Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:15:47.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Harry Korine
Affiliation:
INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France
Pierre-Yves Gomez
Affiliation:
EM Lyon, France
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Strong Managers, Strong Owners
Corporate Governance and Strategy
, pp. 185 - 205
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C., Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2), 1983: 301–325Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. E. and Preston, L. E., The Stakeholder Theory of Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review 20 (1), 1995: 68–91;Google Scholar
Letza, S., Sun, X., and Kirkbride, J., Shareholding Versus Stakeholding: A Critical Review of Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance: An International Review 12 (3), 2004: 242–262Google Scholar
Hansmann, H., Ownership of the Firm, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 4 (2), 1988: 267–304Google Scholar
Werder, A., Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Opportunism, Organization Science 22 (5), 2011: 1345–1358Google Scholar
David, P., O’Brien, J. P., Yoshikawa, T., and Delios, A., Do Shareholders or Stakeholders Appropriate the Rents from Corporate Diversification? The Influence of Ownership Structure, Academy of Management Journal 53 (3), 2010: 636–654Google Scholar
Ryan, L. and Schneider, M., Institutional Investor Power and Heterogeneity: Implications for Agency and Stakeholder Theories, Business and Society 42, 2003: 398–429Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., and Sanders, W. G., Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition, Journal of Management 30, 2004: 749–778Google Scholar
Olsen, B. J., Parayitam, S., and Bao, Y., Strategic Decision Making: The Effects of Cognitive Diversity, Conflict, and Trust on Decision Outcomes, Journal of Management 33 (2), 2007: 196–222Google Scholar
Thomsen, S. and Pedersen, T., Ownership Structure and Economic Performance in the Largest European Companies, Strategic Management Journal 21, 2000: 689–705Google Scholar
von Werder, A., Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Opportunism, Organization Science 22 (5), 2011: 1345–1358Google Scholar
David, P., O’Brien, J. P., Yoshikawa, T., and Delios, A., Do Shareholders or Stakeholders Appropriate the Rents from Corporate Diversification? The Influence of Ownership Structure, Academy of Management Journal 53 (3), 2010: 636–654Google Scholar
Ryan, L. and Schneider, M., Institutional Investor Power and Heterogeneity: Implications for Agency and Stakeholder Theories, Business and Society 42, 2003: 398–429Google Scholar
Willner, J. and Parker, D., The Performance of Public and Private Enterprise under Conditions of Active and Passive Ownership and Competition and Monopoly, Journal of Economics 90 (3), 2007: 221–253Google Scholar
Ryan, L. and Schneider, M., The Antecedents of Institutional Investor Activism, Academy of Management Review 27, 2002: 554–573Google Scholar
Del Guercio, D. and Hawkins, J., The Motivation and Impact of Pension Fund Activism, Journal of Financial Economics 52, 1999: 293–340Google Scholar
Churchill, N. C. and Hatten, K. J., Non-market Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework of Family Business, Family Business Review 10 (1), 1997: 53–67Google Scholar
Carlock, R. S. and Ward, J. L., Strategic Planning for the Family Business, London:Palgrave Macmillan, 2001
Palmiter, A. R., Mutual Fund Voting of Portfolio Shares: Why Not Disclose?Cardozo Law Review 23 (4), 2002: 1419–1491Google Scholar
Admati, A. R. and Pfleiderer, P., The “Wall Street Walk” and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice, The Review of Financial Studies 22 (7), 2009: 2645–2685Google Scholar
Day, G. and Fahey, L., Valuing Market Strategies, Journal of Marketing 52 (3), 1988: 45–57Google Scholar
Staw, B. M. and Epstein, L. D., What Bandwagons Bring: Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Reputation, and CEO Pay, Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (6), 2000: 523–556Google Scholar
Korine, H., Alexander, M., and Gomez, P.-Y., The Real Job of Boards, Business Strategy Review 21 (3), 2010: 36–41Google Scholar
Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., and Rossi, S., Returns to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Clinical Study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund, Review of Financial Studies 23 (3), 2010: 3093–3129Google Scholar
Alfaro, L. and Kim, R., Sovereign Wealth Funds: For Profits/Politics, Harvard Business School Note, 2008
Goergen, M. and Reneboog, L., Managerial Compensation, Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (4), 2011: 1068–1077Google Scholar
Frydman, C. and Saks, R. E., Executive Compensation: A New View from a Long-term Perspective, 1936–2005, Review of Financial Studies 23, 2010: 2099–2138Google Scholar
Laeven, L. and Levine, R., Bank Governance, Regulation, and Risk-Taking, Journal of Financial Economics 93 (2), 2009: 259–75Google Scholar
Ellul, A. and Yerramilli, V., Stronger Risk Controls, Lower Risk: Evidence from U. S. Bank Holding Companies, Mimeo, Indiana University, 2010
Chang, Y. Y., Dasgupta, S., and Hilary, G., CEO Ability, Pay, and Firm Performance, Management Science 56 (10), 2010: 1633–1652Google Scholar
Miller, D., Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment, Management Science 37, 1991: 34–52Google Scholar
Bertrand, M. and Schoar, A., Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 2003: 1169–1208Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M., Leadership and the Psychology of Turnarounds, Harvard Business Review 81 (6), 2003: 58–67Google Scholar
Castrogiovanni, G. J., Baliga, B. R., and Kidwell, R. E., Jr., Curing Sick Businesses: Changing CEOs in Turnaround Efforts, Academy of Management Executive 6 (3), 1992: 26–41Google Scholar
Ocasio, W., Institutionalized Action and Corporate Governance: The Reliance on Rules of CEO Succession, Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2), 1999: 384–416Google Scholar
Frederickson, J. W., Hambrick, D. C., and Baumrin, S., A Model of CEO Dismissal, Academy of Management Review 13 (2), 1988: 255–270Google Scholar
Haleblian, J. and Nandini, R., A Cognitive Model of CEO Dismissal: Understanding the Influence of Board Perceptions, Attributions and Efficacy Beliefs, Journal of Management Studies 43 (5), 2006: 1009–1026Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. and Hambrick, D. C., It’s All About Me: Narcissistic Chief Executive Officers and Their Effects on Company Strategy and Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly 52, 2007: 351–386Google Scholar
Ocasio, W., Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal 18, 1997: 187–206Google Scholar
Yadav, M. S., Prabhu, J. C., and Chandy, R. K., Managing the Future: CEO Attention and Innovation Outcomes, Journal of Marketing 71, 2007: 84–101Google Scholar
Alexander, M. A. and Korine, H., When You Shouldn’t Go Global, Harvard Business Review 86 (12), 2008: 70–77Google Scholar
Korine, H., Alexander, M. A., and Gomez, P.-Y., The Real Job of Boards, Business Strategy Review 21 (3), 2010: 36–41Google Scholar
Amason, A. C., Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams, Academy of Management Journal 39, 1996: 123–148Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P., Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of the Top Managers, Academy of Management Review 9, 1984: 193–206Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., Top Management Groups: A Conceptual Integration and Reconsideration of the “Team” Label, Research in Organizational Behavior 6, 1994: 171–214Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., Fragmentation and the Other Problems CEOs Have with Their Top Management Teams, California Management Review 37 (3), 1995: 110–127Google Scholar
Fee, C. E. and Hadlock, C. J., Raids, Rewards, and Reputations in the Market for Managerial Talent, Review of Financial Studies 16, 2003: 1315–1357Google Scholar
Fulmer, I. S., The Elephant in the Room: Labor Market Influences on CEO Compensation, Personnel Psychology 62, 2009: 659–695Google Scholar
Bigley, G. A. and Wiersema, M. F., New CEOs and Corporate Strategic Refocusing: How Experience as Heir Apparent Influences the Use of Power, Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 2002: 707–727Google Scholar
Beatty, R. P. and Zajac, E. J., Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings, Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 1994: 313–335Google Scholar
Zajac, E. J. and Westphal, J. D., The Costs and Benefits of Managerial Incentives and Monitoring in Large US Corporations: When Is More Not Better?Strategic Management Journal 15, 1994: 121–142Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., Upper Echelons Theory: An Update, Academy of Management Review 32 (3), 2007: 334–343Google Scholar
Bandiera, O., Guiso, L., Prat, A., and Sadun, R., Matching Firms, Managers, and Incentives, Harvard Business School Working Paper 10–073, 2011
Malmendier, U. and Tate, G., Who Makes Acquisitions? CEO Overconfidence and the Market’s Reaction, Journal of Financial Economics 89 (1), 2008: 20–43Google Scholar
Chen, K., Kim, Y.-C., and Marcus, R. D., Hands in the Cookie Jar? The Case of Management Buyouts, International Review of Accounting, Banking & Finance 3 (1), 2011: 43–69Google Scholar
Charan, R., Ending the CEO Succession Crisis, Harvard Business Review 83 (2), 2005: 72–81Google Scholar
Miles, S. A. and Larcker, D. F., Do You Have a Plan for Finding Your Next CEO?Corporate Board 31 (184), 2010: 11–15Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-Specific Investments, Journal of Financial Economics 25, 1989: 123–139Google Scholar
Holderness, C. G., The Myth of Diffuse Ownership in the United States, The Review of Financial Studies 22, 2009: 1377–1408Google Scholar
Solomon, Peter J., former Lehman Brothers partner and founder of the eponymous boutique investment bank (cited inThe Deal, July 23, 2007, pp. 46–48Google Scholar
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W., The Stock Market and Investment: Is the Market a Sideshow?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 1990: 157–215Google Scholar
Pagano, M., The Flotation of Companies on the Stock Market: A Coordination Failure Model, European Economic Review 37, 1993: 1101–1125Google Scholar
Pagano, M., Panetta, F., and Zingales, L., Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Finance 53, 1998: 27–64Google Scholar
Aslan, H. and Kumar, P., Lemons or Cherries? Growth Opportunities and Market Temptations in Going Public and Private, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 46 (2), 2011: 489–526Google Scholar
Jensen, M., Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers, American Economic Review 76, 1986: 323–339Google Scholar
Lehn, K. and Poulsen, A., Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions, The Journal of Finance 44 (3), 1989: 771–787Google Scholar
Gomez, P.-Y. and Guedri, Z., Pourquoi sort-on de la Bourse? Preuves à l’Appui, Institut Français de Gouvernement des Entreprises, Cahier No. 2, 2012
Guo, S., Hotchkiss, E. S., and Song, W., Do Buyouts (Still) Create Value?Journal of Finance 66 (2), 2011: 479–517Google Scholar
Haunschild, P. R., How Much is that Company Worth? Interorganizational Relationships, Uncertainty, and Acquisition Premiums, Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 1994: 391–411Google Scholar
Hall, D. J. and Salas, M. A., Strategy Follows Structure!Strategic Management Journal 1, 1980: 149–163Google Scholar
Burgelman, R. A., A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy, Academy of Management Review 8, 1983: 61–70Google Scholar
Galunic, C. A. and Eisenhardt, K. M., Renewing the Strategy–Structure–Performance Paradigm, Research in Organizational Behavior 16, 1994: 215–255Google Scholar
Eccles, R. G. and Nohria, N., Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management, Cambridge, MA: HBS Press, 1992:127;
Nickerson, J. A. and Zenger, T. R., Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice, Organization Science 13, 2002: 547–566Google Scholar
Kaufman, H., Administrative Decentralization and Political Power, in Shafritz, J. M. and Hyde, A. C. (eds.), Classics of Public Administration (fourth edn., pp. 289–301), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1997 (original work published 1969)
Korine, H. D. and A.G. Fresenius, High-Speed Globalization, Business Strategy Review 11, 2000: 47–57Google Scholar
Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A., and Spector, B., Why Change Programs Don’t Produce Change, Harvard Business Review 68, 1990: 158–166Google Scholar
Thomas, J. B. and McDaniel, R. R., Jr., Interpreting Strategic Issues: Effects of Strategy and the Information Processing Structure of Top Management Teams, Academy of Management Journal 33, 1990: 286–306Google Scholar
Daft, R. L. and Macintosh, N. B., The Nature and Use of Formal Control Systems for Management Control and Strategy Implementation, Journal of Management 10, 1984: 43–66Google Scholar
Borde, S. F., Madura, J., and Akhigbe, A., Valuation Effects of Foreign Divestitures, Managerial and Decision Economics 19, 1998: 71–79Google Scholar
Lin, B., Lee, Z.-H., and Peterson, R., An Analytical Approach for Making Management Decisions Concerning Corporate Restructuring, Managerial and Decision Economics 27, 2006: 655–666Google Scholar
Williamson, O., Markets and Hierarchies, New York: Free Press, 1975
Arcuri, A. and Dari-Mattiacci, G., Centralization versus Decentralization as a Risk-Return Trade-Off, Journal of Law & Economics 53, 2010: 359–378Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A., and Ghoshal, S., MNCs: Get off the Reorganization Merry-go-round, Harvard Business Review 71, 1993: 138–147Google Scholar
Eccles, R. G., The Performance Measurement Manifesto, Harvard Business Review 69, 1991: 131–137Google Scholar
Gebhardt, G. F., Carpenter, G. S., and Sherry, J. F., Jr., Creating a Market Orientation: A Longitudinal, Multiform, Grounded Analysis of Cultural Transformation, Journal of Marketing 70, 2006: 37–55Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Goold, M., and Alexander, M., Corporate Strategy: The Quest for Parenting Advantage, Harvard Business Review, March–April, 1995: 120–132Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-Specific Investments, Journal of Financial Economics 25, 1989: 123–139Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A. and Filatotchev, I., Governance of the Entrepreneurial Threshold Firm: A Knowledge-based Perspective, Journal of Management Studies 41 (5), 2004: 885–897Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., Bates, T. W., Bizjak, J. M., and Lemmon, M. L., Corporate Governance and Firm Diversification, Financial Management 29 (1), 2000: 5–22Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, R., Megginson, W., and Yadav, P. K., Corporate Governance in India, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 20 (1), 2008: 59–72Google Scholar
de Silanes, F. López, La Porta, R., and Shleifer, A., Corporate Ownership Around the World, Journal of Finance 54 (2), 1999: 471–517Google Scholar
Amihud, Y. and Lev, B., Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers, The Bell Journal of Economics 12 (2), 1981: 605–617Google Scholar
Montgomery, C. A., Corporate Diversification, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (3), 1994: 163–178Google Scholar
Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., and Stulz, R. M., Why Do Countries Matter so much for Corporate Governance?Journal of Financial Economics 86, 2007: 1–39Google Scholar
Khanna, T., Kogan, J., and Palepu, K., Globalization and Similarities in Corporate Governance: A Cross-country Analysis, Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 2006: 69–90Google Scholar
Korine, H., Fresenius A. G.: High-speed Globalization, Business Strategy Review 11, 2, 2000)Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A., Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), 1997: 537–533Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance, Organization Science 20 (2), 2009: 410–421Google Scholar
Wiggins, J., The Inside Story of the Cadbury Takeover, Financial Times Magazine, March 12, 2010
Fung, W. and Hsieh, D. A., The Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Long/Short Equity Hedge Funds, Journal of Empirical Finance 18 (4), 2011: 547–569Google Scholar
Nutt, P. C., Surprising but True: Half the Decisions in Organizations Fail, Academy of Management Executive 13 (4), 1999: 75–90Google Scholar
Hickson, D. J., Miller, S. J., and Wilson, D. C., Planned or Prioritized? Two Options in Managing the Implementation of Strategic Decisions, Journal of Management Studies 40, 2003: 1803–1836Google Scholar
Useem, M., Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America, New York: Basic Books, 1996
Aghion, P. and Stein, J., Growth vs. Margins: Destabilizing Consequences of Giving the Stock Market What It Wants, Journal of Finance 63, 2008: 1025–1058Google Scholar
Stein, J., Rational Capital Budgeting in an Irrational World. Journal of Business 69, 1996: 429–455Google Scholar
Polk, C. and Sapienza, P., The Stock Market and Corporate Investment: A Test of Catering Theory, The Review of Financial Studies 22, 2009: 187–217Google Scholar
Auguste, B. G., Harman, E. P., and Pandit, V., The Right Service Strategies for Product Companies, The McKinsey Quarterly 1, 2006: 41–51Google Scholar
Alexander, M. A. and Korine, H., When You Shouldn’t Go Global, Harvard Business Review 86 (12), 2008: 70–77Google Scholar
Mosakowski, E., Strategy Making under Causal Ambiguity: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Evidence, Organization Science 8, 1997: 414–442Google Scholar
King, A. W.; and Zeithaml, C. P., Competencies and the Causal Ambiguity Paradox, Strategic Management Journal 22, 2001: 75–99Google Scholar
Floyd, S. W. and Wooldridge, B., Dinosaurs or Dynamos? Recognizing Middle Management’s Strategic Role, Academy of Management Executive 8, 1994: 47–57Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K., Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation, Strategic Management Journal 12, 1991: 433–448Google Scholar
Westley, F. R., Middle Managers and Strategy: Microdynamics of Inclusion, Strategic Management Journal 11, 1990: 337–351Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, 1995
Bourgeois, L. J. and Brodwin, D. R., Strategic Implementation: Five Approaches to an Elusive Phenomenon, Strategic Management Journal 5, 1984: 241–264Google Scholar
Szulanski, G., Doz, Y., and Porac, J., Strategy Process: Introduction to the Volume, in Szulanski, G., Doz, Y., and Porac, J. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management (Vol. XXII), Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2006: xiii–xxxv
Dean, J. W. and Sharfman, M. P., Does Decision Process Matter? A Study of Strategic Decision-making Effectiveness, Academy of Management Journal 39, 1996: 368–396Google Scholar
Noble, C. H., The Eclectic Roots of Strategy Implementation Research, Journal of Business Research 45, 1999: 119–134Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. R. and Kazanjian, R. K., Strategy Implementation: Structure, Systems, and Process (second edn.), St. Paul, MN: West, 1986
Daft, R. L. and Macintosh, N. B., The Nature and Use of Formal Control Systems for Management Control and Strategy Implementation, Journal of Management 10, 1984: 43–66Google Scholar
Govindarajan, V., A Contingency Approach to Strategy Implementation at the Business-unit Level: Integrating Administrative Mechanisms with Strategy, Academy of Management Journal 31, 1988: 828–853Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E. and Duncan, R. B., The Influence of the Strategic Planning Process on Strategic Change, Strategic Management Journal 8, 1987: 103–116Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E. and Peteraf, M. A., The Dynamic Resource-based View: Capability Lifecycles, Strategic Management Journal 24, 2003: 997–1010Google Scholar
Miller, D. and Friesen, P., Organizations: A Quantum View, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984
Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. R., Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism, Academy of Management Review 21, 1996: 1022–1054Google Scholar
Singh, J. V., House, R. J, and Tucker, D. J., Organizational Change and Organizational Mortality, Administrative Science Quarterly 31, 1986: 587–611Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. and D’Aveni, R., Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 1988: 1–23Google Scholar
Huy, Q. N., Emotional Balancing of Organizational Continuity and Radical Change: The Contribution of Middle Managers, Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 2002: 31–69Google Scholar
Roll, R., The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers, Journal of Business 59, 1986: 197–216Google Scholar
Hayward, M. L. A. and Hambrick, D. C., Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris, Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 1997: 103–127Google Scholar
Geletkanycz, M. and Hambrick, D. C., The External Ties of Top Executives: Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 1997: 654–681Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Simon, H. A., Organizations, New York: Wiley, 1958
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G., A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963
Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., and Floyd, S., The Middle Manager Perspective on Strategy Process: Contributions, Synthesis, and Future Research, Journal of Management 34, 2008: 1190–1221Google Scholar
Raes, A. M. L., Heijltjes, M. G., Glunk, U., and Roe, R. A., The Interface of the Top Management Team and Middle Managers: A Process Model, Academy of Management Review 36, 2011: 102–126Google Scholar
Ocasio, W., Towards an Attention-based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal 18 (Summer Special Issue), 1997: 187–206Google Scholar
Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., and Johnson, R. A., Attention Patterns in the Boardroom: How Board Composition and Processes Affect Discussion of Entrepreneurial Issues, Academy of Management Journal 53, 2010: 550–571Google Scholar
Rost, K. and Osterloh, M., Opening the Black Box of Upper Echelons: Drivers of Poor Information Processing During the Financial Crisis, Corporate Governance: An International Review 18, 2010: 212–233Google Scholar
Guth, W. D. and MacMillan, I. C., Strategy Implementation versus Middle Management Self-interest, Strategic Management Journal 7, 1986: 313–327Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., Upper Echelons Theory: An Update, Academy of Management Review 32, 2007: 334–343
Huy, Q. N., How Middle Managers’ Group-focus Emotions and Social Identities Influence Strategy Implementation, Strategic Management Journal 32, 2011: 1387–1410Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D. and Zajac, E. J., Who Shall Govern? CEO–board Power, Demographic Similarity, and New Director Selection, Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 1995: 60–83Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A. III and Main, B. G. M., Economic and Psychological Perspectives on CEO Compensation: A Review and Synthesis, Industrial and Corporate Change 19, 2010: 675–712Google Scholar
McDonald, M. L., Khanna, P., and Westphal, J. D., Getting Them to Think Outside the Circle: Corporate Governance, CEO’s External Advice Networks, and Firm Performance, Academy of Management Journal 51 (3), 2008: 453–475Google Scholar
McDonald, M. L. and Westphal, J. D., Getting by with the Advice of Their Friends: CEOs’ Advice Networks and Firms’ Strategic Responses to Poor Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 2003: 1–32Google Scholar
Grossman, W. and Cannella, A. A., Jr., The Impact of Strategic Persistence on Executive Compensation, Journal of Management 32, 2006: 257–278Google Scholar
Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J., Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, American Sociological Review 49 (2), 1984: 149–164Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A. and Filatotchev, I., Governance of the Entrepreneurial Threshold Firm: A Knowledge-based Perspective, Journal of Management Studies 41 (5), 2004: 885–897Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Y. and Lievens, J., Pruning the Family Tree: An Unexplored Path to Family Business Continuity and Family Harmony, Family Business Review 21 (4), 2008: 295–313Google Scholar
Korine, H., Asakawa, K., and Gomez, P.-Y., Partnering with the Unfamiliar, Business Strategy Review 13 (2), 2002: 41–50Google Scholar
Myers, S. C. and Majluf, N. S., Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have, Journal of Financial Economics 13(2), 1984: 187–221Google Scholar
Poutziouris, P. Z., The Views of Family Companies on Venture Capital: Empirical Evidence from the UK Small to Medium-Size Enterprising Economy, Family Business Review 14 (3), 2001: 277–291Google Scholar
Upton, N. and Petty, W., Venture Capital Investment and US Family Business, Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 2 (1), 2000: 27–39Google Scholar
Miller, D. and Breton-Miller, I. Le, Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities, Family Business Review 19 (1), 2006: 73–87Google Scholar
Gino, F. and Pisano, G., Why Leaders Don’t Learn from Success, Harvard Business Review, April, 2011
Russo, J. E. and Shoemaker, P. J. H., Managing Overconfidence, Sloan Management Review 33 (2), 1992: 7–17Google Scholar
Levitt, T., Marketing Myopia, Harvard Business Review 28, July–August, 1960: 45–56)Google Scholar
Hannan, M. T. and Reeman, J., Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, American Sociological Review 49 (2), 1984: 149–164)Google Scholar
Gorton, G. and Schmid, F., Capital, Labor, and the Firm: A Study of German Codetermination, Journal of the European Economic Association 2, 2004: 863–905Google Scholar
Fauver, L. and Fuerst, M. E., Does Good Corporate Governance Include Employee Representation? Evidence from German Corporate Boards, Journal of Financial Economics 82, 2006: 673–710Google Scholar
Karmel, R. S., Should a Duty to the Corporation Be Imposed on Institutional Investors?Business Law 60, 1, 2004Google Scholar
Bhagat, S. and Black, B., The Non-correlation Between Board Independence and Long-term Corporate Performance, Journal of Corporate Law 27, 2001: 231Google Scholar
Weir, C. and Laing, D., Governance Structures, Director Independence and Corporate Performance in the UK, European Business Review 13, 2001: 86–95Google Scholar
Korine, H., Alexander, M., and Gomez, P.-Y., The Real Job of Boards, Business Strategy Review 21 (3), 2010: 36–41Google Scholar
Anabtawi, I. and Stout, L., Fiduciary Duties for Activist Investors, Stanford Law Review 60, 2008: 1255Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C. and Reeb, D. M., Board Composition: Balancing Family Influence in S&P 500 Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly 49, 2004: 209–237Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M., Strategy Formulation as a Political Process, International Studies of Management and Organization Summer, 1977: 78–87)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Notes
  • Harry Korine, Pierre-Yves Gomez
  • Book: Strong Managers, Strong Owners
  • Online publication: 05 December 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360013.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Notes
  • Harry Korine, Pierre-Yves Gomez
  • Book: Strong Managers, Strong Owners
  • Online publication: 05 December 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360013.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Notes
  • Harry Korine, Pierre-Yves Gomez
  • Book: Strong Managers, Strong Owners
  • Online publication: 05 December 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360013.019
Available formats
×