Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes and other instruments
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction to the second edition
- PART I Agendas and objectives
- PART II The context of corporate insolvency law: financial and institutional
- 3 Insolvency and corporate borrowing
- 4 Corporate failure
- 5 Insolvency practitioners and turnaround professionals
- PART III The quest for turnaround
- PART IV Gathering and distributing the assets
- PART V The impact of corporate insolvency
- 18 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - Insolvency practitioners and turnaround professionals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes and other instruments
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction to the second edition
- PART I Agendas and objectives
- PART II The context of corporate insolvency law: financial and institutional
- 3 Insolvency and corporate borrowing
- 4 Corporate failure
- 5 Insolvency practitioners and turnaround professionals
- PART III The quest for turnaround
- PART IV Gathering and distributing the assets
- PART V The impact of corporate insolvency
- 18 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Corporate insolvency processes are not mere bodies of rules: they are elaborate procedures in which legal and administrative, formal and informal rules, policies and practices are put into effect by different actors. Those actors, in turn, have cultural, institutional, disciplinary and professional backgrounds which influence their work. They also operate under the influence of a variety of economic, career and other incentives and are subject to a host of constraints ranging from legal duties and professional obligations to client and own-firm expectations. The Cork Report, in an oft-quoted statement, urged that the success of any insolvency system is very largely dependent upon those who administer it, and socio-legal scholars have emphasised how insolvency law is not applied in a mechanical way but is manoeuvred around or manipulated by means of administrative structures ‘designed and imposed by dominant actors’.
This chapter looks at how insolvency law and turnaround processes are made operational by those actors who dominate such procedures: the insolvency practitioners (IPs) and turnaround professionals (TPs). In accordance with the discussion in chapter 2, it will be asked whether present practitioner and professional regimes can be supported as efficient, expert, fair and accountable. This will demand examinations of both the ways that these actors carry out their tasks and the ways that they are regulated.
Insolvency practitioners
Four separate insolvency procedures for companies all involve IPs: Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs); administration orders; administrative receiverships; and liquidations.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Corporate Insolvency LawPerspectives and Principles, pp. 178 - 240Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
- 1
- Cited by