Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T22:20:02.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Thinking about migration law and national borders: An aspirational benchmark?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Mirko Bagaric
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Kim Boyd
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Penny Dimopoulos
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
John Vrachnas
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

A framework for evaluating migration law and policy

An ideal world would be one in which all people would find roughly equal levels of resources in the places where they are born but where everybody would enjoy the right to search for better opportunities elsewhere without being impeded by the circumstances of his or her origins.

Migration and refugee law is inherently controversial. That is an underlying theme in the textbook, Migration and Refugee Law: Principles and Practice in Australia, which accompanies this case and commentary book. In the textbook, we advanced a new theoretical framework for refugee law and set out an alternative definition for a ‘refugee’.

As you read through the cases and materials in this book, you should do so with acritical and analytical mind regarding the rationale for Australian migration law and policy as a whole.

Migration law is complex and technical. Given this, most practitioners and students in this area fail to get beyond the minutiae contained in the hundreds of visa categories and the criteria within these categories. The technical nature of migration law dissuades a search for an overarching rationale for Australia's approach to immigration issues.

In this book, we discuss a large number of visa classes. Most of them do not have an obvious link with each other. Yet, given the importance of immigration to the well-being of potential immigrants and the Australian community, it would be striking if there was not an underlying unity (or at least an attempt to ground an underlying coherency) to this area of the law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Migration and Refugee Law in Australia
Cases and Commentary
, pp. 1 - 27
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×