Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T12:15:16.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Legal Regulation of Twenty-First-Century Families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Marsha Garrison
Affiliation:
Brooklyn Law School
Elizabeth S. Scott
Affiliation:
Columbia University Law School
Get access

Summary

A primary theme of this volume is that recent sweeping changes in marriage and family life present important challenges for family law. Half a century ago, both law and deeply entrenched social norms prescribed marriage as the only acceptable family form. Marriage was exclusively heterosexual, and both marital roles and entitlements were based on spousal gender. As the various contributors to this volume have explained, much has changed. Across most of the industrialized world, the proportion of families based on marriage has declined substantially. Increasingly, couples choose to live together before marriage or as an alternative to marriage. A 2011 survey found that barely 50 percent of American adults were married – a record low (Pew 2011). A growing number of children are born to unmarried mothers, who often live in informal unions with their children's fathers. As a result of higher divorce rates and the dissolution of nonmarital families, many more children live in a succession of households involving a single parent, that parent's new partner, and, sometimes, the children of the partner or of the parent and the new partner. Same-sex couples also form families and raise children today in a way that was uncommon fifty years ago and, increasingly, these couples have been successful in advocating for legal recognition of their unions.

Several contributors describe how the institution of marriage itself has changed dramatically over the past half-century. Differentiated social roles for husband and wife are no longer prescribed in the way that they once were, and the law has taken a strong stand in support of gender equality (Goldberg, Chapter 11). The new equality norm is associated with increasing equality in spousal earnings and a somewhat more egalitarian apportionment of household work (Brinig, Chapter 3). Moreover, the meaning of marriage has evolved from a role-based, “institutional” model to one based on companionship or, more recently, individual personal fulfillment (Amato, Chapter 6). Under modern divorce law, spouses have unprecedented freedom to leave unhappy marriages, and public opinion increasingly favors such freedom (Schneider, Chapter 12).

Type
Chapter
Information
Marriage at the Crossroads
Law, Policy, and the Brave New World of Twenty-First-Century Families
, pp. 303 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, P.R. 2005 The Impact of Family Formation Change on the Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Well-Being of the Next GenerationFuture of Children 15 75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amato, P.R.Cheadle, J. 2005 The Long Reach of Divorce: Divorce and Child Well-Being across Three GenerationsJournal of Marriage and Family 67 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Law Institute 2002 Principles of the Law of Family DissolutionAmerican Law InstituteGoogle Scholar
Andersson, G.Philipov, D. 2002 Life-Table Representations of Family Dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 Other FFS Countries: A Project of Descriptions of Demographic BehaviorDemographic Research 7 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axinn, W.G.Thornton, A. 2000 The Transformation in the Meaning of MarriageWaite, L.J.The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and CohabitationNew YorkAldine de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Banks, R.R. 2011 Is Marriage for White People? How the African American Marriage Decline Affects EveryoneNew YorkDuttonGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. 1981 A Treatise on the FamilyCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, E. 2004 Cohabitation or Marriage? Preferred Living Arrangements in SwedenAustrian Institute for Family StudiesGoogle Scholar
Blankenhorn, D. 2007 The Future of MarriageEncounter BooksGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, P.Schwartz, P. 1983 American Couples: Work, Money, SexNew YorkWm. Morrow & CoGoogle Scholar
Breivik, K.Olweus, D. 2006 Adolescents’ Adjustment in Four Post-Divorce Family StructuresDivorce and Remarriage 44 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S.L. 2000 Union Transitions among Cohabiters: The Significance of Relationship Assessment and ExpectationsJournal of Marriage and Family 62 833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S.L 2004 Family Structure and Child Well-BeingJournal of Marriage and Family 66 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S.L.Booth, A. 1996 Cohabitation versus Marriage: A Comparison of Relationship QualityJournal of Marriage and Family 58 668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahn, N.Carbone, J. 2010 Red Families v. Blue FamiliesOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Carlson, M.McLanahan, S.Brooks-Gunn, J. 2005 Unmarried But Not Absent: Fathers’ Involvement with Children after a Nonmarital BirthCRCW2005Google Scholar
Cherlin, A.J. 2009 The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family TodayNew YorkAlfred A. KnopfGoogle Scholar
Coast, E. 2009 Currently Cohabiting: Relationship Attitudes and IntentionsStillwell, J.Fertility, Living Arrangements, Care and MobilityDordrechtSpringerGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J.S. 1998 Foundations of Social TheoryCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Crawford, C. 2011 Cohabitation, Marriage, Relationship Stability and Child Outcomes: An UpdateLondonInstitute for Fiscal Studieshttp://www.ifs.org.uk/comms/comm120.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, J. 2006 The Invisible Safety Net: Protecting the Nation's Poor Children and FamiliesPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKlyen, M. 2006 The Mental Health of Parents with Infants: Do Marriage, Cohabitation and Romantic Status Matter?American Journal of Public Health 96 1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edin, K.Kefalas, M. 2005 Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before MarriageBerkeleyUniversity of California PressGoogle Scholar
Edin, K.Kefalas, M.Reed, J. 2004 A Peek Inside the Black Box: What Marriage Means for Poor Unmarried ParentsJournal of Marriage and Family 66 1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellman, I.Braver, S. 2011 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1737146
Ellman, I. 2010 Family Law: Cases, Texts, ProblemsLexisNexisGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, D.T.Jencks, C. 2004 The Uneven Spread of Single-Parent Families: What Do We Know? Where Do We Look for the Answers?Neckerman, K. M.Social InequalityNew YorkRussell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
Emery, R.E. 1999 Marriage, Divorce, and Children's AdjustmentThousand Oaks, CASage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Fineman, M.A. 1995 The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Families and other Twentieth Century TragediesNew YorkRoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Fineman, M.A. 2001 Why Marriage?Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 9 239Google Scholar
Garrison, M. 2005 Is Consent Necessary? An Evaluation of the Emerging Law of Cohabitant ObligationUCLA Law Review 52 815Google Scholar
Garrison, M. 2007 The Decline of Formal Marriage: Inevitable or Reversible?Family Law Quarterly 41 491Google Scholar
Garrison, M. 2008 Nonmarital Cohabitation: Social Revolution and Legal RegulationFamily Law Quarterly 42 309Google Scholar
Garrison, M. 2008 Reviving Marriage: Could We? Should We?Journal of Law and Family Studies 10 279Google Scholar
Grossbard-Shechtman, S. 1993 On the Economics of Marriage: A Theory of Marriage, Labor, and DivorceBoulder, COWestview PressGoogle Scholar
Hamplova, D.LeBourdais, C. 2009 One Pot or Two Pot Strategies? Income Pooling in Married and Unmarried Households in Comparative PerspectiveJournal of Comparative Family Studies 40 355Google Scholar
Heimdal, K.R.Houseknecht, S.K. 2003 Cohabiting and Married Couples’ Income Organization: Approaches in Sweden and the United StatesJournal of Marriage & Family 65 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, E.M.Elmore, A.E. 2004 The Intergenerational Transmission of Couple InstabilityChase-Landsdale, P.L.Human Development across Lives and Generations: The Potential for ChangeCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Heuveline, P.Timberlake, J.M. 2004 The Role of Cohabitation in Family Formation: The United States in Comparative PerspectiveJournal of Marriage and Family 61 1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofferth, S.L. 2006 Residential Father Family Type and Child Well-Being: Investment versus SelectionDemography 43 53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofferth, S.L.Anderson, K.G. 2003 Are All Dads Equal? Biology versus Marriage as a Basis for Paternal InvestmentJournal of Marriage and Family 65 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, A.C. 2003 New Hope for Families and Children: Five-Year Results of a Program to Reduce Poverty and Reform WelfareNew YorkMDRCGoogle Scholar
Kieman, K. 2001 The Rise of Cohabitation and Childbearing Outside Marriage in Western EuropeInternational Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15 1Google Scholar
Kiernan, K. 2000 European Perspectives on Union FormationWaite, L.The Ties That BindNew YorkAldine de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Knab, J. 2005 04
Knudsen, K.Wærness, K. 2009 Shared or Separate? Money Management and Changing Norms of Gender Equality among Norwegian CouplesCommunity, Work & Family 12 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, T. 1995 Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference FalsificationCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Lachapelle, R. 2007
Laplante, B. 2006 The Rise of Cohabitation in Quebec: Power of Religion and Power Over ReligionCanadian Journal of Sociology 31 1Google Scholar
2003
LeBourdais, C.Marcil-Gratton, N. 1996 Family Transformations Across the Canadian/American Border: When the Laggard Becomes the LeaderJournal of Comparative Family Studies 28 415Google Scholar
1968
Lichter, D.T. 2002 Economic Restructuring and the Retreat from MarriageSocial Science Research 31 230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyngstad, T.H.Noack, T.Tufte, P.A. 2011 Pooling of Economic Resources: A Comparison of Norwegian Married and Cohabiting CouplesEuropean Sociological Review 27 624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, C. 1984 Back on the Bandwagon: The Effect of Opinion Polls on Public OpinionBritish Journal of Political Science 15 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1976
McLanahan, S. 2004 Diverging Destinies: How Children Are Faring under the Second Demographic TransitionDemography 41 607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLanahan, S.Beck, A.N. 2010 Parental Relationships in Fragile FamiliesFragile Families 20 17Google ScholarPubMed
McRae, S 1993 Cohabiting MothersLondonPolicy Studies InstituteGoogle Scholar
Nock, S. 1995 A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting RelationshipsJournal of Family Issues 16 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nock, S 1999 Marriage in Men's LivesOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Olson, F. 1983 The Family and the Market:  A Study of Ideology and Legal ReformHarvard Law Review 96 1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, F. 1984 The Politics of Family LawLaw and Inequality 2 1Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 2004 Instability in Fragile Families: The Role of Race-Ethnicity, Economics, and Relationship QualityCRCWGoogle Scholar
Pahl, J. 1989 Money and MarriageNew YorkPalgrave McMillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasachoff, E. 2011 Special Education, Poverty, and the Limits of Private EnforcementNotre Dame Law Review 85 1413Google Scholar
Perelli-Harris, B. 2009
Perelli-Harris, B. 2010 The Educational Gradient of Nonmarital Childbearing in EuropePopulation and Development Review 36 775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center 2010 http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1802/decline-marriage-rise-new-families
Pew Research Center 2011 http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2011/12/14/barely-half-of-u-s-adults-are-married-a-record-low/?src=prc-headline
Polikoff, N. 2008 Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage: Valuing All Families under the LawBostonBeacon PressGoogle Scholar
Sassler, S.McNally, J. 2004 Cohabiting Couple's Economic Circumstances and Union Transitions: A Re-Examination Using Multiple Imputation TechniquesSocial Science Research 32 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E.S. 2000 Social Norms and the Legal Regulation of MarriageVirginia Law Review 86 1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E.S. 2004 225
ScottE.S. 2006 Domestic Partnerships, Implied Contracts, and Law ReformWilson, R.F.Reconceiving the FamilyNew YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Scott, E.S. 2007 A World without MarriageFamily Law Quarterly 41 537Google Scholar
Scott, E.S.Scott, R.E. 1998 Marriage as Relational ContractVirginia Law Review 84 1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigle-Rushton, W.McLanahan, S. 2004 Father Absence and Child Well-Being: A Critical ReviewMoynihan, D. P.Smeeding, T.Rainwater, L.The Future of the FamilyNew YorkRussell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
Smock, P.J. 2005 “Everything's There Except Money”: How Money Shapes Decisions to Marry Among CohabitorsJournal of Marriage and Family 67 680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S.M. 2004 Interpersonal Commitment and Premarital or Nonmarital CohabitationJournal of Family Issues 25 496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, J. 2007 Modern Couples: Sharing Money, Sharing LifeHoundsmill BasingstokePalgraveCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, C.Brockmann, M.Wiggins, R.D. 2006 Intimate Relationships and Changing Patterns of Money Management at the Beginning of the Twenty-First CenturyBritish Journal of Sociology 57 455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waite, L.J.Gallagher, M. 2000 The Case for Marriage: Why Married People are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off FinanciallyNew YorkBroadway PublishersGoogle Scholar
Weitoft, G.R. 2003 Mortality, Severe Morbidity, and Injury in Children Living with Single Parents in Sweden: A Population-Based StudyLancet 361 289CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiik, K.A.Bernhardt, E.M.Noack, T. 2009 A Study of Commitment and Relationship Quality in Sweden and NorwayJournal of Marriage and Family 71 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C.M.Oswald, , A.J. 2005
Wilson, J.Q. 2002 The Marriage Problem: How Our Culture Has Weakened FamiliesNew YorkHarperCollinsGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×