Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-8l2sj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:14:07.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 42 - Potential role of MRS, DWI, DTI, and perfusion-weighted imaging in traumatic brain injury

overview

from Section 7 - Trauma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Jonathan H. Gillard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Adam D. Waldman
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Peter B. Barker
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a worldwide source of disability that often affects young adults. For example, in the USA, 1.4 million people are injured every year and approximately 5.3 million individuals currently suffer long-term neurocognitive deficits induced by TBI. Of these new injuries, approximately 80% of them have unremarkable head computed tomography (CT) and routine brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).[1] The current lack of definitive imaging findings using conventional neuroimaging techniques makes the objective determination, evaluation, and categorization of TBI fraught with difficulty and leads to disparity between the available subjective measures and clinical outcomes.

The current diagnosis of TBI is made on subjective measures of clinical history and neuropsychological testing, with severity classification based on Glasgow Coma Scale, loss of consciousness, and post-traumatic amnesia. Response to therapy or intervention is also based upon these subjective clinical measures. Early objective measures that can determine not only the presence of mild TBI but also more precisely classify the severity of the injury are desirable. Within the current medical imaging armamentarium, the multimodal capability of MRI makes this the most likely and promising candidate to meet these objective neuroimaging goals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical MR Neuroimaging
Physiological and Functional Techniques
, pp. 653 - 655
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belanger, HG, Vanderploeg, RD, Curtiss, G, Warden, DL.Recent neuroimaging techniques in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2007, 19: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentry, LRHead trauma. In editor. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine 3rd edn, ed. Atlas, SLondon: Lippincott, Williams, Wilkins, 2001, p. 1069–1075.Google Scholar
Sehgal, V, Delproposto, Z, Haacke, EM, et al. Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 439–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilde, EA, Chu, Z, Bigler, ED, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in the corpus callosum in children after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23: 1412–1426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutgers, DR, Toulgoat, F, Cazejust, J, et al. White matter abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 514–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Büki, A, Povlishock, JT. All roads lead to disconnection? Traumatic axonal injury revisited. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, DG, O’Brien, SP. Splinting the hand to enhance motor control and brain plasticity. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008; 15: 456–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliassen, JC, Boespflug, EL, Lamy, M, et al. Brain-mapping techniques for evaluating poststroke recovery and rehabilitation: a review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008; 15: 427–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato, T, Nakayama, N, Yasokawa, Y, et al. Statistical image analysis of cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with cognitive impairment following diffuse traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24: 919–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavel, D, Jobe, T, Devore-Best, S, et al. Viewing the functional consequences of traumatic brain injury by using brain SPECT. Brain Cogn 2006; 60: 211–213.Google ScholarPubMed
Lew, HL, Poole, JH, Castaneda, A, Salerno, RM, Gray, MPrognostic value of evoked and event-related potentials in moderate to severe brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006; 21: 350–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewine, JD, Davis, JT, Sloan, JH, Kodituwakku, PW, Orrison, WWNeuromagnetic assessment of pathophysiologic brain activity induced by minor head trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 857–866.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×