Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T14:59:36.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Graphs and Networks

from PART II - INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Nii O. Attoh-Okine
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The fundamental concept of graph theory and networks is a graph that provides basic and mathematical representations. Graph theory has been applied to different networks to describe characteristics such as topology, evolution, and dynamic processes and various network interactions. Barrat (2011) grouped network into two classes: (1) the natural systems that compose biological networks (genes, proteins), foodwebs, and social networks; and (2) the infrastructure network, which includes virtual (web) and physical (power grids, transportation) networks. Barrat (2011) also discussed how dynamic processes within a complex network can provide understanding about the resilience and vulnerability of the networks. Newth and Ash (2005) demonstrated through analysis how network properties can provide insight in cascading failures and resilience of large-scale infrastructure networks. Lewis (2009) classified networks as (1) static—when the propagation of nodes, links, and mapping functions remain, unchanged over time;and (2) dynamic—when the number of nodes and links and other information such as mapping functions changes over time. The time varying change leads to reorganization of the network, leading to a phenomenon called emergence. Mathematically, dynamic networks can be expressed as follows:

G(t) = [N(t), L(t), f (t) : R]

This is a time, varying 3-tuple consisting of a set nodes N(t), a set of links L(t), and a mapping function f (t), and R is the microrules that map the network from one state to another. Steen (2010) presented a comprehensive introductory analysis of graph theory and complex networks. Steen presented the basic mathematical principles and proper formulation of graph theory and complex network in real-world applications. Graph theoretic algorithms and metrics can extract useful information, which is the main objective of solving complex systems problems. There are various publications on graph and networks such as Albert and Barabási (2002) and Strogatz (2001), which are comprehensive and present more details. The aim of this chapter is to present a simple overview and provide direction on how the techniques can be applicable to resilience models. The chapter focuses on undirected graph network.

Network analysis presents a unique approach in solving and making inferences about various infrastructure networks. The structure of a critical network can model as a network. The nodes and links abstractly represent bridges and roads, city and railway networks, power generators and power lines or sector assets and relationships among those assets (Lewis 2006).

Type
Chapter
Information
Resilience Engineering
Models and Analysis
, pp. 66 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aderinlewo, O.,and N., Attoh-Okine. 2009. Effect of transportation infrastructure network size on its performance during disruptions.International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 5(3): 285–298.Google Scholar
Albert, R., and A.-L., Barabási. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks.Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1):47–97. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47.Google Scholar
Albert, R., H., Jeong, and A., Barabasi. 2000. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks.Nature, 406(6794):378–382. doi: 10.1038/35019019.Google Scholar
Attoh-Okine, N.O., and O., Aderinlewo. 2008. Pavement and Bridge Management. In O., Pourret, P., Naim, and B., Marcot, editors, 2008. Bayesian Networks: A Practical Guide to Applications, Statistics in Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/9780470994559.
Barrat, A. 2011. “Complex networks : an introduction.”Ecole Polytechnique, France.
Brummitt, C.D., R.M., D'Souza, and E.A., Leicht. 2012. Suppressing cascades of load in interdependent networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(12):E680–689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110586109.Google Scholar
Buldyrev, S. V., R., Parshani, G., Paul, H. E., Stanley, and S., Havlin. 2010a. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks.Nature, 464(7291):1025–1028. doi: 10.1038/ nature08932.Google Scholar
Buldyrev, S. V., R., Parshani, G., Paul, H. E., Stanley, and S., Havlin. 2010b. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks.Nature, 464(7291):1025–1028. doi: 10.1038/ \breaknature08932.Google Scholar
Cetinkaya, E. K., M.J.F., Alenazi, J.P., Rohrer, and J.P.G., Sterbenz. 2012. Topology connectivity analysis of internet infrastructure using graph spectra.In International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops, pages 752–758. doi: 10. 1109/ICUMT.2012.6459764.Google Scholar
Chung, F., and L., Lu. 2002. The average distances in random graphs with given expected degrees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(25):15879–15882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252631999.Google Scholar
Crucitti, P., V., Latora, and M., Marchiori. 2004. Model for cascading failures in complex networks.Physical Review E, 69(4):045104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.045104.Google Scholar
Dinh, T. N., Y., Xuan, M. T., Thai, P. M., Pardalos, and T., Znati. 2012. On New Approaches of Assessing Network Vulnerability: Hardness and Approximation.IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 20(2):609–619. doi: 10.1109/TNET.2011.2170849.Google Scholar
Dueñas Osorio, L. A. 2005. Interdependent Response of Networked Systems to Natural Hazards and Intentional Disruptions Interdependent Response of Networked Systems to Natural Hazards and Intentional Disruptions. PhD thesis.
Fu, G., R., Dawson, M., Khoury, and S., Bullock. 2014. Interdependent networks: vulnerability analysis and strategies to limit cascading failure.The European Physical Journal B, 87(7): 148. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2014-40876-y.Google Scholar
Huang, X., J., Gao, S.V., Buldyrev, S., Havlin, and H. E., Stanley. 2011.Robustness of interdependent networks under targeted attack.Physical Review E, 83(6).Google Scholar
Jamakovic, A., and P. V., Mieghem. 2008. On the Robustness of Complex Networks by Using theAlgebraic Connectivity.In Networking 2008,Ad Hoc and SensorNetworks,Wireless Networks, Next Generation Internet, 7th International IFIP-TC6 Networking Conference, Singapore, May 5–9, 2008, Proceedings, pages 183–194.Google Scholar
Jianxi Gao, S. H., Sergey V., Buldyrev, and H. Eugene, Stanley. 2012. Networks formed from interdependent networks.In Nature Physics, volume 8, pages 40–48.Google Scholar
Kurant, M., and P., Thiran. 2006. Layered Complex Networks. URL http://vw.indiana.edu/netsci06/conf-slides/conf-wed/netsci-talk-maciej-kurant.pdf.
Lesne, A. 2006. Complex Networks: From Graph Theory to Biology.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 78(3):235–262. doi: 10.1007/s11005-006-0123-1.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. G. 2006. Critical Infrastructure Protection in Homeland Security: Defending a Networked Nation.Wiley-Interscience.
Lewis, T.G. 2009. Network Science: Theory and Practice.Wiley.
Mieghem, P.V. 2011. Graph Spectra for Complex Networks.Cambridge University Press.
Molloy, M.,and B., Reed. 1995. Acritical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence.Random Structures & Algorithms, 6(2–3).Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2009. Sustainable Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Framework for Meeting 21st Century Imperatives.The National Academies Press.
Newman, M. E. J., and D. J., Watts. 1999. Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model.Physical Review E, 60(6):7332–7342. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7332.Google Scholar
Newth, D., and J., Ash. 2005. Evolving cascading failure resilience in complex networks.In Complexity International, volume 11.Google Scholar
Nguyen, D.T., Y., Shen, and M.T., Thai. 2013. DetectingCriticalNodes in Interdependent Power Networks for Vulnerability Assessment.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(1):151–159. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2012.2229398.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, S., J., Peerenboom, and T., Kelly. 2001. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies.IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6):11–25. doi: 10.1109/37.969131.Google Scholar
Salles, R. M., and D. A., Marino. 2011. Strategies and Metric for Resilience in Computer Networks.The Computer Journal, 55(6):728–739. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/bxr110.Google Scholar
Son, S.-W., G., Bizhani, C., Christensen, P., Grassberger, and M., Paczuski. 2012. Percolation theory on interdependent networks based on epidemic spreading.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 97(1):16006. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/97/16006.Google Scholar
Steen, M. V. 2010. Graph Theory and Complex Networks: An Introduction.CreateSpace.
Strogatz, S. H. 2001. Exploring complex networks.Nature, 410(6825):268–276. doi: 10.1038/ 35065725.Google Scholar
Trajanovski, S., J., Martin-Hernandez, W., Winterbach, and P., Van Mieghem. 2013. Robustness envelopes of networks.Journal of Complex Networks, 1(1):44–62. doi: 10.1093/comnet/cnt004.Google Scholar
Valdez, L. D., P. A., Macri, H. E., Stanley, and L. A., Braunstein. 2013. Triple point in correlated interdependent networks.Physical Review E, 88(5):050803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE. 88.050803.Google Scholar
Vespignani, A. 2010. Complex networks: The fragility of interdependency.Nature, 464(7291): 984–985. doi: 10.1038/464984a.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J., and S. H., Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks.Nature, 393(6684):440–442. doi: 10.1038/30918.Google Scholar
Yazdani, A., and P., Jeffrey. 2010. A complex network approach to robustness and vulnerability of spatially organized water distribution networks. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1008.1770, page 18.URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1770.
Zemljič, B., and V., Hlebec. 2005. Reliability of measures of centrality and prominence.Social Networks, 27(1):73–88. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.010.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Graphs and Networks
  • Nii O. Attoh-Okine, University of Delaware
  • Book: Resilience Engineering
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026772.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Graphs and Networks
  • Nii O. Attoh-Okine, University of Delaware
  • Book: Resilience Engineering
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026772.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Graphs and Networks
  • Nii O. Attoh-Okine, University of Delaware
  • Book: Resilience Engineering
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026772.005
Available formats
×