Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of statutes
- Table of cases
- Part I General principles
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Characteristics of the English conflict of laws
- 3 Choice of law rules
- 4 Proof of foreign law
- 5 Domicile and residence
- 6 Substance and procedure
- Part II Jurisdiction and foreign judgments
- Part III Law of obligations
- Part IV Property and succession
- Part V Family law
- Part VI Exclusion of foreign laws
- Part VII Theoretical considerations
- Index
4 - Proof of foreign law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of statutes
- Table of cases
- Part I General principles
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Characteristics of the English conflict of laws
- 3 Choice of law rules
- 4 Proof of foreign law
- 5 Domicile and residence
- 6 Substance and procedure
- Part II Jurisdiction and foreign judgments
- Part III Law of obligations
- Part IV Property and succession
- Part V Family law
- Part VI Exclusion of foreign laws
- Part VII Theoretical considerations
- Index
Summary
Status of rules of foreign law
In an action before an English court, a party who relies on the rules of a foreign system of law must plead and prove them. Normally, the courts will not take judicial notice of the rules of foreign law, except that the House of Lords, which is a court of appeal in civil cases from England, Scotland and Northern Ireland, will take judicial notice of the laws of all three countries in hearing appeals from the courts of any one of them.
In this respect rules of foreign law differ from those of public international law; moreover, the rules of public international law have the status of rules of law in an English court, because it is part of the law of England. Rules of foreign law have the status of facts. But they are unusual facts, because, unlike other facts, they need only be proved to the satisfaction of the judge, not that of the jury.
At common law, a particular rule of foreign law must be proved afresh each time it is pleaded, because the foreign law may have changed since the previous occasion on which it was proved to and accepted by an English court.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Conflict of Laws , pp. 33 - 36Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001
- 1
- Cited by