Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T16:31:51.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

12 - Reconceptualising harm reduction in prisons

from Part 3 - Drugs, crime and the law

Suzanne Fraser
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
David Moore
Affiliation:
Curtin University of Technology, Perth
Get access

Summary

Harm reduction, as a framework to reduce drug-related harm, has a long history in some countries. However, it was not until the arrival of HIV in the 1980s that harm reduction began to be re-emphasised in drug policy debates throughout the world. Harm reduction was increasingly framed in public health and social justice terms. As part of the wider public health movement to protect individual and population health, the prevention of HIV transmission and drug-related deaths through harm reduction techniques became a high priority. Harm reduction initiatives, such as needle exchange and drug consumption rooms, represented major transformations in dealing with problem drug users. Stimson points to the globalisation of harm reduction and its ‘indispensable place in the way in which societies can respond to drugs problems’. In Europe, joint strategies and action plans were developed to tackle problematic drug use and public health issues. A clear convergence towards harm reduction occurred as it became more mainstreamed and accepted. This consensus also has been achieved in other countries.

The mainstreaming of harm reduction has not been successful in some settings. A good example is the prison environment where there has been a history of resistance to its implementation. The policies in prisons in many countries have failed to fully embrace the concept of ‘harm reduction’ and the public health agenda that operate successfully in the community (see ‘Definition of harm reduction’). Within analyses of drug and penal policy, the complex relationship between medical and penal forms of control is a potent theme. The drug user is the subject of various forms of control and regulation, including medical, legal and moral, which are often in conflict with each other. The discourses of rehabilitation, welfare and harm reduction frequently clash with those of punishment, security and justice, and these conflicts and contradictions manifest themselves most acutely within the prison environment. This has had a significant effect on the historical development of harm reduction in prisons.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Drug Effect
Health, Crime and Society
, pp. 209 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) 1988 AIDS and Drug MisuseLondonHMSOGoogle Scholar
Ball, A. 1995 Multi-Centre Study on Drug Injecting and Risk of HIV InfectionGenevaWorld Health OrganisationGoogle Scholar
Berridge, V. 1999 Opium and the People: Opiate Use and Drug Control in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century EnglandLondonFree Association BooksGoogle Scholar
Boys, A. 2002 Drug use and initiation in prisons: Results from a national prison survey in England and WalesAddiction 97 1551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cope, N. 2003 It's no time or high time: Young offenders’ experiences of time and drug use in prisonHoward Journal of Criminal Justice 42 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, B. 2006 Prisoner society in the era of hard drugsPunishment and Society457Google Scholar
Davoli, M.Simon, RGriffith, P. 2010 Current and future perspectives on harm reduction in the EURhodes, T.Hedrich, D.Harm Reduction: Evidence, Impacts and ChallengesLisbonEMCDDAGoogle Scholar
Dolan, K.Wodak, A.Penny, R. 1995 AIDS behind bars: Preventing HIV spread among incarcerated drug injectorsAIDS 9 825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duff, C. 2009 The drifting city: The role of affect and repair in the development of ‘enabling environments’International Journal of Drug Policy 20 202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, C. 2010 Enabling places and enabling resources: New directions for harm reduction research and practiceDrug and Alcohol Review 29 337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, K. 2003 Drugs, Prisons and Policy-makingLondonPalgrave MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezard, N. 2001 Public health, human rights and the harm reduction paradigm: From risk reduction to vulnerability reductionInternational Journal of Drug Policy 12 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, S.Hopwood, M.Madden, A. 2009 Towards a global approach: An overview of harm reduction 2008: IHRA's nineteenth International ConferenceInternational Journal of Drug Policy 20 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, G.Gagnon, H.Alary, M. 2001 Correctional officers’ intention of accepting or refusing to make HIV preventive tools accessible to inmatesAIDS Education and Prevention 13 462CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagan, H.Thiede, H. 2003 Does bleach disinfection of syringes help prevent hepatitis C virus transmissionEpidemiology 14 628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedrich, D.Pirona, A.Wiessing, L. 2008 From margins to mainstream: The evolution of harm reduction responses to problem drug use in EuropeDrugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 15 503Google Scholar
Hoover, J.Jurgens, R. 2009 Harm Reduction in Prison: The Moldova ModelNew YorkOpen Society Institute Public Health ProgramGoogle Scholar
Kerr, T.Wood, E.Betteridge, G. 2004 Harm reduction in prisons: A ‘rights based’ analysisCritical Public Health 14 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lines, R.Jurgens, R.Betteridge, G. 2006 Prison Needle Exchange: Lessons from a Comprehensive Review of the International Evidence and ExperienceTorontoCanadian HIV/AIDS Legal NetworkGoogle Scholar
Macalino, G.Hou, J.Kumar, M. 2004 Hepatitis C infection and incarcerated populationsInternational Journal of Drug Policy 15 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melossi, D.Pavarini, M. 1981 The Prison and the Factory: The Origins of the Penitentiary SystemLondonMacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogg, D.Levy, M. 2009 Moving beyond non-engagement on regulated needle-syringe exchange programs in Australian prisonsHarm Reduction Journal 6 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, D.Fraser, S. 2006 Putting at risk what we know: Reflecting on the drug-using subject in harm reduction and its political implicationsSocial Science and Medicine 62 3035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, J. 2008 New punitivenessJewkes, Y.Bennett, J.Dictionary of Prisons and Punishment181Cullompton, DevonWillan PublishingGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, T. 2002 The ‘risk environment’: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harmInternational Journal of Drug Policy 13 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, T. 2009 Editorial essay: Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approachInternational Journal of Drug Policy 20 193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, T.Hedrich, D. 2010 Harm reduction and the mainstreamRhodes, T.Hedrich, D.Harm Reduction: Evidence, Impacts and ChallengesLisbonEMCDDAGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, T.Singer, M.Bourgois, P. 2005 1026
Sarang, A.Rhodes, T.Platt, L. 2006 Drug injecting and syringe use in the HIV risk environment of Russian penitentiary institutions: Qualitative studyAddiction 101 1787CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singleton, N.Pendry, E.Taylor, C. 2003 Drug-related Mortality among Newly Released OffendersLondonHome OfficeGoogle Scholar
Smart, C. 1984 Social policy and drug addiction: A critical study of policy developmentBritish Journal of Addiction 79 31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparks, R.Bottoms, A.Hay, W. 1996 Prisons and the Problem of OrderOxfordClarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallwitz, A.Stover, H. 2007 The impact of substitution treatment in prisons: A literature reviewInternational Journal of Drug Policy 18 464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, A.Stover, H.Brentari, C. 2010 Criminal justice approaches to harm reduction in EuropeRhodes, T.Hedrich, D.Harm Reduction: Evidence, Impacts and ChallengesLisbonEMCDDAGoogle Scholar
Stimson, G. 2010 Editorial: Harm reduction: Moving through the third decadeInternational Journal of Drug Policy 21 91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stover, H.Hennebel, L.Casselmann, J. 2004 Substitution Treatment in European Prisons: A Study of Policies and Practices of Substitution Treatment in Prisons in 18 European CountriesLondonCranstoun Drug ServicesGoogle Scholar
Sykes, G. 1958 The Society of CaptivesPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A.Goldberg, D.Elmslie, J. 1995 Outbreak of HIV infection in a Scottish prisonBritish Medical Journal 310 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P.A. 1990 HIV/AIDS in prisonHoward Journal 29 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNAIDS 1997 Prison and AIDS: UNAIDS Point of View
United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNHCR) 1996 HIV/AIDS in Prisons: Statement by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)GenevaUNCHRGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization 1987 Statement from the Consultation on Prevention and Control of AIDS in PrisonsGenevaWHO Global Programme on AIDSGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization 1993 WHO Guidelines on HIV Infection and AIDS in PrisonsGenevaWHOGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization 2005 Status Paper on Prisons, Drugs and Harm ReductionCopenhagenWHO EuropeGoogle Scholar
Wright, N.Vanichsem, S.Akarasewi, P. 1994 Was the 1988 HIV epidemic among Bangkok's injecting drug users a common source outbreakAIDS 8 529CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×