Sensibility and literary criticism

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521300094.019

18 - Sensibility and literary criticism

from THEMES AND MOVEMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

John Mullan

Edited by

H. B. Nisbet and

Claude Rawson

Show author details

H. B. Nisbet: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Claude Rawson: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Nay, mama, if he is not to be animated by Cowper! – but we must allow for difference of taste. Elinor has not my feelings, and therefore she may overlook it, and be happy with him. But it would have broke my heart had I loved him, to hear him read with so little sensibility.

Thus, in Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility, Marianne Dashwood criticizes the man who has been courting her sister. He lacks ‘sensibility’, a faculty of which the novel is famously suspicious, and this lack is shown in the way that he reads. ‘Sensibility’, in this example, is made explicitly a matter of literary discrimination and performance. When Marianne has her first conversation with Willoughby, she seems to be discovering a shared ‘sensibility’ in their shared tastes in reading:

her favourite authors were brought forward and dwelt upon with so rapturous a delight, that any young man of five and twenty must have been insensible indeed, not to become an immediate convert to the excellence of such works, however disregarded before.

Austen's dry joke on the word ‘insensible’ only emphasizes the point: sensibility is regarded by these characters as best tested and displayed in the exercise of literary taste. Sense and Sensibility, published in 1811 but begun in the late 1790s, shows sensibility to be a dangerous indulgence rather than a natural sensitivity, and satirizes the effusive professions of ‘taste’ supposed to mark that indulgence. Significantly, the most famous critic of sensibility chooses to identify it with a fashionable vocabulary of literary appreciation.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 417 - 433

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300094.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alison, Archibald, Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste (London, 1790).Google Scholar

Austen, Jane, Sense and Sensibility, ed. Chapman, R. W. (1923; rpt Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar

Barnett, George L. (ed.), Eighteenth-Century British Novelists on the Novel (New York, 1968).Google Scholar

Beattie, James, Essays (London, 1776).Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Boulton, J. T. (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar

Carroll, John (ed.), Selected Letters of Samuel Richardson (Oxford, 1964).Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis, Oeuvres (Paris, 1951).Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis, Oeuvres philosophiques, ed. Verniere, P. (Paris, 1959).Google Scholar

Doktor, Wolfgang, and Sauder, Gerhard (eds.), Empfindsamkeit. Theoretische und kritische Texte (Stuttgart, 1976).Google Scholar

Elledge, Scott (ed.), Eighteenth-Century Critical Essays (2 vols., Ithaca, 1961).Google Scholar

Ferriar, John, Illustrations of Sterne (London, 1798).Google Scholar

Gerard, Alexander, An Essay on Taste (Edinburgh, 1759).Google Scholar

Howes, Alan (ed.), Sterne. The Critical Heritage (London, 1974).Google Scholar

Howes, Alan, Yorick and the Critics: Sterne's Reputation in England, 1760–1868 (New Haven, 1958).Google Scholar

Hume, David, Essays, ed. Miller, E. F. (Indianapolis, 1985; revised edn, 1989).Google Scholar

Kames, Henry Home Lord, Elements of Criticism (3 vols., Edinburgh, 1761).Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Sämtliche Schriften, ed. Lachmann, Karl and Muncker, Franz (23 vols., Stuttgart and Leipzig, 1886–1924).Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Lessing, G. E., Moses Mendelssohn and Friedrich Nicolai, Briefwechsel über das Trauerspiel, ed. Schulte-Sasse, Jochen (Munich, 1972).Google Scholar

Mason, John Hope, The Irresistible Diderot (London, 1982).Google Scholar

More, Hannah, Sacred Dramas, Chiefly Intended for Young Persons, to which is added, Sensibility, A Poem (London, 1782).Google Scholar

Mullan, John, Sentiment and Sociability (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar

Petriconi, Hellmuth, Die verführte Unschuld: Bemerkungen über ein literarisches Thema (Hamburg, 1953).Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J., A Dialogue between a Man of Letters and M. J. J. Rousseau, in Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Eloisa, or a series of original letters, trans. Kenrick, William (1803), Woodstock Facsimile reprint (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J., A Letter from M. Rousseau, of Geneva, to M. d'Alembert of Paris (London, 1759).Google Scholar

Sauder, Gerhard, Empfindsamkeit, Vol. III: Quellen und Dokumente (Stuttgart, 1980).CrossRef Google Scholar

Sauder, Gerhard, Empfindsamkeit, Vol. I: Voraussetzungen und Elemente (Stuttgart, 1974).CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, Erich, Richardson, Rousseau und Goethe (Jena, 1875).Google Scholar

Todd, Janet, Sensibility. An Introduction (London, 1986).Google Scholar

Warton, Joseph, An Essay on the Genius and Writings of Pope (London, 1756).Google Scholar

Wellek, René, A History of Modern Criticism 1750–1950, vol. 1 (1955; rpt London, 1966).Google Scholar

Williams, Ioan (ed.), Novel and Romance 1700–1800: A Documentary Record (London, 1970).Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, Mary, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (London, 1929).Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William, and Coleridge, S. T., Lyrical Ballads, ed. Brett, R. L. and Jones, A. R. (London, 1978).Google Scholar

Book contents

18 - Sensibility and literary criticism

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive