Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:26:01.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 91 - Idiopathic ileocolic intussusception

from Section 8 - Pediatrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Martin L. Gunn
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

“Idiopathic” intussusception refers to distal small bowel lymphoid hyperplasia causing invagination of the ileum into the proximal colon. Such ileocolic intussusceptions without a discrete lead point and comprise the vast majority (>90%) of all pediatric intussusceptions [1].

Ultrasound is the preferred diagnostic modality for intussusception evaluation. An intussusception’s characteristic ultrasound appearance is a right abdominal mass exhibiting a swirled pattern of alternating hyperechogenicity and hypoechogenicity when the bowel is scanned transverse (Figure 91.1). This pattern of concentric rings represents alternating layers of mucosa, muscularis, and serosa. Names given to this appearance include “doughnut sign” and “pseudo-kidney” [2–4]. In longitudinal view, this bowel invagination and its various layers may resemble a sandwich (“sandwich sign”) [5].

Several accompanying sonographic features have been assessed for their ability to predict reducibility and/or bowel necrosis. These include thickness of the peripheral hypoechoic ring, the presence of fluid either trapped in the intussusception or within the peritoneal cavity, and presence of blood flow in the intussusception on Doppler interrogation [6, 7–13]. In aggregate the literature has been controversial regarding their respective prognostic abilities, rendering it difficult to predict which intussusceptions will reduce with enema or progress to bowel inviability [1].

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Emergency Radiology
Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 325 - 330
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daneman, A, Navarro, O.Intussusception. Part 1: a review of diagnostic approaches. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33(2):79–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
del-Pozo, G, Albillos, JC, Tejedor, D.Intussusception: US findings with pathologic correlation – the crescent-in-doughnut sign. Radiology. 1996;199:688–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, S, Samuel, E.Multiple concentric ring sign in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of intussusception. Gastrointest Radiol. 1978;3(3):307–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swischuk, LE, Hayden, CK, Boulden, T.Intussusception: indications for ultrasonography and an explanation of the doughnut and pseudokidney signs. Pediatr Radiol. 1985;15(6):388–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
del-Pozo, G, Albillos, JC, Tejedor, D, et al. Intussusception in children: current concepts in diagnosis and enema reduction. Radiographics. 1999;19:299–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verschelden, P, Filiatraut, D, Garel, L, et al. Intussusception in children: reliability of US in diagnosis – a prospective study. Radiology. 1992;184:741–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britton, I, Wilkinson, AG.Ultrasound features of intussusception predicting outcome of air enema. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29:705–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirilas, P, Koumanidou, C, Vakaki, M, et al. Sonographic features indicative of hydrostatic reducibility of intestinal intussusception in infancy and early childhood. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(12):2576–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinstein, KA, Myers, M, Fernbach, SK, et al. Peritoneal fluid in children with intussusception: its sonographic detection and relationship to successful reduction. Abdom Imaging. 1993;18:277–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
del-Pozo, G, Gonzalez-Spinola, JG, Gomez-Anson, B, et al. Intussusception: trapped peritoneal fluid detected with US – relationship to reducibility and ischemia. Radiology. 1996;201(2):379–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, AH, Firman, K.Value of sonography including color Doppler in the diagnosis and management of long standing intussusception. Pediatr Radiol. 1992;22:112–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagalla, R, Caruso, G, Novara, V, et al. Color Doppler ultrasonography in pediatric intussusception. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:171–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, MS, Wong, HF, Lin, SL, et al. Factors related to detection of blood flow by color Doppler ultrasonography in intussusception. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16:141–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sargent, MA, Babyn, P, Alton, DJ.Plain abdominal radiography in suspected intussusception: a reassessment. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24:293–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, JM, Kim, H, Byun, JY, et al. Intussusception: characteristic radiolucencies on the abdominal radiograph. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24:293–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiorella, DJ, Donnelly, LF.Frequency of right lower quadrant position of the sigmoid colon in infants and young children. Radiology. 2001;219:91–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eklof, O, Hartelius, H.Reliability of the abdominal plain film diagnosis in pediatric patient with suspected intussusception. Pediatr Radiol. 1980;9:199–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, SJ, Blane, CE.Intussusception: additional observations on the plain radiograph. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139:511–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirks, DR.Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric intussusception: how far should we push our radiologic techniques?Radiology. 1994;191:622–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crystal, P, Barki, Y.Using color Doppler sonography-guided reduction of intussusception to differentiate edematous ileocecal valve from residual intussusception. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(5):1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×