Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:28:54.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Relationships between the skull and face

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2012

Caroline Wilkinson
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
Christopher Rynn
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Craniofacial reconstruction (CFR) and approximation (CFA) are among terms commonly used to describe the procedure of predicting and recreating a likeness of an individual face based on the morphology of the skull (Gerasimov, 1955; Krogman and İşcan, 1986; Wilkinson, 2004). A variety of methods exist, most of which employ averaged tissue-depth data at various landmarks of the skull, and feature prediction guidelines to estimate the morphology of the eyes, nose, mouth and ears. Some methods also entail interpretation of general and local skull morphology to predict individual muscles of mastication and facial expression. This chapter will describe craniofacial patterns, and discuss anatomical and morphological interrelationships between the skull and the face, such as may be useful in craniofacial reconstruction.

A key principle of anatomy is that structure is inextricably related to function. Every organ, indeed every organelle in every cell in every biological organism, has been gradually evolving its way into a functional niche through the process of natural selection over innumerable generations. The human head is anatomically and architecturally fascinating because of the wide range of functions carried out by its constituent parts. Organs dedicated to four of the five special senses are housed in the craniofacial complex: the eyes (vision), the inner, middle and outer ears (audition/balance), the mouth and oropharynx (gustation/mastication/respiration/verbalisation) and the nasopharyngeal airway (olfaction/respiration), and the functionality of each is responsible in part for the structure of the head and face. The eyes of a child appear much larger and further apart than those of an adult; of course, this is only relative to the rest of the face, but the eyes must develop to a certain level, and thus a certain size, in order to function, and must be a certain distance apart for effective binocular vision, so this structural arrangement is set up early and maintained throughout development. However, the nose, mouth and lower face change shape quite drastically between infancy and adulthood, but remain functional throughout development via a series of compensatory mechanisms involving the entire craniofacial complex.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balueva, T. S.Veselovskaya, E. V. 2004 New developments in facial reconstructionArchaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia 1 143Google Scholar
Balueva, T.Veselovskaya, E. V.Kobyliansky, E. 2009 Craniofacial reconstruction by applying the ultrasound method in live human populationsInternational Journal of Anthropology 24 87Google Scholar
Balueva, T. S.Veselovskaya, E. V.Lebedinskaya, G. V.Pestrjakov, A. P. 1988 Anthropological types of the ancient population at the territory of USSRZubov, A. A.ScienceMoscowIn RussianGoogle Scholar
Enlow, D. H.Hans, M. G. 1996 Essentials of Facial GrowthPhiladelphia, PAW. B. SaundersGoogle Scholar
Enlow, D. H.Kuroda, T.Lewis, A. B. 1971 The morphological and morphogenetic basis for craniofacial form and patternAngle Orthodontist 41 161Google ScholarPubMed
Fedosyutkin, B. A.Nainys, J. V. 1993 The relationship of skull morphology to facial featuresİşcan, M. Y.Helmer, R. P.Forensic Analysis of the Skull: Craniofacial Analysis, Reconstruction, and IdentificationNew York, NYWiley-LissGoogle Scholar
Gasser, R. F. 1967 The development of the facial muscles in manAmerican Journal of Anatomy 120 357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerasimov, M. M. 1955 The Reconstruction of the Face from the Basic Structure of the SkullTshernezky, W.RussiaPublishers unknownGoogle Scholar
Glanville, E. V. 1969 Nasal shape, prognathism and adaptation in manAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology 30 29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooton, E. A. 1946 Up from the ApeRevised Edition. New York, NYThe Macmillan CompanyGoogle Scholar
Krogman, W. M.İşcan, M. Y. 1986 The Human Skeleton in Forensic MedicineSpringfield, ILCharles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Mew, J. 1992 Use of the indicator line to assess maxillary positionCranio-View: The Journal of the Cranio Group and the Society for the Study of Craniomandibular Disorders 1 22Google Scholar
Moss, M. L.Young, R. W. 1960 A functional approach to craniologyAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology 18 281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otuyemi, O. D.Noar, J. H. 1996 A comparison of crown size dimensions of the permanent teeth in a Nigerian and a British populationEuropean Journal of Orthodontics 18 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopec, P.Ubelaker, D. H. 2002 Reconstructing the shape of the nose according to the skullForensic Science Communications 4 1Google Scholar
Rynn, C. 2006
Rynn, C.Wilkinson, C. M.Peters, H. L. 2010 Prediction of nasal morphology from the skullForensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 6 20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheuer, L.Black, S. 2000 Developmental Juvenile OsteologyLondonAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
Schultz, A. H. 1918 Relation of the external nose to the bony nose and nasal cartilages in whites and negroesAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology 1 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, C. N.Davidson, P. L. 2008 The placement of the human eyeball and canthi in craniofacial identificationJournal of Forensic Sciences 53 612CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tessier, P. 1971 Relationship of craniostenoses to craniofacial dysostoses, and to faciostenoses: a study with therapeutic implicationsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery 48 224CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utsuno, H.Kageyama, T.Uchidac, K. 2010 Pilot study of facial soft tissue thickness differences among three skeletal classes in Japanese femalesForensic Science International 195 165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitnall, S. E. 1921 Anatomy of the Eye and OrbitOxfordOxford Medical PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, C. M. 2004 Forensic Facial ReconstructionCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, C. M.Mautner, S. A. 2003 Measurement of eyeball protrusion and its application in facial reconstructionJournal of Forensic Science 48 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×