Clark, Lorna J., The Letters of Sarah Harriet Burney, Athens, GA and London: The University of Georgia Press, 1998, p. 176.Google Scholar

Sutherland, Kathryn, ‘Jane Austen's Dealings with John Murray and his Firm’, Review of English Studies, 64, 263 (March 2012), p.17Google Scholar

Smiles, Samuel' A Publisher and his Friends: Memoir and Correspondence of the Late John Murray, London: John Murray, 1891, vol. i, p. 282Google Scholar

Todd, Janet, ‘Criticism’, in Todd, Janet, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pride and Prejudice, Cambridge University Press, 2013, p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fullerton, Susannah, Happily Ever After, London: Frances Lincoln, 2013, p. 23.Google Scholar

[Lewes, :] ‘The Great Appraisal 1859’, in Southam, B. C., ed., Jane Austen: The Critical Heritage, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968, pp, 148–66, p. 151Google Scholar

Southam, B. C., ed., Jane Austen: The Critical Heritage Volume II 1870–1940, London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987, pp. 209, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, A. C., ‘Jane Austen’, in A Miscellany, London: Macmillan, 1929, pp. 32–72, p. 32.Google Scholar

Grey, J. David, ed., The Jane Austen Handbook, London: Athlone, 1986, pp. 165–78, p. 167.Google Scholar

Cronin, Richard and McMillan, Dorothy, eds., Austen, Jane, Emma, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Jane Austen, Cambridge University Press, 2005, Introduction, p. lvii.Google Scholar

Lynch, Deidre Shauna, The Economy of Character, Novels, Market Culture and the Business of Inner Meaning, University of Chicago Press, 1998Google Scholar

Mullan, John, What Matters in Jane Austen? Twenty Crucial Puzzles Solved, London: Bloomsbury, 2012, p. 4.Google Scholar

Knox-Shaw, Peter, Jane Austen and the Enlightenment, Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trumpener, Katie, ‘The Virago Jane Austen’, in Lynch, Deidre, ed., Janeites: Austen's Disciples and Devotees, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 140–65, p. 154.Google Scholar

Favret, Mary A., War at a Distance: Romanticism and the Making of Modern Wartime, Princeton and London: Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Moira writes that ‘contemporaries could have amplified Sir Thomas's character . . . Planters were infamous for taking slave mistresses and fathering children’, in ‘Mansfield Park, Slavery, Colonialism and Gender’, Oxford Literary Review, 3 (1991) pp. 118–39, p. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gatrell, Vic, City of Laughter: Sex and Satire in Eighteenth-Century London, London: Atlantic Books, 2006, pp. 118–19Google Scholar

Leavis, F. R., ‘Valuation in Criticism’ (1966), in Singh, G., ed., Valuation in Criticism and Other Essays, Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 276–84, p. 278.Google Scholar

Hudelet, Ariane, ‘Beyond Words, Beyond Images: Jane Austen and the Art of Mise en Scène’, in Hudelet, Ariane, Monagham, David and Wiltshire, John, The Cinematic Jane Austen: Essays on the Filmic Sensibility of the Novels, Jefferson, NC and London: McFarland and Company, 2009, p. 57.Google Scholar

Sutherland, Kathryn, Jane Austen's Textual Lives: From Aeschylus to Bollywood, Chapter 5 ‘Speaking Commas’, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 266–313.Google Scholar

Bree, Linda, Sabor, Peter and Todd, Janet, eds., Jane Austen's Manuscript Works, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Literary Texts, 2013, p. 323Google Scholar

Todd, Janet and Bree, Linda, eds., Later Manuscripts, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Jane Austen, Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 287.Google Scholar

Cossy, Valérie, Jane Austen in Switzerland: A Study of the Early French Translations, Geneva: Editions Slatkine, 2006, p. 111.Google Scholar

Harding, D. W., Regulated Hatred and Other Essays on Jane Austen, ed. Lawlor, Monica, London: Athlone Press, 1998, p. 134.Google Scholar

Bray, Joe, The Female Reader in the English Novel: From Burney to Austen, New York and London: Routledge, 2009, Chapter 5 ‘Absorbed Attention’, pp. 144–56, p. 148.Google Scholar

Radcliffe, Ann, The Romance of the Forest, ed. Chard, Chloe, World's Classics, Oxford University Press, 1986, p. 114.Google Scholar

Benedict, Barbara M. and Le Faye, Deirdre, eds., Austen, Jane, Northanger Abbey, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Jane Austen, Cambridge University Press, 2006, Introduction, p. xlviii.Google Scholar

Halévy, Elie, England in 1815 [1913, 1924], trans. Watkin, E. I. and Barker, D. A., London: Ernest Benn, 1961Google Scholar

Tanner, Tony, drawing on Warren Roberts, who asserts in Jane Austen and the French Revolution (1979) that ‘Austen was referring to actual spies’ (p. 29) describes Henry as trying ‘to evoke a kind of phantasm of peaceful life from which the possibility of horror and violence has been eradicated.’ Jane Austen, [1986] reissued edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 70, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Faye, Deirdre, Jane Austen: A Family Record, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 260.Google Scholar

Chapman, R. W. suggested (The Works of Jane Austen, vol. vi. Minor Works, Oxford University Press, 1954, p. 458)Google Scholar

Sabor, Peter, Juvenilia, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Jane Austen. Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 438, note 77.Google Scholar

Grundy, Isobel, ‘Jane Austen and Literary Tradition’, Copeland, Edward and McMaster, Juliet, eds., in The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen, Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 198.Google Scholar

Boswell, James, Boswell's Life of Johnson, ed. Hill, G. B., rev. Powell, L. F., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934, vol. i, pp. 88–9Google Scholar

Harris, Jocelyn, Jane Austen's Art of Memory, Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maurer, Shawn Lisa, ‘At Seventeen: Adolescence in Sense and Sensibility’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 25, 4 (Summer 2013) pp. 721–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrne, Paula, Jane Austen and the Theatre, London: Hambledon and London, 2002, p. 118Google Scholar

Todd, Janet, The Cambridge Introduction to Jane Austen, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, Sandra M. and Gubar, Susan, The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979, p. 120.Google Scholar

Heydt-Stevenson, Jill, Austen's Unbecoming Conjunctions, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, p. 36Google Scholar

Copeland, Edward, ed., Austen, Jane, Sense and Sensibility, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Jane Austen, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 466Google Scholar

Miller, D. A., Jane Austen, or The Secret of Style, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003, p. 20.Google Scholar

Folsom, Marcia McClintock, ‘The Narrator's Voice and the Sense of Sense and Sensibility’, Persuasions, 33 (2011) pp. 29–39.Google Scholar

Gay, Penny, Jane Austen and the Theatre, Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 46.Google Scholar

Johnson, Claudia L., ‘A “Sweet Face as White as Death”, Jane Austen and the Politics of Female Sensibility’, Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 22 (1989) pp. 159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tulving, Endel, ‘Coding and Representation: Searching for a Home in the Brain’, in Roediger, Henry L., Dudai, Yadin, and Fitzpatrick, Susan M., eds., Science of Memory: Concepts, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 65–8Google Scholar

Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1689], ed. Nidditch, Peter, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975, Book ii, Chapter x, ‘Of Retention’, p. 150.Google Scholar

Eakin, Paul John, ‘Autobiography, Identity and the Fictions of Memory’, in Schacter, Daniel L. and Scarry, Elaine, eds., Memory, Brain, and Belief, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2000, pp. 290–306Google Scholar

Winter, Alison, Memory: Fragments of a Modern History, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2012, p. 198.Google Scholar

Schacter, Daniel L., The Seven Sins of Memory, Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2001, p. 26.Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul and Friesen, Wallace V., Unmasking the Face, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall [1975]; Cambridge, MA: Major Books, 2003, pp. 142, 143.Google Scholar

Poovey, Mary, ‘From Politics to Silence: Jane Austen's Nonreferential Aesthetic’, in Johnson, Claudia L. and Tuite, Clara, eds., A Companion to Jane Austen, Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2009, pp. 251–60Google Scholar

Rose, Steven, ’Memories are Made of This’, in Byatt, A. S. and Wood, H. H., eds., Memory: An Anthology, London: Vintage Books, 2009, pp. 54–76, p. 65.Google Scholar

Folsom, Marcia McClintock persuasively argues that ‘he misses the analogy, replying to her literal comment on piano playing, not to the implied criticism of himself’, and that his failure to notice her criticism is another example of his well-established arrogance and conceit: his inattention to her here is akin to his assumption that, if he proposes, she will naturally accept. ‘“Taking Different Positions”: Knowing and Feeling in Pride and Prejudice’, in Folsom, Marcia McClintock ed., Approaches to Teaching Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, New York: Modern Language Association, 1993, pp. 100–14Google Scholar

Babb, Howard S., Jane Austen's Novels: The Fabric of Dialogue, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1962Google Scholar

Brower, Reuben A., ‘The Controlling Hand: Jane Austen and Pride and Prejudice’, Scrutiny, 13, 2 (1945) pp. 99–111.Google Scholar

James, Henry, The Bostonians [1886], London: John Lehmann, 1952, p. 351.Google Scholar

Conrad, Joseph, Author's Note, The Shadow-Line, A Confession, London: John Grant, 1923, p. xi.Google Scholar

Sodré, Ignês, ‘Where the Lights and Shadows Fall: On Not Being Able to Remember and Not Being Able to Forget’, in Byatt, A. S. and Wood, H. H., eds., Memory: An Anthology, London: Vintage Books, 2009, pp. 40–53Google Scholar

Polhemus, Robert M., ‘The Fortunate Fall: Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice’, in his Erotic Faith, Being in Love from Jane Austen to D. H. Lawrence, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1990, pp. 28–54, pp. 37–40.Google Scholar

Sutherland, Kathryn, ‘Jane Austen and the invention of the serious modern novel’, in Keymer, Thomas and Mee, Jon, eds., The Cambridge Companion to English Literature, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 244–62, p. 254.Google Scholar

Wood, James, ‘Jane Austen's heroic consciousness’, in his The Broken Estate, Essays on Literature and Belief, New York: The Modern Library, 2000, pp. 32–41, p. 35.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis, Novum Organum [1620], trans. Ellis, R. and Spedding, James, in Burtt, Edwin A. eds., The English Philosophers from Bacon to Mill, New York: The Modern Library, 1939.Google Scholar

Clark, J. C. D., English Society 1660–1832, Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 28.Google Scholar

Southam, Brian, Jane Austen: A Students' Guide to the Later Manuscript Works, London: Concord Books, 2007, pp. 83–96, p. 86.Google Scholar

Byatt, A. S. and Sodré, Ignês, Imagining Characters: Six Conversations about Women Writers, London: Vintage, 1995, p. 41.Google Scholar

White, Laura Mooneyham, in Jane Austen's Anglicanism, New York and Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2011Google Scholar

Fraiman, Susan, for example, remarks that ‘slavery’ is ‘a trope Austen introduces to argue the essential depravity of Sir Thomas's relations to other people’. ‘Jane Austen and Edward Said: Gender, Culture and Imperialism’, in Lynch, D., ed., Janeities: Austen's Disciples and Devotees, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 206–23Google Scholar

Downie, A. J., ‘Rehabilitating Sir Thomas Bertram’, SEL, 50, 4 (2010), pp. 739–58.Google Scholar

Eliot, George, Felix Holt the Radical, ed. Thomson, Fred C., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980, Chapter 1, p. 28.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Janet, ‘What Maisie Didn't Know’, in her The Purloined Clinic, New York: Vintage Books, 1993, pp. 92–102, p. 102.Google Scholar

Smith, Andrew, ‘Migrancy, Hybridity, and Post-Colonial Literary Studies’, in Lazarus, Neil, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Post-Colonial Studies, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 241–61, p. 247.Google Scholar

Souter, Kay, ‘Jane Austen and the Reconsigned Child: The True Identity of Fanny Price’, Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal, 23 (2002), pp. 205–14Google Scholar

Humphreys, Margaret, Oranges and Sunshine (originally published as Empty Cradles in 1994), London: Corgi Books, 2011Google Scholar

Hill, David (himself one of the children) in the Preface to The Forgotten Children, Fairbridge Farm School and its Betrayal of Australia's Child Migrants, Sydney: Random House Australia, 2007, p. iii.Google Scholar

Huggins, Rita and Huggins, Jackie, Aunty Rita, Sydney: Aboriginal Studies Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Galperin, William H., who, in The Historical Jane Austen, Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003Google Scholar

Southey, Robert, The Life of Nelson [1813], ed. Harvey, E. R. H., London: Macdonald, 1953, p. 4.Google Scholar

Deresiewicz, William's account of Mansfield Park in terms of ‘substitution’ is one of the most perceptive the novel has received (Jane Austen and the Romantic Poets, New York: Columbia University Press, 2004, Chapter 3Google Scholar

Trilling, Lionel, ‘Jane Austen and Mansfield Park’, in Ford, Boris, ed., From Blake to Byron, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1957, pp. 112–29, p. 117Google Scholar

Butler, Marilyn, Jane Austen and the War of Ideas, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975, p. 248.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Nina, ‘Jane Austen's Dangerous Charm’, in Simons, Judy, ed., Mansfield Park and Persuasion, New Casebooks, London: Macmillan, 1997, pp. 49–66, p. 51Google Scholar

Todd, Janet, ed., Jane Austen: New Perspectives, New York and London: Holmes and Meier, 1983.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Eva, Lost in Translation [1989], London: Minerva, 1991, p. 110.Google Scholar

Tandon, Bharat writes of ‘Fanny's righteous occupancy of the sofa’ in Jane Austen and the Morality of Conversation, London: Anthem Press, 2003, p. 214Google Scholar

Galperin, William H. writes that Fanny's ‘headaches and somatic complaints’ are means to gain attention, ‘and, by turns, her way’, in ‘The Missed Opportunities of Mansfield Park’, in Johnson, Claudia L. and Tuite, Clara, eds., A Companion to Jane Austen, Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2009, pp. 123–42, p. 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinman, Arthur, Social Origins of Distress and Disease: Depression, Neurasthenia and Pain in Modern China, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986Google Scholar

Good, Byron J., Medicine, Rationality and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective, Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Folsom, Marcia McClintock, ‘Power in Mansfield Park: Austen's Study of Domination and Resistance’, Persuasions, 34 (2012) pp. 83–98.Google Scholar

Whateley, Richard, unsigned review, Quarterly Review, 24, 48 (January 1821) pp. 352–76, p. 367.

Brown, Julia Prewitt, The Bourgeois Interior, Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2008, pp. 48–52Google Scholar

Johnson, Claudia L., ‘Jane Austen's Relics and the Treasures of the East Room’, Persuasions 28 (2006) pp. 217–20.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston, The Poetics of Space [1964], trans. Jolas, Maria, Boston: Beacon Press, 1994. Chapter 4, ‘Nests’, p. 102.Google Scholar

Hays, Mary, Memoirs of Emma Courtney, ed. Brooks, Marilyn L., Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2000, p. 131.Google Scholar

Pollack, Ellen, ‘Incest and Liberty: Mansfield Park’, in her Incest and the English Novel 1684–1814, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003, pp. 162–99.Google Scholar

Perry, Ruth's authoritative discussion in ‘Family Matters’, in Johnson, Clandia L. and Tuite, Clara, eds., A Companion to Jane Austen, Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2009, pp. 323–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronin, Richard, ‘The Literary Scene’, in Todd, Janet, ed., Jane Austen in Context, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 289–96, p. 294.Google Scholar

Waldron, Maryusefully diagnoses and is severe on this and other examples of Fanny's conduct: ‘though without “guile'” Fanny is not harmless, representing as she does, not open-minded Christian charity, but an inflexible moral system which has little room for generosity and which gives her every opportunity for self-deception’. Jane Austen and the Fiction of her Time, Cambridge University Press, 1999, Chapter 4, ‘The Frailties of Fanny’ p. 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burney, Frances, Evelina, or The History of a Young Lady's Entrance into the World [1778], ed. MacKinnon, F. D., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930, vol. iii, Letter xix, pp. 476–85.Google Scholar

Said, Edward, following Trilling and Raymond Williams many years later, wrote that Mansfield Park is ‘the very embodiment of all that is benign and actively good in England’ (‘Invention, Memory and Place’, Critical Inquiry 26, 2 (2000) pp. 175–92, p. 182)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duckworth, Alistair followed, with Fanny becoming ‘effective mistress of the Mansfield estate’ (The Improvement of the Estate [1971], rev. edn, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994, p. 72).Google Scholar

Said, Edward W., Culture and Imperialism, London: Vintage, 1993, p. 110)Google Scholar

Giffin, Michael, Jane Austen and Religion: Salvation and Society in Georgian England, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, p. 138).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gay, Peter, ed., The Freud Reader, London: Vintage, 1995, pp. 297–300Google Scholar

James, Henry, The Portrait of a Lady [1881], Oxford: World's Classics, 1958, p. 56.Google Scholar

Wenner, Barbara Britton, Prospect and Refuge in the Landscape of Jane Austen, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

Wiltshire, John, ‘By Candlelight: Jane Austen, Technology and the Heritage Film’, in Hudelet, Ariane, Monagham, David and Wiltshire, John, The Cinematic Jane Austen: Essays on the Filmic Sensibility of the Novels, McFarland: Jefferson, NC and London: McFarland and Company, 2009, pp. 38–56, p. 45.Google Scholar

Elfenbein, Andrew, ‘Austen's Minimalism’, Todd, Janet, ed., in The Cambridge Companion to Pride and Prejudice, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 109–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaylin, Ann, Eavesdropping in the Novel from Austen to Proust, Cambridge University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Styles, Elizabeth A., The Psychology of Attention, 2nd edn, Hove and New York: Psychology Press, 2006Google Scholar

Kandel, Eric R., In Search of Memory: The Emergence of a New Science of Mind, New York: Norton and Co., 2006Google Scholar

Murdoch, Iris, Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature, ed. Conradi, Peter, London: Chatto and Windus, 1997Google Scholar

James, William, The Principles of Psychology, New York: Henry Holt, 1890, vol. i, pp. 403–4Google Scholar

Wright, Richard and Ward, Lawrence, Orienting of Attention, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008Google Scholar

Posner, Michael I., Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, 2nd edn, New York: Guildford Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bion, W. R., Experiences in Groups and Other Papers, London: Tavistock, 1961CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Melanie, Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946–1963, London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1973Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W., The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment, Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1991, ‘The development of the capacity for concern’ (1963), pp. 170–81Google Scholar

Winnicott, 's The Family and Individual Development, London: Tavistock, 1965, p. 13Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel, The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson, vol. iii, The Rambler, ed. Bate, W. J. and Strauss, Albrecht R., New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1969, p. 11.Google Scholar

Favret, Mary, Romantic Correspondence: Women, Politics and the Fiction of Letters, Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 169.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel, The History of Rasselas, Prince of Abisinnia [1759], ed. Hardy, J. P., Oxford University Press, 1968Google Scholar

Bree, Linda, Introduction, Persuasion, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Literary Texts, 1998Google Scholar

Gregory, John, for example, advised his daughters: A Father's Legacy to his Daughters [1761], London: John Sharpe, 1822, p. 26Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Gay Science, ed. Williams, Bernard, Cambridge University Press, 2001, p. 215Google Scholar

Harris, Jocelyn discusses in full Jane Austen's cancellations and their significance in the chapter ‘The Reviser at Work’ in her A Revolution beyond Expression: Jane Austen's Persuasion, Delaware: University of Newark Press, 2007, pp. 43–8Google Scholar

Austen-Leigh, J. E., A Memoir of Jane Austen [1870], ed. Sutherland, Kathryn, Oxford: World's Classics, 2002, p. 125.Google Scholar

Southam, Brian, ‘Persuasion: The Cancelled Chapters’, in Grey, J. David, ed., The Jane Austen Handbook, London: Athlone Press, 1986, pp. 322–3, p. 323Google Scholar

Perkins, Moreland, Reshaping the Sexes in Sense and Sensibility, Charlottesville, VA and London: University Press of Virginia, 1998, p. 5.Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia, To the Lighthouse [1927], ed. McNichol, Stella, London: Penguin Books, 2000, p. 186Google Scholar

Zietlow, Paul N., ‘Luck and Fortuitous Circumstance in Persuasion: Two Interpretations’, ELH, 32 (1965) pp. 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar