Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T02:32:13.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - Polling in Politics and Industry

from PART IV - SOCIAL SCIENCE AS DISCOURSE AND PRACTICE IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LIFE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Theodore M. Porter
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Dorothy Ross
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access

Summary

Survey research has a relatively short history, since the systematic practice of aggregating preferences dates back only to the nineteenth century. Scholars, statesmen, and businessmen had an interest in the nature of public opinion long before the nineteenth century, of course, but technically sophisticated attempts to quantify popular sentiment trailed far behind theorizing and discussion of it. In the twentieth century, most Western democracies witnessed a tremendous surge in survey research with the emergence of large commercial firms devoted to counting individual opinions, preferences, and attitudes. This chapter will focus on three moments in the development of survey research: the proliferation of the straw poll in mid nineteenth-century America, the vital period between 1930 and 1950 across several national settings, and contemporary debates over the uses of opinion research in a democratic state.

The meaning of the term “public opinion” itself is tied to historical circumstances, as are methods for measuring it. These days, we have all become accustomed to the constant flow of polling data in our mass media, and to their underlying assumption – that public opinion can be defined as the aggregation of individual opinions. But public opinion has not always been conceptualized or measured in an aggregative fashion. For example, Jacques Necker (1732–1804), the finance minister of France, proposed that public opinion was equivalent to the “spirit of society.” Public opinion was a wise court, embedded in communication and conversation, which made societies stable, rising up slowly and rationally when necessary in response to important events. Necker viewed the salons of the period (elite drawing-room discussions of politics, art, and religion) as manifestations and indicators of public opinion – a far cry from the polls and surveys of today.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, JeanAffairs of Party: The Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid-Nineteenth Century (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Blondiaux, LoïcComment rompre avec Durkheim? Jean Stoetzel et la sociologie française de l’après-guerre (1945–1958),” Revue francaise de sociologie, 32 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, HerbertPublic Opinion and Public Opinion Polling,” American Sociological Review, 13 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, PierrePublic Opinion Does Not Exist,” in Communication and Class Struggle, ed. Mattelart, Armand and Siegelaub, Seth (New York: International General, 1979).Google Scholar
Conrad, ChristophOn Market Research Conducted by Independent Organizations in Interwar Germany: Between Business, State, and Academic Research.” Paper presented to the conference on Opinion Research in the History of Modern Democracies, Free University, Berlin, 1997.Google Scholar
Converse, JeanSurvey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence, 1890–1960 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Coutant, FrankThe Difference between Market Research and Election Forecasting,” International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research, 2 (1948–9).Google Scholar
Desrosières, AlainThe Part in Relation to the Whole: How to Generalise? The Prehistory of Representative Sampling,” in The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880–1940, ed. Bulmer, Martin, Bales, Kevin, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Engle, N. H.Gaps in Marketing Research,” Journal of Marketing, 4 (April 1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, George and Rae, Saul, The Pulse of Democracy: The Public Opinion Poll and How It Works (New York: Greenwood Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Ginsberg, BenjaminThe Captive Public: How Mass Opinion Promotes State Power (New York: Basic Books, 1986).Google Scholar
Gitlin, ToddMedia Sociology: The Dominant Paradigm,” Theory and Society, 6 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, Carroll J., Ostman, Ronald E., and McDonald, Daniel G., “Opinions, Perception, and Social Reality,” in Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent, ed. Glasser, Theodore L. and Salmon, Charles T. (New York: Guilford Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Herbst, SusanNumbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Herbst, SusanReading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Holli, Melvin G.Emil E. Hurja: Michigan’s Presidential Pollster,” Michigan Historical Review, 21 (Fall 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y., Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Keller, MortonAffairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth Century America (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, William and Mosteller, Frederick, “Representative Sampling IV: The History of the Concept in Statistics, 1895–1939,” International Statistical Review, 48 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F.An Episode in the History of Social Research: A Memoir,” in The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960, ed. Fleming, Donald and Bailyn, Bernard (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, PaulThe Art of Asking Why,” National Marketing Review, 1 (Summer 1935)Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, PaulQualitative Analysis: Historical and Critical Essays (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1972).Google Scholar
Lippmann, WalterPublic Opinion (New York: Free Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Lippmann, WalterThe Phantom Public (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1925)Google Scholar
Lyndon, BrownMarket Research and Analysis (New York: Ronald Press, 1937).Google Scholar
Marie, JahodaLazarsfeld, Paul, and Zeisel, Hans, Marienthal: The Sociology of an Unemployed Community (1932) (Chicago: Aldine, Atherton, 1971).Google Scholar
McGerr, MichaelThe Decline of Popular Politics: The American North, 1865–1928 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, JoshuaThe Problem of Getting on the Media Agenda: A Case Study in Competing Logics of Campaign Coverage,” in Presidential Campaign Discourse, ed. Kendall, Kathleen E., (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Michael Baker, KeithInventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, TheodoreChautauqua: A Center for Education, Religion, and the Arts in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, ElisabethThe Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion – Our Social Skin (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Rinauro, SandroThe Diffusion of Public Opinion Surveys in Italy Between Fascism and Democracy.” Paper presented to the conference on Opinion Research in the History of Modern Democracies, Free University, Berlin, 1997.Google Scholar
Sally, ClarkeConsumers, Information, and Marketing Efficiency at GM, 1921–1940,” Business and Economic History, 25 (Fall 1996).Google Scholar
Schudson, MichaelDiscovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers (New York: Basic Books, 1978).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×