Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T19:19:23.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Tense marking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Peter Siemund
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Get access

Summary

The grammatical category of tense relates to the expression of temporal relations and the linguistic embedding of real-world situations in time. It involves highly familiar categories such as the present tense, the present perfect, and the past tense, as well as several others. Tense marking has been widely researched in the grammar of English both in the standard varieties and in the non-standard varieties that are the topic of this book. Section 6.1 of this chapter will introduce the foundations of this category, while Section 6.2 will be concerned with tense in varieties of English. In Section 6.3, we will explore cross-linguistic variation in the realisation of this category.

Overview

Before we can concern ourselves with the study of tense in English and its varieties, we first of all need to achieve some clarification about this category. As scholarly interest in it has been exceptionally extensive, we can only mention the most important facts at this point (see Comrie 1985 and Klein 1994 for very readable introductions).

We can define tense as a grammatical category for the expression of temporal relations. Comrie (1985: 9) states that ‘tense is grammaticalised expression of location in time’. I would like to emphasise the terms ‘grammatical’ and ‘grammatical category’, as temporal relations can also be expressed by a diverse set of lexical expressions (e.g. before, after, yesterday, two minutes ago, etc.). These will not be of interest here. We will define a linguistic expression as a ‘grammatical marker’ if its use is obligatory in certain contexts and it can be used together with a large number of lexical expressions. Grammatical markers, thus, belong to the regular and rule-based systems of language.

Type
Chapter
Information
Varieties of English
A Typological Approach
, pp. 111 - 133
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bao, Zhiming. 1995. Already in Singapore English. World Englishes 14(2). 181–8.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2005. The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substrate explanation. Journal of Linguistics 41(2). 237–67.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen and Velupillai, Viveka. 2011a. The past tense. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 66. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen and Velupillai, Viveka. 2011b. The perfect. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 68. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen and Velupillai, Viveka. 2011c. The future tense. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 67. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Davydova, Julia. 2011. The Present Perfect in Non-Native Englishes: A Corpus-Based Study of Variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. Tense in English: Its Structure and Use in Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elsness, Johan. 2009. The present perfect and the preterite. In Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia (eds.), One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, 228–45. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 1999. A Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2003. Contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27(3). 529–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. The triad ‘Tense-Aspect-Aktionsart’: Problems and possible solutions. In Vetters, Carl and Vandeweghe, Willy (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect and Aktionsart (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6), 9–29. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, William Robert and Todd, Loreto. 1980. Variety in Contemporary English. London: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas. 2009. Hiberno-English medial-object perfects reconsidered: A case of contact-induced grammaticalisation. Studies in Language 33(3). 528–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York and London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1). 51–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, and Paulasto, Heli. 2009. Digging for roots: Universals and contact in regional varieties of English. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, and Paulasto, Heli (eds.), Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English, 231–65. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 2004. Do as a tense and aspect marker in varieties of English. In Kortmann, Bernd (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 245–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2001. Tense and aspect. In Haspelmath, Martin, Konig, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf, and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, volume I, 768–83. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim. 2004. Problems for typology: Perfects and resultatives in spoken and non-standard English and Russian. In Kortmann, Bernd (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 305–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas. 2008. Prepositional aspect constructions in Hiberno-English. In Siemund, Peter and Kintana, Noemi (eds.), Language Contact and Contact Languages, 213–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastall, Paul. 1999. Observations on the present perfect in English. World Englishes 18(1). 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2001. The pluperfect in native and non-native English: A comparative corpus study. Language Variation and Change 13(3). 343–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Divyani. 2009. Typological diversity of New Englishes. English World-Wide 30(2). 170–95.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2004. Substrate, superstrate and universal: Perfect constructions in Irish English. In Kortmann, Bernd (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 401–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka. 2003. Hawai'i Creole English: A Typological Analysis of the Tense-Mood-Aspect System. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1993. Variability in the use of perfect have in Trinidadian English: A problem of categorical and semantic mismatch. Language Variation and Change 5(2). 141–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Tense marking
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Tense marking
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Tense marking
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.007
Available formats
×