorphology, Hydrology/Hydraulics, and Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Edward A. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Yvonne E. Martin
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Edward A. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Yvonne E. Martin
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access

Summary

Sand Dunes are great fun.

(Greely and Iverson, 1984)

Introduction

The dynamic nature of sand dunes over relatively short spatial and temporal scales makes them an ideal phenomenon from which to obtain a better understanding of the interactions between the geosciences and biological sciences. Most early studies of sand dunes focused on classification of dune forms, plant species composition on various dune types, plant succession, and the morphological adaptation of plants to sand burial, salt spray, and xeric conditions. In this chapter, the interaction of ecology and geomorphology in the development of coastal sand dunes will be discussed, from the origin of ecology in the 1800s through to the present. Underlying this history is a struggle by both disciplines to move from a mainly descriptive approach toward an understanding of how sand dunes and plants influence each other. The difficulty has always been how to couple the physical processes of sand transport with the influence of plants and, in turn, how to connect plants with different life histories to sand transport. This undertaking is still in its infancy.

Physiography and Physiographic Ecology

At the end of the 1800s, both physiography (as geomorphology was called at the time) and biology adopted a neo-Lamarckian evolutionary viewpoint (Johnson, 1979; Inkpen and Collier, 2007). Evolution, at this time, incorporated ideas of directional development that could take place at scales above the individual or population (today this idea is called group selection and is mostly rejected as having no valid mechanism (Williams, 1966)). Stages in this directional development were believed to facilitate further evolution. The result was a belief that many forms in biology developed in a progressive, integrated manner with an end-stage that would be in equilibrium. Herbert Spencer, a prolific but now largely forgotten philosopher, was a popular exponent of these ideas, combining both “evolutionary” and “quasi-thermodynamic” ideas in Principles of Biology (1864). He is best remembered for the teleological term “survival of the fittest.”

These evolutionary viewpoints can be found in numerous scientific studies, such as the landscape cycles of Davis (1889; 1899) and in the ecology of communities and succession of Cowles (1899), Clements (1916), and Cooper (1926).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreotti, B. (2004). A two species model of aeolian sand transport. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 510, 47–70.Google Scholar
Andreotti, B., Claudin, P. and Douady, S. (2002). Selection of dune shape and velocities. Part I: Dynamics of sand, wind and barchans. The European Physical Journal B, 28, 321–39.Google Scholar
Andreotti, B., Claudin, P. and Pouliquen, O. (2010). Measurements of the aeolian sand transport length. Geomorphology, 123, 343–8.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. O. and Davidson-Arnott, R. G. D. (2003). A general framework for modelling sediment supply to coastal dunes including wind angle, beach geometry and fetch effects. Geomorphology, 49, 89–108.Google Scholar
Bagnold, R. H. (1941). The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes. London: Methuen.
Buckley, R. (1987). The effect of sparse vegetation cover on the transport of dune sand. Nature, 325(6103), 426–8.Google Scholar
Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Cooper, W. S. (1926). The fundamentals of vegetation change. Ecology, 7, 391–413.Google Scholar
Cowles, H. C. (1899). The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. Botanical Gazette, 27, 95–117, 167–202, 281–308, 361–91.Google Scholar
Cowles, H. C. (1901). The physiographic ecology of Chicago and vicinity: a study of the origin, development, and classification of plant societies. Botanical Gazette, 31, 73–108, 145–82.Google Scholar
Davidson-Arnott, R. G. D. (2009). Introduction to Coastal Processes and Geomorphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson-Arnott, R. G. D. and Bauer, B. O. (2009). Aeolian sediment transport on a beach: thresholds, intermittency and high frequency variability. Geomorphology, 105, 117–25.Google Scholar
Davidson-Arnott, R. G. D., and Pyskir, N. M. (1988). Morphology and formation of an Holocene coastal dune field, Bruce Peninsula, Ontario. Géographie physique et Quaternaire, 42, 163–70.Google Scholar
Davis, W. M. (1889). The rivers and valleys of Pennsylvania. National Geographic Magazine, 1, 183–253.Google Scholar
Davis, W. M. (1899). The geographical cycle. Geographical Journal, 14, 481–504.Google Scholar
Durán, O. (2008). Vegetated Dunes and Barchan Dune Fields. Ph.D. dissertation, Institut für Computerphysik. Stuttgart, Germany: Universität Stuttgart Fakultät Mathematik und Physik.
Durán, O. and Herrmann, H. J. (2006). Vegetation against dune mobility. Physical Review Letters, 96, 188001.Google Scholar
Durán, O. and Moore, L. J. (2013). Vegetation controls on the maximum size of coastal dunes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States, 110, 17217–22.Google Scholar
Durán, O. and Moore, L. J. (2014). Barrier island bistability induced by biophysical interactions. Nature Climate Change, 5, 158–62.Google Scholar
Durán, O., Claudin, P. and Andreotti, B. (2011). On aeolian transport: grain-scale interactions, dynamical mechanisms and scaling laws. Aeolian Research, 3, 243–70.Google Scholar
Durán, O., Schwämmle, V., Lind, P. G. and Herrmann, H. J. (2009). The dune size distribution and scaling relations of barchan dune fields. Granular Matter, 1, 7–11.Google Scholar
Durán, O., Silva, M. V. N., Bezerra, L. J. C., Herrmann, H. J. and Maia, L. P. (2008). Measurements and numerical simulations of the degree of activity and vegetation cover on parabolic dunes in north-eastern Brazil. Geomorphology, 102, 460–71.Google Scholar
Fourrière, A., Claudin, P. and Andreotti, B. (2010). Bedforms in a turbulent stream: formation of ripples by primary linear instability and of dunes by nonlinear pattern coarsening. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 649, 287–328.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A. (1983). Morphodynamics of incipient foredunes in New South Wales, Australia. In Eolian Sediments and Processes, ed. Brookfield, M. E. and Ahlbrandt, T. S.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 325–42.
Hesp, P. A. (1988). Morphology, dynamics and internal stratification of some established foredunes in southeast Australia. Sedimentary Geology, 55, 17–41.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A. (1991). Ecological processes and plant adaptation on coastal dunes. Journal of Arid Environments, 21, 165–91.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. (2002). Foredunes and blowouts: initiation, geomorphology and dynamics. Geomorphology, 48, 245–68.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A. and Hyde, R. (1996). Geomorphology and dynamics of a trough blowout. Sedimentology, 43, 505–25.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A. and Martinez, M. L. (2007). Disturbance processes and dynamics in coastal dunes. In Plant Disturbance Ecology, ed. Johnson, E. A. and Miyanishi, K.. San Diego. CA: Academic Press, pp. 215–47.
Hesp, P. A. and Thom, B. G. (1990). Geomorphology and evolution of transgressive dune fields. In Coastal Dunes: Form and Process, ed. Nordstrom, K. F., Psuty, N. P. and Carter, R. W. G.. New York: Wiley, pp. 253–88
Hunt, J. C. R., Leibovich, S. and Richards, K. J. (1988). Turbulent shear flows over low hills. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 114, 1435–70.Google Scholar
Inkpen, R. and Collier, P. (2007). Neo-Lamarckianism and the Davisian cycle of erosion. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 2, 113–24.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. D. and Rasmussen, K. R. (1999). The effect of wind speed and bed slope on sand transport. Sedimentology, 46, 723–31.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. S. and Hunt, J. C. R. (1975). Turbulent wind flow over a hill. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 101, 929–55.Google Scholar
Jenny, H. (1941). Factors of Soil Formation. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Johnson, E. A. (1979). Succession: an unfinished revolution. Ecology, 60, 238–40.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. A. and Miyanishi, K. (2003). Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. Ecology Letters, 11, 419–31.Google Scholar
Kroy, K., Sauermann, G. and Herrmann, H. J. (2002). Minimal model for aeolian sand dunes. Physical Review E, 66, 031302.Google Scholar
Law, M. N. and Davidson-Arnott, R. G. D. (1990). Seasonal control on aeolian processes on the beach and foredune. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Coastal Sand Dunes, ed. Davidson-Arnott, R. G. D.. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada, pp. 49–68.
Lees, B. (2006). Timing and formation of coastal dunes in northern and eastern Australia. Journal of Coastal Research, 22, 78–89.Google Scholar
Lichter, J. (2000). Colonization constraints during primary succession on coastal Lake Michigan sand dunes. Journal of Ecology, 88, 825–39.Google Scholar
Loope, W. L. and Arbogast, A. F. (2000). Dominance of an ∼150-year cycle of sand-supply change in Late Holocene dune-building along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan. Quaternary Research, 54, 414–22.Google Scholar
Luna, M. C. M. de M., Parteli, E. J. R., Durán, O. and Herrmann, H. J. (2011). Model for the genesis of coastal dune fields with vegetation. Geomorphology, 129, 215–24.Google Scholar
Maun, M. A. (2004). Burial of plants as a selective force in sand dunes. In Coastal Dunes: Ecology and Conservation, ed. Martinez, M. L. and Psuty, N. P.. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 119–35
Maun, M. A. (2009). The Biology of Coastal Sand Dunes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nickling, W. G. and Davidson-Arnott, R. G. D. (1990). Aeolian sediment transport on beaches and coastal sand dunes. Proceedings Canadian Symposium on Coastal Sand Dunes, 111, 1–35.Google Scholar
Ollerhead, J., Davidson-Arnott, R., Walker, I. and Mathew, S. (2012). Annual to decadal morphodynamics of the foredune system at Greenwich Dunes, Prince Edward Island, Canada. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38, 284–98.Google Scholar
Olson, J. S. (1958a). Rates of succession and soil changes in southern Lake Michigan sand dunes. Botanical Gazette, 119, 125–70.Google Scholar
Olson, J. S. (1958b). Lake Michigan dune development. 1. Wind-velocity profiles. Journal of Geology, 66, 254–63.Google Scholar
Olson, J. S. (1958c). Lake Michigan dune development. 2. Plants as agents and tools in geomorphology. Journal of Geology, 66, 345–51.Google Scholar
Olson, J. S. (1958d). Lake Michigan dune development. 3. Lake-level, beach, and dune oscillation. Botanical Gazette, 66, 473–83.Google Scholar
Paola, C., and Voller, V. R. (2005). A generalized Exner equation for sediment mass balance. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(F4), doi:10.1029/2004JF000274.Google Scholar
Psuty, N. P. (1988). Sediment budget and dune/beach interaction. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 3, 1–4.Google Scholar
Pye, K. (1983). Coastal dunes. Progress in Physical Geography, 7, 531–57.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. R., Gillette, D. A. and Leys, J. F. (1993). The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion threshold. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 3023–9.Google Scholar
Sauermann, G., Kroy, K. and Herrmann, H. J. (2001). A continuum saltation model for sand dunes. Physical Review E, 64, 31305.Google Scholar
Schwämmle, V. and Herrmann, H. J. (2005). A model of barchan dunes including lateral shear stress. The European Physical Journal E, 16, 57–65.Google Scholar
Short, A. D. (1996). The role of wave height, period, slope, tide range and embaymentisation in beach classifications: a review. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 69, 589–604.Google Scholar
Short, A. D. (1999). Handbook of Beach and Shoreface Morphodynamics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Short, A. D. (2006). Australian beach system – nature and distribution. Journal of Coastal Research, 22, 11–27.Google Scholar
Short, A. D. and Hesp, P. A. (1982). Wave, beach and dune interactions in southeastern Australia. Marine Geology, 48, 259–84.Google Scholar
Silander, J. A. 1979. Microevolution and clone structure in Spartina patens . Science, 203, 658–60.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. A. and Baedke, S. J. (1995). Beach-ridge development in Lake Michigan: shoreline behavior in response to quasi-periodic lake-level events. Marine Geology, 129, 163–74.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. A. and Baedke, S. J. (1997). Strand evidence for the late Holocene lake level variation in Lake Michigan. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109, 666–82.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Weng, W. S., Hunt, J. C. R., Carruthers, D. J. et al. (1991). Air flow and sand transport over sand dunes. Acta Mechanica (Suppl.), 21, 1–22.Google Scholar
Wright, L. D., and Short, A. D. (1984). Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: a synthesis. Marine Geology, 56, 93–118.Google Scholar
Zarnetske, P. L., Hacker, S. D., Seabloom, E. W. et al. 2012. Biophysical feedback mediates effects of invasive grasses on coastal dune shape. Ecology, 93, 1435–50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×