Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:26:46.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Liberalism, torture, and the ticking bomb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

David Luban
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Preface

This chapter was published concurrently in its present form and in a more extended version that appeared in Karen Greenberg’s collection The Torture Debate in America (Cambridge University Press, 2005). The latter version included a longer and fuller analysis of the torture memos; I have used the shorter version here because other chapters of this book go into the torture memos in greater detail. The chapter received wide circulation: in March 2006 it was excerpted in Harper’s Magazine and published in translation in the German cultural magazine Die Zeit Kursbuch. Together with the following two chapters, it represents the philosophical core of this book’s analysis of torture and its critique of discussing torture through ticking-bomb hypotheticals.

I began writing the chapter when the Bybee–Yoo torture memo became public in the summer of 2004, shortly after the sensational Abu Ghraib revelations. It needs only slight factual updating. At the time I finished it, only two of the torture memos were public. It was not until April 2009 that the Obama administration released the remaining torture memos, all but one of which were shortly republished by David Cole in The Torture Memos: Rationalizing the Unthinkable (New York Review of Books, 2009). The existence of CIA “black sites” – secret prisons in Poland, Romania, and Thailand – had not yet emerged, nor was it clear what interrogation techniques the Justice Department had approved for CIA use. I also wrote before the issue of nonaccountability for torture became salient. By the time the smoke had cleared, only a handful of low-level enlisted personnel had been punished for Abu Ghraib, and, ultimately, none of the 101 potential torture cases investigated by a special prosecutor resulted in criminal referrals. I discuss the issue of nonaccountability in this book’s final chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argetsinger, Amy, “At Colleges, Students Are Facing a Big Test,” Washington Post, Sept. 17, 2001, p. B1.
Pincus, Walter, “Silence of 4 Terror Probe Suspects Poses Dilemma for FBI,” Washington Post, Oct. 21, 2001, p. A6.
Rutenberg, Jim, “Torture Seeps into Discussion by News Media,” New York Times, Nov. 5, 2001, p. C1.
McLaughlin, Abraham, “How Far Americans Would Go to Fight Terror,” Christian Science Monitor, Nov. 14, 2001, p. 1.
Dershowitz, Alan M., Why Terrorism Works (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002), p. 150.Google Scholar
Safire, William, “Seizing Dictatorial Power,” New York Times, Nov. 15, 2001, p. A31.
Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L., Eds., The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner, Mark, Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror (New York Review of Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, Ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
de Montaigne, Michel, “Of Cruelty” [first published in 1580], in The Complete Essays of Montaigne (Frame, Donald M., Trans.) (Stanford University Press, 1958), pp. 306, 316.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, On the Genealogy of Morals [first published in 1887], in Kaufmann, Walter, Ed. and Trans., Basic Writings of Nietzsche (New York: Random House, 1968), pp. 439, 501–3Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Sheridan, Alan, Trans.) (New York: Vintage Books, 1979), p. 8Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N., Ordinary Vices (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984), p. 7.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry, “Torture,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7(2), (1978), 124–43, at 124, 125, 129–30.Google Scholar
Sussman, David, “What’s Wrong with Torture?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(4) (2005), 1–33, at 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [first published in 1921](Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F., Trans.) (London: Routledge Classics, 2001), p 87.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine’s chief points in The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (Oxford University Press, 1985), p. 33Google Scholar
Jehl, Douglas, “Questions Left by C.I.A. Chief on Torture Use,” New York Times, Mar. 18, 2005, p. A1
McCain, John to CIA head Porter Goss and his evasive answer); Editorial, “Torture Showdown,” Wall Street Journal, Jan. 6, 2005, p. A16
Finley, Moses I., Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener, 1998), p. 162.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition, 2nd edn. (University of Chicago Press, 1998), p. 129, n.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare, On Crimes and Punishments [first published in 1764](Young, David, Trans.) (Cambridge, MA: Hackett, 1986), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
Brown, Irene Quenzler and Brown, Richard D., The Hanging of Ephraim Wheeler: A Story of Rape, Incest, and Justice in Early America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003), pp. 192–4, 260–1, 264, 278Google Scholar
Hirsch, Adam Jay, The Rise of the Penitentiary: Prisons and Punishment in Early America (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992), p. 26Google Scholar
Langbein, John H., Torture and the Law of Proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Regime (University of Chicago Press, 1977), pp. 4–5, 45–69;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, John H., “Torture and Plea Bargaining,” University of Chicago Law Review, 46 (1978), 3–22, at 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, Alan, “The Right Not to Incriminate Oneself,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 1(02) (1984), 137–48, at 143–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Neil A. and Johnston, David, “New F.B.I. Files Describe Abuse of Iraq Inmates,” New York Times, Dec. 21, 2004, p. A1.
Jehl, Douglas and Johnston, David, “C.I.A. Expands Its Inquiry into Interrogation Tactics,” New York Times, Aug. 29, 2004, p. A10;
Priest, Dana, “CIA Puts Harsh Tactics on Hold,” Washington Post, June 27, 2004, p. A1;
Schmidt, Susan, “Disclosure of Authorized Interrogation Tactics Urged,” Washington Post, July 3, 2004, p. A3.
Schmitt, Eric, “Navy Charges 3 Commandos with Beating of Prisoners,” New York Times, Sept. 25, 2004, p. A7.
Bowman, Tom, “Charges Urged in Deaths of Detainees,” Baltimore Sun, Sept. 16, 2004, p. A1.
Hastings, Deborah, “Iraq POW Death Remains a Mystery,” Times Union (Albany, NY), Aug. 1, 2004, p. A2.Google Scholar
Jehl, Douglas and Schmitt, Eric, “U.S. Military Says 26 Inmate Deaths May Be Homicide,” New York Times, Mar. 16, 2005, p. A1.
Alter, Jonathan, “Time to Think About Torture,” Newsweek, Nov. 5, 2001, p. 45.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Anscombe, G. E. M., Trans.) (3rd edn., Oxford: Blackwell, 1958), pp. 47e–48e.Google Scholar
Struck, Doug et al., “Borderless Network of Terror: Bin Laden Followers Reach Across Globe,” Washington Post, Sept. 23, 2001, p. A1.
Vitug, Marites Dañguilan and Gloria, Glenda M., Under the Crescent Moon: Rebellion in Mindanao (Manila: Ateneo Center for Social Policy and Public Affairs, 2000), p. 223.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren, “Are Torture Warrants Warranted? Pragmatic Absolutism and Official Disobedience,” Minnesota Law Review, 88 (2004), 1481–51, at 1501–3.Google Scholar
Bowden, Mark, “The Dark Art of Interrogation,” Atlantic Monthly, Oct. 2003, pp. 51, 65–8.
Seidman, Louis Michael, “Torture’s Truth,” University of Chicago Law Review, 72 (2005), 881–918.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, “A Critique of Utilitarianism,” in Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, Bernard, Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp. 77–150, at pp. 75, 93.Google Scholar
Rousset, David, The Other Kingdom (Guthrie, Ramon, Trans.) (New York: Howard Fertig, 1982), p. 168.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael, “The Torture Wars,” New Republic, Apr. 22, 2002, p. 40;
Strauss, Marcy, “Torture,” New York Law School Review, 48 (2003), 201–74, at 270–1.Google Scholar
Applbaum, Arthur Isak, “Professional Detachment: The Executioner of Paris,” Harvard Law Review, 109 (1995), 458–86, at 459–60, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Dana, “U.S. Instructed Latins on Executions, Torture,” Washington Post, Sept. 21, 1996, p. A1.
Arrigo, Jean Maria, “A Utilitarian Argument Against Torture Interrogation of Terrorists,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 10 (2004), 543, 548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osiel, Mark J., Mass Atrocity, Ordinary Evil, and Hannah Arendt: Criminal Consciousness in Argentina’s Dirty War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002), p. 40.Google Scholar
Simpson, John and Bennett, Jana, The Disappeared and the Mothers of the Plaza: The Story of the 11,000 Argentinians Who Vanished (New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1985), p. 109.Google Scholar
Mackey, Chris and Miller, Greg, The Interrogator’s War: Inside the Secret War Against Al Qaeda (London: John Murray, 2004), pp. 479–83.Google Scholar
Harnden, Toby, “Welcome to the CIA’s Hotel California,” Daily Telegraph (London), Mar. 4, 2003, p. 11Google Scholar
Jackall, Robert, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 20.Google Scholar
Hersh, Seymour M., Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib (New York: HarperCollins, 2004), p. 30.Google Scholar
Luban, David, “The Ethics of Wrongful Obedience,” in Rhode, Deborah L., Ed., Ethics in Practice: Lawyers’ Roles, Responsibilities, and Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 94–120, at pp. 101–3;Google Scholar
Luban, David, “Integrity: Its Causes and Cures,” Fordham Law Review, 72 (2003), 279–310, at 293–8.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig et al., “Interpersonal Dynamics of a Simulated Prison,” International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1 (1973), 69–97, at 94;Google Scholar
Zimbardo, Philip G. et al., “The Mind Is a Formidable Jailer: A Pirandellian Prison,” New York Times Magazine, Apr. 8, 1973, pp. 40–2,
Schwartz, John, “Simulated Prison in ’71 Showed a Fine Line Between ‘Normal’ and ‘Monster,’” New York Times, May 6, 2004, p. A20;
Haney, Craig and Zimbardo, Philip G., “The Socialization into Criminality: On Becoming a Prisoner and a Guard,” in Tapp, June Louin and Levine, Felice J., Eds., Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1977), pp. 198–223, at p. 209.Google Scholar
Cole, David, Ed., The Torture Memos: Rationalizing the Unthinkable (New York Review of Books, 2009).Google Scholar
Haynes, William J., General Counsel, Department of Defense (Jan. 9, 2002), in Torture Papers, above, p. 38;
Bush, George W. to the Vice President et al. (Feb. 7, 2002), in Torture Papers, above, pp. 134–5.
Gonzales, Alberto R., Counsel to the President (Aug. 1, 2002), in Torture Papers, above, pp. 172, 176
Beaver, Diane E., Staff Judge Advocate, to Department of Defense Joint Task Force (Oct. 11, 2002), in Torture Papers, above, pp. 229, 235.
Johnston, David and Lewis, Neil A., “Bush’s Counsel Sought Ruling About Torture,” New York Times, Jan. 5, 2005, p. A1;
Jeffrey Smith, R. and Eggen, Dan, “Gonzales Helped Set the Course for Detainees,” Washington Post, Jan. 5, 2005, p. A1.
Wedgwood, Ruth and James Woolsey, R., “Law and Torture,” Wall Street Journal, June 28, 2004, p. A10.
Locy, Toni and Diamond, John, “Memo Lists Acceptable ‘Aggressive’ Interrogation Methods,” USA Today, June 28, 2004, p. A5.
Jehl, Douglas and Johnston, David, “White House Fought New Curbs on Interrogations, Officials Say,” New York Times, Jan. 13, 2005, p. A1.
Gonzales, Alberto R., Counsel to the President (Mar. 19, 2004)
Mayer, Jane, “Outsourcing Torture,” New Yorker, Feb. 14 and 21, 2005, p. 106.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×