Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:53:01.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix D - Grading rubrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael P. Marder
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

These grading rubrics provide an attempt to formalize the way that scientists evaluate scientific work. Most of the rubric is subtractive. This means that the rubric describes various sorts of mistakes, and the numbers of points that can be deducted for them. The total number of points that can be deducted from each category adds to much more than 100 because scientific work can be rendered invalid by poor performance in any of these areas. Unsafe practices or plagiarism lead immediately to a failing grade.

At the very end of the rubric, there is room for additions of points. Adding points accounts for exceptional or innovative work. This part of the rubric captures the idea that the best scientific work has an element of creativity and effort that cannot be captured by the simple avoidance of doing anything wrong.

To use the rubric, the instructor will decide on the baseline value from which points will be subtracted for errors and omissions. This value may be less than 100. Getting the maximum score of 100 may require the addition of points from the final section of the rubric.

Please note that no rubric or checklist can fully capture the full range of strengths and difficulties that describe independent inquiries. This rubric provides a guide to help you identify common misconceptions and errors, but cannot fully cover all cases.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Grading rubrics
  • Michael P. Marder, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Research Methods for Science
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035118.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Grading rubrics
  • Michael P. Marder, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Research Methods for Science
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035118.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Grading rubrics
  • Michael P. Marder, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Research Methods for Science
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035118.010
Available formats
×