Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T03:35:39.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The paradox of the plankton

from Part II - Nonequilibrium and Equilibrium in Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Klaus Rohde
Affiliation:
University of New England, Australia
Get access

Summary

General background

Freshwater streams and lakes are habitats for complex ecosystems, of which plankton is an important component. Even more extensive are the oceans, which cover about 70% of the Earth’s surface. Marine ecosystems including their plankton have very great ecological and economic significance. Although our knowledge of biodiversity patterns in marine phyto- and zooplankton (compared to terrestrial systems) is still very limited (Irigoien et al., 2004), much work, some of it theoretical, some experimental, has led to important insights.

The study of plankton has played a crucial historical role in our understanding of ecological processes. The famous “paradox of the plankton” formulated by Hutchinson (1961) drew attention to the fact that many more species coexist in the supposedly homogeneous habitat than permitted under the competitive exclusion principle of Gause. Hutchinson suggested that nonequilibrium conditions might lead to the greater than expected diversity, a suggestion shown to be correct by many subsequent studies. Hutchinson himself thought that seasons and weather-induced fluctuations were responsible. But, in addition, as reviewed by Scheffer et al. (2003), homogeneity due to mixing hardly exists, and even in the open ocean meso-scale vortices and fronts result in spatial heterogeneity. Moreover, modeling of plankton communities has shown that even in homogeneous and constant environments plankton may never reach equilibrium, because multi-species interactions may lead to oscillations and chaos. This is supported by laboratory experiments, which have shown highly irregular and unpredictable long-term fluctuations at the species level (Figure 4.1), although total algal biomass and other indicators at higher aggregation levels may show regular patterns.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agawin, N. S. R., Rabouille, S., Veldhuis, M. J. W., et al. (2007). Competition and facilitation between unicellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and non-nitrogen-fixing phytoplankton species. Limnology and Oceanography, 52, 2233–2248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beninca, E., Huisman, J., Heerkloss, R., et al. (2008). Chaos in a long-term experiment with a plankton community. Nature, 451, 822–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beninca, E., Johnk, K. D., Heerkloss, R., & Huisman, J. (2009). Coupled predator-prey oscillations in a chaotic food web. Ecology Letters, 12, 1367–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, Y., & Hsu, S.-B, (2010). On a nonlocal reaction-diffusion problem arising from the modeling of phytoplankton growth. SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 42, 1305–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, T. W. (1882). Über Sauerstoffausscheidung von Pflanzenzellen im Mikrospectrum. Botanische Zeitschrift, 40, 419–426.Google Scholar
Engelmann, T. W. (1883a). Bacterium photometricum: ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Physiologie des Licht- und Farbensinnes. Archiv für Physiologie, 30, 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, T. W. (1883b). Farbe und Assimilation. Botanische Zeitschrift, 41, 1–13.Google Scholar
Harris, G. P. (1986). Phytoplankton Ecology. Structure, Function and Fluctuation. London: Chapman and Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilker, F. M., Malchow, H., Langlais, M., & Petrovskii, S. V. 2006). Oscillations and waves in a virally infected plankton system. Part II: transition from lysogeny to lysis. Ecological Complexity, 3, 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (1994). Light-limited growth and competition for light in well-mixed aquatic environments: an elementary model. Ecology, 75, 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (1995). Competition for nutrients and light in a mixed water column – a theoretical analysis. The American Naturalist, 146, 536–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (1999). Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature, 402, 407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (2001a). Fundamental unpredictability in multispecies competition. The American Naturalist, 157, 488–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (2001b). Biological conditions for oscillations and chaos generated by multispecies competition. Ecology, 82, 2682–2695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (2002). Oscillations and chaos generated by competition for interactively essential resources. Ecological Research, 17, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., van Oostveen, P., & Weissing, F. J. (1999a). Species dynamics in phytoplanktonblooms: incomplete mixing and competition for light. The American Naturalist, 154, 46–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huisman, J., Jonker, R. R., Zonneveld, C., & Weissing, F. J. (1999b). Competition for light between phytoplankton species: experimental tests of mechanistic theory. Ecology, 80, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., Johansson, A. M., Folmer, E. O., & Weissing, F. J. (2001). Towards a solution of the plankton paradox: the importance of physiology and life history. Ecology Letters, 4, 408–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., Sharples, J., Stroom, J. M., et al. (2004). Changes in turbulent mixing shift competition for light between phytoplankton species. Ecology, 85, 2960–2970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., Pham Thi, N. N., Karl, D. M., & Sommeijer, B. (2006). Reduced mixing generates oscillations and chaos in the oceanic deep chlorophyll maximum. Nature, 439, 322–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, G. E., (1961). The paradox of the plankton. The American Naturalist, 95, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigoien, X., Huisman, J., & Harris, R. P. (2004). Global biodiversity patterns of marine phytoplankton and zooplankton. Nature, 429, 863–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardinaal, W. E. A., Tonk, L., Janse, I., et al. (2007). Competition for light between toxic and nontoxic strains of the harmful cyanobacterium Microcystis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 2939–2946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leibold, M. A. (1996). A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. The American Naturalist, 147, 784–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litchman, E. (2003). Competition and coexistence of phytoplankton under fluctuating light: experiments with two cyanobacteria. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 31, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malchow, H., Hilker, F. M., Petrovskii, S. V., & Brauer, K. (2004). Oscillations and waves in a virally infected plankton system: Part I: The lysogenic stage. Ecological Complexity, 1, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malchow, H., Hilker, F. M., Sarkar, R. R., & Brauer, K. (2005). Spatiotemporal patterns in an excitable plankton system with lysogenic viral infection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 42, 1035–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medvinsky, A. B., Petrovskii, S. V., Tikhonova, I. A., Malchow, H., & Li, B.-L. (2002). Spatiotemporal complexity of plankton and fish dynamics. SIAM Review, 44, 311–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, L., & Zhang, X. (2012). Existence and nonexistence of positive steady states in multi-species phytoplankton dynamics. Journal of Differential Equations, 253, 2025–2063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passarge, J., Hol, S., Escher, M., & Huisman, J. (2006). Competition for nutrients and light: stable coexistence, alternative stable states, or competitive exclusion? Ecological Monographs, 76, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revilla, T., & Weissing, F. J. (2008). Nonequilibrium coexistence in a competition model with nutrient storage. Ecology, 89, 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (2005). Nonequilibrium Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryabov, A. B., Rudolf, L., & Blasius, B. (2010). Vertical distribution and composition of phytoplankton under the influence of an upper mixed layer. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 263, 120–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffer, M., Rinaldi, S., Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (2003). Why plankton communities have no equilibrium: solutions to the paradox. Hydrobiologia, 491, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, U. (1985). Comparison between steady state and non-steady state competition: experiments with natural phytoplankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 30, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, U. (1986). Nitrate- and silicate-competition among Antarctic phytoplankton. Marine Biology, 91, 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stomp, M., Huisman, J., de Jongh, F., et al. (2004). Adaptive divergence in pigment composition promotes phytoplankton diversity. Nature, 432, 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stomp, M., Huisman, J., Vörös, L., et al. (2007a). Colourful coexistence of red and green picocyanobacteria in lakes and seas. Ecology Letters, 10, 290–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stomp, M., Huisman, J., Stal, J. L., & Matthijs, H. C. (2007b). Colourful niches of phototrophic microorganisms shaped by vibrations of the water molecule. The ISME Journal, 1, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stomp, M., van Dijk, M. A., van Overzee, H. M. J., et al. (2008). The timescale of phenotypic plasticity and its impact on competition in fluctuating environments. The American Naturalist, 172, E169–E185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilman, D. (1977). Resource competition between planktonic algae: an experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology, 58, 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. (1981). Tests of resource competition theory using four species of Lake Michigan algae. Ecology, 62, 802–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissing, F. J., & Huisman, J. (1994). Growth and competition in a light gradient. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 168, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshiyama, K. and Nakajima, H. (2002). Catastrophic transition in vertical distributions of phytoplankton: alternative equilibria in a water column. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 216, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×