Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T18:50:17.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Actively Caring for Mother Earth

from INTRODUCTION TO PART II - APPLICATIONS OF AC4P PRINCIPLES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

E. Scott Geller
By
E. Scott Geller
E. Scott Geller
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
E. Scott Geller
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA
Get access

Summary

Thank God men cannot fly, and lay waste the sky as well as the earth.

– Henry David Thoreau

This chapter addresses the human dynamics of environmental protection and ecological sustainability. An ecologically sustainable future depends on a large-scale increase in environmentally responsible behavior (ERB) and a global decrease in environmentally harmful behavior (EHB). Some behaviors degrade the environment, while others protect our Mother Earth. Indeed, the sustainability of our planet is inextricably linked to human behavior. Consider the issues that confront and challenge environmental resources: overpopulation; climate change; loss of biodiversity; inadequate access to water; ocean acidification; pollution; ozone layer depletion; the extinction of many fish species; and deforestation.

Applied behavioral science (ABS) can play a crucial role in addressing our environmental crises. Almost three decades ago, B. F. Skinner defined this crisis elegantly and succinctly:

Most thoughtful people agree that the world is in serious trouble … fossil fuels will not last forever, and many other critical resources are nearing exhaustion; the earth grows steadily less habitable; and all this is exacerbated by a burgeoning population that resists control. The timetable may not be clear, but the threat is real. That many people have begun to find a recital of these dangers tiresome is perhaps an even greater threat.

Some claim our environmental crisis has reached proportions beyond salvation; others maintain a relentless optimism regarding planetary concerns. A “business as usual” stance has been adopted in some quarters (as if environmental problems will correct themselves naturally); others believe high-technology engineering, physics, biology, and chemistry will rescue us.

Today, organizations and individuals routinely incorporate “green” or pro-environment ideas into their language, but the rhetoric has not resulted in large-scale actively caring behaviors on behalf of Mother Earth. Or noticeably positive results. We have a problem of environmental sustainability and a problem of human denial, helplessness, and apathy.

Current theories and intervention approaches need to be considered (which are reviewed in this chapter) if the three main sources of the earth's environmental threats are to be effectively addressed – human overpopulation, overconsumption, and underconservation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Applied Psychology
Actively Caring for People
 , pp. 594 - 622
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Upon further reflection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, p. 1.
2. Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2009). The emergency of climate change: Why are we failing to take action?Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 9, 205–222.Google Scholar
3. Lahey, B. B. (2011). Psychology: An introduction (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Geller, E. S. (1995). Integrating behaviorism and humanism for environmental protection. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. McCarty, S. M., & Geller, E. S. (2013). Actively caring to prevent bullying: Activating and rewarding prosocial behavior in elementary school. In Geller, E. S. (Ed.). Actively caring at your school: How to make it happen (2nd ed.) (pp. 177–199). Newport, VA: Make-A-Difference, LLC; McCarty, S. M., & Geller, E. S. (2011). Want to get rid of bullying? Then reward behavior that is incompatible with it. Behavior Analysis Digest International, 23(2), 5–7.
6. McCarty, S. M., Teie, S., & Geller, E. S. (2011). Redefining peace through an actively-caring perspective. Technical report submitted to the Center for Peace Studies and Violence Prevention, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
7. Geller, E. S., Bolduc, J. E., Foy, M. J., & Dean, J. (2012). In pursuit of an actively-caring safety culture: Practical methods, empirical results, and provocative implications. Professional Safety, 57(1), 44–50.Google Scholar
8. Roberts, D. S., & Geller, E. S. (1995). An “actively caring” model for occupational safety: A field test. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4, 53–59.Google Scholar
9. Geller, E. S., Roberts, D. S., & Gilmore, M. R. (1996). Predicting propensity to actively care for occupational safety. Journal of Safety Research, 27, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: A test of Geller's actively caring hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 31(3), 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
12. Moller, A. C., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(8), 1024–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Osbaldiston, R. (2004). Meta-analysis of the responsible environmental behavior literature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Missouri–Columbia.
16. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
18. Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits, and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Kaplan, S. (2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Seligman, M. E. (1991). Learned optimism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
25. Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S., Warlop, L., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Whatever people say I am, that's what I am: Social labeling as a social marketing tool. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(4), 278–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 6 (pp. 1–60). New York: Academic Press.
28. Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102–117.Google Scholar
29. Artz, N., & Cooke, P. (2007). Using e-mail listservs to promote environmentally sustainable behaviors. Journal of Marketing Communications, 13(4), 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 55, 531–537; McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 543–554.CrossRef
31. Geller, E. S. (1989). Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: An integration for environmental preservation. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 17–36.Google Scholar
32. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291; Cone, J. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1980). Environmental problems/behavioral solutions. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25, 275–321; Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press; Lehman, P. A., & Geller, E. S. (2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues, 13(1), 13–32.CrossRef
33. Burn, S. M., & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 29–41; Wang, T. H., & Katzev, R. (1990). Group commitment and resource conservation: Two field experiments on promoting recycling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 265–275.
34. Glenwick, D., & Jason, L. (Eds.) (1980). Behavioral community psychology. New York: Praeger.
35. The bird trash receptacles were designed, manufactured, and donated to our field research by the Jackson Company, Pomona, CA.
36. Geller, E. S., Brasted, W. S., & Mann, M. (1979). Waste receptacle designs as interventions for litter control. Journal of Environmental Systems, 9(2), 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press; Geller, E. S., & Veazie, B. (2011). When no one's watching: Living and leading self-motivation. Newport, VA: Make-A-Difference.
38. Energy Star (n.d.). About Energy Star. Retrieved January 19, 2015, from http://www.energystar.gov/about.
39. Fischer, C., & Newell, R. G. (2008).Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(2), 142–162; Winett, R. A. (1980). An emerging approach to energy conservation. In Glenwick, D. & Jason, L. (Eds.). Behavioral community psychology. (pp. 320–350). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
40. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026; Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 1002–1012.
41. Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Goldstein, N., Cialdini, R., & Griskevicius, R. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Allcott, H., & Mullainathan, S. (2010). Behavior and energy policy. Science, 327, 1204–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Bailey, J. S. (1991). Marketing behavior analysis required different talk. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2009). The emergency of climate change: Why are we failing to take action?Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 9, 205–222; Lahey, B. B. (2011). Psychology: An introduction (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
46. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change: Political polarization in the American public's views of global warming. Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Li, Y., Johnson, E. J., & Zaval, L. (2011). Local warming. Psychological Science, 22, 454–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Oskamp, S. (2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How can psychology help?American Psychologist, 55, 496–508.Google Scholar
49. Stern, P. C., &Gardner, G. T. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In Stokols, D. & Altman, I. (Eds.). Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 1043–1088). New York: Wiley.
50. Lehman, P. A., & Geller, E. S. (2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues, 13(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
52. Stern, P. C., & Gardner, G. T. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In Stokols, D. & Altman, I. (Eds.). Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 2 (p. 1050). New York: Wiley.
53. Stern, P. C. (2000). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Stern, P. C. (2000). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. Boyce, T. E., & Geller, E. S. (2001). Applied behavior analysis and occupational safety: The challenge of response maintenance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(1), 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. McSween, T. E., & Mathews, G. A. (2001). Maintenance in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Stern, P. C. (2000). Psychology and the science of human–environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55, 523–530; Stern, P. C., & Gardner, G. T. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In Stokols, D. & Altman, I. (Eds.). Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 1043–1088). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
58. Aronson, E. (1999). The power of self-persuasion. American Psychologist, 54(11), 875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
60. Weigel, R. H., & Weigel, J. (1978). Environmental concern: The development of a measure. Environment and Behavior, 10, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61. Ellis, R. J., & Thompson, F. (1997). Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest. American Political Science Review, 91, 885–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64. de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×