Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-02T11:34:24.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - What's the difference? A multiphasic allometric analysis of fossil and living lions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

By
Matthew H. Benoit
Edited by
Anjali Goswami  and
Anthony Friscia
Matthew H. Benoit
Affiliation:
The Claremont Colleges
Anjali Goswami
Affiliation:
University College London
Anthony Friscia
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Differentiating between various species in the fossil record is one of the most vital tasks in paleontology. As such, evaluating the morphological features that we use to make these taxonomic distinctions is critical. Without any confirmation from molecular lines of evidence, morphological analyses are the only option for such studies. Determining the validity and independence of character changes is a major part of that evaluation. Compounding this limitation to morphological analyses is the fact that assembling a significant sample size of fossil specimens for a single taxon is frequently very difficult, if not impossible. Often, paleontologists compare a single fossil specimen with a single specimen of a closely related extant taxon or representatives of several such taxa. Analyses of this nature, while valuable first glimpses, do not account for variation within populations (of either the fossil or the extant groups), and therefore may result in inaccurate conclusions regarding the relationships of the organisms in question. In this chapter, I present an example of a species–status conflict within the pantherine felids and use allometric analyses to evaluate some of the morphological characteristics that have been used as evidence to support arguments in this conflict.

Since its first official use by Pocock (1930), the generic designation of Panthera for the clade consisting of the lion (P. leo), tiger (P. tigris), leopard (P. pardus), jaguar (P. onca), and now the snow leopard (P. uncia) has reached standard usage. However, the attribution of species or subspecies status below the rank of genus has not been so readily settled, especially for fossil groups that seem to show a relationship to one of the extant pantherine cats. One of these fossil groups is the ‘American lion’ (Panthera leo cf. atrox). There has been some argument regarding the nature of the relationship of P. atrox and P. spelea (the ‘cave lion’) within Panthera, and several authors have maintained a P. tigris or P. onca affinity for P. atrox (e.g. Simpson, 1941; Groiss, 1996).

Type
Chapter
Information
Carnivoran Evolution
New Views on Phylogeny, Form and Function
 , pp. 165 - 188
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H. (1974). New look at statistical-model identification. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, AC19, 716–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, J. C. (1987). Large carnivores (Canidae, Hyaenidae, Felidae) from Laetoli. In Laetoli: A Pliocene Site in Northern Tanzania, ed. Leakey, M. D. and Harris, J. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 235–59.Google Scholar
Bona, F. (2006). Systematic position of a complete lion-like cat skull from the Eemian ossiferous rubble near Zandobbio (Bergamo, North Italy). Rivista Italiana Di Paleontologia E Stratigrafia, 112, 157–66.Google Scholar
Burger, J., Rosendahl, W., Loreille, O., et al. (2004). Molecular phylogeny of the extinct cave lion Panthera leo spelaea. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30, 841–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubach, J., Patterson, B. D., Briggs, M. B., et al. (2005). Molecular genetic variation across the southern and eastern geographic ranges of the African lion, Panthera leo. Conservation Genetics, 6, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groiss, J. T. (1996). Der höhlentiger panthera Tigris spelaea (Goldfuss). Neues Jahrbuch Fur Geologie Und Palaontologie-Monatshefte, 7, 399–414.Google Scholar
Haas, S. K., Hayssen, V. and Krausman, P. R. (2005). Panthera leo. Mammalian Species, 762, 1–11.CrossRef
Hammer, Ø. and Harper, D. A. T. (2006). Paleontological Data Analysis, 1st ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Harington, C. R. (1969). Pleistocene remains of lion-like cat (Panthera atrox) from Yukon Territory and Northern Alaska. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 6, 1277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harington, C. R. (1971). Pleistocene lion-like cat (Panthera atrox) from Alberta. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8, 170–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harington, C. R. (1977). Pleistocene Mammals of the Yukon Territory. Edmonton, Alberta: Department of Zoology, University of Alberta, p. 1060.Google Scholar
Hemmer, H. (1974). Untersuchungen zur Stammesgeschichte der Pantherkatzen (Pantherinae) Teil iii: zur Artgeschichte des Löwen Panthera (Panthera) leo (Linnaeus 1758). Veröffentlichungen der Zoologischen Staatssammlung München, 17, 167–280.Google Scholar
Hemmer, H. (1979). Fossil history of living felidae. Carnivore, 2, 58–61.Google Scholar
Herrington, S. J. (1987). Subspecies and the conservation of Panthera tigris: preserving genetic heterogeneity. In Tigers of the World: The Biology, Biopolitics, Management, and Conservation of an Endangered Species, ed. Tilson, R. L. and Seal. Park, U. S.. Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
Jacobson, A. G. (1993). Somitomeres: mesodermal segments of the head and trunk. In The Skull, ed. Hall, B. K. and Hanken, J.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 42–76.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. (1985). The Pleistocene lion of Beringia. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 22, 117–21.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. and Anderson, E. (1980). Pleistocene Mammals of North America, 1. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Langille, R. M. and Hall, B. K. (1993). Pattern formation and the neural crest. In The Skull, ed. Hanken, J. and Hall, B. K.. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 77–111.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1853). Description of an extinct species of American lion: Felis atrox. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 10, 319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. R. H. and Churcher, C. S. (1961). Pleistocene geology and paleontology of the Talara region, northwest Peru. American Journal of Science, 259, 410–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. D. and Gilbert, B. M. (1978). An American lion, Panthera atrox, from natural trap cave, north central Wyoming. Contributions to Geology, 16, 95–101.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. and McNamara, K. J. (1991). Heterochrony: The Evolution of Ontogeny, New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, J. C. and Stock, C. (1932). The Felidae of Rancho La Brea, 1st ed. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Petter, G. (1973). Carnivores pleistocène du ravin d'olduvai. In Fossil Vertebrates of Africa, ed. Leakey, L. S. B., Savage, R. J. G. and Coryndon, S. C.. London: Academic Press, pp. 43–100.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. (1930). The lions of Asia. Journal of the Bombay Natural Historical Society, 34, 638–65.Google Scholar
PSI-Plot (2002). Scientific Spreadsheet and Technical Plotting. Pearl River, NY: PolySoftware International.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1941). Large Pleistocene felines of North America. American Museum Novitates, 1136, 1–27.Google Scholar
Smuts, G. L., Anderson, J. L. and Austin, J. C. (1978). Age-determination of African lion (Panthera leo). Journal of Zoology, 185, 115–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Sotnikova, M. and Nikolskiy, P. (2006). Systematic position of the cave lion Panthera spelaea (Goldfuss) based on cranial and dental characters. Quaternary International, 142, 218–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunquist, M. and Sunquist, F. (2002). Wild Cats of the World. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vereshchagin, N. K. (1971). The cave lion and its history in the Holarctic and on the territory of the U.S.S.R. Trudy of Zoological Institute, 49, 123–99.Google Scholar
Vrba, E. S. (1998). Multiphasic growth models and the evolution of prolonged growth exemplified by human brain evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 190, 227–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warton, D. I. and Weber, N. C. (2002). Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biometrical Journal, 44, 161–74.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warton, D. I., Wright, I. J., Falster, D. S. and Westoby, M. (2006). Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews, 81, 259–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamaguchi, N., Cooper, A., Werdelin, L. and Macdonald, D. W. (2004). Evolution of the mane and group-living in the lion (Panthera leo): a review. Journal of Zoology, 263, 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×