Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T09:41:51.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Nuns and nationhood: Intimacy in convents in Renaissance drama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

James M. Bromley
Affiliation:
Miami University
Get access

Summary

How do you solve a problem like Isabella?

As the previous chapter's discussion showed, violence characterizes relations between men at the court in The Nice Valour, and Lapet tried to transform the violence of that space into a form of intimacy. Place similarly exerts a shaping influence over the intimate economy of many early modern texts in which convents play a role because the convent offers a space for non-marital intimacy. For instance, at the end of Measure for Measure (1603–1604), the Duke's offer of marriage to Isabella is met with her silence. The text refuses to guarantee a future for the couple, and this textual indeterminacy has prompted critical discussion of the implications of the choice Isabella faces between returning to the convent and marrying a man in whom she has not shown the slightest interest romantically, an act which would involve her reintegration into the city-state of Vienna. While Measure for Measure does not stage Isabella's decision, a number of Renaissance dramatic texts do represent a heroine choosing or compelled to choose between a convent and a husband, often in favor of the husband. Frances E. Dolan argues that some early modern texts ridicule nuns for taking themselves out of marital circulation in order to manage concerns that “normative expectations for women institutionalized through marriage and the family are just as excessive and doomed as those institutionalized through the cloister.” However, as I will show, Robert Greene's Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay (1589), the anonymous Merry Devil of Edmonton (c. 1602), and Measure for Measure at the very least fail fully to denounce, ridicule, or manage their representations of convents in ways that we might expect in English drama after the Reformation. To the extent that these texts invest in the Catholic cloister as a potentially desirable alternative to Protestant marriage, the nun remains a subversive figure.

The nun's subversion is only partly related to religion, however. Kate Chedgzoy rightly notes that the convent is “a fictive space in which women's ambiguous relation to central institutions of early modern society could be reimagined.” Targeting Chedgzoy's analysis to the nation as a whole, I argue in this chapter that the figure of the nun is a threat because of her simultaneous involvement in a supranational religious organization and a single-sex community; this threat reveals that our assessments of the early modern analogies between the female body and the space of the early modern nation and between the early modern household and the monarchical state are limited insofar as they fail to account for marriage as an intimate economy of mediated circulation. Renaissance dramatic representations of the convent challenge the nationalist uses and implications of the consolidation of intimacy around marriage, interiority, and futurity. When the plays I discuss in this chapter show women desiring to be installed in economies of insufficient circulation with men and unprofitable, non-reproductive circulation with other women, by implication they imagine alternatives to dominant understandings of the nation as a space and the subject's participation in the life of the nation. Advancing this book's rethinking of Renaissance intimacy, my analysis of representations of convents reveals that intimate life was situated along a continuum of sexual and non-sexual relations of care and that forms of affiliation not usually associated with intimate life, such as national identity and political subjection, were in fact tethered to the Renaissance intimate sphere.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×