Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- United States - Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products - Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico (WT/DS381): Report of the Panel - Annexes
- United States - Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Products from China - Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU (WT/DS437/16): Award of the Arbitrator
- United States - Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Shrimp from Viet Nam - Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU (WT/DS429/12): Award of the Arbitrator
- Peru - Additional Duty on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products - Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU (WT/DS457/15): Award of the Arbitrator
- United States - Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements - Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU (WT/DS384, WT/DS386) Decisions by the Arbitrator
- Cumulative List of Published Disputes
Peru - Additional Duty on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products - Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU (WT/DS457/15): Award of the Arbitrator
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- United States - Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products - Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico (WT/DS381): Report of the Panel - Annexes
- United States - Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Products from China - Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU (WT/DS437/16): Award of the Arbitrator
- United States - Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Shrimp from Viet Nam - Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU (WT/DS429/12): Award of the Arbitrator
- Peru - Additional Duty on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products - Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU (WT/DS457/15): Award of the Arbitrator
- United States - Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements - Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU (WT/DS384, WT/DS386) Decisions by the Arbitrator
- Cumulative List of Published Disputes
Summary
INTRODUCTION
This arbitration is being conducted pursuant to Article 21.3(c) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU) in order to determine the “reasonable period of time” for implementation of the recommendations and rulings of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) in the dispute Peru – Additional Duty on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products.
On 31 July 2015, the DSB adopted the Appellate Body Report and the Panel Report, as modified by the Appellate Body Report, in Peru – Additional Duty on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products. This dispute relates to the imposition of additional duties by Peru on certain types of rice, sugar, maize and milk. The Panel and the Appellate Body found that the additional duties resulting from the Price Range System (PRS) are inconsistent with Article 4.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture and with the second sentence of Article II:1(b) of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994).
At the DSB meeting held on 31 July 2015, Peru informed the DSB of its intention to implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in this dispute, and indicated that it would need a reasonable period of time for implementation. By joint letter dated 14 September 2015, Guatemala and Peru agreed that, in the absence of an agreement between the parties on a reasonable period of time, any award issued by an arbitrator under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU, including awards not made within 90 days after the date of adoption of the recommendations and rulings of the DSB, would be deemed to be an award of the arbitrator for the purposes of Article 21.3(c) of the DSU in determining the reasonable period of time for Peru to implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
On 1 October 2015, Guatemala informed the DSB that it had not reached an agreement with Peru on the reasonable period of time for implementation. Consequently, Guatemala requested that the reasonable period of time be determined through binding arbitration pursuant to Article 21.3(c) of the DSU.
By joint letter dated 9 October 2015, Peru and Guatemala agreed that I should serve as Arbitrator pursuant to Article 21.3(c) of the DSU.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dispute Settlement Reports 2015 , pp. 5845 - 5876Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017