Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T07:39:23.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Motif design based on reciprocal exchange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Nadrian C. Seeman
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

We now know how to design sequences that should be pretty good at leading to a particular motif. We have studied extensively how to make a branched junction with a number of arms, and how to prevent branch migration in one. In this chapter, we are going to discuss several different routes to designing motifs to use as the basis for making objects, lattices, and devices. The key concept in designing motifs is the notion of reciprocal exchange. This is a process found within biological systems, but we are going to approach it somewhat differently: we are not actually going to perform reciprocal exchange in the laboratory, but merely on paper. We will then use the sequence-selection procedures of the preceding chapter to make the strands that will come together to form the motifs we design.

The notion behind reciprocal exchange is shown in Figure 3-1. The left side of the drawing shows two strands, a red strand and a blue strand. Following reciprocal exchange, we see on the right side a red–blue strand (going from upper left to lower right) and a blue–red strand (going from upper right to lower left). Thus, we still have two strands, but now they are each a mixture of the two strands we had before. We mentioned in Chapter 1 that the strands of DNA have a chemical polarity, called 5′ to 3′ polarity, so that one end of a strand is called the 5′ end and the other end is called the 3′ end. Following the reciprocal exchange shown in Figure 3-1, the red–blue strand contains the 5′ half of the red strand and the 3′ half of the blue strand, while the blue–red strand contains the 5′ half of the blue strand and the 3′ half of the red strand. Resolution in this context means that the crossover is cut and we go back to two juxtaposed bulges or hairpins. This is an idea that derives from recombination chemistry, where crossovers are resolved in one direction or the other to yield different products (e.g., see reference 3.2).

So far, this is just a formalized concept. It would probably help to see what happens in the context of a double helix.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

3.1 Seeman, N.C., DNA Nicks and Nodes and Nanotechnology. Nano Letters 1, 22–26 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.2 Sun, W., Mao, C., Iwasaki, H., Kemper, B., Seeman, N.C., No Braiding of Holliday Junctions in Positively Supercoiled DNA Molecules. J. Mol. Biol. 294, 683–699 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.3 Churchill, M.E.A., Tullius, T.D., Kallenbach, N.R., Seeman, N.C., A Holliday Recombination Intermediate is Twofold Symmetric. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 85, 4653–4656 (1988).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.4 Rich, A., Davies, D.R., A New Two-Stranded Helical Structure: Polyadenylic Acid and Polyuridylic Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78, 3548–3549 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.5 Wells, A.F., Three-Dimensional Networks and Polyhedra, New York, John Wiley & Sons (1977).Google Scholar
3.6 Williams, R., The Geometrical Foundation of Natural Structure, New York, Dover (1979).Google Scholar
3.7 Chen, J., Seeman, N.C., The Synthesis from DNA of a Molecule with the Connectivity of a Cube. Nature 350, 631–633 (1991).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.8 Zhang, Y., Seeman, N.C., The Construction of a DNA Truncated Octahedron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 1661–1669 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.9 Wang, X., Seeman, N.C., The Assembly and Characterization of 8-Arm and 12-Arm DNA Branched Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 8169–8176 (2007).Google ScholarPubMed
3.10 Edmondson, A., A Fuller Explanation, Boston, Birkhauser (1987).Google Scholar
3.11 Duckett, D.R., Murchie, A.I.H., Diekmann, S., Kitzing, E. von, Kemper, B., Lilley, D.M.J., The Structure of the Holliday Junction and its Resolution. Cell 55, 79–89 (1988).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.12 Mao, C., Sun, W., Seeman, N.C., Designed Two-Dimensional DNA Holliday Junction Arrays Visualized by Atomic Force Microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 5437–5443 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.13 Fu, T.-J., Seeman, N.C., DNA Double Crossover Structures. Biochem. 32, 3211–3220 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.14 Kumara, M.T., Nykypanchuk, D., Sherman, W.B., Assembly Pathway Analysis of DNA Nanostructures and the Construction of Parallel Motifs. Nano Letters 8, 1971–1977 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.15 Liu, W., Wang, X., Wang, T., Sha, R., Seeman, N.C., A PX DNA Triangle Oligomerized Using a Novel Three-Domain Motif. Nano Letters 8, 317–322 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.16 Wang, X., Zhang, X., Mao, C., Seeman, N.C., Double-Stranded DNA Homology Produces a Physical Signature. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 107, 12547–12552 (2010).Google ScholarPubMed
3.17 Wang, T., Ph.D. thesis, New York University (2007).
3.18 Shen, Z., Yan, H., Wang, T., Seeman, N.C., Paranemic Crossover DNA: A Generalized Holliday Structure with Applications in Nanotechnology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 1666–1674 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.19 Shih, W.M., Quispe, J.D., Joyce, G.F., A 1.7 kilobase Single-Stranded DNA That Folds into a Nanoscale Octahedron. Nature 427, 618–621 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.20 Maiti, P.K., Pascal, T.A., Vaidehi, N., Goddard, W.A. III, The Stability of Seeman JX DNA Topoisomers of Paranemic Crossover (PX) Molecules as a Function of Crossover Number. Nucl. Acids Res. 32, 6047–6056 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.21 Maiti, P.K., Pascal, T.A., Vaidehi, N., Heo, J., Goddard, W.A. III, Atomic Level Simulations of Seeman Nanostrutures: The Paranemic Crossover in Salt Solution. Biophys. J. 90, 1463–1479 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.22 Zhang, X., Yan, H., Shen, Z., Seeman, N.C., Paranemic Cohesion of Topologically Closed DNA Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 12940–12941 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×