Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T08:30:43.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Realism and instrumentalism about the wave function: how should we choose?

from Part II - Meanings and implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

Mauro Dorato
Affiliation:
University of Rome Three
Federico Laudisa
Affiliation:
University of Milan-Bicocca
Shan Gao
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is not exaggeration to claim that one of the major divides in the foundations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics derives from the way physicists and philosophers understand the status of the wave function. On the instrumentalist side of the camp, the wave function is regarded as a mere instrument to calculate probabilities that have been established by previous measurement outcomes. On the other “realistic” camp, the wave function is regarded as a new physical entity or a physical field of some sort. While both sides agree about the existence of quantum “particles” (the so-called theoretical entities), and therefore reject the radical agnosticism about them preached by van Fraassen (1980), the various “realistic” (and consequently, instrumentalist) philosophies of quantum mechanics are typically formulated in different, logically independent ways, so their implications need to be further investigated.

For instance, on the one hand it seems plausible to claim that a realistic stance about the wave function is not the only way to defend “realism” about quantum theory. One can support a “flash” or a “density-of-stuff ” ontology (two variants of GRW), or an ontology of particles with well-defined positions (as in Bohmian mechanics), as primitive ontologies for observer-independent formulations of quantum mechanics (Allori, Goldstein, Tumulka and Zanghí, 2008). “Primitive ontologies”, as here are understood, are not only a fundamental ground for other ontological posits, but also entail a commitment to something concretely existing in spacetime (see also Allori, 2013). On the other hand, however, it is still debated whether such primitive ontologies can be autonomous from some form of realism about the wave function (Albert, 1996).

In order to discuss this problem, we begin with a preliminary clarification of the meaning of “realism” and “instrumentalism” in physics, which are often subject to ideological and abstract discussions that often have little to do with the practice of physics (Section 9.2).

Type
Chapter
Information
Protective Measurement and Quantum Reality
Towards a New Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
, pp. 119 - 134
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, D. Z. (1996) Elementary quantum metaphysics, in J. T., Cushing, A., Fine and S., Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: an Appraisal. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 277–284.
Albert, D. Z. (2000) Time and Chance, Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Albert, D. Z. (2013) Wave function realism, in A., Ney and D., Albert (eds.), The Wave Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–57.
Allori, V. (2013) Primitive ontology and the structure of fundamental physical theories, in A., Ney and D., Albert (eds.), The Wave Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–75.
Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R. and Zanghi, N. (2008) On the common structure of Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber theory, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 353–389.Google Scholar
Bell, J. S. (1987) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bohr, N. (1972–2006) Collected Works, Vol. 1–12, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Carroll, J. (1994) Laws ofNature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darby, G. (2012) Relational holism and Humean supervenience, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63 (4): 773–788.Google Scholar
Dorato, M. (2005) The Software of the Universe. An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Laws of Nature, Ashgate: Gower-Lund Humphries.
Dorato, M. (2007a) Cosa c'entra l'anima con gli atomi?, Roma: Laterza.
Dorato, M. (2007b) Dispositions, relational properties and the quantum world, in M., Kistler and B., Gnassonou (eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 249–270.
Dorato, M. (2011) The Alexandroff present and Minkowski spacetime: why it cannot do what it has been asked to do, in D., Dieks, W., Gonzales, S., Hartmann, T., Ubel and M., Weber (eds.), Explanation Prediction and Confirmation. New Trends and Old Ones Considered. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 379–394.
Dorato, M. (2013) Rovelli's relational quantum mechanics, monism and quantum becoming, arxiv.org/abs/1309.0132.
Dorato, M. and Esfeld, M. (2010) GRW as an ontology of dispositions, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41 (1): 41–19.Google Scholar
Dorato, M. and Esfeld, M. (2014) The metaphysics of laws: dispositionalism vs. primi-tivism, forthcoming.
Esfeld, M., Lazarovici, D., Hubert, M. and Dürr, D. (2013) The ontology of Bohmian mechanics. Forthcoming in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64. philsciarchive.pitt.edu/9381/, doi:10.1093/bjps/axt019.Google Scholar
Faye, J. (1991) Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. An Antirealist View of Quantum Mechanics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Goldstein, S. and Zanghì, N. (2013) “Reality and the role of the wave function in quantum theory”, in A., Ney and D., Albert (eds.), The Wave Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 96–109.Google Scholar
Harrigan, N. and Spekkens, R. W. (2010) Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states, Foundation of Physics 40, 125–157.Google Scholar
Lange, M. (2002) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics, Oxford: Blackwell.
Laudisa, F. and Rovelli, C.Relational quantum mechanics, in E. N., Zaltia (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/qm-relational/.
Laudisa, F. (2014), Against the ‘no-go’ philosophy of quantum mechanics, forthcoming in the European Journal for the Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. G., Jennings, D., Barrett, J.Rudolph, T. (2012), Distinct quantum states can be compatible with a single state of reality, Physical Review Letters, 109, 150404.Google Scholar
Loewer, B. (1996) Humean supervenience, Philosophical Topics, 24, 101–127.Google Scholar
Maudlin, T. (2007) The Metaphysics within Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maudlin, T. (2013) The nature of the quantum state, in A., Ney and D., Albert (eds.), The Wave Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 126–154.Google Scholar
Monton, B. (2006) Quantum mechanics and 3-N dimensional space, Philosophy of Science, 75 (5), 778–789.Google Scholar
Mumford, S. (2004) Laws in Nature, London: Routledge.
North, J. (2013) The structure of a quantum world, in A., Ney and D., Albert (eds.), The Wave Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 184–202.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (2006) Review symposium, looking for laws, Metascience, 15, 452–464.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. (2011) Living with the abstract, Synthese, 180 (1), 1–3.Google Scholar
Pusey, M., Barrett, J. and Rudolph, T. (2012), On the reality of the quantum state, Nature Physics, 8, 475–478.Google Scholar
Rovelli, C. (1996) Relational quantum mechanics, Int. J. Th. Phys. 35, 1637.Google Scholar
Schlosshauer, M. and Fine, A. (2012) Implications of the Pusey–Barrett–Rudolph quantum no-go theorem, Physical Review Letters, 108, 260404.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. (1980) The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Fraassen, B. (2002) The Empirical Stance, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Weinert, F. (1995) Laws of Nature. Essays on the Scientific, Philosophical and Historical Dimensions, Berlin: de Gruyter.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×