Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T01:49:02.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Foundations of Public International Aviation Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Brian F. Havel
Affiliation:
DePaul University School of Law
Gabriel S. Sanchez
Affiliation:
DePaul University School of Law
Get access

Summary

Background to the Chicago Convention

The cornerstone instrument of public international aviation law is the 1944 Convention on International Civil Aviation, popularly known as the “Chicago Convention” in honor of its birthplace. Even as the Second World War was reaching its fiery climax in the European and Asian theaters, United States (U.S.) President Franklin D. Roosevelt – responding to a British initiative – brought fifty-four Allied and neutral States to Chicago during the winter months of 1944 with the goal of developing an ordering mechanism for the world’s airspace and the nascent international air transport industry. The United States hoped that it could steer the negotiations toward affirming a (relatively) free market in aviation services, one which would give the U.S. airline industry – at the time the most developed and technologically sophisticated in the world – the opportunity to dominate the global marketplace. That ambition was not to be realized. Instead, the Convention’s scope was curtailed to solve technical coordination problems relating to, among other things, aircraft registry, air traffic management, cross-border recognition of licensing certificates, and the kinds of taxes and charges that could be imposed on international air services.

States, Not Airlines, Define Chicago’s Commercial Environment

Where the Convention does directly implicate economic rights for air carriers, it is typically in an illiberal key. States, not their airlines, are vested with the right to define international aviation’s commercial environment. That fact is not terribly surprising if one recalls the Chicago Convention’s historical context. Memories of the 1929 worldwide economic collapse were still fresh, and economic advisors on both sides of the Atlantic were flirting with the supposed benefits of a Soviet-style command economy. Even the United States, eventually a bastion of neoliberalism and globalization, tempered the market freedoms of its industrial sectors in the late nineteenth century when Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act and established the Interstate Commerce Commission. That regulatory impulse spread to the privately owned U.S. air transport industry, which since 1938 had been placed under the economic supervision of a public agency, the now-defunct Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB). European States, on the other hand, opted to couple regulation of their major airlines with outright public ownership.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Convention on International Civil Aviation, opened for signature Dec. 7, 1944, 61 Stat. 1180, 15 U.N.T.S. 295 (entered into force Apr. 4, 1947) [hereinafter Chicago Convention]
Yergin, Daniel & Stanislaw, Joseph, The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy (rev. ed. 2002)
Areeda, Philip E. & Hovenkamp, Herbert, Antitrust Law ¶ 100–04 (3d ed. 2006)
Stone, Richard D., The Interstate Commerce Commission and the Railroad Industry: A History of Regulatory Policy (1991)
Dempsey, Paul Stephen, The Rise and Fall of the Civil Aeronautics Board – Opening Wide the Floodgates of Entry, 11 Transp. L.J.91 (1979)Google Scholar
Kuhn, Arthur K., The Beginnings of Aerial Law, 4 Am. J. Int’l L.109, 111 (1910)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Declaration Prohibiting the Discharge of Projectiles and Explosives from Balloons, opened for signature Oct. 18, 1907, 1907 A.T.S. 14 (entered into force Nov. 27, 1909)
Convention Relating to the Regulation of Aerial Navigation art. 1, opened for signature Oct. 13, 1919, 11 L.N.T.S. 173, reprinted in 30–1 Annals Air & Space L. 5 (2005) (entered into force May 31, 1920) [hereinafter Paris Convention]
York, Brower V., International Air Law in the Americas, 3 J. Air. L.411 (1932)Google Scholar
Diederiks-Verschoor, I. H. Ph., An Introduction to Air Law 6 (8th rev. ed. 2006)
Sayers, Dorothy L., The Lost Tools of Learning (1961),
Kane, Robert M., Air Transportation 361 (2003)
Goedhuis, Daniel, Air Law in the Making 22–27 (1938)
ICAO, Manual on the Regulation of International Air Transport 2.0–1, Doc. 9626 (2nd ed. 2004)
Roberts, Andrew, The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War (2009)
Schleusser, John M., The Deception Dividend: FDR’s Undeclared War, 34 Int’l Security133–65 (2010)Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., Human Rights, the Laws of War, and Reciprocity (John M. Olin L. & Econ. Working Paper No. 537 (2d ser.), Sept. 2010)
Posner, Eric A., The Perils of Global Legalism xii (2009)
Posner, Eric A., Do States Have a Moral Duty to Obey International Law?, 55 Stan. L. Rev.1901 (2003)Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., Liberal Democracy and Cosmopolitan Duty, 55 Stan. L. Rev.1667 (2003)Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. & Posner, Eric A.,The Limits of International Law 86–87 (2005)
Havel, Brian F., Beyond Open Skies: A New Regime for International Aviation 100 n.5 (2009)
Lawson, Robert Neale, A Plan for the Organization of a European Air Service (1936)
Levine, Michael, Scope and Limits of Multilateral Approaches to International Air Transport, in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, International Air Transport: The Challenges Ahead75, 87 n.6 (1993)Google Scholar
Concise Encyclopedia of Economics (Henderson, David R. ed., 2007)
International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 1–2 (Darity, William A. ed., 2d ed. 2008)
Schumpeter, Charles A., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy 84 (1975)
Banner, Stuart, Who Owns the Sky?: The Struggle to Control Airspace from the Wright Brothers On 42 (2008)
Haanappel, Peter P. C., The External Aviation Relations of the European Economic Community and of the EEC Members into the Twenty-First Century, Part II, 14 Air L.122, 141 (1989)Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, Human Rights and the Environment: What Specific Environmental Rights Have Been Recognized, 35 Denv. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y129, 164 (2006)Google Scholar
Harris, James W., Property & Justice 76 (1996)
Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, opened for signature Jan. 27, 1967, 610 U.N.T.S. 205
Reinhardt, Dean N., The Vertical Limit of State Sovereignty, 72 J. Air L. & Com.65 (2007)Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark, Governing the World: The History of an Idea (2012)
U.S. Gen. Accounting Office, Airline Competition: Impact of Changing Foreign Investment and Control Limits on U.S. Airlines, GAO/RCED-93–7, at 14–15 (1992)
Abeyratne, Ruwantissa I. R., Responsibility and Liability Aspects of the Icelandic Volcanic Eruption, 35 Air & Space L. 281, 283 (2010)Google Scholar
Haanappel, Peter P. C., Law and Policy of Air Space and Outer Space: A Comparative Approach 45 (2003)
ICAO, ICAO Policies on Charges for Airports and Air Navigation Services, para. 1, ICAO Doc. 9082/7 (7th ed. 2004)
Walker, Karen, EU MP: Europe Will Not Back Down on ETS, Air Transport World Daily News, Nov. 7, 2011, Google Scholar
Nova: The Deadliest Plane Crash (PBS (U.S.) television broadcast 2006)
Mendes de Leon, Pablo M. J., Cabotage in Air Transport Regulation (1981)
Lewis, Douglas R., Air Cabotage: Historical and Modern-Day Perspectives, 45 J. Air L. & Com.1059 (1980)Google Scholar
Sheehan, W. M., Comment, Air Cabotage and the Chicago Convention, 63 Harv. L. Rev.1157 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knibb, David, Chile Trades Cabotage for “Precedent Setting” Deal, Airline Bus., Apr. 1, 2003
García-Arboleda, José Ignacio, Transnational Airlines in Latin America Facing the Fear of Nationality, 37 Air & Space L.93, 100–112 (2012)Google Scholar
Tan, Alan Khee Jin, Singapore’s New Air Services Agreements with the E.U. and U.K.: Implications for Liberalization in Asia, 73 J. Air L. & Com.351, 362–64 (2008)Google Scholar
Havel, Brian F. & Sanchez, Gabriel S., The Emerging Lex Aviatica, Geo. J. Int’l L.639, 668–71 (2011)Google Scholar
Clark, Nicola & Jolly, David, Hungarian National Airline Halts Flights, N.Y. Times, Feb. 3, 2012
Weber, Ludwig, International Civil Aviation Organization: An Introduction (2007)
Abeyratne, Ruwantissa, The Role of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in the Twenty-First Century, 34 Annals Air & Space L.529 (2009)Google Scholar
Abeyratne, Ruwantissa, Reinventing ICAO’s Role in Economic Regulation – A Compelling Need, 13 Issues Aviation L. & Pol’y9 (2013)Google Scholar
Charter of the United Nations art. 18, opened for signature Jun. 26, 1945, 3 Bevans 1153 (entered into force Oct. 24, 1945)
WTO, The WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: A Collection of the Relevant Legal Texts (2012)
Downs, George W. & Jones, Michael A., Reputation, Compliance, and International Law, 31 J. Legal Stud.S95 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy 97 (1984)
ICAO, Rules for the Settlement of Differences, ICAO Doc. No. 7782/2 (1975)
Posner, Eric A., The Decline of the International Court of Justice, in International Conflict Resolution111 (Voigt, Stefan et al. eds., 2006)Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona & Shapiro, Scott J., Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law, 121 Yale L.J.252 (2011)Google Scholar
Bonin, Jason R., Regionalism in International Civil Aviation: A Reevaluation of the Economic Regulation of International Air Transport in the Context of Economic Integration, 12 Singapore Y.B. Int’l L. & Contributions113 (2008)Google Scholar
ICAO, 2011: State of Global Aviation Safety 24–25 (2011)
Havel, Brian F., A US Point of View on European ATM Developments, in Achieving the Single European Sky107 (Mendes de Leon, Pablo M. J. & Crespo, Daniel Calleja eds., 2011)Google Scholar
Ensuring the Safety and Efficiency of Global Aviation, 66 ICAO J. 3 (2011)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×