Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T02:22:23.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - China confronts the Soviet Union: warfare and diplomacy on China's Inner Asian frontiers

from PART I - THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION: CHINA IN TURMOIL, 1966–1969

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Thomas Robinson
Affiliation:
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Roderick MacFarquhar
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
John K. Fairbank
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

During the “active phase” of the Cultural Revolution, up to 1969, China deliberately adopted a low profile in foreign policy, as the country was consumed by internal disorder. The conscious foreign policy of the Cultural Revolution was to have as little of it as possible. China purposely went into diplomatic isolation, kept foreigners out of the country, lowered the level of commercial intercourse with other countries, steered clear of international institutions, and substituted Maoist rhetoric for more tangible means of policy. For a while, China was not a factor of consequence in global politics or even in Asian international relations.

Nevertheless, a chapter on this brief period can illustrate several verities of Chinese foreign policy. Among these are the interdependence and interpenetration of Chinese domestic developments and the international environment. Even though the Cultural Revolution was a period of almost exclusive Chinese attention to internal events, its causes were partly international, its initiation was delayed by occurrences outside China's borders, its effects were felt directly by China's neighbors and strongly even by nations and foreign offices at great distances from Peking, and its direction was abruptly altered by the threat of war in 1969 and after.

Another verity is the dependence of Chinese internal policy and international actions on the policies and actions of the United States and the Soviet Union. American intervention in Vietnam precipitated the strategic debate of 1965 that, in turn, helped divide the leadership along pro- and anti-Cultural Revolution lines; and Soviet intervention in Czechoslovakia in 1968 caused the Chinese leadership to take fright over the Soviet military buildup along the Chinese border and to catch the Soviets off guard with the Chen-pao Island raids early the next year.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adie, W. A. C., “China and the war in Vietnam,” Mizan, 8.6 (November-December 1966)
Adie, W. A. C., “Chou En-lai on safari,” China Quarterly, 18 (April-June 1964)Google Scholar
Alexander, Dallin, ed., Diversity in international communism: a documentary record, 1961–1963
Alexander, Woodside, “Peking and Hanoi: anatomy of a revolutionary partnership,” International Journal, 24.1 (Winter 1968–69)Google Scholar
Allen, S. Whiting, “The use of force in foreign policy by the People's Republic of China,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 402 (July 1972)Google Scholar
Allen, S. Whiting, “How we almost went to war with China,” Look, 33 (29 April 1969)
Antonie, C. A. Dake, In the spirit of the Red Banteng: Indonesian communists between Moscow and Peking 1959–1965
Arthur, J. Dommen, “The attempted coup in Indonesia,” China Quarterly, 25 (January-March 1966), 144–70; “Quarterly chronicle and documentation,” China Quarterly, 26 (April-June 1966).Google Scholar
Baum, Richard. Prelude to revolution: Mao, the Party, and the peasant question, 1962–66. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975.
BorisovKoloskov, O. B. B. T., Soviet-Chinese relations, 1945–1970.
Brian, Shaw, “China and North Vietnam:two revolutionary paths,” Current Scene, 9.11 (November 1971)Google Scholar
Carol, Bell, “Korea and the balance of power,” Political Quarterly, 25.1 (January-March 1954).Google Scholar
Cecil, Johnson, Communist China and Latin America, 1959–1967.
Charles, Neuhauser, Third World politics: China and the Afro-Asian People's Solidarity Organisation, 1957–1967.
Chiang, I–shan, “Military affairs of communist China, 1968,” Tsukiio, 59 (February 1969).
Chin, Chung, P'yongyang between Peking, and Moscow. North Korea's involvement in the Sino–Soviet dispute, 1958–1975.
Choudhury, G[olam] W. China in world affairs: the foreign policy of the PRC since 1970. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1982.
Daniel, D. Lovelace, China and “People's War” in Thailand, 1964–1969.
Deshpande, G. P., “China and Vietnam,” International Studies, 12.4 (October-December 1973)Google Scholar
Donald, Hindley, “Political power and the October 196; coup in Indonesia,” Journal of A sian Studies, 1969..Google Scholar
DonaldUri, S. Zagoria Ra'anan, “On Kremlinology: a reply to Michael Yahuda,” China Quarterly, 50 (April-June 1972).Google Scholar
Donald, S. Zagoria, The Sino-Soviet conflict, 1956–1961
Donald, W. Klein, “Peking's diplomats in Africa,” Current Scene, 2.36 (1 July 1964)Google Scholar
Doolin, Dennis J. Territorial claims in the Sino-Soviet conflict: documents and analysis. Stanford, Calif.: Hoover Institution, 1965.
Edgar, Snow, “Interview with Mao,” New Republic, 152 (27 February 1965).
Frank, N. Trager, “Sino–Burmese relations: the end o f the Pauk Phaw era,” Orbis, 11.4 (Winter 1968)
Frederick, C. Teiwes, Politics and purges in China: rectification and the decline of Party norms, 195O–1965
George, T. Yu, “Sino- African relations: a survey,” Asian Survey, 5.7 (July 1965)Google Scholar
Griffith, William E. Sino-Soviet relations, 1964–1965.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1967.
Harold, C. Hinton, ed., The People's Republic of China, 1949–1979. a documentary survey, 2..
Harrison, E. Salisbury, “Marco Polo would recognize Mao's Sinkiang,” New York Times Magazine, 23 November 1969Google Scholar
Henry, S. Albinski, “Chinese and Soviet policies in the Vietnam crisis,” Australian Quarterly, 40.1 (March 1968)Google Scholar
Hinton, , ed., The People's Republic of China, 1949–1979, vol. 4, documents
Hsiang, Nai–kuang, “The relations between Hanoi and Peiping,” Chinese Communist Affairs, 1.4 (December 1964)Google Scholar
Ilpyong, J. Kim, “Chinese Communist relations with North Korea: continuity and change,” Journal of A sian Studies, 13.4 (December 1970)Google Scholar
Ishwer, C. Ojha, The changing pattern of China's attitude toward a negotiated settlement in Vietnam, 1964–1971
Jiirgen, Domes, The internalpoliticsojChina, 1949–1972.
Johnson, Cecil. Communist China and Latin America, 1959–1967. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.
Joseph, C. Kun, “North Korea: between Moscow and Peking,” China Quarterly, 31 (July-September 1967)Google Scholar
Justus, M. Van Kroef, “Chinese subversion in Burma,” Indian Communist, 3.1–2 (March-June 1970).Google Scholar
King, C. Chen, “Hanoi vs. Peking: policies and relations –a survey,” Asian Survey, 12.9 (September 1972)Google Scholar
Kroef, , “The Sino-Indonesian partnership,” Orhis, 8.2 (Summer 1964).
Lin, Piao, “Address at the enlarged meeting of the CCP Central Politburo,” 18 May 1966, in Chinese haw and Government, 5.4 (Winter 1969/1970).Google Scholar
Lin, Piao, “Long live the victory of People's War!Peking Review (later Beijing Review), 8.36 (3 September 1965).Google Scholar
Lin, Piao, “Report to the Ninth National Congress of the Communist Party of China,” Peking Review (later Beijing Review), 18 (30 April 1969).Google Scholar
Lo, Jui–ch'ing, “Commemorate the victory over German fascism! Carry the struggle against U.S. imperialism through to the end!Hung-ch'i, 5 (1965), in PR, 8.20(14 May 1965).Google Scholar
Lynn, B. Pascoe, “China's relations with Burma, 1949–1964,” in Andrew, Cordier, ed., Columbia essays in international affairs: the dean'spapers, 1965Google Scholar
Michael, B. Yahuda, China's role in world affairs, 185, and the "Communique," 12 August 1966, Peking Review (later Beijing Review), 34(19 August 1966).Google Scholar
Michael, Yahuda, “Kremlinology and the Chinese strategic debate, 1965–66,” China Quarterly, 49 (January-March 1972)Google Scholar
Miksche, F. O., “USSR: Rot-China – An der Ostgrenze Russlands Wacht die Dritte Weltmacht,” Webr und Wirtscbajt (October 1974)Google Scholar
Neuhauser, Charles. Third World politics: China and the Afro-Asian People's Solidarity Organization, 1917–1967. Cambridge, Mass.: East Asian Research Center, Harvard University, 1968
Neville, Maxwell, “A note on the Amur/Ussuri sector of the Sino-Soviet boundaries,” Modern China, 1.1 (January 1975).Google Scholar
Richard, Baum and Frederick, C. Teiwes, Ssu-cb'ing: the Socialist Education Movement of 1962–1966
Richard, Baum, Prelude to revolution: Mao, the Party, and the peasant question, 1962–66
Robert, A. Holmes, “Burma's foreign policy toward China since 1962,” Pacific Affairs, 45.2 (Summer 1972)Google Scholar
Robert, A. Scalapino, “Africa and Peking's united front,” Current Scene, 3.26 (1 September 1965).Google Scholar
Robinson, , A political-military biography of Lin Piao, Part 2, 1950–1971.
Roy, U. T. Kim, “Sino–North Korean relations,” Asian Survey, 8 (August 1968)Google Scholar
Sardesar, D. R., “China and peace in Vietnam,” China Report, 5.3 (May-June 1969)Google Scholar
Tai-sung, An, “The Sino-Soviet dispute and Vietnam,” Orbis, 9.2 (Summer 1965)
Tania, Jacques, ‘“Sharqiy Turkstan’ or ‘Sinkiang’?” Radio Liberty Research, 7 March 1975.Google Scholar
Thomas, Robinson, “A politico-military biography of Lin Piao, Part II, 1950–1971.”
Thomas, W. Robinson, “The Wuhan Incident: local strife and provincial rebellion during the Cultural Revolution,” China Quarterly, 47 (July-September 1971).Google Scholar
Thomas, W. Robinson, “The Sino-Soviet border dispute: background, development, and the March 1969 clashes,” American Political Science Review, 66.4 (December 1972).Google Scholar
William, E. Griffith, “Sino-Soviet relations, 1964–65,” China Quarterly, 25 (January-March 1966).Google Scholar
William, E. Griffith, The Sino-Soviet rift and his Sino-Soviet relations, 1964–1965
William, Heaton, “Maoist revolutionary strategy and modern colonization: the Cultural Revolution in Hong Kong,” Asian Survey, 10.9 (September 1970)Google Scholar
William, W. Whitson, The Chinese high command: a history of communist military politics, 1927–71, ch. 11, “Strategy and tactics.”Google Scholar
Yao, Meng–hsien, “Chinese communists and the Vietnam War,” Issues Studies, 1.9 (June 1965).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×