Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:44:03.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Candidate Incumbent Bands for Three-Tier Spectrum Sharing

from Part VI - Future Bands, Network Services, Business Models, and Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter will survey a number of spectrum bands for their applicability to the three-tier spectrum sharing regime developed earlier in this book, and in terms of the incumbent usage. Some of the bands are not apparent candidates for sharing, but are included for purposes of discussion, and to demonstrate methodology.

The complexity of a generalized approach to three-tier spectrum is apparent when one considers the balkanized nature of primary and secondary national spectrum assignments. The National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) map of these assignments [1] in the United States of America (USA) is shown in Figure 16.1. Although it is hard to read in this book's reduced, gray-scale printing, the complexity of the chart, the division of spectrum into uniquely managed spectrum slivers, and the range of uses of most of the individual frequencies is readily apparent. Undoing this legacy of partitioning and stacking of fixed rights to spectrum access is not a trivial challenge, particularly when, in most cases, the existing structure must continue to operate, even in the presence of the new regime.

Because of the myriad of unique bands, and primary/secondary/tertiary usage permutations, the discussion in this chapter will initially focus mostly on the characteristics of different allocation categories and usage, rather than specific bands.With the discussion of specific sharing and protection constraints completed, the results will then be mapped to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) international allocations.

Even with this structure, individual National Regulatory Authority (NRA) decisions have established unique national primary and secondary allocations in many bands, so the results of this chapter must be further reconciled with national practices. For example, many countries do not use several of these allocation types at all. International agreement on reallocation may not be possible, but might not be required for action by individual nations, so long as not interfering with international commitments.

Evaluation Criteria for Considering Opportunities for Three-Tier Spectrum

It is necessary to have a scientific, evidence-based process to determine what bands are good candidates for three-tier spectrum, and which ones are really unsuited to such a regime. Spectrum politics often obscures the fundamental technical issues, and the basis and outcomes of decision-making are not always driven by the scientific reality, unfortunately.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 National Telecommunications and Information Administration, United States Frequency Allocations: The Radio Spectrum Chart. Consultation (2016). www.ntia.doc.gov/page/2011/ united-states-frequency-allocation-chart.
2 The Economist, A brief history of Wi-Fi. Technology Quarterly, 2Q (2004). www.economist. com/node/2724397.
3 International Telecommunications Union, Radio Regulations International Telecommunications Union Radio Regulations, Volume 1 (2012).
4 Federal Communications Commission, Amendment of the Commission's Rules with Regard to Commercial Operation in the 3550–3650 MHz Band, GN Docket 12–354 (2016). https://apps. fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-55A1.pdf.
5 National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Systems Engineering Forum (NPEF), Assessment of LightSquared Terrestrial Broadband System Effects on GPS Receivers and GPS-dependent Applications (2011). www.gps.gov/spectrum/lightsquared/docs/2011-06- NPEF-lightsquared-report.pdf.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×